SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-12450H + Intel Arc A370M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

88 Score

Top 12% Ranking

88 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 12% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

83%

GPU

93%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-12450H

17,239 Benchmark Score

Top 17% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A370M

29,175 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This CPU+GPU pairing represents a mid-range mobile configuration aimed at balanced 1080p gaming and everyday productivity. The Intel Core i5-12450H is a solid performer, sitting at the 71st percentile among all CPUs, while the Intel Arc A370M GPU holds the 74th percentile among all GPUs. Combined, this laptop configuration lands at the 73rd percentile overall, indicating a system that outperforms roughly three-quarters of all recorded hardware combinations, though it is not a high-end enthusiast setup.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-12450H is an 8-core, 12-thread processor based on the Alder Lake architecture, specifically the Alder Lake-H mobile variant. It uses Intel’s hybrid design, combining performance and efficiency cores, though the FACT PACK does not specify the exact core distribution. The chip has a base clock of 2000.00 MHz and can boost up to 4.40 GHz, which provides strong single-thread responsiveness for everyday tasks and gaming. The CPU is manufactured on Intel’s 10 nm process node, with a die size of 217 mm².

Cache configuration is substantial for a mobile chip: 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 12 MB of shared L3 cache. This cache hierarchy helps reduce memory latency, which is critical for gaming workloads that rely on rapid data access. The processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, though the FACT PACK does not list a specific memory bandwidth figure. ECC memory is not supported, which is typical for consumer mobile processors.

Benchmark data shows a clear scaling pattern across thread counts. The 3DMark scores progress from 912 in single-thread to 1,743 in 2-threads, 3,091 in 4-threads, 4,233 in 8-threads, and 5,001 in 16-threads, with a max-thread score of 5,020. This indicates efficient thread scaling up to 8 threads, after which gains are minimal — the difference between 8-thread and 16-thread scores is only about 18.6%. This suggests the 12-thread configuration (via Hyper-Threading) provides diminishing returns beyond 8 physical cores, which is relevant for heavily multithreaded workloads like video rendering or software compilation.

Cinebench results reinforce this picture. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 8,822.5 in multi-core and 1,661 in single-core. The multi-core score represents roughly 5.3 times the single-core score, which is reasonable given the 8-core/12-thread design but not exceptional — higher-end desktop chips often achieve 6-7x scaling. The R20 scores are 5,671 multi-core and 800 single-core, while R15 scores are 1,350 multi-core and 238 single-core. These figures indicate the i5-12450H is a capable mid-range mobile processor that can handle modern productivity tasks but will not compete with high-core-count desktop or high-end mobile parts.

PassMark results show a mix of strengths. Integer math scores 54,782, floating-point math scores 40,568, and extended instructions score 11,992. Data encryption scores 10,832, and compression scores 195,132. The multithread score is 16,265, with a single-thread score of 3,306. The find prime numbers test is notably low at 46, which suggests the CPU’s integer-heavy prime calculation performance is weak relative to its other scores — likely a quirk of the hybrid architecture. Physics score is 883, and random string sorting is 20,838.

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 17,239, placing it at the 71st percentile. Its nearest rivals are tightly clustered: the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G scores 17,278 (0.2% higher), the Intel Core i5-11400F scores 17,177 (0.4% lower), the AMD Ryzen 3 210 scores 17,321 (0.5% higher), and the AMD Ryzen 5 4500 scores 17,333 (0.5% higher). This means the i5-12450H is essentially performance-equivalent to these desktop-class parts, which is impressive for a mobile chip — the delta is within 0.5% across the board. In real terms, users should expect the i5-12450H to match or slightly trail these desktop alternatives in CPU-bound workloads, which is a positive sign for a laptop processor.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s overall average benchmark score is 17,239, placing it at the 71st percentile among all CPUs. This is a strong mid-tier result, indicating the i5-12450H outperforms roughly 71% of recorded processors. The GPU, Intel Arc A370M, has an average benchmark score of 29,175, placing it at the 74th percentile among all GPUs. The combined system percentile is 73, which reflects a balanced pairing where neither component dramatically outperforms the other.

The GPU’s benchmarks include a Geekbench OpenCL score of 29,676 and a Vulkan score of 28,673. These are close, suggesting consistent performance across different compute APIs. The GPU’s nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH (score 29,197, 0.1% higher), the AMD FirePro W8000 (score 29,211, 0.1% higher), the AMD Radeon RX 470 (score 28,996, 0.6% lower), and the AMD Radeon RX 6800M (score 28,874, 1.0% lower). The deltaPct values are very small — within 1% — indicating the A370M performs at a level comparable to these desktop GPUs, despite being a mobile part with a 35W TDP. This is notable because the RX 6800M is typically a high-end mobile GPU, and the A370M matches its benchmark score within 1%, though the FACT PACK does not specify whether this is a fair comparison across identical workloads.

The combined picture is a system that is slightly stronger on the GPU side (74th percentile) than the CPU side (71st percentile), but the difference is minimal. For gaming, this means the GPU will likely be the primary determinant of frame rates, but the CPU will not bottleneck in most scenarios. For productivity, the CPU’s 71st percentile is sufficient for mainstream tasks, though users with heavy rendering workloads may find the GPU’s compute capabilities (via OpenCL/Vulkan) to be the more valuable asset.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data indicates a well-balanced pairing with a slight GPU bias. The CPU’s 71st percentile and GPU’s 74th percentile are close, suggesting neither component is a severe bottleneck for the other. In CPU-bound scenarios — such as strategy games, simulations, or physics-heavy titles — the i5-12450H’s single-thread score of 912 in 3DMark and 1,661 in Cinebench R23 will set the ceiling. These are respectable scores, but they are not top-tier; users should expect the CPU to be the limiting factor in highly threaded workloads that exceed 8 threads, given the minimal scaling observed between the 8-thread (4,233) and 16-thread (5,001) 3DMark scores.

In GPU-bound scenarios — such as modern AAA games at high resolutions or demanding graphics settings — the A370M will be the limiting factor. The GPU’s 74th percentile is decent for a mobile part, but it is not a high-end gaming GPU. The 4 GB VRAM capacity is a concern for modern titles at ultra settings, which often exceed this amount. The 112.0 GB/s memory bandwidth is also modest, which may constrain performance in texture-heavy scenes.

The FPS scaling evidence is absent because the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this combination. However, based on the benchmark scores, the CPU’s single-thread performance (3,306 in PassMark) is strong enough to drive the GPU in most games at 1080p. The GPU’s Vulkan score of 28,673 suggests it can handle modern graphics APIs, which is important for DirectX 12 and Vulkan titles. The CPU’s 12 MB L3 cache helps reduce memory latency, which benefits gaming performance. Overall, the system is balanced, but the GPU will be the first component to reach its limit in graphically demanding titles.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel BGA 1744 socket, which is a soldered mobile platform, meaning the CPU cannot be upgraded in a traditional sense — it is permanently attached to the motherboard. The platform supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, giving users flexibility in memory choice, though the FACT PACK does not specify maximum capacity or speed. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes, which is ample for a mobile GPU and NVMe storage.

The GPU has a TDP of 35 W and is listed as an IGP (integrated graphics processor) with a slot width of IGP, meaning it is soldered to the motherboard as well. This is an end-of-life product with a release date of 2022-03-29, so no upgrade path exists for the GPU itself. The CPU has a TDP of 45 W, and the FACT PACK lists no suggested PSU for either component, which is typical for laptops where power delivery is fixed by the chassis design.

For a sensible next upgrade, the data suggests the memory is the most flexible component. Moving from DDR4 to DDR5 could improve memory bandwidth, which would benefit both CPU and GPU performance. However, the FACT PACK does not provide comparative performance data for different memory types, so this is a qualitative recommendation. Storage upgrades via PCIe Gen 4 NVMe drives are also viable, given the 20 available CPU lanes. The platform’s limitations are clear: neither the CPU nor the GPU can be swapped, so users should plan for a full laptop replacement rather than component upgrades.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s performance percentile and what does it mean?

A: The Intel Core i5-12450H sits at the 71st percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 17,239. This means it outperforms roughly 71% of recorded processors, placing it in the upper-mid range for mobile and desktop parts.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The CPU is within 0.5% of all its nearest rivals. The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G is 0.2% faster, the Intel Core i5-11400F is 0.4% slower, the AMD Ryzen 3 210 is 0.5% faster, and the AMD Ryzen 5 4500 is 0.5% faster. Effectively, it is performance-equivalent to these parts.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory configuration?

A: The Intel Arc A370M has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 112.0 GB/s. The memory clock is 1750 MHz, operating at 14 Gbps effective.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the Intel Arc A370M has 8 dedicated RT cores. The architecture is Xe-HPG, and it supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), which includes ray tracing and other advanced features.

Q: What is the CPU’s boost clock and how does it affect performance?

A: The CPU has a base clock of 2000.00 MHz and a boost clock of 4.40 GHz. The boost clock is critical for single-thread performance, as evidenced by the 3DMark single-thread score of 912, which is strong for a mobile part.

Q: Is the CPU overclockable?

A: No, the multiplier is locked (multiplierUnlocked is false). Users cannot overclock the CPU beyond its factory boost behavior.

Q: What is the combined system percentile?

A: The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 73, meaning it outperforms 73% of all recorded hardware combinations. This reflects a balanced mid-range mobile system.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A370M is an end-of-life mobile GPU based on the Xe-HPG architecture, specifically the Alchemist generation for Arc 3 Mobile. The chip is the DG2-128, manufactured on a 6 nm process at TSMC, with 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 45.9M per mm². This is a compact, power-efficient design with a TDP of 35 W, making it suitable for thin-and-light laptops.

The GPU’s memory subsystem consists of 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 112.0 GB/s. This is a modest configuration — the 64-bit bus is narrow, and the bandwidth is adequate for 1080p gaming but will struggle with high-resolution textures or heavy asset streaming. The memory clock is 1750 MHz, translating to 14 Gbps effective.

Compute resources include 1,024 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, and 32 raster output pipelines. The GPU has 8 RT cores for ray tracing and no listed tensor cores, meaning AI-accelerated workloads will rely on the shading units. The FP32 performance is 4.198 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 8.397 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio). The pixel rate is 65.60 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 131.2 GTexel/s. These figures are modest — the FP32 throughput is roughly half of what a mid-range desktop GPU like the RX 470 would offer, though the A370M matches the RX 470 in overall benchmark score (28,996 vs. 29,175, with the A370M being 0.6% faster).

The GPU’s clock speeds are a base of 1550 MHz and a boost of 2050 MHz. The boost clock is relatively high for a 35W part, which helps compensate for the narrow memory bus. The GPU supports PCIe 4.0 x8, which is sufficient for its bandwidth needs. Display outputs are listed as portable device dependent, meaning the available ports vary by laptop design.

Benchmark results show the GPU scoring 29,676 in Geekbench OpenCL and 28,673 in Vulkan. The Vulkan score is slightly lower, which may indicate driver overhead or architectural limitations with that API, but the difference is only about 3.4%. The GPU’s average benchmark score is 29,175, placing it at the 74th percentile. Compared to its nearest rivals, the A370M is effectively tied with the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH (0.1% slower), the AMD FirePro W8000 (0.1% slower), the AMD Radeon RX 470 (0.6% faster), and the AMD Radeon RX 6800M (1.0% faster). This is a strong result for a mobile GPU — matching desktop parts from several years prior.

For rendering workloads, the GPU’s DirectX 12 Ultimate support and Vulkan 1.4 compatibility mean it can handle modern graphics APIs. The 8 RT cores provide basic ray tracing capability, though performance will be limited by the 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 throughput. Compute-heavy tasks like video encoding or machine learning inference will rely on the OpenCL/Vulkan paths, which score well in Geekbench.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU+GPU combination. All frame rate figures below are estimates based on the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations rather than tested results.

The GPU’s 74th percentile and the CPU’s 71st percentile suggest this system is capable of 1080p gaming at medium to high settings in most modern titles. The GPU’s Vulkan score of 28,673 and OpenCL score of 29,676 indicate solid compute performance, which translates to good frame pacing in Vulkan-based games. The 4 GB VRAM is a limiting factor at ultra settings, where texture quality may need to be reduced to stay within memory limits.

For esports titles like Counter-Strike 2, Valorant, or Rocket League, the CPU’s strong single-thread performance (3,306 in PassMark, 912 in 3DMark single-thread) will drive high frame rates, likely exceeding 100 FPS at 1080p with competitive settings. The GPU’s modest bandwidth (112.0 GB/s) will not bottleneck these lighter workloads.

For AAA titles like Cyberpunk 2077, Assassin’s Creed Mirage, or Starfield, the system will likely achieve 30-50 FPS at 1080p with medium settings, depending on the specific game’s optimization. The GPU’s 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 performance is comparable to a desktop GTX 1650-class part, which typically handles AAA games at 1080p medium. Ray tracing is technically supported via the 8 RT cores, but performance will be poor — likely 20-30 FPS at 1080p with RT enabled, forcing users to disable RT for playable frame rates.

The CPU will not be a major bottleneck in most GPU-bound scenarios. The minimal thread scaling beyond 8 threads (from 4,233 to 5,001 in 3DMark) means the CPU’s 12 threads are sufficient for modern games, which typically use 6-8 threads. The 12 MB L3 cache helps maintain low latency, which is beneficial for frame time consistency.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class configuration (buildClass is "laptop") pairing the Intel Core i5-12450H with the Intel Arc A370M. The CPU is an 8-core, 12-thread Alder Lake-H mobile processor with a 45W TDP, while the GPU is a 35W end-of-life mobile part from Intel’s Arc 3 series. The combined percentile of 73 places this system in the upper-mid tier, outperforming roughly 73% of all recorded hardware combinations.

The CPU’s 71st percentile and GPU’s 74th percentile indicate a balanced pairing. The system is not a high-end gaming machine — the GPU’s 4 GB VRAM and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth are clear limitations — but it is a competent mainstream laptop for gaming at 1080p and productivity workloads. The CPU’s 12 MB L3 cache and dual-channel memory support (DDR4/DDR5) provide a solid foundation for multitasking.

This is not a creator-focused build. The GPU’s FP32 throughput of 4.198 TFLOPS is adequate for light video editing or 3D modeling, but the 4 GB VRAM will limit complex scenes. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 score of 8,822.5 multi-core is sufficient for quick renders in Blender or Premiere, but longer renders will be slow compared to desktop-class parts with 16+ threads.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets mainstream laptop users who need a balance of CPU and GPU performance for daily use and light-to-moderate gaming. The system is well-suited for gamers at 1080p resolution who prioritize medium settings over ultra settings — the GPU’s 74th percentile ensures smooth frame rates in most titles, but the 4 GB VRAM will require texture quality adjustments in newer games.

For content creators, the CPU’s 12 threads and 12 MB L3 cache handle 1080p video editing and photo processing with ease. The GPU’s OpenCL and Vulkan scores support GPU-accelerated effects in applications like After Effects or DaVinci Resolve, though the 4 GB VRAM limits complex compositions. Software developers will find the CPU’s 8 cores and 12 threads sufficient for compilation tasks, and the PassMark data encryption score of 10,832 indicates adequate performance for secure coding workflows.

Students and small business users will appreciate the system’s balanced profile — the CPU’s 71st percentile handles office productivity, web browsing, and spreadsheet work without issue, while the GPU provides occasional gaming or light graphics work. The 35W GPU TDP and 45W CPU TDP suggest reasonable battery life for a laptop, though the FACT PACK does not provide specific battery data.

This is not a system for 1440p or 4K gaming, nor for heavy 3D rendering or machine learning training. Users with those needs should look at higher-end configurations with more VRAM and higher thread counts. For mainstream laptop buyers, this pairing represents a smart balance of performance and efficiency at the 73rd combined percentile.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-12450H + Intel Arc A370M

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-12450H

Intel Arc A370M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Upgrade Path and Platform

FAQ

GPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

Build Overview

Who Should Build It

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds