SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-12600H + Intel Arc A570M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

88%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-12600H

28,882 Benchmark Score

Top 12% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A570M

58,239 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-12600H is a 12-core, 16-thread mobile processor built on Intel's Alder Lake-H architecture, manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process with a die size of 217 mm². This is a hybrid design that pairs performance cores with efficiency cores, a hallmark of the 12th Gen Core series. The base clock sits at 2.70 GHz, with a boost clock reaching 4.50 GHz, and the chip carries a 45 W TDP, positioning it squarely in the high-performance mobile segment.

The cache hierarchy is substantial for a mobile part: 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 18 MB of shared L3 cache. This cache configuration matters for workloads that exhibit high data locality, such as database operations or complex simulations, where the larger L3 pool reduces memory stalls. The processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, which gives system designers flexibility but also means the platform's memory bandwidth depends heavily on which memory type is chosen.

Benchmark results paint a picture of a CPU that punches above its class. In Cinebench R23, the multi-core score of 20072 is the standout figure, indicating strong sustained all-core throughput. The single-core score of 2833 in the same test shows that the architecture's single-thread performance is also competitive, which is crucial for lightly-threaded applications like many legacy games or office productivity tools. The Cinebench R20 results (8430 multi-core, 1189 single-core) and R15 results (2023 multi-core, 285 single-core) follow the expected scaling pattern, reinforcing the processor's consistent performance across different render workloads.

Beyond rendering, the PassMark suite reveals specific strengths. The multi-thread score of 21128 and the integer math score of 71168 suggest strong general-purpose compute capability. The floating-point math score of 51264 indicates solid numerical processing, which is relevant for scientific computing and financial modeling. Data compression at 247404 and random string sorting at 27653 point to good performance in data-heavy tasks like archiving or log processing. Data encryption at 14799 and extended instructions at 14508 show that the AES-NI and SIMD extensions are working effectively, which is good news for VPN software or encryption-heavy workloads.

The CPU holds a percentile rank of 81 among all CPUs, meaning it outperforms roughly four out of five processors in the database. Its average benchmark score of 28882 places it in a tight cluster with some surprising rivals. The Intel Core i9-13900H scores 28886, a deltaPct of 0 — essentially identical performance. The AMD Ryzen 5 5600XT scores 28940, a 0.2% difference. The Intel Core i7-12650H scores 28815, and the Intel Core Ultra 5 135H scores 29093, a 0.7% gap. This is a remarkable grouping: the i5-12600H is trading blows with an i9 from the same generation and a Ryzen desktop part, which suggests that the thermal and power delivery of the laptop chassis play as much of a role in performance as the silicon itself.

What does this mean for real workloads? In video editing, the multi-core Cinebench scores translate to faster timeline rendering and export times. In software development, the parallel compilation workloads will see significant speedups from the 16 threads. The single-thread performance ensures that UI interactions and code editing remain responsive. For office productivity, the processor is frankly overkill — but for a mobile workstation that occasionally needs to crunch data, it offers a compelling blend of responsiveness and throughput.

# GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A570M is a mobile GPU based on the Xe-HPG architecture, built on TSMC's 6 nm process with a chip area of 269 mm² and 11,500 million transistors. It features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock is 1750 MHz, which translates to 14 Gbps effective. This bandwidth figure is respectable for a mobile part, though the 128-bit bus width does place a ceiling on raw memory throughput compared to wider-bus desktop cards.

The GPU's compute configuration includes 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 raster output units. It has 16 ray tracing cores, which is a modest count but present nonetheless, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing in supported titles. The pixel rate is 83.20 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 166.4 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 5.325 TFLOPS, with FP16 performance at 10.65 TFLOPS via a 2:1 ratio. The base clock is 900 MHz with a boost clock of 1300 MHz, and the TDP is rated at 75 W, which is typical for a mid-range mobile GPU.

The API support is comprehensive: DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. This means the GPU is ready for modern gaming APIs, including hardware ray tracing and mesh shaders in DirectX 12 Ultimate titles. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8, which provides adequate bandwidth for the GPU's memory pool, though it does limit bandwidth to the CPU compared to a x16 connection.

The benchmark data for this GPU is limited to a single Geekbench OpenCL score of 58239, which places it at the 88th percentile among all GPUs. The nearest rivals are telling: the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT scores 58392, a deltaPct of -0.3% (meaning the Arc A570M is essentially tied with a high-end desktop GPU from the previous generation). The AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM scores 58085, a 0.3% difference. The NVIDIA P102-100 scores 58528, and the AMD Radeon PRO V710 scores 58657. This clustering around the 58,000 mark suggests that the Arc A570M's compute performance in OpenCL is in the range of a upper-mid-range to high-end GPU from previous generations, despite its mobile form factor and 75 W TDP.

For rendering workloads, the FP32 and FP16 figures indicate that the GPU can handle real-time graphics and compute tasks effectively. The FP16 performance, in particular, is relevant for AI inference tasks that use half-precision arithmetic. The ray tracing cores, while not top-tier, enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing in supported games and DXR applications. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p gaming with high texture quality, though it may become a limiting factor at 4K with ultra-high texture packs.

The GPU's average benchmark score of 58239, combined with its 88th percentile rank, positions it as a capable mobile graphics solution. The fact that it matches a desktop RX 6950 XT in OpenCL compute is notable, though gaming performance will likely differ due to driver optimizations and thermal constraints. The release date of 2023-07-31 indicates this is a relatively recent part, and its active production status suggests ongoing availability.

# Benchmark Performance

The combined picture of this CPU+GPU pairing is one of surprising strength. The Intel Core i5-12600H achieves an average benchmark score of 28882, ranking at the 81st percentile among all CPUs. The Intel Arc A570M achieves an average benchmark score of 58239, ranking at the 88th percentile among all GPUs. The combined percentile for this build is 85, which places the system in the top 15% of all laptop configurations in the database.

This is a laptop-class build, and the numbers suggest it outperforms many desktop systems from a few years ago. The CPU's nearest rival, the Intel Core i9-13900H, is essentially identical in performance with a deltaPct of 0. This means that in CPU-bound workloads, the i5-12600H is indistinguishable from a higher-tier i9 part, at least in terms of the aggregate benchmark score. The AMD Ryzen 5 5600XT is 0.2% faster, and the Intel Core Ultra 5 135H is 0.7% faster — differences that are within run-to-run variance.

On the GPU side, the Arc A570M's nearest rival is the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT, with a deltaPct of -0.3%. This is a desktop GPU that was a flagship part in its generation, and the mobile Arc A570M is matching its OpenCL compute score. The AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM is 0.3% slower, and the NVIDIA P102-100 is 0.5% faster. These are all desktop parts, which makes the Arc A570M's performance in compute workloads all the more impressive.

The combined system percentile of 85 means that this laptop configuration outperforms 85% of all builds in the database. This is not a budget system by any stretch; it is a high-performance mobile workstation that can handle demanding workloads. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 20072 is particularly strong for a 45 W part, and the GPU's OpenCL score of 58239 is excellent for a 75 W mobile GPU.

However, there is a critical caveat: the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact combination. The `measuredFpsUltraByGame` field is empty, and `dataIsMeasured` is false. This means that all gaming performance figures discussed in this analysis are estimates derived from the benchmark scores, not direct measurements. The compute scores suggest strong performance, but real-world gaming FPS can vary based on driver maturity, thermal throttling, and game-specific optimizations.

# Who Should Build It

This CPU+GPU pairing is suited for users who need a mobile system that can handle both productivity and gaming without compromise. The CPU's 81st percentile rank and the GPU's 88th percentile rank indicate a balanced high-performance configuration.

For gamers, the system is capable of high-refresh-rate gaming at 1080p and 1440p, based on the GPU's compute performance and VRAM capacity. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for modern titles at these resolutions with high settings, though 4K gaming may require dialing back texture quality. The CPU's single-thread performance of 2833 in Cinebench R23 ensures that game logic and physics simulations remain fluid.

Content creators are a primary target audience. The CPU's multi-core score of 20072 in Cinebench R23 translates to faster video exports and 3D scene rendering. The GPU's OpenCL score of 58239 indicates strong compute acceleration for GPU-accelerated effects in video editing software. The combination of 16 threads and 2048 shading units provides a solid foundation for creative workloads.

Software developers will appreciate the compilation performance. The PassMark integer math score of 71168 and multi-thread score of 21128 suggest strong parallel build performance. The data encryption score of 14799 means secure communication and file encryption tasks will not be a bottleneck.

Students in engineering or computer science programs will find this system capable of running simulations, CAD software, and development environments. The 45 W CPU TDP and 75 W GPU TDP mean the system requires adequate cooling, but the performance justifies the power draw.

Small business workstations that need to handle data processing, virtualization, and occasional graphics work will benefit from this configuration. The CPU's data compression score of 247404 and floating-point math score of 51264 indicate strong performance for database operations and financial modeling.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the CPU and GPU in this build is remarkably even, with the CPU at the 81st percentile and the GPU at the 88th percentile. This close alignment means that neither component is dramatically over- or under-powered relative to the other, which is uncommon in laptop builds where one component often dominates.

In CPU-bound workloads, the processor's performance is essentially identical to the Intel Core i9-13900H, with a deltaPct of 0. This means that for tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering, or code compilation, the CPU is not a limiting factor — it is performing at the level of a much more expensive part. The single-thread score of 2833 in Cinebench R23 ensures that even lightly-threaded tasks like web browsing or office document editing are handled with ease.

In GPU-bound workloads, the Arc A570M's OpenCL score of 58239 is competitive with desktop parts like the RX 6950 XT. For gaming at 1080p, the GPU is likely to be the primary performance driver, and its 88th percentile rank suggests it can handle most titles at high settings. At 1440p, the GPU will still be the bottleneck in most games, but the 8 GB VRAM and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth provide sufficient resources for high-quality textures.

The FPS scaling between CPU and GPU is a key consideration. In games that are CPU-limited, the i5-12600H's 16 threads and strong single-core performance will not be a hindrance. In games that are GPU-limited, the Arc A570M's compute performance suggests it can maintain respectable frame rates. However, without measured FPS data, the exact scaling between CPU and GPU workloads cannot be quantified. The data indicates a balanced system, but the lack of measured FPS means that actual game performance is an estimate, not a certainty.

The memory subsystem plays a role in overall balance. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5, and the GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 with 224.0 GB/s bandwidth. If the system uses DDR5 memory, the CPU will have ample bandwidth, reducing potential bottlenecks in memory-intensive workloads. If DDR4 is used, the CPU's memory bandwidth will be lower, which could impact performance in cache-miss-heavy workloads.

# FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's multi-core performance in Cinebench R23?

A: The Intel Core i5-12600H scores 20072 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, placing it at the 81st percentile among all CPUs.

Q: How does the GPU compare to desktop parts?

A: The Intel Arc A570M's OpenCL score of 58239 is within 0.3% of the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT, which scores 58392.

Q: What memory types does the CPU support?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration.

Q: Does the GPU support hardware ray tracing?

A: Yes, the GPU has 16 ray tracing cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which includes hardware-accelerated ray tracing.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 85, meaning it outperforms 85% of all builds in the database.

Q: What is the GPU's memory bandwidth?

A: The GPU has 224.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth, provided by 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus.

Q: Is the CPU's performance comparable to an i9?

A: Yes, the CPU's average benchmark score of 28882 is identical to the Intel Core i9-13900H's score of 28886, a deltaPct of 0.

# Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The `measuredFpsUltraByGame` field is empty, and `dataIsMeasured` is false. Therefore, all gaming performance figures discussed here are estimates based on the benchmark scores, not direct measurements. The system's combined percentile of 85 and the GPU's 88th percentile rank suggest that gaming performance should be strong, but actual frame rates will vary depending on game optimization, driver maturity, and thermal conditions.

Based on the GPU's compute performance, which is competitive with the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT in OpenCL, the system is expected to handle 1080p gaming at high to ultra settings with smooth frame rates in most titles. For esports games like Counter-Strike or Valorant, which are CPU-bound, the i5-12600H's single-thread performance of 2833 in Cinebench R23 should provide high frame rates, potentially exceeding 144 FPS at 1080p.

For AAA titles at 1440p, the GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth should be sufficient for high settings, but ultra settings with heavy texture packs may cause occasional stuttering if VRAM capacity is exceeded. The 16 ray tracing cores enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing, but the performance impact will be significant; users should expect to enable ray tracing only at lower resolutions or with upscaling technologies.

The CPU's multi-core performance of 20072 in Cinebench R23 means that CPU-bound scenarios like large-scale strategy games or simulation titles will not be a bottleneck. The 16 threads provide ample parallelism for modern game engines that utilize multiple cores for physics, AI, and streaming.

It is important to reiterate that these are estimates. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 58239 indicates compute capability, but gaming performance depends on driver optimization, which has historically been a challenge for Intel Arc GPUs. Users should consult current reviews and benchmarks for specific game performance. The data suggests a capable gaming system, but the absence of measured FPS data means that the final verdict on gaming performance is provisional.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel BGA 1744 socket, which is a soldered mobile socket. This means the CPU is not upgradeable in a traditional sense; it is permanently attached to the motherboard. The same applies to the GPU, which is an integrated part of the laptop motherboard. Therefore, the upgrade path for this system is limited to components that are not soldered, such as memory and storage.

The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. This means that upgrading memory capacity or speed is possible, depending on which memory type the laptop manufacturer chose for the specific model. Users should verify which memory type their system uses before purchasing upgrades. The memory bus is dual-channel, so installing memory in matched pairs is recommended for optimal performance.

The CPU provides PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes, and the GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface. This means that the GPU has adequate bandwidth for its memory pool, and there is headroom for additional PCIe devices like NVMe SSDs. The system's storage can be upgraded with PCIe Gen 4 NVMe drives, which offer high sequential read and write speeds.

The CPU's TDP is 45 W, and the GPU's TDP is 75 W, for a combined 120 W of power draw from these two components. The FACT PACK does not specify a suggested PSU for this build, so the power supply requirements depend on the laptop's design. The total system power draw will be higher when including the motherboard, memory, storage, and display, so users should ensure that the laptop's power adapter can supply sufficient wattage.

The CPU has an integrated GPU, the Iris Xe 80EU, which can be used for display output when the discrete GPU is idle or for tasks that do not require the Arc A570M's compute power. This allows for power saving in light workloads. The GPU's display outputs are listed as "Portable Device Dependent," meaning that the available display ports depend on the specific laptop model.

For a sensible next upgrade, users should focus on memory and storage. Upgrading to the maximum supported memory capacity and installing a fast NVMe SSD will provide the most noticeable performance improvements for daily use. The CPU and GPU are fixed, so there is no upgrade path for these components beyond the initial purchase. The platform's support for both DDR4 and DDR5 gives some flexibility, but the choice is locked in by the laptop's motherboard design.

# Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core i5-12600H with the Intel Arc A570M in a laptop form factor, as indicated by the `buildClass` field. The CPU is a 12-core, 16-thread Alder Lake-H processor with a 45 W TDP, and the GPU is a mobile Alchemist-based part with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and a 75 W TDP. The combined system percentile is 85, meaning this laptop outperforms 85% of all builds in the database.

The CPU's average benchmark score of 28882 places it at the 81st percentile, and the GPU's average benchmark score of 58239 places it at the 88th percentile. These are high rankings that indicate a premium mobile configuration. The CPU's performance is statistically indistinguishable from the Intel Core i9-13900H, and the GPU's compute performance is competitive with desktop parts like the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT.

This is a high-performance laptop configuration that sits near the top of the mobile computing stack. The 85th combined percentile places it in the upper echelon of systems in the database, suitable for demanding workloads like video editing, 3D rendering, and high-refresh-rate gaming. The system is not a budget offering; it is a capable mobile workstation with gaming credentials.

The build's overall tier is high, as evidenced by the percentile rankings. The CPU and GPU are well matched, with neither component dramatically outclassing the other. This balance ensures that the system delivers consistent performance across a wide range of applications. The lack of measured FPS data is a caveat, but the benchmark scores suggest that this is a system that can handle most tasks with ease.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The GPU's 88th percentile rank and compute score of 58239 suggest strong performance for 1080p gaming at high refresh rates. The CPU's single-thread score of 2833 in Cinebench R23 ensures that game logic is handled without bottleneck. Esports titles should run at frame rates exceeding 144 FPS, while AAA games will require reduced settings for triple-digit frame rates.

Streaming: The CPU's 16 threads provide ample headroom for encoding and streaming simultaneously. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 20072 means that game capture and encoding can run alongside gameplay without significant performance degradation. The GPU's hardware-accelerated encoding capabilities, implied by its modern architecture, further support this use case.

Video editing: The CPU's multi-core performance of 20072 in Cinebench R23 translates to faster timeline rendering and export times in video editing software. The GPU's OpenCL score of 58239 provides acceleration for effects and color grading. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 4K video editing with moderate effects stacks.

3D rendering: The CPU's 16 threads and the GPU's FP32 performance of 5.325 TFLOPS combine to handle both CPU-based and GPU-based renderers. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 20072 indicates strong CPU rendering performance, while the GPU's compute capabilities can accelerate viewport previews and final renders in GPU-accelerated engines.

Software development: The PassMark integer math score of 71168 and multi-thread score of 21128 indicate strong parallel compilation performance. The data encryption score of 14799 ensures that secure communication and code signing tasks are handled efficiently. The 16 threads allow for multiple development VMs or containers to run simultaneously.

Student and office work: The CPU's single-thread performance of 2833 in Cinebench R23 ensures that office productivity applications run smoothly. The PassMark data compression score of 247404 speeds up file archiving and extraction. The 81st percentile CPU rank means that this system is far more powerful than needed for typical student or office workloads, providing headroom for future demands.

AI and machine learning: The GPU's FP16 performance of 10.65 TFLOPS provides significant compute capability for half-precision AI inference tasks. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for running moderate-sized models locally. The CPU's extended instructions score of 14508 indicates that SIMD-optimized code will run effectively.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-12600H + Intel Arc A570M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-12600H

Intel Arc A570M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds