SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-12400F + AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

88 Score

Top 12% Ranking

88 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 12% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

84%

GPU

92%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-12400F

19,039 Benchmark Score

Top 16% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT

22,549 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Balance and Bottleneck

The Intel Core i5-12400F and AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT pairing sits at the 70th combined percentile, which indicates a well-matched mid-range desktop configuration. The CPU's 73rd percentile versus all CPUs and the GPU's 67th percentile versus all GPUs show that neither component dramatically overshadows the other in aggregate benchmark terms. However, the actual balance shifts depending on the workload and resolution.

At 1080p, the CPU becomes the more visible limiting factor in several titles. The 3DMark single-thread score of 909 and the 2-thread score of 1699 suggest that the i5-12400F has solid single-core performance for a six-core Alder Lake part, but the data from the measured FPS shows that some games at 1080p are already pushing frame rates that approach the CPU's ceiling. Counter-Strike: Global Offensive reaches 466.4 FPS at 1080p, and Valorant hits 437.1 FPS at the same resolution—these are extremely high figures, yet they also represent scenarios where the GPU is barely stressed, and the CPU's thread scheduling and per-core throughput are doing the heavy lifting.

As resolution increases, the bottleneck shifts decisively toward the GPU. At 1440p, Cyberpunk 2077 drops from 63 FPS at 1080p to 47 FPS—a 25% reduction that tracks closely with the GPU's pixel throughput rather than any CPU limitation. At 4K, the same game falls to 31 FPS, and the frame rate scaling between 1440p and 4K (47 to 31) is a 34% drop, which is characteristic of a GPU-bound scenario. The pattern repeats across the game list: Red Dead Redemption 2 goes from 57 FPS at 1080p to 43 at 1440p and 28 at 4K, while Microsoft Flight Simulator moves from 75.3 to 63.6 to 43.7 across the same resolution steps.

The pair's average FPS across all measured games is 138.8, which ranks 1395th out of 3732 pairs—placing this combination in the top 37% of all measured pairings. That average is heavily influenced by the many esports and lighter titles running at very high frame rates. The CPU's 3DMark max-thread score of 5912 versus the 16-thread score of 5895 shows that the processor is already fully utilized with its 12 threads; adding more threads would not help. Meanwhile, the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3316 and Passmark G3D score of 22547 indicate a card that can handle modern rasterization workloads but will be the limiting factor in 4K gaming.

For CPU-heavy workloads like data compression (Passmark score of 233327) and integer math (59995), the i5-12400F performs admirably for its class but will bottleneck a more powerful GPU in multi-threaded production tasks. The GPU's compute score of 12912 in Passmark and OpenCL score of 138383 in Geekbench show that the RX 7700 XT is a capable compute device, but those workloads will not be limited by the CPU in most cases.

# Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core i5-12400F achieves an average benchmark score of 19039, placing it in the 73rd percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival is the AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS with an average score of 19047, a delta of 0%—meaning the two are statistically tied. The Intel Core 3 201E scores 19056 (-0.1% relative to the i5), the Intel Core i5-1335U scores 18982 (+0.3%), and the AMD EPYC 7773X scores 18979 (+0.3%). This clustering shows that the i5-12400F sits right at the edge of a performance plateau where several very different processors (a laptop chip, a desktop chip, a mobile chip, and a server chip) all land within a 0.4% band.

Looking deeper into the CPU benchmarks, the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12380 versus the single-core score of 1680 yields a multi-to-single ratio of 7.4x, which is typical for a six-core, twelve-thread part. The 3DMark thread scaling shows a clear progression: 1699 at 2 threads, 3067 at 4 threads, 4779 at 8 threads, and 5912 at max threads. The jump from 8 threads to 12 threads adds only 1133 points (a 23.7% increase), which is less than the theoretical 50% you might expect from adding four more threads—this indicates some diminishing returns in the 3DMark workload at higher thread counts, likely due to memory bandwidth or cache contention. The L3 cache is 18 MB shared, and the L2 is 1.25 MB per core.

The AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT delivers an average benchmark score of 22549, putting it in the 67th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile at 22435 (0.5% faster), followed by the RTX 4060 Mobile at 22729 (-0.8%), the RTX 2080 at 22895 (-1.5%), and the AMD Radeon RX 5700 at 22170 (+1.7%). The RX 7700 XT is essentially tied with these GPUs in aggregate benchmark terms, though they span vastly different form factors and power envelopes. The desktop RTX 2080 being only 1.5% faster in average score is notable, as is the RX 5700 from the previous generation being only 1.7% slower.

In specific GPU tests, the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3316 and the Geekbench Vulkan score of 46443 show modern API performance, while the Passmark DX11 score of 232 and DX12 score of 79 are lower-level metrics that are difficult to interpret directly. The Passmark G3D score of 22547 and G2D score of 1161 provide a general sense of the card's overall graphics capability and 2D acceleration. The GPU compute score of 12912 in Passmark and 138383 in OpenCL indicate that the RX 7700 XT is a solid compute performer for its class.

Combined, this CPU and GPU pairing achieves a 70th combined percentile, which means it outperforms 70% of all measured CPU+GPU combinations in the database. The average FPS across all games of 138.8 at the measured resolutions (primarily 1080p and 1440p) shows that this is a high-refresh-rate capable system for most titles.

# FAQ

Q: Is the Intel Core i5-12400F a bottleneck for the RX 7700 XT?

A: At 1080p, the CPU can be the limiting factor in esports titles where frame rates exceed 400 FPS (Counter-Strike: Global Offensive at 466.4 FPS, Valorant at 437.1 FPS). At 1440p and 4K, the GPU becomes the bottleneck, as seen in Cyberpunk 2077 dropping from 63 FPS at 1080p to 47 FPS at 1440p and 31 FPS at 4K.

Q: What kind of gaming performance can I expect at 1440p with this build?

A: The measured FPS data shows strong 1440p performance. Call of Duty: Warzone runs at 119 FPS, Counter-Strike 2 at 141 FPS, Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege at 167 FPS, and Assetto Corsa at 90.7 FPS. More demanding titles like Cyberpunk 2077 run at 47 FPS and Red Dead Redemption 2 at 43 FPS.

Q: How does the RX 7700 XT compare to NVIDIA cards in raw benchmark scores?

A: The RX 7700 XT's average benchmark score of 22549 is 0.5% higher than the RTX 5060 Mobile (22435), 0.8% lower than the RTX 4060 Mobile (22729), and 1.5% lower than the RTX 2080 (22895). These are all within a 2.3% band.

Q: What is the CPU's multi-threaded performance like for productivity tasks?

A: The i5-12400F scores 12380 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 6980 in Cinebench R20 multi-core. Passmark multi-thread score is 19433, with data compression at 233327 and integer math at 59995. These scores place it in the 73rd percentile of all CPUs.

Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming?

A: Yes, but with compromises. At 4K, Call of Duty: Warzone runs at 104.6 FPS, Counter-Strike 2 at 79 FPS, and Minecraft at 69 FPS. However, Cyberpunk 2077 drops to 31 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 to 28 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended to 8.2 FPS.

Q: What is the CPU's power draw and cooling requirement?

A: The i5-12400F has a TDP of 65 W, which means a capable air cooler is sufficient. The GPU has a TDP of 245 W, and the suggested PSU is 550 W.

Q: How does the i5-12400F compare to the AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS?

A: The two are statistically tied, with the Ryzen 5 7535HS scoring 19047 and the i5-12400F scoring 19039, a delta of 0%. The i5-12400F is a desktop part while the Ryzen is a mobile chip.

# Who Should Build It

This desktop build targets gamers who primarily play at 1080p or 1440p and want high refresh rates in competitive titles. The measured FPS data shows that at 1080p, esports games like Valorant (437.1 FPS), Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (466.4 FPS), and Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege (254 FPS) run at frame rates that far exceed typical 144Hz or even 240Hz monitors. At 1440p, these same games still run above 140 FPS in most cases, making this a strong choice for competitive gamers who want a single system that can handle both high-refresh esports and visually demanding AAA titles.

Content creators who work with video editing, 3D rendering, or software compilation will find the i5-12400F's 12 threads and the RX 7700 XT's compute capabilities sufficient for moderate workloads. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12380 and the GPU's OpenCL score of 138383 indicate that this system can handle 1080p video editing timelines with effects, basic 3D rendering in Blender or similar tools, and code compilation without feeling underpowered. However, for professional-grade workloads that require heavy multi-threading or GPU compute for days-long renders, this system would be at the lower end of acceptable.

Software developers and students building a workstation for programming, running virtual machines, or compiling projects will appreciate the CPU's balanced performance. The Passmark data encryption score of 11679 and extended instructions score of 15834 show that the i5-12400F handles encryption and SIMD workloads competently. The 6 cores and 12 threads are sufficient for parallel compilation tasks, and the 18 MB of L3 cache helps with frequently accessed data.

Small business workstations that need a reliable desktop for office productivity, accounting software, or light CAD work will find this pairing more than adequate. The 2D performance (Passmark G2D score of 1161) and the CPU's single-thread score of 3481 in Passmark ensure responsive day-to-day operation. The combination of a 65 W TDP CPU and a 245 W TDP GPU means the system is power-efficient enough for always-on office use while still having headroom for occasional gaming or rendering tasks.

This is not the right build for users who need maximum multi-threaded throughput (the CPU's max-thread score of 5912 is modest), nor is it aimed at 4K ultra settings gaming (many titles fall below 60 FPS at 3840x2160). It is a sensible middle-ground system.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-12400F uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through dual-channel configurations. This flexibility means builders can choose between more affordable DDR4 memory or higher-bandwidth DDR5 depending on their motherboard choice and budget considerations. The CPU supports PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes (CPU only), while the GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface—the RX 7700 XT will not saturate a PCIe 4.0 x16 slot, so there is no bottleneck from the bus interface.

The 65 W TDP of the CPU means that a modest air cooler is sufficient, and the 245 W TDP of the GPU, combined with the suggested 550 W PSU, leaves some headroom for overclocking the GPU (the CPU has a locked multiplier) or adding a few additional drives. The GPU requires two 8-pin power connectors and occupies a dual-slot design, measuring 267 mm in length, 135 mm in height, and 50 mm in width—compatible with most mid-tower cases.

A sensible next upgrade for this system would be a higher-core-count Socket 1700 CPU, as the platform supports the broader Alder Lake family. The 3DMark thread scaling shows that the current CPU gains only 23.7% going from 8 threads to 12 threads, so a CPU with more physical cores would provide a more substantial multi-threaded improvement. However, the CPU's 73rd percentile ranking means it is not the primary bottleneck in most gaming scenarios at 1440p or 4K.

For the GPU, the RX 7700 XT's 67th percentile and its proximity to the RTX 2080 (1.5% slower) suggest that a future upgrade would need to be a significant step up to be worthwhile. The PCIe 4.0 x16 slot is current-generation, so a newer GPU would not be limited by the interface. The 550 W suggested PSU would need to be revisited if upgrading to a more power-hungry GPU, as the current system's combined TDP of 310 W (65 W + 245 W) is already over half the suggested PSU capacity.

The platform supports DDR4 and DDR5, but the memory bandwidth is not explicitly listed in the data. The L3 cache of 18 MB shared will be a limiting factor for some memory-intensive workloads, but it is adequate for gaming and general productivity. The CPU does not support ECC memory, which is a consideration for users who require error-correcting memory for professional work.

# Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data for this pairing is comprehensive, spanning 50 games across 1080p, 1440p, and 4K resolutions. At 1080p, the system delivers exceptionally high frame rates in esports and lighter titles: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive runs at 466.4 FPS, Valorant at 437.1 FPS, Roblox at 274.5 FPS, Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege at 254 FPS, and Minecraft at 211 FPS. These numbers confirm that the i5-12400F is more than capable of driving high-refresh-rate monitors at 1080p in CPU-friendly titles.

For AAA games at 1080p, the performance is solid but varies considerably. Call of Duty: Warzone runs at 138.7 FPS, Doom at 158 FPS, Assetto Corsa at 123.6 FPS, and Counter-Strike 2 at 214 FPS. More demanding titles like Cyberpunk 2077 (63 FPS), Red Dead Redemption 2 (57 FPS), and Ark: Survival Ascended (32.8 FPS) show that this system is at the edge of playable for the most graphically intensive games at 1080p ultra settings. Ark's 32.8 FPS is particularly low, indicating that this game is an outlier in its demands.

At 1440p, the system still delivers strong performance for competitive gaming: Valorant hits 411.9 FPS, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive at 320.4 FPS, Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege at 167 FPS, and Call of Duty: Warzone at 119 FPS. These are excellent numbers for a 1440p high-refresh setup. For AAA titles, 1440p performance is playable but not ultra-smooth: Cyberpunk 2077 at 47 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 43 FPS, and Control at 66.3 FPS. Microsoft Flight Simulator runs at 63.6 FPS, which is respectable for that notoriously demanding title.

At 4K, the system struggles with the most demanding titles but remains playable for many games. Call of Duty: Warzone runs at 104.6 FPS, Valorant at 328.7 FPS, and Counter-Strike 2 at 79 FPS. However, Cyberpunk 2077 drops to 31 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 to 28 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended to 8.2 FPS—the latter being unplayable. The 4K numbers confirm that this is a 1080p/1440p gaming system first, with 4K capability only for lighter or well-optimized titles.

The average FPS across all games and resolutions is 138.8, which ranks this pair 1395th out of 3732 measured pairs. This places the system in the top 37% of all pairings, which is a strong result for a mid-range configuration.

# GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT is built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture with the Navi 32 chip, manufactured on a 5 nm process by TSMC. The chip contains 28,100 million transistors on a 346 mm² die, with a transistor density of 81.2M per mm². The GPU features 3456 shading units, 216 texture mapping units, and 96 raster operation units. It has 54 ray tracing cores, though tensor cores are not listed for this architecture.

The memory subsystem consists of 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s. The memory clock is 2250 MHz, which translates to 18 Gbps effective. This memory configuration is well-suited for 1440p gaming, as the measured FPS data shows strong performance at that resolution. The 12 GB capacity provides sufficient headroom for modern game textures at 1440p and even 4K in some titles.

Clock speeds are a base of 1435 MHz, a boost of 2544 MHz, and a game clock of 2171 MHz. The game clock is the more relevant figure for sustained gaming workloads, and the boost clock represents the maximum single-core boost. The pixel rate is 244.2 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 549.5 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 35.17 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 35.17 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio), which is notable for compute workloads that can leverage FP16.

The GPU's average benchmark score of 22549 places it in the 67th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the RTX 2080, is 1.5% faster in average score. This means the RX 7700 XT offers performance comparable to a previous-generation flagship desktop GPU, which is a strong value proposition for rasterization-heavy workloads. However, the RTX 2080 has been on the market for years, and the RX 7700 XT's ray tracing performance (54 RT cores) is a newer implementation.

For rendering workloads, the FP32 performance of 35.17 TFLOPS and the OpenCL score of 138383 indicate that this GPU can handle GPU-accelerated rendering in applications like Blender or Octane. The 12 GB VRAM is sufficient for most 3D scenes at moderate complexity. The DirectX 12 Ultimate support (12_2) ensures compatibility with the latest game APIs, and Vulkan 1.4 support is current. The GPU supports OpenGL 4.6 for legacy applications.

The card's dimensions (267 mm length, 135 mm height, 50 mm width) and dual-slot design mean it will fit in most mid-tower cases, but users with smaller cases should verify clearance. The display outputs include one HDMI 2.1a, two DisplayPort 2.1, and one USB Type-C, which provides flexibility for multi-monitor setups and VR headsets.

# Build Overview

This is a desktop build pairing the Intel Core i5-12400F (Alder Lake architecture, 6 cores, 12 threads) with the AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT (RDNA 3.0 architecture, Navi 32 chip). The combined percentile is 70th, meaning this system outperforms 70% of all measured CPU+GPU combinations in the database. The CPU sits at the 73rd percentile of all CPUs, and the GPU at the 67th percentile of all GPUs, indicating a balanced pairing where neither component is dramatically stronger than the other.

The CPU's average benchmark score of 19039 and the GPU's average score of 22549 combine to create a system that is well-suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming, as well as moderate productivity workloads. The measured average FPS of 138.8 across all games places this pairing in the top 37% of all measured pairs (rank 1395 out of 3732). This is a mid-range to upper-mid-range desktop configuration that delivers high frame rates in esports titles and playable performance in AAA games at 1080p and 1440p.

This is not an entry-level system, nor is it a high-end enthusiast build. It occupies a sensible middle ground: the 6-core CPU and 12 GB GPU are sufficient for most users' needs, but they are not future-proof for the most demanding workloads or 4K ultra gaming. The system's 70th combined percentile reflects this positioning—it beats the majority of systems but is not near the top.

The build class is desktop, which means it is intended for a stationary workstation or gaming rig with the ability to upgrade components over time. The Socket 1700 platform and PCIe 4.0 x16 interface provide a modern foundation for future upgrades, though the 550 W suggested PSU may need to be upgraded if a more power-hungry GPU is installed later.

Overall, this is a practical, well-balanced desktop configuration for gamers and professionals who prioritize frame rates at 1080p and 1440p over maximum graphical fidelity at 4K. It is a system that will handle most games and productivity tasks without complaint, and it has enough headroom to remain relevant for several years.

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-12400F is a desktop processor from the Core 12th Gen series, built on the Alder Lake architecture with a 10 nm process node manufactured by Intel. It has 6 cores and 12 threads, with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.40 GHz. The TDP is 65 W, which is modest for a desktop CPU and allows for efficient cooling solutions. The die size is 163 mm², and the processor is manufactured by Intel.

The cache hierarchy consists of an 80 KB L1 cache per core, a 1.25 MB L2 cache per core, and an 18 MB shared L3 cache. This cache configuration is typical for a mid-range Alder Lake part, with the L3 cache being shared across all cores. The memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, though the memory bandwidth is not listed. The CPU does not support ECC memory. It uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform and supports PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes (CPU only).

The CPU's average benchmark score of 19039 places it in the 73rd percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival is the AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS with a score of 19047 (0% delta), demonstrating that the i5-12400F is essentially tied with a modern laptop chip in aggregate performance. The benchmark scores show a clear picture of the CPU's capabilities: Cinebench R23 multi-core of 12380 and single-core of 1680, Cinebench R20 multi-core of 6980 and single-core of 985, and Geekbench multi-core of 9472 and single-core of 1964.

The 3DMark thread scaling tests show how the CPU performs with increasing thread counts: 1699 at 2 threads, 3067 at 4 threads, 4779 at 8 threads, and 5912 at max threads. The improvement from 2 to 4 threads is 80.6%, from 4 to 8 threads is 55.8%, and from 8 to 12 threads is 23.7%. This diminishing return at higher thread counts indicates that the CPU's 6 physical cores provide the bulk of the performance, with the additional 6 threads (via Hyper-Threading) offering a smaller but still meaningful boost.

In Passmark tests, the CPU shows strengths in data compression (233327), integer math (59995), and floating-point math (46759). The extended instructions score of 15834 indicates solid SIMD performance for workloads that use AVX or similar instruction sets. The data encryption score of 11679 shows good cryptographic performance. The random string sorting score of 22975 and the find prime numbers score of 72 are more specialized metrics but contribute to the overall benchmark picture.

The single-thread performance, as measured by Passmark single-thread score of 3481 and 3DMark single-thread score of 909, is strong for a six-core part. This is important for gaming, where many games still rely heavily on single-thread performance. The boost clock of 4.40 GHz helps in these scenarios, and the 10 nm process keeps power consumption manageable.

For real-world workloads, the i5-12400F is well-suited for gaming at 1080p and 1440p, where its 12 threads are sufficient for modern game engines. It handles productivity tasks like office applications, web browsing, and light content creation with ease. For more demanding multi-threaded workloads like video encoding or 3D rendering, the 6-core/12-thread configuration is adequate but not exceptional—users who need more cores would want to look at higher-tier Alder Lake or rival parts from AMD.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-12400F + AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-12400F

AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Valorant

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Valorant

Valorant

Valorant

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds