SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-12400F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

90 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
84%
VS
GPU
96%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-12400F

19,039 Benchmark Score
Top 16% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER

54,209 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-12400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER pairing is a desktop configuration that marries a mid-range 12th Gen Intel processor with a flagship-tier graphics card. The CPU, built on the Alder Lake architecture and a 10 nm process, offers 6 cores and 12 threads with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.40 GHz. This is a locked multiplier part, so overclocking is not an option, but its 65W TDP ensures efficient operation. The GPU, based on the Ada Lovelace architecture and a 5 nm TSMC process, is a massive piece of silicon with 45,900 million transistors on a 379 mm² die, featuring 16 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus with 736.3 GB/s of bandwidth. The data indicates a strong overall performance tier, with the build achieving a combined percentile of 80 across all components.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-12400F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor from the Alder Lake-S generation. Its configuration relies on 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, and a shared 18 MB L3 cache. It supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory and provides Gen 5 PCIe with 20 lanes from the CPU. The benchmark scores paint a picture of a processor that is strong in single-threaded tasks but has limited headroom for heavily threaded workloads compared to its GPU counterpart.

In single-thread performance, the CPU scores 909 in 3dmark_single_thread and 1680 in Cinebench R23 single-core. These figures place it in the 73rd percentile for all CPUs, indicating it is better than a majority of processors on the market for tasks that rely on one or two cores. The 3dmark_2_threads score of 1699 reinforces this, showing robust performance for legacy or lightly threaded applications. The data suggests this CPU can handle everyday responsiveness, web browsing, and office productivity without issue, as these workloads often depend on single-core speed.

However, the multi-threaded results show a different story. The Cinebench R23 multicore score is 12380, and the 3dmark_max_threads score is 5912. While these are respectable numbers, the CPU's percentile of 73 against all CPUs indicates it is not a top-tier performer for rendering or heavy computation. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, which scores nearly identically with a 0% delta, and the Intel Core i5-1335U, which is 0.3% ahead. This places the 12400F in a competitive but not dominant position for multi-threaded tasks. The Passmark multithread score of 19433 and the Geekbench multicore score of 9472 confirm that it is a capable mid-range processor, but it will not compete with higher-core-count parts in professional rendering or video encoding.

For real workloads, this means the CPU excels in gaming scenarios where a strong single-thread is key, such as in esports titles or older game engines. It will also handle moderate content creation tasks like photo editing or light video editing, but for heavy 3D rendering or complex simulation, the 6-core, 12-thread layout will be the limiting factor. The 163 mm² die size and 65W TDP suggest an efficient design that runs cool, but it is not designed for extreme multi-threaded compute. The data shows a processor that is a solid foundation for a gaming build, but one that must be paired with a workload that respects its architectural limits.

Benchmark Performance

The combined performance of this build is defined by a significant imbalance. The CPU sits at the 73rd percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU achieves the 86th percentile among all GPUs. This 13-point gap is substantial and indicates that the graphics card is capable of far more than the processor can consistently feed in certain scenarios. The combined percentile for the build is 80, which is a strong overall position, but the individual components tell a more nuanced story.

The GPU’s benchmark scores are formidable. It scores 34245 in Passmark G3D and 219065 in Geekbench OpenCL, with a Vulkan score of 260075. The 3dmark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 6600. These results place it just 0.1% behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, its immediate predecessor and closest rival. The data shows it is also 1.1% ahead of the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X and 2.7% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB. This confirms the RTX 4080 SUPER is a top-tier GPU for rasterization and compute, with a 16 GB frame buffer that provides ample capacity for high-resolution textures.

The CPU’s performance in comparison is more modest. Its average benchmark score is 19039, while the GPU’s average is 54209. The CPU’s nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, is a mobile part, which highlights that the 12400F is in a performance class more akin to high-end laptops than desktop monsters. The Passmark single-thread score of 3481 is decent, but the Passmark find prime numbers score of 72 is low, indicating weak integer-heavy multi-threaded performance. The overall picture is one of a GPU that is ready for 4K gaming and heavy compute, paired with a CPU that is adequate for 1080p and 1440p gaming but will struggle to keep up with the GPU’s full potential in CPU-bound scenarios.

The combined data shows a system that is highly capable for gaming, with an average FPS across all tested games of 197.8. This places the pair at rank 284 out of 3732 pairs, putting it in the top 8% of all tested configurations. This is a strong result, driven almost entirely by the GPU’s raw power. However, the delta between the CPU and GPU percentiles suggests that in many titles, particularly at lower resolutions, the CPU will be the bottleneck, preventing the GPU from achieving its maximum frame rates.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance data reveals a clear bottleneck dynamic in this pairing. The GPU is in the 86th percentile, while the CPU is in the 73rd percentile. This gap means that in scenarios where the CPU is the limiting factor, the system will not perform to the GPU’s potential. Looking at the measured FPS, this is most evident at 1080p resolution. In games like Counter-Strike 2, the system achieves 322.5 FPS at 1080p, but the CPU’s single-thread score of 909 suggests it is working hard to maintain that. At 1440p, the frame rate drops to 212.5 FPS, and at 4K it drops to 120.7 FPS. The scaling between resolutions is not linear, which indicates that the GPU is becoming more of a factor at higher resolutions, but the CPU still has a significant role.

For a more demanding title like Cyberpunk 2077, the system hits 89 FPS at 1080p, 71 FPS at 1440p, and 47 FPS at 4K. The drop from 1080p to 4K is roughly 47%, which suggests that the GPU is the primary driver of performance at higher resolutions. At 1080p, the CPU is likely limiting the frame rate, as the GPU could potentially render more frames if the CPU could supply data faster. The 3dmark_8_threads score of 4779 and the 3dmark_16_threads score of 5895 show that the CPU’s multi-threaded capabilities are modest, which can hinder performance in games that use more than a few cores.

The data shows that the CPU is the bottleneck in most gaming scenarios, especially at 1080p. The GPU’s massive compute power, with 52.22 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, is often waiting for the CPU to catch up. In CPU-bound games like Valorant, the system achieves 437.1 FPS at 1080p, but this reflects the game’s light CPU load rather than the CPU’s raw speed. In contrast, in GPU-bound games like Red Dead Redemption 2, the system achieves 89.7 FPS at 1080p, which is a good result but shows the CPU is not the limiting factor there. The balance is skewed towards the GPU, and users should expect the CPU to be the component that holds the system back in less demanding titles.

Who Should Build It

This build is designed for users who prioritize graphics performance above all else and are willing to accept a CPU that is not in the same performance tier. Gamers targeting 4K resolution will see the most benefit, as the GPU’s 86th percentile ranking and 16 GB of memory are well-suited for high-resolution textures and demanding visual effects. At 4K, the CPU bottleneck is less pronounced, as the GPU is typically the limiting factor. For example, in Call of Duty: Warzone, the system achieves 102.4 FPS at 4K, which is a very playable frame rate, and in Control it hits 69 FPS at 4K. These results show that the system is capable of a premium 4K experience.

Content creators who work primarily with GPU-accelerated applications will also find this build appealing. The RTX 4080 SUPER’s 219065 OpenCL score and 260075 Vulkan score indicate strong compute performance for tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering with GPU acceleration, and AI workloads. The 16 GB of VRAM is ample for large projects. However, CPU-bound tasks like software compilation or complex physics simulations will not benefit from the GPU’s power. For a video editor who uses GPU-accelerated effects, this is a strong choice, but for a 3D artist using CPU-based rendering, the 12400F will be a significant bottleneck.

Students and small business users who need a machine for general productivity, web development, or office work will find this build to be overkill. The CPU’s single-thread performance is more than enough for these tasks, but the GPU’s power is wasted. A less powerful GPU would be a better fit for these users, as the data shows the CPU is capable of handling everyday workloads with ease. For gamers who play at 1080p with high refresh rates, this build is also not ideal, as the CPU will limit frame rates in many titles. The measured FPS in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 714 at 1080p, but this is a game that is not CPU-intensive. For a game like Ark: Survival Ascended, the system only achieves 46.3 FPS at 1080p, which shows the CPU is not capable of driving high frame rates in demanding titles.

FAQ

Q: What is the primary performance characteristic of this CPU+GPU pair?

A: The data shows a significant imbalance, with the GPU in the 86th percentile and the CPU in the 73rd percentile. This means the GPU is a top-tier component, while the CPU is a mid-range part, leading to a CPU bottleneck in many gaming scenarios.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Intel Core i5-12400F has an average benchmark score of 19039, which is identical to the AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (0% delta) and just 0.1% behind the Intel Core 3 201E. It is also 0.3% ahead of the Intel Core i5-1335U and the AMD EPYC 7773X.

Q: Is this system good for 4K gaming?

A: Yes, the data indicates strong 4K performance. For example, the system achieves 102.4 FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone, 69 FPS in Control, and 47 FPS in Cyberpunk 2077 at 3840x2160 resolution. The GPU’s 16 GB of memory and high compute power are well-suited for this resolution.

Q: What is the main bottleneck of this system?

A: The CPU is the main bottleneck. Its 73rd percentile ranking is lower than the GPU’s 86th percentile, and in CPU-bound games at 1080p, the frame rates are often limited by the processor’s single-thread and multi-thread capabilities.

Q: What is the memory support for this CPU?

A: The Intel Core i5-12400F supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory. The system does not support ECC memory.

Q: How does the GPU compare to the RTX 4080?

A: The RTX 4080 SUPER has an average benchmark score of 54209, which is 0.1% lower than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080’s score of 54247. They are essentially equivalent in performance.

Q: What is the average FPS across all tested games for this pair?

A: The pair rank 284 out of 3732 pairs with an average FPS across all games of 197.8. This places the configuration in the top 8% of all tested pairs.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming at 1440p, this build is exceptional. The GPU’s power allows for high frame rates in most titles. In Counter-Strike 2, the system achieves 212.5 FPS at 1440p, and in Valorant it hits 414.4 FPS. Even in more demanding games like Call of Duty: Warzone, the system maintains 121.7 FPS at 1440p. The CPU is sufficient for these scenarios, as the GPU is the primary driver of performance at this resolution.

Streaming is a mixed bag. The GPU’s NVENC encoder can handle the video encoding load, but the CPU’s 6 cores and 12 threads may struggle when simultaneously running a game and streaming software. In a CPU-bound game like Cyberpunk 2077, the system gets 71 FPS at 1440p, which is playable, but the overhead of streaming could cause frame drops. The 3dmark_max_threads score of 5912 suggests limited headroom for multi-tasking.

Video editing is a strong use case for this build. The GPU’s 219065 OpenCL score accelerates effects and rendering, and the 16 GB of VRAM is ample for 4K timelines. The CPU’s performance is adequate, as the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 12380 is enough for basic editing tasks, but the GPU will do the heavy lifting in most modern editing software.

3D rendering is a scenario where the CPU is a clear bottleneck. For GPU-based renderers, the system is excellent, but for CPU-based rendering, the 6-core, 12-thread processor will be slow. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 12380 is low for professional rendering workloads, and users would benefit from a higher-core-count CPU.

Software development is feasible, but not ideal. The CPU’s single-thread performance is good for compilation tasks, but the multi-threaded scores are modest. The Passmark integer math score of 59995 is decent, but for large codebases, a faster CPU would be beneficial. The GPU is not utilized in most development workflows.

Student and office work is over-served by this build. The CPU’s single-thread performance is more than enough for word processing, spreadsheets, and web browsing. The GPU’s power is unused, and a less powerful configuration would be more appropriate for these tasks. The data shows the CPU is not a limiting factor in these workloads.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data, which is confirmed as measured, shows a wide range of performance across games. At 1920x1080, the system excels in esports titles. Counter-Strike: Global Offensive achieves 714 FPS, and Valorant hits 437.1 FPS. Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege reaches 384 FPS. These results show the GPU is capable of extremely high frame rates, but the CPU is likely the limiting factor in these titles, as the frame rates are high but not as high as a more powerful CPU might allow.

At 2560x1440, the performance remains strong. Counter-Strike 2 drops to 212.5 FPS, and Valorant stays high at 414.4 FPS. More demanding games like Cyberpunk 2077 achieve 71 FPS, and Red Dead Redemption 2 hits 63.7 FPS. This resolution is the sweet spot for this pairing, as the GPU is heavily utilized and the CPU is less of a bottleneck.

At 3840x2160, the GPU is the clear dominant component. Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 47 FPS, and Call of Duty: Warzone runs at 102.4 FPS. Microsoft Flight Simulator achieves 69.2 FPS. The most demanding title, Ark: Survival Ascended, only achieves 13.3 FPS at 4K, which is unplayable. The data shows that for most games, 4K is viable, but for the most graphically intense titles, settings may need to be adjusted. The average FPS across all games is 197.8, but this is skewed by the high performance in esports titles.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-12400F uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform. This socket supports 12th Gen processors, and the data shows the CPU is an active production part. The platform supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory, allowing users to choose between the two memory types based on their budget and performance needs. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes, which is a forward-looking feature for storage and graphics.

The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface and requires a 16-pin power connector. The suggested PSU for this GPU is 700W, which is a significant requirement. The GPU has a TDP of 320W, while the CPU has a TDP of 65W, so the total system power draw is substantial. Users should ensure their power supply is capable of handling the load.

A sensible next upgrade for this system would be a more powerful CPU on the same socket, provided the motherboard supports it. The data shows the CPU is the bottleneck, so upgrading to a higher-core-count 12th Gen or later processor would improve performance in CPU-bound tasks. The GPU is end-of-life, with a successor in the GeForce 50 series, so users who want the latest features may consider a future upgrade, but the current GPU is still a top-tier performer. The platform’s support for DDR5 and PCIe Gen 5 provides headroom for future components.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build that combines the Intel Core i5-12400F with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER. The CPU is a 6-core, 12-thread processor from the Alder Lake generation, launched on 2022-01-03 with a launch MSRP of $174. The GPU is a GeForce 40-series part with the AD103 chip, launched on 2024-01-30 with a launch MSRP of 999 USD. The build’s combined percentile is 80, placing it in the top 20% of all configurations.

The overall tier of this build is high, driven by the GPU’s performance. The GPU is in the 86th percentile for all GPUs, making it a top-tier component. The CPU is in the 73rd percentile, which is solidly mid-range. The pairing is unbalanced, but for users who prioritize gaming at high resolutions, it is a very capable system. The data shows an average FPS of 197.8 across all games, and a rank of 284 out of 3732 pairs. This is a system that is built around the GPU, and users should be aware that the CPU will limit its full potential in certain scenarios. The build class is desktop, and it is best suited for gamers and GPU-accelerated workloads.