SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-12500H + Intel Arc A570M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

91 Score

Top 9% Ranking

91 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

86%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-12500H

22,625 Benchmark Score

Top 14% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A570M

58,239 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-12500H and Intel Arc A570M form a mobile pairing that sits in a distinct performance tier. The data shows a laptop configuration built around a 12th Gen Alder Lake-H processor and an Alchemist-generation discrete GPU. This analysis uses only the provided benchmark scores to characterize the platform, its balance, and its suitability for various tasks. The benchmark results indicate a system that is capable across a broad range of workloads, with a clear emphasis on multi-threaded performance and solid GPU compute capabilities. Note that no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination; all frame rate discussion is estimated from the benchmark scores.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is anchored by the Intel Core i5-12500H, which uses the Intel BGA 1744 socket. This is a soldered mobile processor, meaning the CPU itself is not a user-upgradeable component. The Alder Lake architecture supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, offering flexibility in memory choice depending on the laptop's design. The memory bus is dual-channel, which is standard for this class of mobile processor, and the platform does not support ECC memory.

For PCIe, the CPU provides Gen 4 connectivity with 20 lanes. This is a crucial detail for the GPU, which interfaces via a PCIe 4.0 x8 bus. This configuration provides ample bandwidth for the Arc A570M, ensuring that the graphics card is not bottlenecked by a slower connection. The integrated graphics is Iris Xe 80EU, which provides a basic display output and can handle light tasks when the discrete GPU is not in use.

The power envelope is defined by a 45W TDP for the CPU and a 75W TDP for the GPU. The data does not include a suggested PSU wattage. However, the combined thermal and power draw of this system, typical for a laptop with a 45W processor and a 75W discrete GPU, will require a substantial power adapter. A sensible next upgrade path for this platform is not about swapping the CPU or GPU, as both are soldered. Instead, the meaningful upgrades are memory capacity, moving to a larger or faster dual-channel DDR5 kit if the laptop supports it, and storage, adding a high-capacity NVMe SSD to utilize the Gen 4 lanes. The platform's strength lies in its balance; the 45W CPU and 75W GPU are well-matched for a thin-and-light performance laptop, and the upgrade path is limited to peripherals and storage.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data reveals a system where the CPU and GPU are relatively well-matched, but their performance profiles suggest different bottleneck characteristics depending on the workload. The CPU's 3DMark scores show strong scaling from 2 threads (1773) to 4 threads (3139), 8 threads (4394), and 16 threads (5954). The jump from 8 to 16 threads is modest (about 35% faster), indicating that the processor's hybrid architecture with 12 cores and 16 threads is efficient but that the performance gains taper off as more threads are utilized, likely due to the mix of performance and efficiency cores.

The GPU's Geekbench OpenCL score of 58239 places it in the 88th percentile of all GPUs. This is a high score, suggesting the Arc A570M is a powerful part. When comparing the CPU's 76th percentile to the GPU's 88th percentile, it is clear that the GPU is the more dominant component in terms of relative performance against other parts. In gaming scenarios, this means the GPU is likely to be the primary determinant of frame rates at higher resolutions, while the CPU is less likely to be a limiting factor. In CPU-intensive tasks like physics simulation (Passmark physics score of 1018) or data compression (253431), the CPU will be the active component, and the GPU will be underutilized.

The FPS scaling is estimated from the benchmark scores. The CPU's single-thread score of 924 in 3DMark and 3418 in Passmark single-thread are strong, indicating good performance for game logic and physics. However, the GPU's superior percentile rank suggests that at 1080p or higher, the Arc A570M will be the limiting factor in most graphically demanding games. The system is balanced in the sense that neither component is dramatically weaker than the other, but the GPU's higher percentile suggests it will be the bottleneck for maximizing frame rates in AAA titles, while the CPU will be the bottleneck in heavily threaded productivity tasks that do not utilize the GPU.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The data suggests this is a capable gaming platform. The GPU's 88th percentile ranking and Geekbench OpenCL score of 58239 indicate it has the raw compute power to drive high frame rates. The CPU's strong single-thread performance (3418 in Passmark) ensures it can keep up with the GPU, but the estimated FPS scaling indicates the GPU will be the limiting factor at 1080p. For high-refresh 1080p gaming, this pairing is well-suited, though the GPU's TDP of 75W might limit sustained performance in thinner chassis.

Streaming: This scenario benefits from both strong CPU and GPU capabilities. The CPU's 16 threads and 3DMark 16-thread score of 5954 provide ample headroom for encoding and game logic simultaneously. The GPU's support for modern APIs like DirectX 12 Ultimate and its 16 RT cores also make it suitable for hardware-accelerated encoding and streaming tasks. The system should handle a game and a streaming encoder without significant frame drops, though the 75W GPU TDP may constrain performance in a combined workload.

Video Editing: The combination of a powerful CPU and GPU is ideal for video editing. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 19840 shows strong multi-threaded performance for rendering and exporting timelines. The GPU's 2048 shading units and 5.325 TFLOPS of FP32 performance will accelerate effects, transitions, and preview rendering. The 8 GB of VRAM and 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth are sufficient for 1080p and 1440p editing timelines with multiple layers.

3D Rendering: The Arc A570M's compute capabilities are a highlight here. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 58239, which rivals the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT (deltaPct -0.3), indicates excellent OpenCL performance for render engines that use GPU acceleration. The CPU's 12 cores and 16 threads will also contribute to CPU-based rendering. The 8 GB VRAM is a consideration, as very large scenes may exceed this capacity, but for most project sizes, this is a capable rendering machine.

Software Development: The CPU's balanced performance is the key asset for development. The high integer math score in Passmark (71714) and the strong multi-threaded scores indicate excellent performance for compiling code, running virtual machines, and managing containers. The 16 threads are particularly useful for parallel builds. The GPU is less relevant for standard development, but its compute power can be leveraged for tasks like running local machine learning models or GPU-accelerated testing.

Student and Office Work: This system is overkill for basic tasks. The CPU's single-thread score of 924 in 3DMark and 3418 in Passmark make short work of document editing, web browsing, and spreadsheet tasks. The integrated Iris Xe 80EU graphics can handle display output and video playback without needing to wake the discrete GPU, saving power. The performance is far beyond what is required, but it ensures the system will not feel slow for years. The 45W CPU TDP, however, means this is not an ultra-portable, low-power solution.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who need a single machine for both demanding work and play. The GPU's 88th percentile ranking and its performance parity with a high-end desktop GPU like the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT (deltaPct -0.3) in compute benchmarks make it a draw for content creators. Video editors and 3D artists who work on the go will appreciate the combination of the CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 19840 and the GPU's OpenCL prowess.

Gamers at 1080p who want high refresh rates will find this a strong option, as the CPU's single-thread performance and the GPU's raw power are a good match for this resolution. Developers who need to compile large codebases will benefit from the 16 threads and high integer math score of 71714. Students in engineering or computer science fields will have more than enough power for their coursework. Small business workstations that require occasional GPU acceleration for tasks like CAD or data visualization would also be well-served by this configuration, as it offers a balance of CPU and GPU performance without the power draw of a desktop workstation.

Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core i5-12500H delivers a strong showing in synthetic benchmarks. The 3DMark scores scale from 924 (single-thread) to 6043 (max-threads), showing consistent performance growth. The Cinebench results are particularly telling, with a multicore score of 19840 in R23 and a single-core score of 2801. This indicates a processor that is roughly 7 times faster in multi-threaded workloads than in single-threaded ones, highlighting the benefit of its 12 cores and 16 threads. The Passmark multi-thread score is 20625, with a single-thread score of 3418. The CPU's average benchmark score is 22625, placing it in the 76th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are all within a 1% margin, including the Intel Core Ultra 5 135U (deltaPct 0) and the AMD Ryzen 5 7535U (deltaPct -0.7), indicating this is a top-tier mobile processor in its class.

The Intel Arc A570M's benchmark data is limited to a single Geekbench OpenCL score of 58239. This score places the GPU in the 88th percentile of all GPUs, which is exceptionally high. Its nearest rivals in the data are the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT (deltaPct -0.3), the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM (deltaPct 0.3), and the NVIDIA P102-100 (deltaPct -0.5). The fact that this mobile GPU trades blows with a desktop flagship like the RX 6950 XT in this compute test is remarkable. The combined picture is a CPU that is solidly above average and a GPU that is near the top of the performance charts, resulting in a combined percentile of 82. The CPU is not a bottleneck, and the GPU is a standout performer.

FAQ

Q: What is the performance class of the Intel Core i5-12500H?

A: The CPU has an average benchmark score of 22625, placing it in the 76th percentile of all CPUs. It performs nearly identically to the Intel Core Ultra 5 135U and the Intel Core i7-1270P, with delta percentages of 0 and 0.5, respectively.

Q: How does the Arc A570M compare to other GPUs?

A: The GPU's Geekbench OpenCL score is 58239, which places it in the 88th percentile of all GPUs. This score is on par with the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT, with a deltaPct of -0.3.

Q: What memory types are supported by this platform?

A: The Intel Core i5-12500H supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The platform does not support ECC memory.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The Intel Arc A570M features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s.

Q: Is there measured frame rate data for this CPU+GPU combination?

A: No. The data contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, so all frame rate performance is estimated from the benchmark scores.

Q: What is the CPU's socket type?

A: The CPU uses the Intel BGA 1744 socket, which is a soldered mobile socket, meaning it is not upgradeable.

Q: Does the GPU support hardware ray tracing?

A: Yes, the Intel Arc A570M has 16 RT cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which includes hardware-accelerated ray tracing features.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A570M is the standout component in this pairing. Built on the Xe-HPG architecture and the DG2-256 chip, it is fabricated on TSMC's 6 nm process with 11,500 million transistors. The GPU operates at a base clock of 900 MHz and boosts to 1300 MHz. Its memory subsystem consists of 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s at an effective speed of 14 Gbps. This configuration is well-suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming with high detail settings.

The compute resources are substantial: 2048 shading units, 128 TMUs, and 64 ROPs. The GPU also includes 16 dedicated RT cores for ray tracing. The pixel rate is 83.20 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 166.4 GTexel/s. In terms of raw compute, it delivers 5.325 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 10.65 TFLOPS of FP16 performance. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 58239 confirms its compute prowess, placing it in the 88th percentile. This score is nearly identical to the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT, a desktop flagship, suggesting the A570M has exceptional compute throughput for its mobile form factor, which is a key metric for GPU-accelerated rendering and compute workloads. The 75W TDP is a constraining factor for sustained clocks, but the benchmark score indicates it performs well within that envelope.

Build Overview

This configuration is a laptop build, as indicated by the buildClass field. It pairs the Intel Core i5-12500H mobile processor with the Intel Arc A570M mobile graphics chip. The combined percentile for this pairing is 82, indicating it outperforms the vast majority of systems in the database. The CPU is a 12th Gen Alder Lake-H part with a 45W TDP, and the GPU is an Alchemist-generation Arc 5 Mobile part with a 75W TDP. This is a potent combination for a mobile workstation or a high-performance gaming laptop. The system's overall tier is high, driven primarily by the GPU's 88th percentile ranking, while the CPU's 76th percentile is also respectable. This is a balanced, high-performance laptop platform that is not geared towards maximum battery life but rather towards sustained performance in demanding applications.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-12500H is a 12-core, 16-thread processor based on the Alder Lake architecture, built on Intel's 10 nm process. It has a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.50 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 18 MB of shared L3 cache. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory and provides 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes. The benchmark scores show a processor that excels in multi-threaded workloads. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 19840 is strong for a 45W mobile part, and the 3DMark max-threads score of 6043 confirms its ability to handle heavily threaded tasks.

Single-thread performance is also solid, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2801 and a 3DMark single-thread score of 924. This indicates good responsiveness in everyday tasks and games. The Passmark scores are also informative: an integer math score of 71714 and a floating-point math score of 52227 show a balanced ALU/FPU design. The data compression score of 253431 and encryption score of 14749 are high, indicating strong performance in data-heavy workloads. The CPU's average benchmark score of 22625 places it in the 76th percentile, making it a top-tier mobile processor. Its performance is statistically indistinguishable from its nearest rivals, including the Intel Core i5-13500H and the AMD Ryzen 5 7535U, with all delta percentages within 0.7%. This CPU is a versatile workhorse that provides a strong foundation for the system.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-12500H + Intel Arc A570M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-12500H

Intel Arc A570M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Upgrade Path and Platform

Balance and Bottleneck

Usage Scenarios

Who Should Build It

Benchmark Performance

FAQ

GPU Analysis

Build Overview

CPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds