SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-12450H + Intel Arc A530M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

89 Score

Top 11% Ranking

89 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 11% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

83%

GPU

96%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-12450H

17,239 Benchmark Score

Top 17% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A530M

46,614 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-12450H and Intel Arc A530M form a laptop-class pairing that sits in the upper-mid range of the benchmark database. The CPU's average benchmark score of 17,239 places it in the 71st percentile of all processors, while the GPU's average score of 46,614 lands in the 85th percentile of all GPUs. Combined, the configuration reaches the 78th percentile among all builds. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination; the gaming performance estimates below are derived from these benchmark scores and should be treated as projections rather than verified results.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming is a viable use case for this pairing. The GPU's 85th percentile, supported by 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with 224.0 GB/s bandwidth, provides enough graphics horsepower for smooth 1080p gameplay in many titles. The CPU's single-thread PassMark score of 3,306 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1,661 indicate solid per-core performance, though the 71st percentile CPU may occasionally become the limiting factor in scenes that depend heavily on processor throughput. The combined 78th percentile suggests that the system can handle high-refresh monitors, but frame rates will vary by title and settings.

Streaming benefits from the CPU's 12 threads and the GPU's compute capabilities. The CPU's PassMark multithread score of 16,265 and Cinebench R23 multicore of 8,822.5 provide enough headroom for software encoding while gaming. The GPU's OpenCL score of 49,735 and Vulkan score of 43,492 indicate hardware-accelerated encoding support, though the lack of measured FPS data means actual streaming quality will depend on encoder settings and game load.

Video editing workloads are well served by this pairing. The CPU's 8 cores / 12 threads and Cinebench R20 multicore score of 5,671 handle timeline scrubbing and export tasks efficiently. The GPU's OpenCL and Vulkan scores, combined with its 3.994 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, accelerate rendering and effects in applications that leverage GPU compute. The 224.0 GB/s memory bandwidth further helps when working with high-resolution footage.

For 3D rendering, the CPU's 12 threads and Cinebench R15 multicore score of 1,350 provide moderate throughput for CPU-based renderers. The GPU's 12 ray-tracing cores and DirectX 12 Ultimate support enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing, though the 3.994 TFLOPS FP32 figure suggests that heavy ray-traced scenes will require careful settings. The GPU's 65W TDP limits sustained loads, but the system remains capable of moderate rendering tasks.

Software development is a strong use case. The CPU's PassMark integer math score of 54,782 and data encryption score of 10,832 indicate fast compile times and secure data handling. The single-thread score of 3,306 supports quick code analysis and editing. The CPU's 71st percentile overall means it outperforms the majority of processors, making it a reliable choice for developers who need a responsive laptop.

Student and office work is entirely within the comfort zone of this configuration. The CPU's 45W TDP and efficient Alder Lake architecture allow for good battery life, while the 12 threads and 12 MB shared L3 cache handle typical productivity applications without strain. The integrated UHD Graphics (part of the CPU) is sufficient for light tasks, though the discrete GPU is available for more demanding graphical workloads.

Gaming Performance

As stated, there are no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination. All frame-rate expectations below are estimates based on the benchmark scores and percentiles, not direct measurements. The GPU's 85th percentile places it ahead of 85% of all GPUs, with an average score of 46,614. This is essentially tied with the AMD Radeon RX 5600M (46,601, 0% delta) and the AMD Radeon RX 6550M (46,702, -0.2%), and it outperforms the NVIDIA RTX A2000 by 1.2%. Such scores indicate that at 1080p with high or ultra settings, the system should deliver playable frame rates in most modern titles, with the GPU being the primary driver of performance.

At 1080p, the CPU's 71st percentile and single-thread score of 3,306 suggest that CPU-bound games (e.g., esports titles) can achieve high frame rates, but in scenarios with heavy physics or AI, the CPU may become the limiting factor. The GPU's pixel rate of 62.40 GPixel/s and texture rate of 124.8 GTexel/s point to strong rasterization capabilities. At 1440p, the GPU's 224.0 GB/s bandwidth and 3.994 TFLOPS FP32 become more relevant, and the gap between CPU and GPU percentiles narrows, making the system more GPU-limited. However, without measured FPS, exact figures cannot be provided; the estimates are based on the relative strength of the GPU (85th percentile) and CPU (71st percentile).

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-12450H is a mobile processor from the 12th-generation Alder Lake-H family, built on Intel's 10nm process. It features 8 physical cores and 12 threads, with a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.40 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 12 MB of shared L3 cache. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory, and its PCIe Gen 4 interface provides 20 lanes, which is more than enough for the discrete GPU (which uses PCIe 4.0 x8).

The benchmark scores show a balanced processor. In Cinebench R23, it scores 8,822.5 in multicore and 1,661 in single-core. The multicore score is about 0.4% higher than the Intel Core i5-11400F (deltaPct 0.4%), while the single-core performance is comparable to that of the AMD Ryzen 5 4500 (which has an average score of 17,333, -0.5% delta). The PassMark multithread score of 16,265 and single-thread score of 3,306 confirm that the CPU is competitive with mid-range desktop parts from the previous generation. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 5,001 and 2-thread score of 1,743 illustrate the scaling across threads, with 8 threads achieving 4,233, indicating good parallel efficiency.

For real-world workloads, the CPU is well suited to multitasking and productivity. The 12 threads allow for smooth operation with multiple applications, and the 4.4 GHz boost ensures snappy single-threaded performance. The 45W TDP (Thermal Design Power) is typical for a mobile processor, and the Alder Lake architecture delivers a good balance between performance and power efficiency. The 12 MB L3 cache reduces memory latency, and the dual-channel memory support (DDR4 or DDR5) provides adequate bandwidth for most applications. The CPU is not unlocked (multiplierUnlocked false), so overclocking is not possible, but that is expected in a laptop.

Who Should Build It

This configuration is aimed at laptop users (buildClass: laptop) who want a balanced system for gaming and productivity. The GPU's 85th percentile and 8 GB GDDR6 memory make it an excellent choice for 1080p gaming at high or ultra settings. Gamers who prioritize frame rates over resolution will find that the CPU's 71st percentile is sufficient for most titles, but those who play CPU-intensive simulations or strategy games may want to consider a higher-end CPU.

Content creators—specifically those who edit video or do light 3D rendering—will benefit from the CPU's 12 threads and the GPU's OpenCL and Vulkan acceleration. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 8,822.5 and the GPU's 3.994 TFLOPS FP32 are adequate for moderate workloads. The GPU's 12 RT cores enable hardware ray tracing in compatible software, though heavy ray-traced scenes may require lower settings.

Developers and programmers will appreciate the CPU's strong integer math and encryption scores. The PassMark integer math of 54,782 and data encryption of 10,832 indicate that code compilation and data processing tasks are handled efficiently. The single-thread performance of 3,306 ensures quick responses during development.

Students and office workers get a laptop that is light enough to carry (45W CPU TDP) and powerful enough for everyday tasks. The CPU's 71st percentile ensures it outpaces the vast majority of laptops on the market, and the discrete GPU can handle any graphics-accelerated tasks like photo editing or light video editing. The 8 GB GDDR6 memory is sufficient for most productivity applications.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score of 17,239 places it at the 71st percentile of all processors. Its nearest rivals are all within a 0.5% margin: the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G (17,278, -0.2%), the Intel Core i5-11400F (17,177, +0.4%), the AMD Ryzen 3 210 (17,321, -0.5%), and the AMD Ryzen 5 4500 (17,333, -0.5%). This indicates that the CPU is essentially a peer of these well-known mid-range parts, with performance differences that are negligible.

The GPU's average benchmark score of 46,614 puts it in the 85th percentile of all GPUs. It is nearly identical to the AMD Radeon RX 5600M (46,601, 0%) and the AMD Radeon RX 6550M (46,702, -0.2%). The GPU also outperforms the NVIDIA RTX A2000 (46,043, +1.2%) and the NVIDIA RTX 5880 Ada Generation (45,972, +1.4%). These deltas show that the Arc A530M is a solid mid-range mobile GPU with performance matching last generation's mainstream desktop GPUs.

The combined percentile of 78 reflects the system's overall standing. The CPU and GPU are not equally strong—the GPU is significantly more powerful relative to its peers than the CPU—but the configuration still lands in the upper quarter of all builds. In terms of specific scores, the GPU's Geekbench OpenCL result of 49,735 and Vulkan score of 43,492 are strong indicators of compute performance, while the CPU's Cinebench R20 multicore score of 5,671 and single-core score of 800 are typical for a 12-thread mobile processor.

FAQ

Q: What is the core and thread count of the Intel Core i5-12450H?

A: The CPU has 8 cores and 12 threads.

Q: Does the Intel Arc A530M support ray tracing?

A: Yes, it has 12 ray tracing cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which includes ray tracing.

Q: What is the GPU memory configuration?

A: The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s and a memory clock of 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective).

Q: What memory types does the CPU support?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, using a dual-channel memory bus.

Q: How does this CPU compare to the AMD Ryzen 5 4500?

A: The CPU's average benchmark score of 17,239 is 0.5% lower than the AMD Ryzen 5 4500's average score of 17,333.

Q: Is this build a desktop or a laptop?

A: The build class is laptop.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 78, meaning it outperforms 78% of all configurations in the database.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data reveals a noticeable imbalance between the CPU and GPU. The GPU's 85th percentile is 14 percentage points higher than the CPU's 71st percentile. This means that in most gaming scenarios, the GPU is the more capable component, and the CPU will become the limiting factor at lower resolutions or in CPU-bound titles. For instance, at 1080p with high frame rates, the CPU's single-thread performance (PassMark 3,306, Cinebench R23 single 1,661) will be pushed to its limits, potentially reducing the GPU's utilization. At 1440p or higher, the GPU's 3.994 TFLOPS and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth become the bottleneck, and the CPU's lower percentile matters less.

In compute workloads, the GPU's OpenCL and Vulkan scores (49,735 and 43,492) show that it can accelerate many tasks, but the CPU's 12 threads and 16,265 PassMark multithread score provide a strong foundation. The CPU will likely be the limiting factor in heavily multithreaded tasks that do not use GPU compute, such as video encoding (though the GPU can assist) and complex simulations. The 45W CPU TDP and 65W GPU TDP together sum to 110W, which is a reasonable power budget for a laptop, but sustained loads may throttle if the laptop's cooling solution is insufficient.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is a mobile (laptop) design, with the CPU soldered to an Intel BGA 1744 socket. The GPU is integrated on the same board (slotWidth: IGP), so neither component is user-upgradeable. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel, allowing for memory upgrades within the laptop's capabilities. The PCIe Gen 4 interface provides 20 lanes from the CPU, with the GPU using a PCIe 4.0 x8 connection; this is sufficient for the GPU's bandwidth needs.

Because this is a sealed laptop system, the upgrade path is limited to external peripherals or replacing the entire unit. The CPU's TDP of 45W and GPU's 65W indicate a combined thermal budget of 110W, which is typical for a mid-range laptop. There is no PSU suggestion (suggestedPsu is null) because the power delivery is managed by the laptop's internal adapter. A sensible next upgrade would be to a laptop with a higher-tier CPU and GPU, but within the same platform, no meaningful component swaps are possible. The 8 GB GDDR6 GPU memory and the CPU's 12 threads are sufficient for the next few years of gaming and productivity, though heavy future titles may require lower settings.

Build Overview

The Intel Core i5-12450H + Intel Arc A530M is a laptop configuration with a combined percentile of 78. The CPU's 8 cores / 12 threads and 45W TDP make it a mobile processor with strong performance for its class, while the GPU's 8 GB GDDR6 memory and 3.994 TFLOPS FP32 put it in the 85th percentile of all GPUs. The pairing is a balanced mid-range solution, with the GPU being the more dominant component. It is suitable for high-refresh gaming at 1080p, video editing, software development, and general productivity, but it is not a high-end desktop replacement or a workstation for heavy rendering. The lack of measured FPS data for this exact combination means the gaming performance should be considered an estimate, but the benchmark scores indicate a capable and well-rounded laptop.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-12450H + Intel Arc A530M

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-12450H

Intel Arc A530M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Usage Scenarios

Gaming Performance

CPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

Benchmark Performance

FAQ

Balance and Bottleneck

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds