SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-12450HX + Intel Arc A370M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

90 Score

Top 10% Ranking

90 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

86%

GPU

93%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-12450HX

24,576 Benchmark Score

Top 14% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A370M

29,175 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-12450HX and Intel Arc A370M pairing represents a balanced mobile platform aimed at mainstream laptop users. The CPU is a capable 8-core, 12-thread Alder Lake-HX processor that delivers strong multi-threaded performance for its class, while the GPU is an entry-level Arc 3 solution with modern features like ray tracing and DirectX 12 Ultimate support. The benchmark data indicates a system positioned at the 76th combined percentile, suggesting a tier above entry-level but below enthusiast territory. The CPU’s 77th percentile ranking is its strongest asset, while the GPU’s 74th percentile confirms it is a competent, though not high-end, graphics solution.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-12450HX is an 8-core, 12-thread processor built on the Alder Lake architecture and fabricated on Intel’s 10 nm process node. It has a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 4.40 GHz, with a 55 W TDP. This is a mobile chip using the Intel BGA 1964 socket, and it supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 12 MB L3 cache. The CPU also features integrated UHD Graphics 710, though the discrete GPU handles rendering tasks.

Benchmark results show a processor that is strong in multi-threaded workloads but less exceptional in single-threaded tasks. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 11390 in multi-core and 2119 in single-core. The multi-core score is roughly 5.4 times the single-core score, which highlights the efficiency of its hybrid core design when all threads are utilized. The Cinebench R20 scores follow a similar pattern: 6304 multi-core versus 889 single-core. The PassMark suite reinforces this, with a multithread score of 18274 and a single-thread score of 3340.

Real-world implications are clear for content creation. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 11390 suggests the chip can handle video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation with reasonable efficiency for a laptop processor. The PassMark data compression score of 219707 and floating-point math score of 43126 indicate solid performance in data-heavy tasks like file archiving and scientific calculations. However, the single-thread score of 3340 in PassMark and 2119 in Cinebench R23 place it below top-tier desktop chips, meaning tasks like spreadsheet calculations or web browsing will be responsive but not class-leading.

The CPU’s 77th percentile ranking against all CPUs places it in the upper quartile, and its average benchmark score of 24576 is remarkably close to its nearest rivals. It sits nearly identical to the Intel Core i5-11600 with a delta of just 0.1%, and it is only 0.5% behind the AMD EPYC 9654P and 0.5% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D. This suggests that despite being a mobile chip, the 12450HX delivers performance comparable to recent desktop mid-range processors in aggregate benchmarks, though power characteristics differ significantly.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the CPU and GPU in this laptop is heavily workload-dependent. The CPU scores at the 77th percentile, while the GPU sits at the 74th percentile, indicating a slight CPU advantage in raw compute capability relative to their respective pools. This near-parity suggests the system is well-matched for most tasks, but the nature of the bottleneck shifts based on the application.

In CPU-intensive workloads like 3D rendering or video encoding, the processor will be the primary driver. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 11390 demonstrates strong sustained throughput, and the PassMark multithread score of 18274 confirms that the CPU can push through parallel tasks. Here, the GPU sits idle, and the CPU becomes the limiting factor for overall system speed.

Conversely, in gaming at high resolutions, the GPU is typically the constraint. The Arc A370M has a 4 GB GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus with 112.0 GB/s bandwidth, which is a modest configuration. Its FP32 throughput of 4.198 TFLOPS is entry-level, so the GPU will limit frame rates in graphics-heavy titles. The CPU’s single-thread performance, while not top-tier, is sufficient to feed the GPU in most scenarios, so the bottleneck will primarily be the graphics card.

The combined percentile of 76 indicates a system that avoids severe imbalance. When the GPU is stressed, the CPU can keep up with the demands of frame generation. When the CPU is loaded, the GPU is not holding it back. The lack of measured FPS data makes precise bottleneck quantification impossible, but the percentile delta of 3 points between CPU and GPU suggests a harmonious pairing where neither component consistently drags the other down.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s multi-core performance compared to its nearest rivals?

A: The Core i5-12450HX has an average benchmark score of 24576, which is 0.1% higher than the Intel Core i5-11600 and 0.5% higher than the AMD EPYC 9654P. It is 0.5% lower than the AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D and 0.6% lower than the AMD Ryzen 5 7600X3D.

Q: Does the GPU support hardware ray tracing?

A: Yes, the Intel Arc A370M includes 8 dedicated ray tracing cores, and it supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), which enables hardware-accelerated ray tracing in compatible games.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory bandwidth?

A: The GPU has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing a total bandwidth of 112.0 GB/s. The memory clock runs at 1750 MHz with 14 Gbps effective speed.

Q: Is the CPU overclocking capable?

A: Yes, the multiplier is unlocked, which allows for overclocking on supported motherboards. However, as a mobile processor, overclocking is typically limited by laptop thermal and power delivery designs.

Q: How does the GPU compare to the AMD Radeon RX 470?

A: The Arc A370M has an average benchmark score of 29175, which is 0.6% higher than the RX 470’s score of 28996. This indicates nearly identical aggregate performance.

Q: What is the CPU’s socket type?

A: The CPU uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket, which is a ball-grid array design soldered directly to the motherboard, meaning it is not user-replaceable in most laptops.

Q: What is the memory support for the CPU?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The specific memory type depends on the laptop motherboard design.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination, as the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for any game or resolution. Therefore, all frame rate expectations below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations rather than tested results.

The Intel Arc A370M’s 74th percentile ranking, with an average benchmark score of 29175, places it in the same performance class as the AMD Radeon RX 470 (0.6% lower) and the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH (0.1% lower). These are entry-level discrete GPUs that were designed for 1080p gaming at medium to high settings in older titles, or low to medium settings in modern AAA releases.

At 1080p resolution, the GPU’s FP32 throughput of 4.198 TFLOPS and 112.0 GB/s memory bandwidth suggest it can handle esports titles like competitive shooters and MOBAs at high frame rates, potentially exceeding 60 FPS on medium settings. For more demanding games, the 4 GB VRAM capacity may become a limiting factor at higher texture quality settings, and the 64-bit memory bus will restrict performance in bandwidth-heavy scenarios.

The CPU’s single-thread score of 3340 in PassMark is adequate for gaming, ensuring that the processor will not be the primary bottleneck in most titles. The 12 threads provide enough parallelism for modern game engines that utilize more than 8 threads. At 1440p, the GPU will struggle to maintain high frame rates in demanding titles, and 4K gaming is not recommended given the memory bandwidth and compute limitations.

Who Should Build It

This laptop configuration targets mainstream users who need a well-rounded machine for both productivity and light gaming. The CPU’s 77th percentile ranking makes it suitable for content creators who work with video editing or 3D modeling, as the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 11390 provides solid rendering performance for a mobile chip.

Students and small business professionals will find the system adequate for office applications, web browsing, and multitasking. The PassMark single-thread score of 3340 ensures snappy response in everyday tasks, while the 12 threads handle concurrent applications without stutter. The CPU’s support for DDR4 and DDR5 memory allows for flexible system configurations depending on the laptop design.

Gamers at 1080p resolution with moderate settings will appreciate the GPU’s capabilities, especially in esports titles where the 74th percentile ranking indicates smooth playable frame rates. Developers working on code compilation will benefit from the CPU’s multi-threaded performance, as the PassMark integer math score of 57189 and data encryption score of 12110 demonstrate efficient processing of computational workloads.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A370M is built on the Xe-HPG architecture with the DG2-128 chip, fabricated on TSMC’s 6 nm process node. It contains 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die, with a transistor density of 45.9 million per square millimeter. The GPU has a base clock of 1550 MHz and a boost clock of 2050 MHz, with a 35 W TDP that is suitable for thin-and-light laptops.

The 4 GB GDDR6 memory operates on a 64-bit bus with a bandwidth of 112.0 GB/s. This memory configuration is the primary limitation of the GPU, as the narrow bus restricts data throughput compared to wider-memory GPUs. The 1024 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, and 32 raster output pipelines deliver a pixel rate of 65.60 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 131.2 GTexel/s.

Compute performance is rated at 4.198 TFLOPS for FP32 and 8.397 TFLOPS for FP16, which is entry-level for discrete GPUs. The 8 ray tracing cores enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing, and support for DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4 ensures compatibility with modern graphics APIs. The GPU connects via PCIe 4.0 x8 and is classified as an integrated-style IGP solution, meaning it is soldered onto the laptop motherboard.

Benchmark results show the GPU scoring 29676 in Geekbench OpenCL and 28673 in Geekbench Vulkan, with an average score of 29175. This places it at the 74th percentile, nearly identical to the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH (0.1% lower) and AMD FirePro W8000 (0.1% lower). The GPU is 0.6% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 470 and 1% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 6800M, which is a surprising result given the latter is a high-end mobile GPU, though the benchmark parity suggests the Arc A370M punches above its weight in compute tasks.

Benchmark Performance

The combined benchmark picture for this CPU+GPU pairing is one of consistent, mid-tier performance. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 24576 places it at the 77th percentile, while the GPU’s average score of 29175 places it at the 74th percentile. The system’s combined percentile is 76, indicating a cohesive platform that performs slightly above the midpoint of all tested configurations.

The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 11390 is its standout result, demonstrating strong multi-threaded capability. The PassMark multithread score of 18274 corroborates this, and the data compression score of 219707 shows efficient parallel processing. Single-thread performance is less impressive, with a PassMark single-thread score of 3340, but this is still sufficient for most consumer workloads.

The GPU’s Geekbench OpenCL score of 29676 and Vulkan score of 28673 are closely matched, suggesting consistent compute performance across different APIs. The near-parity with the RX Vega M GH and FirePro W8000 indicates that the Arc A370M delivers stable, predictable performance for a 35 W part.

When combined, the CPU and GPU scores suggest a system that excels in productivity tasks like video editing and 3D rendering, where the CPU’s multi-core strength shines. In gaming, the GPU’s 74th percentile ranking means playable frame rates at 1080p for most titles, though not at maximum settings. The overall system sits at the 76th percentile, placing it in the upper-mid range of laptop configurations.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build featuring the Intel Core i5-12450HX processor paired with the Intel Arc A370M discrete GPU. The CPU is a mobile Alder Lake-HX chip with 8 cores and 12 threads, while the GPU is an entry-level Arc 3 mobile solution based on the Xe-HPG architecture. Together, they form a balanced platform for mainstream users who need a versatile machine for work and play.

The system’s combined percentile of 76 indicates that this pairing outperforms roughly three-quarters of all tested configurations. The CPU’s 77th percentile is its strongest attribute, providing a solid foundation for demanding applications. The GPU’s 74th percentile is slightly lower but still above average, ensuring that the system is not severely bottlenecked in graphics workloads.

This is not a high-end gaming or workstation platform. Instead, it occupies the upper-mid tier of laptop performance, suitable for users who want a machine that can handle a variety of tasks without major compromises. The CPU’s 55 W TDP and GPU’s 35 W TDP suggest a system that balances performance with power efficiency, making it suitable for portable use.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The Arc A370M’s 74th percentile ranking and 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 performance suggest it can achieve high frame rates in esports titles at 1080p with reduced settings. The CPU’s single-thread score of 3340 ensures the processor will not bottleneck in competitive games. However, demanding AAA titles will struggle to maintain high refresh rates due to the GPU’s 112.0 GB/s bandwidth and 4 GB VRAM.

Streaming: The CPU’s 8 cores and 12 threads, evidenced by the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 11390, provide enough headroom for software encoding while gaming. The PassMark multithread score of 18274 indicates the CPU can handle simultaneous gaming and encoding workloads. The GPU’s support for modern APIs like DirectX 12 Ultimate ensures compatibility with streaming software.

Video editing: The CPU’s multi-core performance is well-suited for video editing, with Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 11390 enabling smooth timeline scrubbing and preview rendering. The PassMark floating-point math score of 43126 indicates efficient processing of video effects and transitions. The GPU accelerates effects rendering, though its 4 GB VRAM may limit use of large 4K projects.

3D rendering: The CPU’s 12 threads push through CPU-based renderers, with the Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 6304 providing a baseline for expected performance. The GPU’s 8 ray tracing cores and 8.397 TFLOPS FP16 performance support GPU-accelerated rendering in compatible software, though the 64-bit memory bus will limit complex scene sizes.

Software development: The CPU’s PassMark integer math score of 57189 and data encryption score of 12110 demonstrate strong performance in code compilation and cryptographic operations. The 12 threads allow for parallel builds, and the single-thread score of 3340 ensures responsive IDE interaction. The 12 MB L3 cache reduces latency in iterative compilation cycles.

Student and office work: The CPU’s PassMark single-thread score of 3340 ensures snappy performance in word processing, spreadsheets, and web browsing. The data compression score of 219707 indicates fast file archiving for document management. The GPU’s 4 GB VRAM is sufficient for multiple displays and basic graphical tasks, and the 35 W TDP contributes to longer battery life during portable use.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-12450HX + Intel Arc A370M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-12450HX

Intel Arc A370M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

FAQ

Gaming Performance

Who Should Build It

GPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Build Overview

Usage Scenarios

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds