SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-12400F + Intel Arc B580

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

88 Score

Top 12% Ranking

88 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 12% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

84%

GPU

92%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-12400F

19,039 Benchmark Score

Top 16% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc B580

23,021 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

Intel Core i5-12400F and Intel Arc B580 form a desktop pairing that lands in the 71st combined percentile of all benchmarked systems, a figure that places it firmly in the upper-middle tier of PC builds. The CPU, a 6-core/12-thread Alder Lake-S part on the Intel Socket 1700 platform, delivers a 73rd percentile score against all CPUs, while the GPU, a Battlemage-generation Arc B580, sits at the 68th percentile among all GPUs. This is a balanced, modern foundation for 1080p and 1440p gaming, with the data showing a clear picture of where each component excels and where the pair hits its limits.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-12400F is built on the Alder Lake architecture using Intel's 10 nm process, with a die size of 163 mm². It runs six physical cores and twelve threads, with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.40 GHz. The cache hierarchy consists of 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 18 MB of shared L3 cache. This is not an unlocked multiplier part, so overclocking headroom is limited, but the stock performance is well-documented across multiple benchmark suites.

In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 12,380 points in multi-core and 1,680 points in single-core. The multi-core result is the more telling figure for productivity; a score above 12,000 indicates strong sustained throughput for threaded workloads like video encoding or 3D rendering. The single-core score of 1,680 is competitive for everyday responsiveness and gaming, where per-thread performance often dictates frame pacing. In Geekbench, the multi-core score is 9,472 and single-core is 1,964, which corroborates the Cinebench picture: this is a CPU that handles both heavily threaded and lightly threaded tasks without a glaring weakness.

The 3DMark thread scaling tests show interesting behavior. The 2-thread score is 1,699, rising to 3,067 at 4 threads, 4,779 at 8 threads, and peaking at 5,912 at max threads. The jump from 8 to max threads is modest (from 4,779 to 5,912), which makes sense for a 6-core/12-thread part—scaling beyond 8 threads is still positive but with diminishing returns as the scheduler fills out the remaining logical cores. The single-thread 3DMark score of 909 is a solid baseline for titles that rely on one or two primary threads.

PassMark results add another layer. The multithread score is 19,433, with integer math at 59,995 and floating-point math at 46,759. Data compression scores 233,327, which is a strong result for archiving or file transfer workloads. Extended instructions (SIMD) score 15,834, indicating capable AVX performance for scientific or financial applications. The CPU's average benchmark score is 19,039, which places it at the 73rd percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals in the database are the AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS at 19,047 (0% delta), the Intel Core 3 201E at 19,056 (-0.1% delta), and the Intel Core i5-1335U at 18,982 (0.3% delta). This means the 12400F is effectively performance-equivalent to a mid-range mobile Ryzen part and a higher-end mobile Core 3, which is a strong showing for a desktop chip with a 65 W TDP.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc B580 is a Battlemage-generation GPU, built on TSMC's 5 nm process with 19,600 million transistors on a 272 mm² die. It operates at a fixed 2670 MHz base and boost clock, with memory running at 2375 MHz (19 Gbps effective). The memory subsystem is 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, delivering 456.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is a generous memory allocation for the price tier, and the bandwidth figure supports high-resolution textures and compute workloads without stalling.

The graphics core has 2,560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units, and 80 ROPs. Ray tracing is handled by 20 dedicated RT cores, and the FP32 compute throughput is 13.67 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 27.34 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio). Pixel fill rate is 213.6 GPixel/s, and texture fill rate is 427.2 GTexel/s. The card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, which covers modern gaming APIs and ensures compatibility with upcoming titles.

In benchmark results, the GPU scores 15,748 in PassMark G3D and 7,729 in PassMark GPU compute. The Geekbench OpenCL score is 92,821, and the Vulkan score is 109,672. These numbers suggest strong compute performance for a mid-range card, particularly in Vulkan workloads where Intel's driver stack has improved. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 3,068, which is a representative figure for modern DX12 gaming loads. The average benchmark score is 23,021, placing the B580 at the 68th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP at 23,061 (-0.2% delta), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 at 22,895 (0.6% delta), and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 at 23,172 (-0.7% delta). This places the B580's raw compute performance in the same league as a last-generation high-end card (RTX 2080) and a previous-generation flagship (RTX 3080), which is remarkable for a GPU at this tier.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration. This gives builders flexibility: existing DDR4 kits can be reused to save on cost, or new DDR5 can be adopted for higher bandwidth potential. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, which is forward-looking for storage and GPU connectivity, though the GPU itself uses PCIe 4.0 x8. This means the B580's bandwidth needs are fully satisfied by the platform, and there is headroom for future PCIe Gen 5 devices.

The CPU's TDP is 65 W, and the GPU's TDP is 190 W, with a suggested PSU rating of 450 W. This is a modest power envelope for the combined system; a quality 450 W unit is sufficient, and many builders will have headroom with a 500 W or 550 W PSU if they upgrade other components later. The GPU requires a single 8-pin power connector, which is standard for this class. The CPU is not multiplier-unlocked, so the upgrade path for CPU performance would involve replacing the chip with a higher-tier LGA 1700 part rather than overclocking the existing one.

For a sensible next upgrade, the data suggests the GPU is the more likely bottleneck in heavily threaded or GPU-bound scenarios. The CPU's 73rd percentile ranking is solid, but the GPU's 68th percentile is slightly lower. A future upgrade to a higher-tier socket-1700 CPU (e.g., an i7 or i9 from the same generation) would provide more cores and threads for multi-threaded workloads, while the platform's PCIe Gen 5 support would accommodate a faster GPU without a motherboard change. The memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 means that a memory upgrade is possible without changing the board, provided the correct DIMM type is used.

Balance and Bottleneck

The combined percentile of this pair is 71, with the CPU at 73 and the GPU at 68. The gap is small, but it indicates that the GPU is the more limiting factor in overall system performance. In gaming workloads, this is confirmed by the FPS data across games. At 1080p, the CPU can drive high frame rates in lighter titles, but heavier games show the GPU struggling to maintain high FPS. For example, in Counter-Strike 2 at 1080p, the pair hits 150.2 FPS, which is CPU-friendly, but in Cyberpunk 2077 at 1080p, the score drops to 46.1 FPS, showing GPU-bound behavior.

The bottleneck shifts depending on resolution. At 1080p, the CPU is more likely to be the limiting factor in esports titles where frame rates exceed 150 FPS (Valorant at 337.9 FPS, CS:GO at 327.3 FPS). At 1440p and 4K, the GPU becomes the primary constraint, as seen in Red Dead Redemption 2 dropping from 37.5 FPS at 1080p to 27.3 FPS at 1440p and 19.9 FPS at 4K. The GPU's 12 GB VRAM and 456 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for 1080p and most 1440p titles, but 4K ultra settings push the card to its limits, often resulting in sub-30 FPS in demanding games.

In productivity workloads, the CPU's 6 cores and 12 threads are adequate but not exceptional. The multi-core scores (Cinebench R23 12,380, Geekbench 9,472) indicate that the CPU can handle video editing and 3D rendering at a hobbyist level, but the GPU's compute capabilities (13.67 TFLOPS FP32) may take over some of these tasks in applications that support GPU acceleration. For pure CPU-bound tasks like data compression, the PassMark score of 233,327 shows strong performance, but the GPU's 7,729 PassMark compute score suggests that GPU-accelerated workloads would run faster on the B580 than on the CPU alone.

The pair's average FPS across all tested games is 99.3, ranking 2,784 out of 3,732 pairs. This places it in the 25th percentile of all pairs, which sounds low, but it reflects that this is a mid-range setup, not a high-end one. The ranking is skewed by pairs that include top-tier CPUs and GPUs, so the absolute performance is respectable for the component tier.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets gamers who primarily play at 1080p with high refresh rates, and who are willing to accept medium-to-high settings in the most demanding titles. The data shows strong 1080p performance in competitive shooters: Valorant runs at 337.9 FPS, CS:GO at 327.3 FPS, and Rainbow Six Siege at 178 FPS. For single-player games at 1080p, the experience is playable but not uniformly smooth—Cyberpunk 2077 at 46.1 FPS and Red Dead Redemption 2 at 37.5 FPS are below the 60 FPS threshold often desired.

Content creators who work with video editing or 3D rendering will find the CPU adequate for moderate workloads, with Cinebench R23 multi-core at 12,380 and the GPU's 13.67 TFLOPS providing acceleration in supported applications. Software developers will appreciate the 12 threads for compilation tasks, and the PassMark integer math score of 59,995 indicates solid performance for code builds. Students and office workers will find the system more than capable for everyday tasks, though the GPU is overkill for that use case.

Small business workstations that need to handle occasional gaming or light GPU compute would benefit from this pair, particularly given the 12 GB VRAM for tasks like machine learning inference or video transcoding. The system's power efficiency (65 W CPU, 190 W GPU, 450 W PSU) makes it practical for office environments where power draw is a consideration.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data (dataIsMeasured is true) provides a comprehensive picture across 40+ games at three resolutions. At 1920x1080, the pair delivers high frame rates in esports and lighter titles: Valorant hits 337.9 FPS, CS:GO 327.3 FPS, and Roblox 192 FPS. Competitive shooters like Rainbow Six Siege (178 FPS) and Counter-Strike 2 (150.2 FPS) are well above the 144 Hz threshold, making this a strong 1080p esports machine.

For AAA titles at 1080p, the performance is mixed. Call of Duty: Warzone runs at 135.3 FPS, which is excellent, but Cyberpunk 2077 (46.1 FPS) and Red Dead Redemption 2 (37.5 FPS) require settings reductions to hit 60 FPS. Games like Control (63.3 FPS) and Microsoft Flight Simulator (52.5 FPS) are playable but not smooth at ultra settings. The 1080p average across all games is 99.3 FPS, which is a reasonable overall figure that includes both esports and AAA titles.

At 2560x1440, the GPU becomes the limiting factor. Valorant still runs at 289.6 FPS, and CS:GO at 224 FPS, but AAA games drop significantly: Call of Duty: Warzone (121 FPS) remains playable, but Cyberpunk 2077 falls to 34.6 FPS and Red Dead Redemption 2 to 27.3 FPS. The 1440p experience is best for older or lighter titles, with games like Assetto Corsa (62 FPS) and Dave The Diver (94 FPS) running smoothly.

At 3840x2160, 4K gaming is not viable for most titles on ultra settings. Valorant (229.3 FPS) and CS:GO (136.2 FPS) remain playable, but the majority of games drop below 40 FPS: Cyberpunk 2077 (20.1 FPS), Red Dead Redemption 2 (19.9 FPS), and Control (31.2 FPS). The 12 GB VRAM is sufficient for 4K textures in many games, but the raw compute power is insufficient for high frame rates at this resolution. The pair's rank by FPS is 2,784 out of 3,732 pairs, with an average FPS of 99.3, which confirms its position as a solid 1080p performer and a capable 1440p card for less demanding titles.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, this pair delivers exceptional frame rates in esports titles—Valorant at 337.9 FPS and CS:GO at 327.3 FPS—making it ideal for 144 Hz or 240 Hz monitors in competitive shooters. Rainbow Six Siege (178 FPS) and Counter-Strike 2 (150.2 FPS) also clear the 144 FPS mark.

Streaming: The 6-core/12-thread CPU handles encoding at a baseline level, with a PassMark multithread score of 19,433. The GPU's 13.67 TFLOPS FP32 and 7,729 PassMark compute score can offload encoding to the GPU in supported software, freeing CPU cycles for gaming. Streaming at 1080p60 is feasible, but high-bitrate 1440p streaming may strain the system if the game is demanding.

Video editing: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12,380 provides solid performance for timeline editing and export in applications like Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve. The GPU's 12 GB VRAM and 456 GB/s bandwidth accelerate effects, color grading, and rendering in GPU-accelerated workflows. For 4K video editing, the system can handle proxy workflows, but real-time 4K editing may require lower preview resolutions.

3D rendering: CPU rendering in Blender or Cinema 4D will be modest, with the 12-thread CPU scoring 5,912 in 3DMark max threads. GPU rendering is faster, with the B580's 13.67 TFLOPS FP32, but the 20 RT cores are not as numerous as higher-tier cards, so ray-traced scenes will take longer.

Software development: The 12 threads and 18 MB L3 cache support parallel compilation, with PassMark integer math at 59,995 indicating strong performance for code builds. The 12 GB VRAM is useful for running local machine learning models or GPU-accelerated data processing, and the Vulkan score of 109,672 shows capable compute for scientific workloads.

Student and office work: This system is overkill for word processing, spreadsheets, and web browsing, but the CPU's single-thread score of 909 in 3DMark and 1,680 in Cinebench R23 ensures snappy responsiveness. The GPU is unnecessary for office tasks, but it provides headroom for occasional gaming or creative projects without a system upgrade.

FAQ

Q: Is the Intel Core i5-12400F good for gaming?

A: Yes, for 1080p gaming. The CPU's single-thread performance (1,680 Cinebench R23 single-core) drives high frame rates in esports titles like Valorant (337.9 FPS) and CS:GO (327.3 FPS), and its 6 cores/12 threads handle modern games without bottlenecking the GPU at that resolution.

Q: Can the Intel Arc B580 handle 1440p gaming?

A: It depends on the game. Lighter titles like Valorant (289.6 FPS) and CS:GO (224 FPS) run excellently at 1440p, and Call of Duty: Warzone hits 121 FPS. However, demanding AAA games like Cyberpunk 2077 (34.6 FPS) and Red Dead Redemption 2 (27.3 FPS) require reduced settings for smooth play.

Q: How much VRAM does the Arc B580 have, and is it enough?

A: The GPU has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering 456.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p gaming with high textures, and it provides headroom for 4K textures in some titles, though the GPU's compute power is the limiting factor at 4K.

Q: Does this CPU support overclocking?

A: No, the multiplier is locked. The base clock is 2.50 GHz and the boost clock is 4.40 GHz, but you cannot adjust the multiplier to increase performance beyond stock settings.

Q: What power supply do I need for this system?

A: The CPU has a 65 W TDP and the GPU has a 190 W TDP, with a suggested PSU rating of 450 W. A quality 450 W unit is sufficient; a 500 W or higher PSU provides headroom for future upgrades.

Q: Is this system good for video editing?

A: Yes, for moderate workloads. The CPU scores 12,380 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 9,472 in Geekbench multi-core, which handles 1080p and light 4K editing. The GPU's 12 GB VRAM and 456 GB/s bandwidth accelerate effects and rendering in supported software.

Q: What is the upgrade path for this build?

A: The CPU uses Socket 1700, which supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory. You can upgrade to a higher-tier LGA 1700 CPU for more cores, and the platform's 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes accommodate faster GPUs or NVMe storage without changing the motherboard.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 19,039, placing it at the 73rd percentile of all CPUs. Its best results include Cinebench R23 multi-core at 12,380, Geekbench multi-core at 9,472, and PassMark multithread at 19,433. The GPU's average benchmark score is 23,021, placing it at the 68th percentile of all GPUs. Key results include PassMark G3D at 15,748, Geekbench Vulkan at 109,672, and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 at 3,068.

The combined percentile for this pair is 71, indicating a balanced system where the CPU is slightly stronger than the GPU. In real-world gaming, the pair averages 99.3 FPS across all tested games, ranking 2,784 out of 3,732 pairs. This ranking reflects the mid-range nature of the components: the CPU is competitive with high-end mobile parts (Ryzen 5 7535HS at 0% delta), and the GPU's compute is on par with the RTX 2080 (0.6% delta) and RTX 3080 (-0.7% delta), but the pair cannot match systems with higher-tier desktop components.

The data shows that this build is a well-balanced 1080p gaming machine with strong productivity potential. The CPU's 73rd percentile performance is a solid foundation, and the GPU's 68th percentile is adequate for the target resolution. The bottleneck is clearly the GPU at 1440p and 4K, while the CPU is rarely the limiting factor in gaming scenarios. For the launch MSRP of $174 for the CPU and $249 for the GPU, this pair offers a competitive combination for builders seeking a capable mid-range system, though the total cost of the platform must be considered separately.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-12400F + Intel Arc B580

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-12400F

Intel Arc B580

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Valorant

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Valorant

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Valorant

Valorant

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

GPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

Balance and Bottleneck

Who Should Build It

Gaming Performance

Usage Scenarios

FAQ

Benchmark Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds