SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-12450HX + Intel Arc A570M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

91 Score

Top 9% Ranking

91 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

86%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-12450HX

24,576 Benchmark Score

Top 14% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A570M

58,239 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis — Intel Core i5-12450HX

The Intel Core i5-12450HX is a mobile processor built on the Alder Lake-HX architecture, fabricated on Intel's 10 nm process node. It features 8 cores and 12 threads, with a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 4.40 GHz. The chip carries a 55 W TDP and is designed for the Intel BGA 1964 socket, indicating its primary deployment in high-performance laptops and mobile workstations.

The cache hierarchy is substantial: 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 12 MB L3 pool. This configuration, paired with dual-channel DDR4 or DDR5 memory support, positions the CPU for sustained multi-threaded workloads. The processor also includes integrated UHD Graphics 710, a basic iGPU that handles display output and light tasks without burdening the discrete GPU.

Benchmark results paint a clear picture of the CPU's capabilities. In Cinebench R23, the processor scores 11,390 in multi-core and 2,119 in single-core. The multi-core score suggests strong throughput for rendering and compilation tasks, while the single-core score is respectable for daily responsiveness and lightly-threaded applications. Cinebench R20 results (6,304 multi-core, 889 single-core) and R15 results (1,512 multi-core, 213 single-core) follow the same pattern, confirming consistent scaling across workload intensities.

PassMark results add further depth. The multi-thread score of 18,274 indicates solid parallel performance, while the single-thread score of 3,340 shows competitive per-core efficiency. Data compression scores 219,707, and data encryption hits 12,110, suggesting the CPU handles archival, database, and security-related tasks with ease. Integer math (57,189) and floating-point math (43,126) scores reveal balanced arithmetic capability, while extended instructions (13,832) and random string sorting (23,306) point to practical strength in data processing and sorting algorithms.

The CPU sits at the 77th percentile among all processors in the database. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core i5-11600 (average score 24,563, delta 0.1%), the AMD EPYC 9654P (24,465, delta 0.5%), the AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D (24,709, delta -0.5%), and the AMD Ryzen 5 7600X3D (24,728, delta -0.6%). These deltas, all under 1%, indicate the i5-12450HX is squarely in a competitive tier with these desktop-class chips, despite being a mobile part. The average benchmark score of 24,576 places it within striking distance of the EPYC 9654P, a server-grade processor, which underscores the i5-12450HX's surprising efficiency for its class.

For real workloads, the data suggests the CPU excels in multi-threaded rendering, video encoding, and software compilation where all 12 threads can be utilized. The single-core performance, while not top-tier, is more than adequate for web browsing, office applications, and light coding tasks. The 8-core, 12-thread configuration is notable: it balances core count for parallel tasks with a reasonable thread count for power management in a mobile chassis.

# GPU Analysis — Intel Arc A570M

The Intel Arc A570M is a mobile discrete GPU based on the Xe-HPG architecture, built on TSMC's 6 nm process node. The chip, designated DG2-256, contains 11,500 million transistors on a 269 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 42.8 million per mm². This is a modern, power-efficient design aimed at mainstream mobile gaming and content creation.

Memory configuration is 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, delivering 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock runs at 1750 MHz, translating to 14 Gbps effective. This bandwidth is adequate for 1080p gaming and mid-range rendering tasks, though it may become a limiting factor at higher resolutions or with texture-heavy workloads.

The GPU core operates at a base clock of 900 MHz with a boost clock of 1300 MHz. It packs 2,048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 raster output units. The pixel rate is 83.20 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 166.4 GTexel/s. Floating-point performance is rated at 5.325 TFLOPS for FP32 and 10.65 TFLOPS for FP16 (at a 2:1 ratio). The GPU includes 16 ray tracing cores, though tensor core counts are not specified in the data. The TDP is 75 W, and the bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8, which is typical for mobile discrete GPUs. API support includes DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern game engines and professional applications.

The only benchmark score available is Geekbench OpenCL, where the GPU achieves 58,239. This places it at the 88th percentile among all GPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT (average score 58,392, delta -0.3%), the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM (58,085, delta 0.3%), the NVIDIA P102-100 (58,528, delta -0.5%), and the AMD Radeon PRO V710 (58,657, delta -0.7%). The deltas here are again minimal, all within 0.7%, suggesting the Arc A570M performs on par with these desktop GPUs in compute workloads. This is remarkable for a 75 W mobile part, as the RX 6950 XT is a high-end desktop card with a much higher power envelope.

For rendering and compute, the FP32 throughput of 5.325 TFLOPS and the 16 RT cores indicate the GPU can handle real-time ray tracing at modest settings and accelerate 3D rendering in applications that leverage these features. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for most 1080p game assets and mid-sized projects in Blender or similar tools. The 224 GB/s bandwidth, while not exceptional, supports smooth texture streaming and frame buffer operations at mainstream resolutions.

# Benchmark Performance

The combined picture from the benchmark data is one of strong, balanced performance. The CPU's average benchmark score of 24,576 places it at the 77th percentile, while the GPU's Geekbench OpenCL score of 58,239 places it at the 88th percentile. The combined percentile for this build is 83, indicating that pairing these two components yields a system that outperforms the vast majority of configurations in the database.

The CPU's nearest rival, the Intel Core i5-11600, scores 24,563 on average, a delta of just 0.1%. This means the i5-12450HX essentially matches a desktop i5-11600 in overall CPU benchmarks, despite being a mobile chip. The AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D sits slightly higher at 24,709 (-0.5% delta), and the Ryzen 5 7600X3D at 24,728 (-0.6% delta). The AMD EPYC 9654P, a data center processor, scores 24,465 (0.5% delta), which is only marginally lower. These comparisons highlight that the i5-12450HX delivers desktop-comparable compute in a mobile form factor.

On the GPU side, the Arc A570M's score of 58,239 is within 0.3% of the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT (58,392), a flagship desktop GPU from a previous generation. The delta against the RX 5600 OEM (58,085) is 0.3%, and against the NVIDIA P102-100 (58,528) it is -0.5%. The Radeon PRO V710 (58,657) leads by 0.7%. These tiny deltas suggest the Arc A570M delivers compute performance that rivals or exceeds these established desktop parts, which is exceptional for a 75 W mobile GPU.

The combined percentile of 83 means this laptop configuration outperforms 83% of all recorded systems in the database. The CPU and GPU are both above the 75th percentile individually, and together they create a system that is well-suited for demanding tasks. The data indicates no single component is a weak link; both deliver performance that exceeds their respective mobile-class expectations.

# Who Should Build It

This configuration targets users who need desktop-class performance in a portable chassis. The CPU's 77th percentile and GPU's 88th percentile scores mean the system handles a wide range of tasks without compromise. Gamers playing at 1080p will benefit from the GPU's compute strength, as the Arc A570M's 8 GB VRAM and 224 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for modern titles at high settings, though exact frame rates are not measured in this data.

Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will find the 8-core, 12-thread CPU and the GPU's 5.325 TFLOPS FP32 performance well-matched. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 11,390 indicates strong rendering throughput, while the GPU's OpenCL score of 58,239 suggests it can accelerate GPU-accelerated effects and exports. Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the multi-threaded integer math score of 57,189, which indicates efficient parallel compilation.

Students and small business workstations that run office suites, web applications, and light data analysis will find the single-thread score of 3,340 (PassMark) more than adequate for responsive daily use. The CPU's data encryption score of 12,110 also supports secure file handling and VPN workloads. This is not a budget build, but the launch MSRP of $284 for the CPU alone (GPU has no listed MSRP) signals a premium mid-range positioning. The target user is someone who demands performance across a spectrum of applications without the bulk or power draw of a full desktop system.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a well-balanced pairing, but the bottleneck profile varies by workload. The CPU's 77th percentile and GPU's 88th percentile indicate the GPU is the stronger component relative to its peers. In CPU-bound tasks like software compilation or single-threaded applications, the CPU will be the limiting factor, as its single-thread score of 3,340 (PassMark) is lower than the GPU's relative standing.

Conversely, in GPU-bound workloads like 3D rendering or machine learning inference, the GPU's 5.325 TFLOPS and 16 RT cores provide ample compute, but the CPU must feed it data. The CPU's 12 MB L3 cache and dual-channel memory support help maintain data flow, but the PCIe 4.0 x8 interface for the GPU is half the bandwidth of a x16 slot. This could introduce a minor bottleneck for data-intensive GPU tasks, though the practical impact is likely small given the GPU's performance class.

The memory bandwidth of 224 GB/s on the GPU is a potential constraint at higher resolutions or with demanding textures. The CPU's memory bandwidth is not specified, but dual-channel DDR4 or DDR5 support is standard for this class. The 55 W CPU TDP and 75 W GPU TDP create a combined thermal envelope that is manageable in a laptop, but sustained multi-threaded loads may trigger thermal throttling in thinner chassis designs. The FPS scaling, while not measured, would likely show the GPU as the primary limiter at 1440p or above, while at 1080p the CPU's multi-thread performance keeps pace.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The GPU's 88th percentile score and 8 GB VRAM suggest the system can drive 1080p displays at high refresh rates in most titles. The CPU's single-thread score of 2,119 (Cinebench R23) ensures game logic and physics calculations do not bottleneck the frame rate. Exact FPS figures are not measured, but the component scores indicate a capable 1080p high-refresh experience.

Streaming: The CPU's 8 cores and 12 threads provide headroom for encoding while gaming. The multi-thread score of 18,274 (PassMark) indicates the CPU can handle simultaneous game and encode workloads without significant frame drops. The GPU's 16 RT cores and modern API support (DirectX 12 Ultimate) also enable hardware-accelerated encoding if the software supports it.

Video editing: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 11,390 and the GPU's OpenCL score of 58,239 combine for strong timeline performance. 4K timeline scrubbing and export tasks will benefit from the 12 threads and 8 GB VRAM for effect caching. The data compression score of 219,707 also aids in efficient file handling.

3D rendering: The CPU's multi-thread performance is solid for CPU-based renderers, while the GPU's FP32 throughput of 5.325 TFLOPS supports GPU-accelerated renderers like Blender Cycles. The 16 RT cores provide hardware ray tracing acceleration, and the 8 GB VRAM handles moderate scene sizes.

Software development: The CPU's integer math score of 57,189 and extended instructions score of 13,832 indicate strong compile performance. Parallel builds will use all 12 threads effectively, and the single-thread score ensures responsive IDE interactions.

Student and office work: The CPU's single-thread score of 3,340 (PassMark) and the GPU's 2,048 shading units provide smooth performance for web browsing, document editing, and spreadsheet analysis. The system is overkill for these tasks but offers headroom for future workloads.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket, which is a soldered mobile platform, meaning the processor is not upgradable in a traditional sense. Users are locked into the CPU choice for the life of the laptop. The GPU, also a mobile part (slot width is "IGP"), is similarly non-upgradable. This is a sealed platform, so upgrades are limited to memory and storage.

Memory support includes DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel mode, allowing users to maximize bandwidth with two modules. PCIe Gen 5 is available with 20 lanes from the CPU, providing high-speed connectivity for NVMe SSDs and other peripherals. The GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x8, which is compatible with the CPU's Gen 5 lanes but operates at Gen 4 speeds.

The CPU's TDP is 55 W, and the GPU's TDP is 75 W, for a combined 130 W. There is no suggested PSU listed, but this total power draw is typical for a mid-range gaming laptop and does not require an external power brick beyond what is supplied. A sensible next upgrade, given the platform constraints, is to maximize RAM capacity and install the fastest NVMe SSD supported. For users seeking more performance, the only path is a new laptop with a higher-tier CPU and GPU, as both components are soldered and non-swappable.

# FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread count?

A: The Intel Core i5-12450HX has 8 cores and 12 threads, with a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 4.40 GHz.

Q: How much VRAM does the Intel Arc A570M have?

A: The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s.

Q: What is the CPU's benchmark percentile?

A: The CPU sits at the 77th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 24,576.

Q: What is the GPU's benchmark percentile?

A: The GPU is at the 88th percentile among all GPUs, with a Geekbench OpenCL score of 58,239.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: No, the CPU does not support ECC memory. It supports DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel mode.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile is 83, indicating the system outperforms 83% of all configurations in the database.

Q: What ray tracing hardware does the GPU have?

A: The GPU has 16 ray tracing cores, and it supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing in compatible games.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU-GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows, so all frame rate figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The GPU's 88th percentile OpenCL score and 8 GB VRAM suggest strong 1080p performance, while the CPU's 77th percentile multi-thread score ensures minimal bottleneck in most titles.

At 1080p with ultra settings, the system likely delivers smooth frame rates in esports titles like Counter-Strike 2 or Valorant, given the GPU's 5.325 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and the CPU's 4.40 GHz boost clock. For AAA titles at 1080p ultra, the 8 GB VRAM and 224 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for current games, though very demanding titles may require settings adjustments. At 1440p, the GPU's compute power may become the limiting factor, with frame rates dropping below the 1080p experience. The CPU's single-thread score of 2,119 (Cinebench R23) supports high-refresh gaming at 1080p in CPU-bound titles.

For ray tracing workloads, the 16 RT cores provide hardware acceleration, but the 75 W TDP limits sustained performance. Users should expect playable ray tracing at 1080p with upscaling enabled, but not at native 1440p with high ray tracing settings. These are estimates; actual frame rates vary by game, driver, and cooling solution. The component scores indicate a capable 1080p gaming machine, but users seeking maximum frame rates at higher resolutions should look to higher-tier GPUs.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-12450HX + Intel Arc A570M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-12450HX

Intel Arc A570M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds