SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-12600HX + Intel Arc A350M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

91 Score

Top 9% Ranking

91 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

90%

GPU

92%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-12600HX

33,375 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A350M

24,647 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-12600HX and Intel Arc A350M pairing represents a specific mobile configuration designed for balanced performance in a laptop form factor. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact combination, so all gaming frame rate discussions herein are estimated from the synthetic benchmark scores rather than derived from direct game testing.

Gaming Performance

Since the data set contains no measured FPS rows for this specific CPU and GPU pairing, all gaming performance figures are estimates based on the benchmark scores of each component. The Intel Arc A350M holds a 70th percentile position among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 24647. This places it in the lower-midrange tier of mobile graphics solutions. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 590, scores 24744, which is only 0.4% higher, indicating that the Arc A350M delivers performance roughly comparable to that older desktop-class GPU.

The GPU's 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus provides 112.0 GB/s of bandwidth. For 1080p gaming at high settings, this configuration would likely handle esports titles and older AAA games smoothly, but modern demanding titles would require reduced settings or lower resolutions. The GPU’s FP32 compute of 3.379 TFLOPS suggests that raw rasterization performance is modest, and the 6 RT cores provide entry-level ray tracing capability that would significantly impact frame rates when enabled.

The CPU side, with its 83rd percentile ranking among all CPUs, is substantially stronger relative to its class than the GPU is relative to its own class. The Core i5-12600HX scores 20714 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, which is a robust result for a mobile processor. In gaming scenarios where the CPU handles physics, AI, and game logic, this processor would not present a bottleneck for the Arc A350M. However, the GPU would be the limiting factor at higher resolutions and graphics settings, meaning that estimated frame rates at 1440p or 4K would be considerably lower than at 1080p.

For high-refresh-rate gaming at 1080p, the Arc A350M would likely deliver playable frame rates in competitive titles, but the CPU’s single-core performance, evidenced by a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2924, ensures that frame pacing and minimum frame rates would be stable. The overall experience would be that of a capable entry-level gaming laptop rather than a high-end gaming machine.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s benchmark suite reveals a processor that excels in multi-threaded workloads. In Cinebench R23, the multi-core score of 20714 represents strong sustained performance for a 55 W mobile part. The single-core score of 2924 indicates solid per-thread performance, which translates to responsive system behavior and good performance in lightly-threaded applications. The PassMark multi-thread score of 24681 and single-thread score of 3623 corroborate this balanced profile.

The CPU’s average benchmark score of 33375 places it at the 83rd percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS, scores 33244, a difference of only 0.4%, making these processors essentially equivalent in overall CPU performance. The Intel Core Ultra 7 255H scores 33537, which is 0.5% higher, again a negligible difference. This indicates that the i5-12600HX sits in a highly competitive performance bracket where small percentage differences separate products from different generations and manufacturers.

The GPU’s average benchmark score of 24647 places it at the 70th percentile among all GPUs. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 24546 and Vulkan score of 24747 show consistent performance across different compute APIs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 590, scores 24744, just 0.4% higher. Interestingly, the NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile also appears as a rival with a score of 24763, 0.5% higher, despite that being a workstation-class GPU in a different performance tier. The combined percentile for this pairing is 77, reflecting that the CPU is stronger than the GPU relative to their respective markets.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The GPU’s 70th percentile ranking suggests that 1080p esports gaming at high refresh rates is feasible, with the CPU’s strong single-core performance ensuring consistent frame delivery. However, the 4 GB VRAM capacity may limit texture quality in modern titles, and the modest FP32 throughput would restrict frame rates in demanding games.

Streaming: The CPU’s 12 cores and 16 threads, combined with a PassMark multi-thread score of 24681, provide ample headroom for encoding video while gaming. The Arc A350M’s dedicated media engines would offload encoding tasks, though the GPU’s overall performance ceiling would limit the game settings that could be maintained while streaming.

Video Editing: The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 20714 indicates strong performance for video encoding and rendering tasks. The GPU’s 6.758 TFLOPS FP16 performance and DirectX 12 Ultimate support enable hardware-accelerated effects and timeline previews. The 4 GB VRAM might constrain work with very high-resolution footage or complex multi-layer compositions.

3D Rendering: The CPU would be the primary workhorse for CPU-based rendering, with its multi-threaded performance being competitive with desktop processors from a few generations prior. The GPU’s 3.379 TFLOPS FP32 performance is modest for GPU rendering, but its Vulkan 1.4 and OpenGL 4.6 support ensure compatibility with modern renderers.

Software Development: The CPU’s balanced performance, with a PassMark data compression score of 292256 and integer math score of 79339, indicates strong compilation and code analysis capabilities. The 16 threads handle parallel builds efficiently, while the single-core performance keeps interactive development tools responsive.

Student and Office Work: The combination of a powerful CPU and adequate GPU easily handles document processing, spreadsheet analysis, and web browsing. The CPU’s data encryption score of 17506 and floating point math score of 58378 indicate fast performance in productivity applications that rely on such operations.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance asymmetry between the CPU and GPU creates a clear bottleneck structure. The CPU’s 83rd percentile ranking versus the GPU’s 70th percentile indicates that the processor is significantly stronger relative to its market than the graphics chip is relative to its own market. In gaming workloads, the Arc A350M would be the limiting factor, capping frame rates regardless of the CPU’s capabilities. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2924 ensures that even in CPU-intensive game scenes, the processor would not hold back the GPU.

In compute workloads, the CPU dominates. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 20714 and PassMark multi-thread score of 24681 indicate that CPU-bound tasks like rendering, compilation, and data processing would be limited by the processor’s thermal and power envelope rather than the GPU’s capabilities. The GPU would only accelerate specific tasks where its architecture is well-suited.

The FPS scaling between resolutions would be typical of a GPU-limited system: performance drops as resolution increases, with the CPU maintaining consistent frame generation capabilities. At 1080p, the GPU would be the primary constraint; at lower resolutions, the CPU could potentially push higher frame rates, but the GPU would still cap maximum output. The 4 GB VRAM could also become a bottleneck in texture-heavy scenarios, causing stutters or reduced quality settings.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-12600HX features 12 cores and 16 threads based on the Alder Lake architecture, built on Intel’s 10 nm process. The base clock of 2.50 GHz boosts up to 4.60 GHz, providing strong single-threaded responsiveness. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB L1 per core, 1.25 MB L2 per core, and 18 MB of shared L3 cache, which supports efficient data access in multi-threaded workloads.

The processor supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support being a notable feature for reliability-sensitive applications. The PCIe Gen 5 interface with 20 lanes provides high-bandwidth connectivity for GPUs and NVMe storage. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides display output and basic acceleration when the discrete GPU is not needed, though gaming would rely on the Arc A350M.

The Cinebench R20 scores of 8699 multi-core and 1228 single-core reflect a processor that scales well with multi-threaded workloads. The PassMark results show strong performance in specific tasks: data compression at 292256, encryption at 17506, extended instructions at 17328, and floating point math at 58378. The find prime numbers score of 83 is notably low, suggesting that this particular workload pattern does not suit the processor’s architecture well. The physics score of 1504 in PassMark indicates adequate performance for physics simulation in games and applications.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The processor uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket, which is a soldered mobile platform, meaning the CPU cannot be upgraded in a traditional sense. The platform supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, allowing for memory capacity and speed upgrades within the laptop’s design constraints. The PCIe Gen 5 support with 20 lanes from the CPU provides bandwidth for current and next-generation storage devices.

The GPU is also a mobile component with a 25 W TDP, and its end-of-life production status indicates that replacement would require a new laptop rather than a component swap. The system’s power delivery is designed around the CPU’s 55 W TDP and the GPU’s 25 W TDP, suggesting that the total system power draw is modest. The suggested PSU is not specified, but the combined power requirements indicate that a standard laptop power adapter would suffice.

A sensible next upgrade for users of this platform would be to increase memory capacity if the laptop allows it, particularly for workloads that benefit from larger memory pools. Storage upgrades to PCIe Gen 5 NVMe drives would also improve system responsiveness, given the CPU’s native support for that interface. However, the soldered nature of both the CPU and GPU means that performance upgrades would require a completely new laptop system.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A350M features the DG2-128 chip with 7,200 million transistors on TSMC’s 6 nm process, occupying a 157 mm² die. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1150 MHz with a boost clock of 2200 MHz. The 4 GB of GDDR6 memory runs at 1750 MHz with a 14 Gbps effective data rate, providing 112.0 GB/s of bandwidth over a 64-bit bus.

The GPU contains 768 shading units, 48 texture mapping units, and 24 raster output units. The 6 ray tracing cores provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing, while the lack of dedicated tensor cores means AI acceleration relies on general-purpose compute. The pixel rate of 52.80 GPixel/s and texture rate of 105.6 GTexel/s indicate modest fill rates that would limit performance at high resolutions.

The FP32 performance of 3.379 TFLOPS and FP16 performance of 6.758 TFLOPS (with 2:1 ratio) provide the compute foundation for graphics and compute workloads. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern game engines and graphics APIs. The PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface provides adequate bandwidth for the GPU’s memory requirements.

The Geekbench scores of 24546 in OpenCL and 24747 in Vulkan demonstrate consistent compute performance across APIs. The GPU’s 70th percentile ranking places it above most integrated graphics solutions but below dedicated gaming GPUs. The nearest rival comparison shows the Arc A350M is within 0.5% of the AMD Radeon RX 590 and NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile, and 0.8% higher than the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT, indicating that while the absolute performance is modest, the competitive landscape is tight at this tier.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile for this laptop build is 77, reflecting the CPU’s stronger relative performance (83rd percentile) compared to the GPU (70th percentile).

Q: Does this system support hardware ray tracing?

A: Yes, the Intel Arc A350M includes 6 dedicated ray tracing cores, and the GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), which includes ray tracing features.

Q: What memory types are supported by the processor?

A: The Intel Core i5-12600HX supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support available.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival?

A: The CPU’s average benchmark score of 33375 is 0.4% higher than the AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS (33244) and 0.5% lower than both the Intel Core Ultra 7 255H (33537) and AMD Ryzen 5 240 (33542).

Q: What is the GPU’s memory bandwidth?

A: The Arc A350M has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing 112.0 GB/s of bandwidth with a 14 Gbps effective memory clock.

Q: Is the CPU upgradeable?

A: No, the processor uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket, which is a soldered mobile platform, so the CPU is not removable or upgradeable.

Q: What PCIe generation does the CPU support?

A: The processor supports PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU, providing high-bandwidth connectivity for discrete GPUs and NVMe storage devices.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets users who need strong CPU performance in a laptop form factor without requiring high-end gaming graphics. The CPU’s 83rd percentile ranking makes it suitable for developers who compile code, analysts who process large datasets, and students running computational workloads. The PassMark data encryption score of 17506 and integer math score of 79339 indicate capability in security and data processing tasks.

Content creators working with video editing would benefit from the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 20714, which accelerates rendering and export times. The GPU’s 70th percentile performance provides adequate acceleration for effects and previews, though the 4 GB VRAM limits work with very large projects. Gamers at 1080p with modest settings expectations would find this configuration sufficient for esports titles and older AAA games, while users demanding high-refresh 1440p gaming would need a more powerful GPU.

Small business workstations that require reliable multi-threaded performance for office applications, financial modeling, and data analysis would find the CPU’s capabilities well-matched. The ECC memory support adds reliability for critical workloads. Students in engineering or scientific disciplines would benefit from the processing power for simulations and mathematical computing, as evidenced by the floating point math score of 58378.

Build Overview

This laptop configuration pairs the Intel Core i5-12600HX processor with the Intel Arc A350M GPU, representing a balanced mobile system where the CPU is relatively stronger than the GPU. The CPU’s 83rd percentile ranking and the GPU’s 70th percentile ranking combine for a 77th percentile overall system, placing it in the upper-midrange tier of laptop performance. The Alder Lake architecture with 12 cores and 16 threads provides excellent multi-threaded performance, while the Arc A350M with 4 GB GDDR6 memory delivers entry-level discrete graphics capability.

The system excels in CPU-bound workloads such as software development, data analysis, and content creation, where the processor’s strong multi-threaded performance (Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 20714) provides substantial compute headroom. Gaming performance is adequate for 1080p at moderate settings, with the GPU’s performance closely matching the AMD Radeon RX 590 (0.4% difference). The platform supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, PCIe Gen 5 storage, and includes modern API support including DirectX 12 Ultimate and Vulkan 1.4. This is a laptop-class build designed for users who prioritize CPU performance and need a discrete GPU for basic gaming and hardware acceleration, rather than a dedicated gaming or workstation machine.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-12600HX + Intel Arc A350M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-12600HX

Intel Arc A350M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Gaming Performance

Benchmark Performance

Usage Scenarios

Balance and Bottleneck

CPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

GPU Analysis

FAQ

Who Should Build It

Build Overview

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds