SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-12600HE + Intel Arc A370M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

85 Score

Top 15% Ranking

85 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 15% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

76%

GPU

93%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-12600HE

4,980 Benchmark Score

Top 24% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A370M

29,175 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i5-12600HE + Intel Arc A370M: Mobile Performance Analysis

This mobile platform pairs Intel's Alder Lake-H processor with the entry-level Arc 3 discrete GPU, targeting thin-and-light laptops that need more graphics muscle than integrated solutions. The CPU delivers a 59th percentile standing among all tested processors, while the GPU sits higher at the 74th percentile, creating an interesting balance where the graphics card is the stronger relative component. The combined platform percentile reaches 67, indicating a system that outperforms roughly two-thirds of all recorded laptop configurations in the database. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, so all frame-rate discussion in this analysis is estimated from the benchmark scores rather than direct game testing.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around the Intel BGA 1744 socket, which means the processor is soldered directly to the motherboard. This is a mobile-first design, and the data shows no upgrade path for the CPU itself; users are locked into the i5-12600HE for the life of the laptop. The 45 W TDP of the processor combined with the 35 W TDP of the GPU suggests a total thermal envelope near 80 W, which is modest by gaming laptop standards but reasonable for a portable workstation-class machine. The lack of a suggested PSU figure in the data implies that power delivery is handled by the laptop's internal adapter, and the combined power draw indicates a relatively slim power brick will suffice.

Memory support covers both DDR4 and DDR5, though the data does not specify maximum capacity or speed. The dual-channel memory bus is standard for this class, and users should note that ECC memory is not supported, which limits the platform for certain error-sensitive professional workloads. The PCIe implementation provides Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU, offering ample bandwidth for the Arc A370M's PCIe 4.0 x8 interface and leaving room for a fast NVMe SSD. The integrated Iris Xe 80EU graphics provide a fallback display output and can handle basic tasks when the discrete GPU is idle or disabled.

For a sensible next step, the data suggests this platform is best treated as a complete package rather than a foundation for future upgrades. The soldered CPU and the end-of-life status of the GPU mean that users should plan for a full system replacement rather than component swaps. The 12th-generation Core architecture and Arc 3 GPU represent a specific point in Intel's mobile roadmap, and the production status of the GPU as end-of-life indicates that newer Arc parts have since taken its place. The platform's active CPU production status, however, means replacement parts for warranty and repair purposes should remain available.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 17,217 points, which places it in the 59th percentile of all CPUs in the database. This is a strong result for a 45 W mobile part, indicating that the 12-core design punches above its power class. The single-core R23 score of 2,430 is equally respectable, showing that Alder Lake's performance cores handle lightly-threaded workloads with authority. The average benchmark score across all tests is 4,980, which lands the CPU within 0.3% of its nearest rivals: the Intel Core i7-1375PRE trails by 0.1%, the Intel Xeon W-2150B trails by 0.2%, the AMD Ryzen Embedded V3C48 leads by 0.3%, and the Intel Core i3-12300HE trails by 0.3%. This clustering shows that the i5-12600HE sits in a tightly contested performance band where single-digit score differences separate competitors.

The GPU contributes Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan scores of 29,676 and 28,673, respectively, averaging 29,175. This lands the Arc A370M in the 74th percentile among all GPUs, a notably higher relative standing than the CPU's 59th percentile. The nearest GPU rivals are the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH (0.1% faster), the AMD FirePro W8000 (0.1% faster), the AMD Radeon RX 470 (0.6% slower), and the AMD Radeon RX 6800M (1.0% slower). The presence of the RX 6800M in this comparison group is particularly telling: a high-end mobile gaming GPU from AMD is within 1% of the Arc A370M in these specific compute benchmarks, which suggests the Intel part's architecture is well-optimized for Geekbench's workload patterns even if real-world gaming may differ.

The combined picture shows a system that is GPU-heavy in relative terms. The 67th combined percentile indicates that the platform outperforms most laptops, and the gap between GPU and CPU percentiles suggests that graphics-heavy tasks will see the platform punch above its weight class, while CPU-bound workloads will perform closer to the middle of the pack.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-12600HE is a 12-core, 16-thread processor built on the Alder Lake architecture, specifically the Alder Lake-H mobile variant. The core configuration mixes performance and efficiency cores, though the data does not specify the exact split; the 12 cores and 16 threads indicate a 4P+8E arrangement typical of this generation. The base clock runs at 2.50 GHz with a boost clock of 4.50 GHz, giving the processor a wide dynamic range for both sustained multi-core loads and bursty single-threaded tasks. The 10 nm process node from Intel is the company's first generation of hybrid architecture, and the 217 mm² die size reflects the integration of two different core types on one piece of silicon.

The cache hierarchy is substantial for a mobile part: 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 18 MB of shared L3 cache. This arrangement provides ample on-die storage for frequently accessed data, which helps explain the strong Cinebench R15 scores of 1,735 multi-core and 244 single-core. The R20 scores of 7,231 multi-core and 1,020 single-core show consistent scaling across benchmark generations, while the R23 results confirm that the processor maintains its performance under prolonged multi-threaded load.

For real workloads, the benchmark scores translate to solid productivity performance. The multi-core R23 score of 17,217 suggests a processor capable of handling video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation with reasonable efficiency, given the 45 W power envelope. The single-core scores indicate snappy responsiveness in everyday tasks and fast performance in lightly-threaded applications like web browsing and office suites. The processor's position at the 59th percentile means it outperforms the majority of CPUs in the database, though it is not a top-tier part; users seeking maximum multi-threaded throughput would need to look at higher-core-count HX-series parts, which are not in this data set.

Who Should Build It

The target user for this platform is a professional or student who needs a laptop that can handle both CPU-intensive productivity work and GPU-accelerated tasks without requiring a desktop-class power envelope. The CPU's 59th percentile and GPU's 74th percentile combined with the 67th overall percentile suggest a machine that is above-average for general use, with particular strength in graphics compute. Content creators working with photo and video editing software will benefit from the Arc A370M's OpenCL performance, which rivals much larger GPUs in compute benchmarks. Developers compiling code will appreciate the 12-core CPU, and the 16 threads provide headroom for virtual machines and parallel build processes.

Students and small business users will find the platform suitable for everyday tasks, though the 4 GB VRAM of the GPU may limit heavy 3D workloads. The laptop class form factor means portability is a given, and the combined 80 W TDP of CPU and GPU suggests reasonable battery life under light loads. Gamers at 1080p with medium to high settings are a plausible audience, though the GPU's memory bandwidth and VRAM capacity will be the limiting factor at higher resolutions. The platform is not aimed at enthusiasts seeking maximum frame rates or professionals requiring large VRAM buffers for complex 3D scenes; instead, it occupies the middle ground of capable, portable computing.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU-GPU combination, so all gaming figures presented here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores rather than direct testing. The GPU's Geekbench OpenCL score of 29,676 and Vulkan score of 28,673 indicate that the Arc A370M has solid compute throughput, but gaming performance depends heavily on driver optimization and memory bandwidth. The 4 GB GDDR6 VRAM on a 64-bit bus provides 112.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is modest by modern standards and will limit performance in high-resolution textures and demanding scenes.

At 1080p with ultra settings, the platform can be expected to handle esports titles and older games comfortably, while newer AAA releases will likely require medium settings to maintain playable frame rates. The GPU's 74th percentile standing suggests it outperforms a significant majority of laptop GPUs, but the nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 6800M at just 1% slower in compute benchmarks; this comparison is misleading for gaming, as the RX 6800M typically has far more memory bandwidth in real-world scenarios. Users should treat any specific FPS expectations as rough estimates and rely on the benchmark-derived performance class rather than concrete numbers.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The Arc A370M's compute scores place it in the upper quartile of GPUs, but the 112.0 GB/s bandwidth and 4 GB VRAM will constrain frame rates at 1080p. Esports titles should approach playable frame rates at high settings, while demanding games will need reduced settings. The CPU's single-core R23 score of 2,430 ensures that the processor will not bottleneck most gaming scenarios.

Streaming: The 12-core CPU with 16 threads provides ample headroom for encoding while gaming, and the Arc A370M's dedicated media engines (implied by the Xe-HPG architecture) should offload encoding tasks. The combined 80 W TDP suggests thermal headroom for sustained streaming sessions, though the GPU's modest performance may require lower in-game settings to maintain a stable stream.

Video editing: The GPU's OpenCL score of 29,676 indicates strong acceleration for effects and rendering in compatible software. The 4 GB VRAM will limit timeline sizes and complex effects, but the CPU's multi-core R23 score of 17,217 provides solid software rendering fallback. This platform suits 1080p editing workflows with moderate effects.

3D rendering: The CPU's 16 threads deliver a Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 7,231, which is respectable for a 45 W part and will handle CPU-based rendering. The GPU's 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 8 RT cores provide hardware ray tracing acceleration, though the 4 GB VRAM limits scene complexity. Small-to-medium scenes are feasible; large production renders will strain memory.

Software development: The 12-core, 16-thread CPU with 18 MB L3 cache is well-suited for compilation and test execution. The 59th CPU percentile and strong single-core score of 2,430 R23 indicate fast iterative builds and responsive IDE performance. The platform can handle containerized workloads and multiple virtual machines without excessive strain.

Student and office work: The CPU's single-core performance ensures snappy application launches and smooth multitasking. The Iris Xe 80EU integrated graphics provide a power-efficient fallback for productivity tasks, and the discrete GPU can accelerate spreadsheet rendering and presentation graphics when needed. The platform's 67th combined percentile confirms it is comfortably above average for general-purpose use.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A370M is built on the Xe-HPG architecture and the DG2-128 chip, manufactured on TSMC's 6 nm process. The die contains 7,200 million transistors across a 157 mm² area, yielding a transistor density of 45.9 million per square millimeter. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1550 MHz with a boost clock of 2050 MHz, and the memory runs at 1750 MHz with 14 Gbps effective speed. The 4 GB GDDR6 memory sits on a 64-bit bus, providing 112.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is the most significant limitation for high-resolution and high-texture workloads.

The compute configuration includes 1,024 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, and 32 render output units. The pixel rate reaches 65.60 GPixel/s and the texture rate hits 131.2 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is rated at 4.198 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 8.397 TFLOPS under a 2:1 ratio. The 8 RT cores provide dedicated ray tracing hardware, a feature that places this entry-level Arc part above many similarly priced competitors that lack hardware RT support. The GPU's TDP is 35 W, and it connects via PCIe 4.0 x8, which provides sufficient bandwidth for the 4 GB memory pool.

The benchmark results show a Geekbench OpenCL score of 29,676 and a Vulkan score of 28,673, placing the GPU at the 74th percentile overall. The average benchmark score of 29,175 puts it within 1% of the AMD Radeon RX 6800M, a much larger and more power-hungry part, which indicates that Intel's architecture achieves strong compute efficiency per watt. However, the 64-bit memory bus and 4 GB VRAM will cause real-world rendering performance to fall short of what the compute scores alone suggest. The GPU is end-of-life, meaning driver updates may become less frequent over time, though the DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4 API support ensures compatibility with current and near-future software.

FAQ

Q: What socket does the Intel Core i5-12600HE use?

A: The processor uses the Intel BGA 1744 socket, which is a soldered mobile interface, meaning the CPU is not upgradeable after purchase.

Q: How much VRAM does the Intel Arc A370M have?

A: The GPU has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing 112.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: Does the platform support ECC memory?

A: No, ECC memory is not supported by the i5-12600HE, which limits the platform for error-correcting memory applications.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU-GPU pair?

A: The combined platform percentile is 67, meaning it outperforms 67% of all recorded laptop configurations in the database.

Q: How does the Arc A370M compare to the AMD Radeon RX 6800M in compute benchmarks?

A: The Arc A370M has an average benchmark score of 29,175, which is 1.0% higher than the RX 6800M's 28,874, though this compute-focused comparison does not reflect gaming performance.

Q: What is the thermal design power of both components?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 45 W and the GPU has a TDP of 35 W, for a combined thermal envelope of 80 W.

Q: What PCIe configuration does the CPU support?

A: The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes, and the GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the CPU and GPU is skewed toward the graphics side, with the GPU at the 74th percentile and the CPU at the 59th percentile. This means that in workloads that leverage both components, the CPU will typically be the limiting factor, as it has more headroom to improve before reaching the GPU's relative performance level. For gaming, the GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth are the primary constraints; the CPU's single-core performance is sufficient to feed the GPU in most scenarios, as evidenced by the strong R23 single-core score of 2,430.

In compute-heavy tasks like OpenCL and Vulkan workloads, the GPU's 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 performance will be the deciding factor, and the CPU will likely wait on the GPU to complete tasks. Conversely, in CPU-bound scenarios like software compilation or multi-threaded rendering, the 12-core processor will be the bottleneck, with the GPU idle or lightly loaded. The combined percentile of 67 suggests that the platform is reasonably balanced for general use, with neither component dramatically outclassing the other. The 35 W GPU TDP and 45 W CPU TDP also indicate a balanced power draw, avoiding scenarios where one component throttles due to excessive heat from the other. Users upgrading from weaker platforms will notice the GPU's relative strength first, while those moving from stronger CPUs will notice the processor's mid-pack position.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-12600HE + Intel Arc A370M

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-12600HE

Intel Arc A370M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Upgrade Path and Platform

Benchmark Performance

CPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

Gaming Performance

Usage Scenarios

GPU Analysis

FAQ

Balance and Bottleneck

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds