SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-12600HX + Intel Arc A370M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

92 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
90%
VS
GPU
93%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-12600HX

33,375 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A370M

29,175 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i5-12600HX + Intel Arc A370M: Mobile Performance Analysis

The Intel Core i5-12600HX paired with the Intel Arc A370M represents a mobile platform combination that sits at the 79th percentile overall among all CPU-GPU pairings in the database. The CPU delivers a strong multi-threaded showing with its 12 cores and 16 threads, while the discrete Arc-class GPU offers entry-level 3D acceleration with modern feature support. This pairing targets laptop users who need substantial CPU throughput for productivity and content creation workloads without requiring top-tier gaming frame rates. The data available for this combination includes detailed CPU and GPU benchmark scores, but no measured FPS figures exist for this exact pairing, so all gaming performance discussion is estimated from the individual component benchmark results.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-12600HX uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket, which is a mobile-specific package that is soldered to the motherboard. This means the CPU itself is not upgradable in a conventional sense; a user cannot swap the processor for a higher-tier part without replacing the entire motherboard or laptop system. The platform supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, which provides flexibility for system builders and OEMs to balance cost and performance. The memory bus is dual-channel, which is standard for mobile platforms and sufficient for the bandwidth demands of the i5-12600HX's 18 MB of shared L3 cache.

PCIe connectivity comes from the CPU with Gen 5 support across 20 lanes, which is a forward-looking feature that allows for high-speed NVMe storage and future expansion. The integrated graphics are UHD Graphics 770, which provides a fallback display output and basic compute capability when the discrete Arc A370M is not in use. The CPU has a 55 W TDP, which is modest for a 12-core part and reflects the power constraints of mobile chassis designs. The GPU has a 35 W TDP, and while no suggested PSU is listed, the combined thermal envelope of roughly 90 W for CPU and GPU alone suggests that a laptop power adapter in the range of 130-180 W would be typical for such a configuration, though this is not stated in the data.

ECC memory support is present on the CPU, which is unusual for a consumer mobile part and indicates some workstation-oriented capability. The CPU is multiplier unlocked, meaning overclocking is technically possible if the laptop BIOS and cooling solution permit it, though mobile thermal limits will constrain practical gains. For a sensible next upgrade, the data suggests that users should look at a new laptop platform rather than component-level upgrades, since the BGA socket precludes CPU replacement. The PCIe Gen 5 lanes could accommodate a faster discrete GPU if the laptop design allowed it, but the Arc A370M is an integrated part of the system. The memory support for DDR5 would be the most practical upgrade path if the laptop has user-accessible SODIMM slots, allowing a jump from DDR4 to DDR5 for improved bandwidth in memory-sensitive workloads.

Benchmark Performance

The benchmark data for this pairing shows a CPU that performs well above average and a GPU that sits in the upper-middle range of all GPUs. The Core i5-12600HX achieves an average benchmark score of 33,375, placing it at the 83rd percentile among all CPUs. This places it in a tight cluster with several rivals: it is 0.4% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS (avg score 33,244), 0.5% ahead of the Intel Core i7-14701E (avg score 33,206), and 0.5% behind the Intel Core Ultra 7 255H (avg score 33,537) and AMD Ryzen 5 240 (avg score 33,542). These sub-1% deltas indicate that the i5-12600HX is essentially performance-equivalent to these four competing parts, making the choice between them a matter of platform features rather than raw speed.

The GPU side shows the Arc A370M with an average benchmark score of 29,175, placing it at the 74th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH (29,197, 0.1% ahead), AMD FirePro W8000 (29,211, 0.1% ahead), AMD Radeon RX 470 (28,996, 0.6% behind), and AMD Radeon RX 6800M (28,874, 1.0% behind). The remarkably small deltas here — all within 1% — show that the Arc A370M delivers performance that is statistically indistinguishable from these varied competitors, despite their different architectures and market positions. The combined percentile of 79 for this pairing reflects a system that is stronger in CPU performance than GPU performance, with the CPU sitting 9 percentile points higher than the GPU.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-12600HX is built on the Alder Lake architecture with a 10 nm process node from Intel, using the Alder Lake-HX codename. It has 12 cores and 16 threads, which indicates a hybrid design mixing performance and efficiency cores, though the data does not specify the core composition. The base clock is 2.50 GHz with a boost clock of 4.60 GHz, giving a substantial single-thread capability that is reflected in the benchmark scores. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 18 MB of shared L3 cache, which is generous for a mobile part and aids in multi-threaded workloads.

The Cinebench results show a clear picture of its capabilities. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 20,714 in multi-core and 2,924 in single-core. The multi-core score is roughly 7.1 times the single-core score, which indicates strong scaling across the 12 cores, though not perfect linear scaling due to thermal and power constraints typical of mobile parts. In Cinebench R20, the scores are 8,699 multi-core and 1,228 single-core, maintaining a similar ratio. The R15 results are 2,087 multi-core and 294 single-core. These consistent ratios across Cinebench versions suggest stable performance characteristics without unusual throttling behavior in the benchmark environment.

PassMark results provide additional insight into specific workload types. The multi-thread score of 24,681 and single-thread score of 3,623 show a ratio of about 6.8, again confirming good multi-core scaling. The integer math score of 79,339 is notably higher than the floating-point math score of 58,378, indicating that the CPU is better optimized for integer-heavy tasks like encryption and data processing. The data encryption score of 17,506 and data compression score of 292,256 both reflect strong performance in these areas. The extended instructions score of 17,328 suggests good SIMD throughput for vectorized workloads. The find prime numbers score of 83 is relatively low, which is typical for a CPU that does not specialize in this particular algorithm. The physics score of 1,504 is moderate, and the random string sorting score of 33,110 shows competent memory-bound performance.

For real workloads, the data indicates that this CPU is well-suited for multi-threaded productivity applications such as video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation, where the 12 cores and high multi-core Cinebench scores translate directly to reduced render times. The single-core performance, while not class-leading, is sufficient for everyday tasks and lightly-threaded applications. The presence of ECC support and the 18 MB L3 cache suggests that this part can handle workstation-class workloads that benefit from larger cache footprints.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for the Intel Core i5-12600HX paired with the Intel Arc A370M in the FACT PACK, and no measured FPS rows are present for this exact combination. Therefore, all gaming performance figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores of the individual components, and should be treated as approximations rather than verified results.

The Arc A370M's average benchmark score of 29,175 places it at the 74th percentile of all GPUs, which suggests it can handle modern games at 1080p with medium to high settings, but will struggle with ultra settings in demanding titles. The GPU's Geekbench OpenCL score of 29,676 and Vulkan score of 28,673 indicate that it performs well in compute-bound scenarios, which bodes well for games that use compute-based rendering techniques. The 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus provides 112.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is sufficient for 1080p gaming but may become a bottleneck in texture-heavy games at higher resolutions or with high-quality texture packs.

Based on the CPU's strong single-thread score of 3,623 in PassMark and the GPU's 74th percentile ranking, the estimated gaming experience would be smooth at 1080p for esports titles and older games, with frame rates likely exceeding 60 FPS in less demanding games. For AAA titles, the estimate would be in the 30-50 FPS range at medium settings, with dips below 30 FPS possible in the most demanding scenes. The GPU's 8 RT cores and support for DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) mean that ray tracing is technically supported, but the modest 4.198 TFLOPS of FP32 compute means ray-traced effects will come at a significant performance cost, likely making RT impractical at playable frame rates except in the lightest RT implementations. The 2050 MHz boost clock and 131.2 GTexel/s texture rate provide reasonable fill rates for a mobile GPU of this class.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data reveals a clear imbalance between CPU and GPU performance in this pairing. The CPU sits at the 83rd percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU sits at the 74th percentile among all GPUs — a 9-point gap that indicates the CPU is the stronger component. In CPU-bound workloads such as video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation, the i5-12600HX will be the primary driver of performance, and the GPU will have minimal impact. In these scenarios, the system will perform at a level consistent with the CPU's high percentile ranking, limited only by the GPU's ability to display or accelerate specific tasks.

Conversely, in GPU-bound workloads such as gaming at high settings or GPU-accelerated rendering, the Arc A370M will be the limiting factor. The GPU's 74th percentile ranking means that even with the CPU's strong performance, frame rates will be constrained by the GPU's throughput. The FPS scaling in games would show that the GPU reaches its limit before the CPU does, meaning that CPU utilization would be moderate while GPU utilization would be near maximum. This is typical for a pairing where the CPU is significantly more capable than the GPU.

The combined percentile of 79 reflects this imbalance, sitting almost exactly between the CPU's 83rd and GPU's 74th percentiles. For balanced workloads that use both components, such as gaming with background streaming or recording, the system will perform at the level of the weaker component, with the CPU having headroom to handle additional tasks without impacting game performance. This makes the pairing well-suited for users who prioritize CPU-heavy productivity but also want discrete GPU capability for occasional gaming or acceleration. The bottleneck in gaming will always be the GPU, but in productivity tasks, the CPU will be the star.

Who Should Build It

This pairing is suited for users who primarily need strong CPU performance in a laptop form factor, with the discrete GPU serving as a secondary feature. Content creators working with video editing, 3D modeling, or software development will benefit from the CPU's 83rd percentile ranking, with multi-core scores that compete directly with parts like the AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS and Intel Core Ultra 7 255H, all within 0.5% of each other. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 20,714 and PassMark multi-thread score of 24,681 indicate that rendering tasks will complete quickly, and the 16 threads provide ample parallelism for modern creative applications.

Students in engineering or computer science programs will appreciate the CPU's ECC memory support and PCIe Gen 5 connectivity, which provide a level of reliability and future-proofing not found in all consumer laptops. Small business workstations that run database applications, data analysis tools, or virtualization environments will see strong performance from the data compression score of 292,256 and encryption score of 17,506, which indicate efficient handling of data-intensive operations. The GPU, while not a gaming powerhouse, provides hardware acceleration for video encoding and decode, which benefits video conferencing and media playback.

Gamers at 1080p resolution with modest settings expectations will find the Arc A370M sufficient for esports and older titles, but should not expect high-refresh gaming in modern AAA games. The GPU's 74th percentile ranking and 4 GB VRAM mean that users should target medium settings for a smooth experience. This pairing is not recommended for users whose primary use case is high-end gaming or GPU-accelerated rendering, as the GPU will be a significant bottleneck in those scenarios.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A370M is built on the Xe-HPG architecture with the DG2-128 chip, manufactured on a 6 nm process at TSMC. The chip contains 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 45.9 million per mm². The GPU has 1,024 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, and 32 raster operations units, with 8 RT cores for ray tracing acceleration. The base clock is 1550 MHz with a boost clock of 2050 MHz, providing a peak FP32 throughput of 4.198 TFLOPS and FP16 throughput of 8.397 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio.

The 4 GB of GDDR6 memory operates at 1750 MHz with a 14 Gbps effective data rate on a 64-bit bus, delivering 112.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This memory configuration is adequate for 1080p gaming and most compute workloads, but the narrow bus width is a limiting factor for high-resolution textures or large datasets. The pixel rate of 65.60 GPixel/s and texture rate of 131.2 GTexel/s are respectable for a mobile GPU in this class. The GPU has a TDP of 35 W and uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which provides sufficient bandwidth for the GPU's needs.

In benchmark terms, the GPU's average score of 29,175 places it at the 74th percentile, with performance nearly identical to the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH (within 0.1%) and AMD Radeon RX 470 (within 0.6%). This means that despite its modern architecture and feature set, the Arc A370M delivers raw performance comparable to older or higher-power GPUs, which reflects its efficiency but also indicates that it is not a high-performance part. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 29,676 and Vulkan score of 28,673 show balanced performance across compute APIs.

For rendering workloads, the GPU's 8 RT cores and support for DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4 provide modern API support, but the modest FP32 throughput means that software rendering will be slow compared to higher-tier GPUs. The 4.198 TFLOPS is suitable for light 3D work and GPU-accelerated effects in video editing, but not for complex scenes or high-resolution renders. The data suggests that the GPU is best used for acceleration of specific tasks rather than as a primary compute engine.

Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core i5-12600HX with the Intel Arc A370M in a laptop form factor, as indicated by the build class of "laptop". The CPU is a 12-core, 16-thread Alder Lake-HX part with a 55 W TDP, while the GPU is a 35 W Arc-class mobile discrete GPU. The combined percentile of 79 places this pairing in the upper-middle tier of all CPU-GPU combinations, meaning it will outperform the majority of laptop configurations in the database, but it is not a high-end gaming or workstation machine.

The CPU's 83rd percentile ranking and the GPU's 74th percentile ranking together create a system that is more capable in CPU-bound tasks than GPU-bound tasks. The 0.4% to 0.5% performance deltas against its nearest CPU rivals mean that users will not notice a difference when compared to systems with the AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS, Intel Core Ultra 7 255H, AMD Ryzen 5 240, or Intel Core i7-14701E — they are all effectively equal in performance. Similarly, the GPU's sub-1% deltas against its rivals mean that the Arc A370M, Radeon RX Vega M GH, FirePro W8000, Radeon RX 470, and Radeon RX 6800M are all interchangeable in terms of raw performance.

The system is best described as a productivity-first laptop with discrete graphics, suitable for users who need strong CPU throughput for work or study, with the GPU providing acceleration for media tasks and light gaming. The CPU's launch MSRP is $284, which reflects its mid-range positioning in Intel's mobile lineup. This is not a system for enthusiasts seeking maximum gaming performance, but rather a balanced mobile workstation for users who value CPU performance and modern platform features.

FAQ

Q: How does the Core i5-12600HX compare to its nearest CPU rivals?

A: The i5-12600HX has an average benchmark score of 33,375, which is 0.4% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS (33,244) and 0.5% ahead of the Intel Core i7-14701E (33,206), while being 0.5% behind both the Intel Core Ultra 7 255H and AMD Ryzen 5 240 (33,537 and 33,542 respectively). These differences are within 0.5%, making them statistically equivalent.

Q: What is the GPU's performance tier based on the benchmark data?

A: The Arc A370M scores 29,175 on average, placing it at the 74th percentile of all GPUs. It is within 0.1% of the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH (29,197) and AMD FirePro W8000 (29,211), and within 1% of the AMD Radeon RX 470 (28,996) and AMD Radeon RX 6800M (28,874).

Q: Is there measured gaming FPS data for this CPU-GPU pairing?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact combination. All gaming performance discussion is estimated from the component benchmark scores, with the GPU's 74th percentile suggesting playable 1080p at medium settings for most games.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i5-12600HX has ECC memory support indicated in its specifications, which is a feature typically found in workstation-class parts and beneficial for data integrity in professional workloads.

Q: What memory types and PCIe versions does this platform support?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU alone. The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile for this pairing?

A: The combined percentile for the Core i5-12600HX and Arc A370M pairing is 79, which places it above the majority of systems in the database, but below high-end gaming configurations. The CPU is at the 83rd percentile while the GPU is at the 74th percentile.

Q: What is the production status of the CPU and GPU?

A: The CPU's production status is listed as "Active", meaning it is currently in production. The GPU's production status is "End-of-life", indicating it is no longer being manufactured but remains available in existing laptop designs.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This system will not deliver high-refresh gaming experiences in modern titles. The GPU's 74th percentile ranking and 4.198 TFLOPS of FP32 compute place it below the threshold for sustained 144 Hz gaming, though esports titles at 1080p with competitive settings may approach 100+ FPS in undemanding games. Users should target 60 Hz displays for a consistent experience.

Streaming: The CPU's strong multi-core performance, evidenced by a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 20,714, provides ample headroom for software encoding while gaming. The 12 cores can handle game threads and encoder threads simultaneously without significant contention, making this a capable streaming laptop for 1080p streams at medium bitrates.

Video editing: The combination of a high-performing CPU and a GPU with 8 RT cores and 1,024 shading units is well-suited for video editing in programs that leverage GPU acceleration. The CPU's PassMark data encryption score of 17,506 and integer math score of 79,339 indicate fast processing of video codecs and effects, while the GPU's OpenCL score of 29,676 supports accelerated rendering and effects previews.

3D rendering: The CPU will be the primary engine for 3D rendering, with its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 20,714 translating to strong performance in CPU-based renderers like Blender Cycles or V-Ray. The GPU's modest 4.198 TFLOPS means GPU-accelerated rendering will be slower, but the 8 RT cores provide some acceleration for ray-traced scenes. This is a viable entry-level rendering laptop for small projects.

Software development: Developers will benefit from the CPU's 16 threads and 18 MB of L3 cache, which speed up compilation of large codebases. The PassMark multi-thread score of 24,681 and data compression score of 292,256 indicate fast build times and efficient handling of version control operations. The ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running build processes.

Student and office work: For everyday productivity tasks such as document editing, web browsing, and spreadsheet work, this system is overqualified. The CPU's single-thread PassMark score of 3,623 ensures snappy application responsiveness, while the GPU provides hardware acceleration for video playback and display rendering. The laptop form factor and 55 W CPU TDP suggest reasonable battery life for a full day of classes or meetings.