SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-12600KF + AMD Radeon RX 6600

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

89 Score

Top 11% Ranking

89 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 11% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

88%

GPU

91%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-12600KF

27,799 Benchmark Score

Top 12% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6600

19,036 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-12600KF paired with the AMD Radeon RX 6600 is a desktop build that targets a specific performance window. The CPU lands in the 79th percentile of all processors, while the GPU sits in the 63rd percentile, creating a combined percentile of 71 for this pairing. This is a system where the processor has more headroom than the graphics card, which matters for understanding where the bottlenecks lie in different workloads. The data shows a capable 1080p gaming machine with strong CPU compute for productivity, but with clear limitations at higher resolutions and in the most demanding titles.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 6600 is built on the RDNA 2.0 architecture using the Navi 23 chip on a 7 nm process. It comes with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU operates with a base clock of 1626 MHz, a game clock of 2044 MHz, and a boost clock of 2491 MHz. Its memory runs at 1750 MHz, which translates to 14 Gbps effective.

In terms of compute hardware, the card has 1792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units (TMUs), and 64 raster operation units (ROPs). For ray tracing, it includes 28 dedicated RT cores. The theoretical performance figures are 8.928 TFLOPS for FP32 and 17.86 TFLOPS for FP16. Its pixel rate is 159.4 GPixel/s, and its texture rate is 279.0 GTexel/s.

The benchmark results for this GPU show a strong showing in legacy and synthetic tests. It scores 15096 in the Passmark G3D test and 6554 in Passmark GPU Compute. In Geekbench, it scores 88398 in Metal, 28850 in OpenCL, and 67623 in Vulkan. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 1492. These scores place the GPU in the 63rd percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 19036. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA Quadro K6000 and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile, with deltaPct values of 0 and -0.1 respectively, indicating essentially identical average performance.

For rendering and gaming, the data suggests this is a card built for 1080p ultra settings in most titles, with the RT cores providing some ray tracing capability. However, the 8 GB VRAM and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth are modest, which explains the significant frame rate drops at 1440p and especially 4K in the measured games. The FP32 performance of 8.928 TFLOPS indicates it can handle compute tasks, but the low G2D score of 889 suggests it is not optimized for 2D desktop work. The lack of tensor cores is notable for AI workloads, but the Vulkan score of 67623 shows solid API efficiency for modern games.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile for this desktop build is 71, placing it above the majority of all possible pairings in the database.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Core i9-10900K?

A: The Intel Core i5-12600KF has an average benchmark score of 27799, which is 0.3% lower than the Core i9-10900K's score of 27872.

Q: What is the GPU's rank among all pairs by FPS?

A: This pair is ranked 2925 out of 3732 pairs, with an average FPS across all tested games of 93.8.

Q: Is the measured FPS data based on actual testing or estimates?

A: The data is measured; the field `dataIsMeasured` is set to true, meaning the frame rates come from real benchmark runs.

Q: What is the GPU's memory bandwidth and how does it affect performance?

A: The GPU has a memory bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s, which is a limiting factor at higher resolutions, evident from the substantial FPS drops from 1080p to 4K.

Q: What is the CPU's single-threaded performance score in Cinebench R23?

A: The CPU scores 3302 in Cinebench R23 single-core, indicating strong per-thread performance for lightly threaded tasks.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the GPU?

A: The launch MSRP for the GPU is 329 USD.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data reveals a clear imbalance in this pairing. The CPU is in the 79th percentile, while the GPU is in the 63rd percentile. This means the processor is significantly stronger relative to its peers than the graphics card is relative to its own peers. In gaming, this manifests as the GPU being the primary bottleneck in most scenarios, especially at higher resolutions.

Looking at the measured FPS, we see that at 1920x1080, the system often delivers high frame rates, such as 152 FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone and 142 FPS in Counter-Strike 2. However, at 3840x2160, these same games drop to 115 FPS and 53 FPS respectively. This scaling pattern indicates that the GPU's rendering capacity is being taxed as resolution increases. The CPU's high multi-threaded scores, like 23391 in Cinebench R23 multicore, suggest it can feed the GPU at 1080p, but the GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth cap performance at higher resolutions.

For CPU-bound tasks, the bottleneck is reversed. The CPU's Passmark multithread score of 27575 and its 3DMark max threads score of 7952 show it can handle heavy compute loads. The GPU's compute score of 6554 in Passmark indicates it is less capable in this domain. So, for gaming, the GPU limits frame rates; for productivity tasks like rendering or encoding, the CPU is the stronger component, but the GPU can still contribute via its 8.928 TFLOPS FP32 performance. The average FPS across all games is 93.8, but this figure masks the wide variance between lightweight esports titles and demanding AAA games.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, the data shows this is a solid 1080p performer. In esports titles like Valorant, the system hits 326 FPS at 1080p, and in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive it reaches 314 FPS. These scores are well above the 144 Hz threshold. At 1440p, these titles still manage 278 FPS and 216 FPS respectively, making it viable for high-refresh 1440p in lighter games.

Streaming and content creation are feasible, but with caveats. The CPU's strong multi-threaded performance, evidenced by a 3DMark 16 threads score of 7956 and a Passmark data compression score of 343231, suggests it can handle encoding and streaming overhead. The GPU's Vulkan score of 67623 also helps with API efficiency. However, the lack of tensor cores means no dedicated AI acceleration, so streaming with software encoding on the CPU is the better path.

Video editing is supported by the CPU's 10 cores and 16 threads, with a Geekbench multicore score of 12137. The GPU can assist with effects and rendering, but its 8 GB VRAM may be limiting for large projects. The passmark extended instructions score of 22003 indicates good SIMD performance for codecs. For 3D rendering, the CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 23391 is strong for CPU-based renders, while the GPU's 8.928 TFLOPS can accelerate GPU-accelerated renderers.

Software development benefits from the CPU's high single-thread score of 3925 in Passmark and 3302 in Cinebench R23, which speeds up compilation of single-threaded tasks. The 20 MB of L3 cache helps with frequently accessed data. For student and office work, this system is overkill, but the data shows it excels. The CPU's Passmark single thread score of 3925 ensures snappy application responses, and the GPU's G3D score of 15096 handles any graphical needs. The low G2D score of 889 is a minor point but does not affect most productivity software.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-12600KF is a 10-core, 16-thread processor based on the Alder Lake architecture, specifically the Alder Lake-S die. It has a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz. The CPU is built on Intel's 10 nm process with a die size of 215 mm². It supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and provides 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes from the CPU.

The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 20 MB of shared L3 cache. The CPU has a TDP of 125 W and uses the Intel Socket 1700. It is an unlocked multiplier processor, allowing for overclocking. It does not have integrated graphics, so a discrete GPU is mandatory.

Benchmark data shows this CPU is a strong performer. Its average benchmark score is 27799, placing it in the 79th percentile of all CPUs. It scores 23391 in Cinebench R23 multicore and 3302 in single-core. In Passmark, it scores 27575 multithread and 3925 single thread. The 3DMark tests show scores of 7956 for 16 threads and 1016 for single thread. Its nearest rival is the Intel Core i9-10900K, with a deltaPct of -0.3, meaning the i5-12600KF is essentially tied with that older flagship. It also compares closely with the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D, with a deltaPct of -0.3.

For real workloads, this CPU is a jack-of-all-trades. The high single-thread score of 3302 in Cinebench R23 means it excels in everyday tasks and lightly threaded applications like web browsing and office software. The 16 threads and 20 MB of L3 cache make it powerful for multi-threaded tasks like video editing and 3D rendering, as shown by its 3DMark max threads score of 7952. The Passmark data encryption score of 18445 indicates solid security performance, and the floating point math score of 67074 is high for scientific computing.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive look at gaming performance across three resolutions. At 1920x1080, this system is a capable gaming machine. It hits 326 FPS in Valorant and 314 FPS in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, making it excellent for competitive shooters. In AAA titles, it manages 68 FPS in Fortnite, 65 FPS in Grand Theft Auto V, and 60.1 FPS in Control. The data shows that most games run above 60 FPS at 1080p, with a few exceptions like Cyberpunk 2077 at 42 FPS and Red Dead Redemption 2 at 38 FPS.

At 2560x1440, performance drops noticeably. Valorant drops to 278 FPS, which is still high, but Control falls to 47.8 FPS, and Cyberpunk 2077 drops to 31 FPS. The average frame rate across all games at this resolution is lower, but many titles remain playable. Games like Call of Duty: Warzone at 135 FPS and Counter-Strike 2 at 94 FPS still provide smooth experiences.

At 3840x2160, the GPU struggles. The data shows heavy dips, with Cyberpunk 2077 at 21 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 19 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended at 7 FPS. Even esports titles like Valorant drop to 222 FPS, but that is still playable. Most demanding games are not playable at this resolution with ultra settings. The pair's average FPS across all games is 93.8, but this is skewed by the high performance in lightweight titles. Overall, this is a 1080p gaming system, with acceptable 1440p performance in less demanding games.

Who Should Build It

This build is ideal for gamers who primarily play at 1920x1080 and want high frame rates. The data shows it excels in esports titles, with over 300 FPS in Valorant and CS:GO, and delivers over 60 FPS in most AAA games at this resolution. Gamers who play at 1440p should consider this only if they stick to less demanding titles or are willing to lower settings, as the data shows significant drops in demanding games.

Content creators who work on video editing or 3D rendering can benefit from the CPU's strong multi-threaded performance, with a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 23391. The GPU can assist with rendering tasks, but its 8 GB VRAM may be a limitation. Software developers will appreciate the high single-thread performance, which speeds up compilation times.

Students and office workers will find this system more powerful than needed. The CPU's 3925 Passmark single thread score ensures responsive applications, and the GPU handles any graphical workloads. Small business workstations that need to run productivity suites and light CAD work can rely on this pairing, but the power draw of the CPU at 125 W TDP and GPU at 132 W TDP may be a consideration. This is not a build for 4K gaming or heavy ray tracing, as the data shows those workloads strain the GPU.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build that combines a 12th Gen Intel Core i5 processor with a Radeon RX 6000 series GPU. The CPU is a 10-core, 16-thread Alder Lake chip, and the GPU is a Navi 23-based RDNA 2.0 card. The combined percentile of 71 places it in the upper-middle tier of all builds in the database.

The CPU is the stronger component relative to its peers. Its 79th percentile ranking indicates it is a high-end processor, while the GPU's 63rd percentile shows it is a mid-range card. This means the pairing is CPU-heavy, which is unusual for a gaming build. The system is best classified as a high-performance 1080p gaming rig with strong productivity capabilities.

The pair's rank by FPS is 2925 out of 3732 pairs, with an average of 93.8 FPS across all games. This places it in the lower half of all pairs, but it is important to note that this ranking includes many higher-end GPU pairings. For the target resolution of 1080p, the performance is competitive with other systems in its class. The build uses the PCIe 4.0 x8 interface for the GPU, which is sufficient for this card's bandwidth needs. The CPU's 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes provide ample connectivity.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 27799, putting it in the 79th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i9-10900K, scores 27872, with a deltaPct of -0.3, showing the i5-12600KF is nearly identical in performance. This is a significant achievement for a lower-tier processor against a former flagship. The CPU scores 23391 in Cinebench R23 multicore and 3302 in single-core, demonstrating balanced performance.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 19036, placing it in the 63rd percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA Quadro K6000, scores 19030, with a deltaPct of 0, showing they are statistically tied. The GPU scores 15096 in Passmark G3D and 67623 in Geekbench Vulkan.

The combined picture is a system where the CPU outperforms the GPU relative to their respective markets. The combined percentile of 71 reflects this, as the CPU's high percentile drags the overall score up. In gaming, the GPU is the limiting factor, but the CPU ensures that frame times are consistent and that the system never feels CPU-bound in most titles. For productivity, the CPU carries the load, and the GPU provides adequate compute support. The measured FPS data confirms the 1080p focus, with an average of 93.8 FPS across all games, but with a wide variance from 326 FPS in Valorant to 7 FPS in Ark: Survival Ascended at 4K.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-12600KF + AMD Radeon RX 6600

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-12600KF

AMD Radeon RX 6600

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Valorant

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Valorant

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Valorant

Valorant

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis

FAQ

Balance and Bottleneck

Usage Scenarios

CPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

Who Should Build It

Build Overview

Benchmark Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds