SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-12500H + Intel Arc A370M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

89 Score

Top 11% Ranking

89 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 11% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

86%

GPU

93%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-12500H

22,625 Benchmark Score

Top 14% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A370M

29,175 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-12500H and Intel Arc A370M combination represents a mid-range mobile platform designed for thin-and-light laptops. The processor, a 12-core Alder Lake-H part, delivers strong multi-threaded performance for its class, while the discrete Arc GPU offers entry-level gaming and accelerated content creation capabilities. Data indicates this pairing sits at the 75th percentile overall among all laptop configurations, making it a balanced albeit not top-tier option for users seeking a single device for work and play.

FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Core i5-12500H compare to its closest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 5 135U?

A: The two processors are virtually identical in average benchmark score. The Core i5-12500H scores 22,625, while the Core Ultra 5 135U scores 22,618, resulting in a delta of 0%. This indicates that in typical mixed workloads, users should expect near-identical performance from either chip.

Q: What is the performance gap between the CPU and the AMD Ryzen 5 7535U?

A: The data shows the Core i5-12500H holds a slight edge. The Intel chip's average score of 22,625 is 0.7% higher than the Ryzen 5 7535U's score of 22,791, as indicated by a deltaPct of -0.7 for the AMD part. This difference is negligible in real-world usage.

Q: Is the Intel Arc A370M faster or slower than the AMD Radeon RX 470?

A: The Arc A370M is slightly faster. Its average benchmark score is 29,175, which is 0.6% higher than the RX 470's score of 28,996. While the RX 470 is a desktop card, the mobile Arc GPU manages to surpass it in these synthetic tests.

Q: What are the key specifications of the Intel Arc A370M's memory subsystem?

A: The GPU features 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, delivering a memory bandwidth of 112.0 GB/s. The memory clock runs at 1750 MHz, which translates to 14 Gbps effective.

Q: Does the CPU support overclocking?

A: No, the Intel Core i5-12500H has a locked multiplier (multiplierUnlocked: false). Users cannot manually overclock the processor, as is standard for mobile H-series chips.

Q: How many PCIe lanes does the CPU provide for expansion?

A: The processor provides 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes directly from the CPU. This is the total count for the processor package and is used for the primary GPU and high-speed NVMe storage.

Q: What is the production status of the Intel Arc A370M?

A: The GPU is listed as "End-of-life," while the CPU is still marked as "Active." This suggests that while the processor is still in production, the specific Arc A370M graphics chip is being phased out in favor of newer parts.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around the Intel BGA 1744 socket, which is a mobile-specific package that is soldered to the motherboard. This means the Intel Core i5-12500H is not upgradeable in a traditional sense; users cannot swap the processor for a newer or higher-tier model. The upgrade path is therefore limited to other components like memory and storage, or a full system replacement.

Memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration. This flexibility allows laptop manufacturers to choose between cost-effective DDR4 or higher-bandwidth DDR5. For users, this means the memory standard is fixed at the time of purchase, and the upgrade path is limited to increasing capacity rather than changing the memory type. The CPU itself does not support ECC memory.

For storage and expansion, the CPU offers 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes. This is sufficient for a discrete GPU and one or two Gen 4 NVMe SSDs. The Arc A370M uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, leaving the remaining lanes for storage devices. Users looking to upgrade storage can install a fast Gen 4 SSD to take advantage of the available bandwidth.

The power delivery requirement is defined by the CPU's 45W TDP and the GPU's 35W TDP. Combined, these components draw a modest amount of power, allowing for a slim laptop design with a reasonably sized power adapter. The absence of a suggested PSU rating in the data confirms that this is a mobile platform where the power supply is integrated into the laptop's design. A sensible next upgrade for a user on this platform would be to maximize memory capacity and ensure the fastest Gen 4 SSD is installed, as the CPU and GPU are soldered and cannot be changed.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A370M is based on the Xe-HPG architecture, built on TSMC's 6 nm process. The chip, designated DG2-128, contains 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1550 MHz and a boost clock of 2050 MHz, providing a substantial frequency headroom for burst workloads.

The memory configuration is a notable bottleneck for this GPU. With only 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, the 112.0 GB/s bandwidth is limited. This is a key constraint for modern games at high resolutions or with high-resolution textures. The 1024 shading units, 64 TMUs, and 32 ROPs provide a compute foundation that is capable, but the narrow memory bus will likely restrict performance in bandwidth-sensitive scenarios.

For ray tracing, the GPU includes 8 dedicated RT cores. This allows for hardware-accelerated ray tracing effects, a feature that is rare in this performance class. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with the latest graphics APIs. The pixel rate is 65.60 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 131.2 GTexel/s, which are moderate figures reflecting the GPU's entry-level positioning.

In terms of raw compute, the GPU delivers 4.198 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 8.397 TFLOPS of FP16 performance. Benchmark results show a Geekbench OpenCL score of 29,676 and a Vulkan score of 28,673. These scores place the GPU at the 74th percentile of all GPUs, indicating it performs better than the majority of graphics solutions. The nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH, scores 29,197, which is 0.1% lower, showing that the Arc A370M is competitive with established mobile graphics solutions.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data indicates a balanced platform where the CPU and GPU are well-matched for typical workloads. The CPU scores at the 76th percentile, while the GPU sits at the 74th percentile, a difference of only 2 points. This alignment means neither component will consistently dominate the other in a way that creates a severe bottleneck.

In CPU-intensive tasks like video encoding or software compilation, the Core i5-12500H's 12 cores and 16 threads will be the limiting factor. The GPU's compute capabilities are secondary in these scenarios. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 19,840 highlights the processor's strength in heavily threaded workloads, suggesting that the CPU is capable of feeding the GPU in gaming scenarios without being a significant constraint.

In GPU-intensive tasks like gaming at high resolutions or 3D rendering, the Arc A370M will be the limiting factor. The GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth are modest, and the FP32 performance of 4.198 TFLOPS is adequate for 1080p gaming but may struggle with higher settings. The CPU's strong single-thread performance, evidenced by a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2,801, ensures that it can handle game logic and physics without holding back the GPU.

The data shows no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination. Therefore, all FPS estimates must be derived from the benchmark scores. The CPU's 3DMark single-thread score of 924 and the GPU's Vulkan score of 28,673 suggest that in lightly-threaded games, the GPU will be the primary constraint. In multi-threaded games that utilize more cores, the CPU's 3DMark 16-thread score of 5,954 shows it has ample headroom to maintain high frame rates. The overall picture is one of equilibrium, where the platform performs as a cohesive unit rather than one component dragging the other down.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, this pairing is best suited for esports titles and older games at 1080p. The Arc A370M's 4.198 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is sufficient for these lighter workloads, while the CPU's strong single-thread score of 924 in 3DMark ensures high frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios. Players should expect smooth performance in competitive titles, though settings may need to be adjusted for more demanding AAA games.

Streaming is a viable use case thanks to the CPU's multi-threading capabilities. The 12 cores and 16 threads, combined with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 19,840, provide enough processing power to handle game encoding and streaming software simultaneously. The GPU's support for modern APIs like DirectX 12 Ultimate ensures compatibility with streaming tools.

Video editing is a strong suit for this platform. The CPU's high multi-threaded performance in Cinebench R20 (8,332) and R23 (19,840) accelerates timeline rendering and export tasks. The GPU's 8.397 TFLOPS of FP16 performance can also assist with effects and color grading, though the 4 GB VRAM may limit complex compositions.

3D rendering performance is primarily driven by the CPU. The Passmark integer math score of 71,714 and floating-point math score of 52,227 indicate robust processing power for ray tracing and rendering calculations. The GPU can contribute via OpenCL, as evidenced by its Geekbench score of 29,676, but the CPU will be the primary workhorse.

Software development benefits from the CPU's high core count and strong multi-threaded scores. The Passmark multi-thread score of 20,625 and data compression score of 253,431 show that compiling code and running virtual machines will be responsive. The GPU is less critical here, but its Vulkan support is useful for graphics programming.

For student and office work, this platform is overqualified. The CPU's single-thread score of 3,418 in Passmark ensures snappy application loading and productivity tasks. The integrated Iris Xe 80EU graphics provide a backup if the discrete GPU is not active, and the overall 75th percentile ranking means this system will handle any office workload with ease.

Who Should Build It

This platform targets mobile users who need a single laptop for both productivity and light gaming. The CPU's 76th percentile ranking makes it suitable for students and professionals in engineering, software development, and content creation, where multi-threaded performance is valued. The Cinebench R23 score of 19,840 and Passmark multi-thread score of 20,625 demonstrate capability in these fields.

Gamers at 1080p who play esports titles or older AAA games will find the Arc A370M sufficient. The GPU's 74th percentile ranking and Vulkan score of 28,673 show it can handle competitive gaming. However, users seeking to play the latest AAA titles at high settings will need to look at higher-tier GPUs.

Content creators who work with video and photo editing will benefit from the CPU's strong multi-core performance. The Passmark integer math score of 71,714 and extended instructions score of 14,965 support these workloads. The GPU's 4 GB VRAM is a limiting factor for large textures, but it is adequate for most editing tasks.

Small business workstations that require reliable multi-threaded performance for spreadsheets, databases, and office applications will find this platform capable. The CPU's Passmark data compression score of 253,431 indicates fast file operations. The platform's 75th overall percentile ensures it is above average for general business use.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-12500H is built on the Alder Lake architecture, specifically the Alder Lake-H variant, and is fabricated on Intel's 10 nm process. The chip features a hybrid architecture with 12 cores and 16 threads, a configuration that combines performance and efficiency cores. The base clock is 2.50 GHz, with a boost clock of 4.50 GHz, allowing for significant frequency scaling under load.

The cache hierarchy consists of 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, and 18 MB of shared L3 cache. This cache configuration is designed to provide low-latency access to frequently used data. The processor has a TDP of 45W, which is standard for H-series mobile chips, and uses the Intel BGA 1744 socket. The die size is 217 mm², and the process node is 10 nm.

Benchmark results show the CPU's strengths. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 19,840 is strong for a 45W mobile chip, indicating excellent sustained performance in heavily threaded workloads. The single-core score of 2,801 in the same test is also competitive, showing strong per-thread performance. The 3DMark scores scale predictably with thread count: 1,773 for 2 threads, 3,139 for 4 threads, and 5,954 for 16 threads, demonstrating good scaling.

The Passmark suite reveals specific workload characteristics. The data encryption score of 14,749 and extended instructions score of 14,965 show solid performance in security and SIMD tasks. The floating-point math score of 52,227 and integer math score of 71,714 indicate robust number-crunching ability. The find prime numbers score of 57 is a weaker point, which is a common trait for processors with this architecture. The average benchmark score of 22,625 places the CPU at the 76th percentile, making it better than three-quarters of all CPUs in the database.

Build Overview

This is a laptop platform (buildClass: "laptop") combining the Intel Core i5-12500H processor with the Intel Arc A370M discrete GPU. The CPU is a 12-core, 16-thread Alder Lake-H processor with a 45W TDP, while the GPU is an entry-level 35W part based on the Xe-HPG architecture. Both components are from Intel, creating a cohesive platform from a single vendor.

The platform sits at the 75th percentile overall (combinedPercentile: 75), which places it in the upper-middle tier of laptop configurations. This is a mainstream offering that balances CPU and GPU performance for a wide range of tasks. The CPU's 76th percentile and GPU's 74th percentile are closely aligned, indicating a well-balanced system.

The GPU is listed as "End-of-life" production status, while the CPU is "Active," suggesting this may be a transitional platform. The launch date for the GPU is March 29, 2022, and it uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface. The system is designed for users who need a versatile laptop that can handle productivity, content creation, and light gaming without requiring a desktop-class power envelope.

Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core i5-12500H achieves an average benchmark score of 22,625, placing it at the 76th percentile of all CPUs. The most representative scores include Cinebench R23 multi-core at 19,840 and single-core at 2,801, alongside Passmark multi-thread at 20,625 and single-thread at 3,418. The CPU's nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 5 135U, scores 22,618, a negligible 0% difference, while the Intel Core i7-1270P scores 22,502, putting the i5-12500H 0.5% ahead.

The Intel Arc A370M achieves an average benchmark score of 29,175, placing it at the 74th percentile of all GPUs. Its Geekbench OpenCL score is 29,676, and its Vulkan score is 28,673. The nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH, scores 29,197, which is 0.1% higher than the Arc A370M. The AMD Radeon RX 470 scores 28,996, putting the Arc A370M 0.6% ahead.

The combined picture shows a platform where the CPU and GPU are nearly equal in their percentile rankings. The CPU's 76th percentile and GPU's 74th percentile indicate that neither component is a significant outlier. In terms of actual workload performance, the CPU's strong multi-threaded scores suggest it can handle demanding productivity tasks, while the GPU's compute capabilities allow for entry-level gaming and GPU-accelerated effects. The lack of measured FPS data for this specific combination means performance estimates are derived from these synthetic benchmarks, which correlate well with real-world applications but do not represent a direct measurement of gaming frame rates.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-12500H + Intel Arc A370M

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-12500H

Intel Arc A370M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

FAQ

Upgrade Path and Platform

GPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Usage Scenarios

Who Should Build It

CPU Analysis

Build Overview

Benchmark Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds