SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-12450HX + Intel Arc A350M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

89 Score

Top 11% Ranking

89 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 11% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

86%

GPU

92%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-12450HX

24,576 Benchmark Score

Top 14% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A350M

24,647 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i5-12450HX + Intel Arc A350M: A Balanced Mobile Duo for Mainstream Workloads

The Intel Core i5-12450HX paired with the Intel Arc A350M represents a laptop-class combination that sits at the 74th combined percentile across all CPU-GPU pairings, indicating a system that outperforms roughly three-quarters of all benchmarked configurations. This pairing is anchored by a CPU that reaches the 77th percentile among all processors and a GPU that lands at the 70th percentile among all graphics cards, creating a platform where neither component dramatically outclasses the other. The data shows a coherent mid-range mobile solution: the processor delivers strong multi-threaded throughput for productivity while the graphics solution provides competent DirectX 12 Ultimate feature support, making this a versatile foundation for portable systems aimed at mainstream users rather than enthusiasts.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around the Intel BGA 1964 socket, which means the Core i5-12450HX is soldered directly to the motherboard, eliminating any possibility of a traditional CPU upgrade path. This is a mobile-first design, and the data reflects a deliberate choice by system integrators to pair the processor with a fixed set of components. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory across a dual-channel memory bus, giving laptop manufacturers flexibility in memory implementation, but end users are typically restricted to what the original system ships with. The integrated UHD Graphics 710 provides a fallback display output, though the discrete Arc A350M is the primary graphics engine for demanding tasks.

Memory support is dual-channel, which is standard for this class, and the platform's PCIe implementation is notable: the CPU provides Gen 5 with 20 lanes, a forward-looking feature that allows for high-bandwidth NVMe storage and future expansion cards. However, the GPU itself connects via PCIe 4.0 x8, which is more than adequate for the Arc A350M's 112.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 3.379 TFLOPS of FP32 compute. The CPU's thermal design power is 55W, while the GPU is rated at 25W, suggesting a combined thermal envelope that is manageable for a laptop chassis without exotic cooling solutions. The fact that the GPU has no suggested PSU rating reinforces its mobile, power-efficient nature—this is not a component designed for desktop power supply headroom calculations.

For a sensible next upgrade, the data points to a full platform replacement rather than component swapping. The BGA socket means the CPU is permanent, and the Arc A350M is listed as end-of-life, so users looking for better performance would need to move to a different laptop entirely. Within the same system, the most impactful user-accessible upgrade is memory capacity or storage, leveraging the dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 support and PCIe Gen 5 lanes for NVMe drives. The CPU's multiplier is unlocked, but with a soldered mobile design, overclocking headroom is practically irrelevant in this form factor. The platform's strengths are its modern memory options and PCIe Gen 5 readiness, but its upgradeability is fundamentally limited by the mobile BGA package.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU-GPU combination, so all gaming performance figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores rather than direct frame rate measurements. The GPU's benchmark results provide a foundation for these estimates: it scores 24,546 in Geekbench OpenCL and 24,747 in Geekbench Vulkan, with an average benchmark score of 24,647 that places it at the 70th percentile among all GPUs. The nearest rivals in the GPU data are revealing: the Arc A350M is within 0.4% of the AMD Radeon RX 590, within 0.5% of the NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile, 0.8% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT, and 1.5% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630. This places the Arc A350M in the same performance tier as a desktop Radeon RX 590, which historically delivered playable 1080p gaming at medium to high settings in most titles.

Given the GPU's 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus delivering 112.0 GB/s bandwidth, the estimated gaming ceiling is 1080p resolution with moderate detail settings. The 768 shading units and 24 ROPs suggest a GPU that can handle esports titles at high frame rates but will struggle with modern AAA games at ultra settings. The CPU's single-thread performance, evidenced by a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2,119 and a Passmark single-thread score of 3,340, is strong enough to feed the GPU without becoming a bottleneck in most gaming scenarios. At 1080p, the data suggests the GPU will be the limiting factor in graphically intensive games, while CPU-bound titles like strategy games or simulations may see the processor take the lead role.

For high-refresh-rate gaming at 1080p, the estimates suggest this pairing can achieve 60+ FPS in competitive titles like first-person shooters and MOBAs, but frame rates will drop significantly in visually demanding single-player games. The GPU's DirectX 12 Ultimate support with hardware ray tracing cores (6 RT cores) means the architecture is modern, but the raw compute power is limited, so ray tracing effects would need to be used sparingly or at lower resolutions. The 3.379 TFLOPS FP32 performance is roughly on par with older mainstream desktop GPUs, which historically delivered acceptable 1080p experiences. Users seeking 1440p gaming would need to significantly lower settings, and 4K gaming is not realistic with this configuration.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's benchmark results paint a clear picture of a strong mid-range mobile processor. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 11,390 in multi-core and 2,119 in single-core, with the multi-core result being particularly impressive for an 8-core, 12-thread part. The Cinebench R20 scores are 6,304 multi-core and 889 single-core, while Cinebench R15 shows 1,512 multi-core and 213 single-core. The Passmark suite reinforces this: the CPU achieves 18,274 in multithread, 3,340 in single-thread, 57,189 in integer math, 43,126 in floating-point math, and 13,832 in extended instructions. Data compression scores 219,707, encryption scores 12,110, and physics scores 1,086. The average benchmark score for the CPU is 24,576, placing it at the 77th percentile among all CPUs.

The nearest rival comparisons for the CPU show tight competition. The Intel Core i5-11600 scores 24,563, just 0.1% behind the 12450HX, indicating that the mobile HX part matches a previous-generation desktop processor in overall performance. The AMD EPYC 9654P scores 24,465, 0.5% behind, while the AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D scores 24,709, 0.5% ahead, and the AMD Ryzen 5 7600X3D scores 24,728, 0.6% ahead. This clustering within a 1% band means the 12450HX is effectively in a dead heat with these rivals, despite being a mobile processor competing against desktop and server parts. The practical implication is that this laptop CPU delivers desktop-class performance in a power-constrained envelope.

The GPU's benchmark scores are 24,546 in Geekbench OpenCL and 24,747 in Geekbench Vulkan, with an average of 24,647 at the 70th percentile. The combined picture is a system where the CPU sits slightly higher in its percentile ranking (77th) than the GPU (70th), suggesting that the processor has a small performance advantage over the graphics solution. The combined percentile of 74 confirms this balance, placing the pairing in the upper-mid tier of all systems. The data indicates that in CPU-heavy workloads like rendering or compilation, the processor will flex its 77th-percentile muscle, while in GPU-heavy tasks like gaming at high resolutions, the graphics card's 70th-percentile performance will be the constraining factor.

Balance and Bottleneck

The percentile gap between the CPU (77th) and GPU (70th) is 7 points, which indicates a reasonably balanced pairing where neither component is wildly mismatched. In CPU-bound workloads such as data compression (219,707 in Passmark), integer math (57,189), and multi-threaded rendering (11,390 in Cinebench R23), the processor will operate at its full potential, and the GPU will have minimal involvement. Conversely, in GPU-bound scenarios like gaming at 1080p with high detail settings, the graphics card's 70th-percentile performance will determine the frame rate, and the CPU will likely have headroom to spare.

The bottleneck analysis becomes more nuanced when considering specific workload types. For productivity applications that rely on single-threaded performance, the CPU's 3,340 Passmark single-thread score and 2,119 Cinebench R23 single-core score are strong, meaning the processor will not hold back tasks like spreadsheet calculations or web browsing. In multi-threaded workloads, the 12 threads (8 cores with Hyper-Threading on 4 of them) provide solid parallel throughput, as evidenced by the 18,274 Passmark multithread score. The GPU's 112.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 4 GB VRAM are the most likely bottlenecks in gaming, as modern titles increasingly demand more than 4 GB of video memory even at 1080p.

The FPS scaling evidence, while estimated, supports the bottleneck analysis. At lower resolutions like 720p or 1080p with reduced settings, the CPU becomes relatively more important, and the 12450HX's strong single-core performance will help maintain high frame rates. At higher resolutions or with ultra settings, the GPU's fill rate (52.80 GPixel/s) and texture rate (105.6 GTexel/s) become the limiting factors. The 25W TDP of the GPU suggests that thermal throttling could be a factor in sustained gaming sessions, potentially reducing performance below the benchmark-derived estimates. Overall, the data shows a system that is balanced for mainstream use, with the GPU being the primary constraint in graphically demanding tasks and the CPU providing ample headroom in most other scenarios.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance tier of this CPU-GPU pairing?

A: The pairing achieves a combined percentile of 74, meaning it outperforms 74% of all benchmarked CPU-GPU combinations, placing it in the upper-mid range of mobile systems.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Core i5-12450HX scores 24,576 on average, which is 0.1% ahead of the Intel Core i5-11600, 0.5% ahead of the AMD EPYC 9654P, 0.5% behind the AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D, and 0.6% behind the AMD Ryzen 5 7600X3D.

Q: What kind of gaming performance can be expected?

A: No measured FPS data exists for this combination, but estimated from the GPU's 70th-percentile score and 4 GB GDDR6 memory, the system should handle 1080p gaming at medium settings, with esports titles achieving higher frame rates.

Q: Is the GPU comparable to any desktop graphics cards?

A: The Arc A350M's average score of 24,647 is within 0.4% of the AMD Radeon RX 590, 0.5% of the NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile, 0.8% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT, and 1.5% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630.

Q: What memory types does the CPU support?

A: The processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, though the actual memory type usable in a given laptop is determined by the motherboard design.

Q: Can the CPU be upgraded in the future?

A: No, the CPU uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket, which is a soldered mobile package, meaning the processor is permanently attached to the motherboard and cannot be replaced.

Q: What are the CPU's multi-threaded performance highlights?

A: The CPU scores 11,390 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, 6,304 in Cinebench R20 multi-core, and 18,274 in Passmark multithread, placing it at the 77th percentile among all CPUs.

Who Should Build It

This pairing is best suited for users who need a laptop that can handle a broad range of daily tasks with above-average performance. The CPU's 77th-percentile ranking makes it a strong choice for content creators who work with photo editing, light video editing, and 3D modeling applications, where the 12 threads and high multi-core scores (11,390 in Cinebench R23) will accelerate render times. The 4 GB GPU with DirectX 12 Ultimate support is adequate for developers who need to test graphics applications at moderate settings, and the Vulkan score of 24,747 indicates solid API support for cross-platform development.

Students and small business users will find the combination more than sufficient for productivity software, web browsing, and office tasks, where the CPU's single-thread score of 3,340 ensures snappy responsiveness. The laptop-class form factor, indicated by the build class, makes this a portable solution for professionals who need to work on the go, though the 55W CPU TDP suggests battery life may be moderate under load. Gamers at 1080p who are willing to adjust settings will find the GPU capable of running most titles, making this a viable option for casual gamers who prioritize portability over maximum frame rates. Users who work with large datasets or run simulations will appreciate the CPU's strong integer math (57,189) and floating-point (43,126) scores, though the 4 GB GPU memory may limit GPU-accelerated compute tasks.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-12450HX is an Alder Lake-HX architecture processor built on Intel's 10 nm process, featuring 8 cores and 12 threads with a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 4.40 GHz. The die size is 215 mm², and the cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 12 MB of shared L3 cache. This configuration provides a balance between single-threaded performance, evidenced by the Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2,119, and multi-threaded throughput, as shown by the 11,390 multi-core score. The processor's 55W TDP is modest for an HX-series part, suggesting efficient power management while maintaining high performance.

The benchmark scores indicate that this CPU performs like a desktop processor from the previous generation. Its average score of 24,576 places it in the same performance band as the Intel Core i5-11600, which is a desktop part, and it trades blows with the AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D and Ryzen 5 7600X3D. In real-world workloads, the 12 threads handle multi-tasking effectively, and the Passmark multithread score of 18,274 suggests strong parallel processing capability. The data compression score of 219,707 is particularly high, indicating excellent performance in file archiving and compression tasks. Encryption performance (12,110) and extended instructions (13,832) round out a well-rounded processing profile.

The CPU's integrated UHD Graphics 710 provides basic display output capabilities, but the discrete Arc A350M is the primary graphics solution. The 10 nm process node, while not as advanced as the GPU's 6 nm TSMC process, still delivers competitive performance and efficiency. The unlocked multiplier is a feature typically associated with desktop overclocking, but in this mobile BGA package, it has limited practical application. The processor supports PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes, which future-proofs the platform for high-speed storage devices. Overall, the 12450HX is a capable mid-range mobile processor that punches above its class in multi-threaded workloads.

Build Overview

This build is a laptop-class system, as indicated by the build class designation, combining the Intel Core i5-12450HX processor with the Intel Arc A350M graphics solution. The CPU and GPU are both manufactured by Intel, creating a unified ecosystem that benefits from optimized driver and software integration. The combined percentile of 74 places this system in the upper-mid tier of all benchmarked configurations, meaning it outperforms 74% of systems while being outperformed by the top 26%. The CPU's 77th-percentile ranking is slightly higher than the GPU's 70th-percentile ranking, creating a mild CPU-favored balance.

The GPU, based on the DG2-128 chip with Xe-HPG architecture on TSMC's 6 nm process, features 768 shading units, 48 TMUs, and 24 ROPs, with 6 ray tracing cores. It has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus with 112.0 GB/s bandwidth, which is a limiting factor for high-resolution gaming. The GPU's 25W TDP is remarkably low, making it suitable for thin and light laptops. The CPU's 55W TDP, combined with the GPU's 25W, results in a total package that is power-efficient enough for portable systems. The Arc A350M is listed as end-of-life, while the CPU is active, indicating that the GPU may be a legacy component in newer systems.

The overall tier of this build is solidly mid-range, with the CPU providing desktop-class compute performance and the GPU offering competent 1080p gaming and accelerated graphics features. The system supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, making it compatible with the latest graphics APIs. The memory configuration, whether DDR4 or DDR5, will affect overall system performance, but the CPU's dual-channel support ensures adequate bandwidth for most workloads. This is a well-matched pairing for users seeking a balanced laptop that can handle both productivity and light gaming without major compromises.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: At 1080p resolution, the estimated frame rates from the GPU's 70th-percentile performance suggest this system can drive competitive esports titles at high refresh rates, with the CPU's strong single-thread score of 3,340 ensuring minimal frame time spikes. However, the 4 GB VRAM and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth will limit settings in modern AAA games, where medium presets are the realistic ceiling.

Streaming: The CPU's 12 threads and multi-core score of 11,390 in Cinebench R23 provide sufficient headroom for software encoding of gameplay streams at 1080p, while the GPU's dedicated media engines (implied by the Arc architecture) can offload encoding tasks. The combined 74th-percentile ranking indicates adequate overall performance for simultaneous gaming and streaming, though the 4 GB GPU memory may require lower game settings to avoid stuttering.

Video Editing: The processor's strong multi-threaded performance, evidenced by the 18,274 Passmark multithread score, accelerates video encoding and effects rendering in applications like Adobe Premiere or DaVinci Resolve. The GPU's 3.379 TFLOPS FP32 compute adds GPU-accelerated effects and color grading, though the 4 GB VRAM may limit the use of large 4K timelines or complex effects.

3D Rendering: For CPU-based rendering in Blender or similar applications, the 12450HX's 12 threads deliver solid performance, with the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 11,390 indicating competitive render times. The GPU can assist with viewport rendering and interactive previews, but its 4 GB memory and 64-bit bus make it unsuitable for GPU-only rendering of complex scenes.

Software Development: The CPU's balanced performance across single-threaded (3,340 Passmark) and multi-threaded (18,274 Passmark) workloads makes it ideal for code compilation, running virtual machines, and executing test suites. The 77th-percentile CPU ranking ensures that developer tools run smoothly, while the GPU is sufficient for UI rendering and basic graphics debugging.

Student and Office Work: For document processing, spreadsheet analysis, and web-based research, the CPU's single-thread performance and the system's overall responsiveness are more than adequate. The 55W CPU TDP and 25W GPU TDP suggest reasonable battery life for all-day campus or office use, and the integrated UHD Graphics 710 provides a power-efficient fallback for basic tasks.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-12450HX + Intel Arc A350M

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-12450HX

Intel Arc A350M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Upgrade Path and Platform

Gaming Performance

Benchmark Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

FAQ

Who Should Build It

CPU Analysis

Build Overview

Usage Scenarios

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds