SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-12500H + Intel Arc A350M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

89 Score

Top 11% Ranking

89 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 11% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

86%

GPU

92%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-12500H

22,625 Benchmark Score

Top 14% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A350M

24,647 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-12500H paired with the Intel Arc A350M is a laptop-class build that combines a 12-core Alder Lake-H processor with an entry-level Alchemist GPU. The combined benchmark percentile of 73 places it above most systems, yet the data for this exact combination contains no measured FPS rows, so all gaming performance discussed here is estimated from the CPU and GPU scores alone. The CPU sits at the 76th percentile among all processors, while the GPU ranks at the 70th percentile, indicating a slight CPU advantage in relative standing. That imbalance, along with the GPU's modest 4 GB of VRAM and 64-bit memory bus, shapes every workload verdict that follows.

Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU's average benchmark score of 22625 is nearly identical to its closest rivals: the Intel Core Ultra 5 135U (22618, delta 0%), the Core i7-1270P (22502, +0.5%), and the Core i5-13500H (22468, +0.7%), while the AMD Ryzen 5 7535U (22791) is 0.7% ahead. In contrast, the Arc A350M's average score of 24647 is 0.4% behind the Radeon RX 590, 0.5% behind the RTX A5000 Mobile, 0.8% ahead of the RX 6600 XT, and 1.5% ahead of the GTX 1630. The CPU's 76th percentile versus the GPU's 70th percentile means the processor is relatively stronger in its own market segment than the graphics card is in its own. For CPU-bound tasks—compilation, physics, integer math—the i5-12500H will not bottleneck the system. For gaming, the GPU becomes the limiting factor at 1080p and above, especially when texture quality or resolution demands more than 4 GB of VRAM. The GPU's 3.379 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 112 GB/s of memory bandwidth are modest for a 2023 laptop, and the 64-bit bus further restricts data throughput. The CPU's single-thread performance (3DMark single-thread 924, Cinebench R23 single-core 2801) is strong enough to feed the GPU in most scenarios, but the GPU will cap frame rates in demanding titles. In mixed workloads like video editing, the balance shifts: the CPU's 16 threads handle timeline and encoding, while the GPU accelerates effects and export, but the GPU's 4 GB capacity may limit project complexity.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The i5-12500H is soldered onto a BGA 1744 socket, making CPU upgrades impossible in a typical laptop chassis. Memory support is dual-channel DDR4 or DDR5, but the exact slot configuration is not specified; users can potentially upgrade RAM if the laptop allows. The CPU offers 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes, while the Arc A350M connects via PCIe 4.0 x8, leaving headroom for a more powerful GPU in a hypothetical custom build, but the laptop form factor prevents such changes. The GPU itself is marked end-of-life in the fact pack, so future driver support and availability may be limited. The CPU's 45 W TDP and the GPU's 25 W TDP together suggest a modest power envelope, but no suggested PSU figure is provided—so we cannot comment on power supply headroom. A sensible upgrade path would be to increase memory capacity to the maximum supported (though the maximum is not listed) and to ensure storage is NVMe-based, as the platform supports PCIe Gen 4. Because the CPU is not socketed, the only meaningful hardware changes are RAM and storage, both of which are user-accessible in many laptops. The absence of a launch MSRP for either component means pricing cannot be assessed, but the platform's performance class is clear from the benchmark percentiles.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The CPU's single-thread scores (3DMark single-thread 924, Cinebench R23 single-core 2801) are competitive, but the Arc A350M's 70th-percentile rank and 4 GB VRAM will cap frame rates at 1080p. Expect smooth performance at medium settings, but not the 144 Hz-plus levels typically associated with high-refresh panels. The GPU's 3.4 TFLOPS is roughly half of what a desktop RX 6600 XT delivers, so the system is better suited to 60 Hz displays.

Streaming: With 16 threads, the CPU can handle software encoding while gaming, though the Arc GPU does not list dedicated encoder data. The CPU's Passmark multithread score of 20625 and Cinebench R23 multi-core of 19840 indicate it can encode 1080p60 without overwhelming the system. The GPU's Vulkan score of 24747 suggests it can assist with some compute tasks, but the 4 GB VRAM may limit overlay quality.

Video Editing: The CPU's strong multicore performance (Cinebench R20 multi 8332, R23 multi 19840) handles timeline scrubbing and export. The GPU's OpenCL score of 24546 accelerates effects and rendering. However, 4 GB VRAM is below the 8 GB recommended for 4K editing, so projects must be kept to 1080p or use proxy workflows.

3D Rendering: The CPU's 12 cores and 16 threads excel in CPU-based renderers like Blender Cycles, where the R23 multi-core score of 19840 is competitive. The GPU's 3.379 TFLOPS and 6 RT cores can assist in GPU-accelerated ray tracing, but its 4 GB VRAM will limit scene complexity. For large scenes, the CPU is the primary render engine.

Software Development: The CPU's high integer math score (Passmark 71714) and data compression score (253431) indicate fast compilation and build times. The 16 threads allow parallel builds. The GPU is not a bottleneck in development, as most tools are CPU-bound. The system is well-suited for running IDEs, containers, and local tests.

Student and Office Work: The CPU's single-thread score of 3418 (Passmark) and 3DMark 2-thread 1773 ensure snappy responsiveness in spreadsheets and web browsers. The GPU is irrelevant for this workload, but its low power draw (25 W) helps battery life. The system is portable, and the CPU's 12 cores handle multitasking.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. All gaming expectations are therefore estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The CPU's 76th percentile ranking and the GPU's 70th percentile suggest a system that is capable of 1080p gaming at medium to high settings in most titles, but not at high refresh rates. The GPU's 4 GB VRAM is the primary constraint; it will fail to load textures for 1440p or 4K in modern games, and even at 1080p, some titles with large assets may hit the 4 GB ceiling. The 3.4 TFLOPS and 112 GB/s bandwidth are comparable to a desktop GTX 1650-class card, so frame rates would likely fall between 30 and 60 FPS at ultra settings in recent releases, with better performance in e-sports titles. The CPU, with its strong single-thread score, will not be a limiting factor in most games. For competitive games like CS2 or Valorant, the CPU can push high FPS, but the GPU will still cap at around 60–80 FPS at 1080p low. The data does not support any specific FPS figures, so this is a qualitative estimate.

Who Should Build It

This build targets laptop users who need a balanced system for CPU-heavy tasks and moderate gaming. The 76th-percentile CPU is ideal for developers and students who compile code, run virtual machines, or work with large datasets. The 70th-percentile GPU is suitable for casual gamers who play at 1080p with medium settings, and for content creators who occasionally edit video or render 3D scenes but do not require 4K workflows. The 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit bus make it unsuitable for 1440p gaming or professional 3D rendering. The system also fits small business workstations where the CPU's 16 threads handle spreadsheet and database tasks, and the GPU can accelerate office graphics or simple design software. For gamers aiming at high refresh rates or 1440p, this pairing is not adequate; they should consider a higher-tier GPU. For students, the CPU's single-thread performance and low GPU power draw provide a responsive and battery-friendly machine.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's socket type?

A: The Intel Core i5-12500H uses the Intel BGA 1744 socket, which is soldered and not upgradeable.

Q: What memory types does the CPU support?

A: It supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5, but not both simultaneously; the exact configuration depends on the laptop motherboard.

Q: What is the GPU's memory capacity and type?

A: The Arc A350M has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory with a 64-bit bus and 112 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile is 73, indicating performance above the average laptop.

Q: Does this GPU support ray tracing?

A: The Arc A350M has 6 RT cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, so it can execute hardware-accelerated ray tracing, but the 4 GB VRAM limits the scope.

Q: What is the CPU's TDP?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 45 W, while the GPU has a TDP of 25 W.

Q: Is the GPU still in production?

A: The Arc A350M is marked as End-of-life, meaning its production status is no longer active.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-12500H is a 12-core, 16-thread processor based on the Alder Lake architecture, manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process. It has a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.50 GHz, with a TDP of 45 W. The cache layout includes 80 KB L1 per core, 1.25 MB L2 per core, and 18 MB of shared L3. It supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory, and its PCIe Gen 4 interface provides 20 lanes (CPU only). The integrated graphics is Intel Iris Xe with 80 execution units, though the discrete GPU handles graphics duties.

The benchmark scores show a CPU that is strong in both single-thread and multi-thread workloads. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 19840 is 76th percentile, while the single-core score of 2801 is also competitive. The 3DMark scores scale with thread count: 2 threads 1773, 4 threads 3139, 8 threads 4394, 16 threads 5954, and max threads 6043. This scaling indicates good thread efficiency, and the max-thread score is only slightly higher than the 16-thread score, showing that the 16 threads are the full use case. The PassMark integer math score of 71714 and floating-point math of 52227 highlight strong arithmetic throughput, while the data compression score of 253431 is exceptionally high for a mobile CPU, suggesting excellent memory and cache behavior. The extended instruction score of 14965 reflects AVX2 and other SIMD capabilities. The CPU's average benchmark score of 22625 places it within 0.7% of its closest rival, the Core i5-13500H, and 0.5% behind the i7-1270P, indicating that this CPU is essentially at the top of its performance band.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build (buildClass: "laptop") combining a high-end mobile CPU with an entry-level mobile GPU. The CPU is a 12th Gen Core i5 from the Alder Lake-H series, and the GPU is an Intel Arc A350M, which is the smallest die (DG2-128) in the Arc 3 Mobile family. The combined percentile of 73 indicates that this system outperforms 73% of all other CPU+GPU pairings in the database. The CPU is more powerful relative to its peer group than the GPU, as shown by the 76th vs. 70th percentiles. This is a pairing that favours CPU-heavy workloads, such as compiling, office tasks, and light content creation, rather than GPU-bound gaming. The GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit memory bus are modest, and its production status is end-of-life, so this is not a future-proof platform. The system's overall tier is mid-range among laptops, with the CPU carrying the performance weight.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 22625, with a percentile of 76. Its nearest rivals include the Core Ultra 5 135U (22618, 0% delta), the Core i7-1270P (22502, +0.5%), and the Core i5-13500H (22468, +0.7%), while the Ryzen 5 7535U is 0.7% slower. The GPU's average benchmark score is 24647, with a percentile of 70. Its nearest rivals are the Radeon RX 590 (24744, -0.4% delta), the RTX A5000 Mobile (24763, -0.5%), the RX 6600 XT (24442, +0.8%), and the GTX 1630 (24277, +1.5%). The GPU scores 24546 in Geekbench OpenCL and 24747 in Vulkan. The combined percentile is 73, reflecting the CPU's slight dominance. In real terms, the CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 19840 is about 12% higher than the GPU's average benchmark score, but the GPU's 70th percentile shows it is still above average. The CPU's PassMark multithread score of 20625 and single-thread score of 3418 are consistent with its 76th percentile. The combined picture is a system that excels in CPU-heavy tasks, while the GPU offers 1080p gaming capability at medium settings, but with a limited memory capacity that will restrict high-resolution and high-texture workloads. The data does not include measured FPS, so all gaming conclusions are estimates based on the relative performance of the CPU and GPU.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-12500H + Intel Arc A350M

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-12500H

Intel Arc A350M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Balance and Bottleneck

Upgrade Path and Platform

Usage Scenarios

Gaming Performance

Who Should Build It

FAQ

CPU Analysis

Build Overview

Benchmark Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds