SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i3-12300HE + Intel Arc A550M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

86 Score

Top 14% Ranking

86 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 14% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

76%

GPU

96%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i3-12300HE

4,995 Benchmark Score

Top 24% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A550M

49,737 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i3-12300HE + Intel Arc A550M: Mobile Performance Analysis

This pairing combines Intel's Alder Lake-H mobile processor with Intel's Arc A550M discrete graphics in a laptop configuration, achieving a combined percentile of 73 across all benchmarked systems. The CPU sits at the 59th percentile among all processors while the GPU reaches the 86th percentile among all graphics cards, creating an asymmetric performance profile where the graphics subsystem is considerably stronger relative to its hardware class than the processor. There are no measured FPS rows available for this exact combination, so all gaming performance discussion in this analysis is estimated from the benchmark scores rather than derived from direct frame-rate testing.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i3-12300HE is a mobile processor built on Intel's Alder Lake-H architecture using a 10 nm process node from Intel's own foundry. It features 8 cores and 12 threads, a configuration that indicates a hybrid design mixing performance and efficiency cores, though the FACT PACK does not specify the exact core distribution. The base clock runs at 1900 MHz with a boost clock reaching 4.30 GHz, and the chip carries a 45 W TDP typical of high-performance mobile processors. The die size is 217 mm², and the CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus. The processor includes UHD Graphics as integrated graphics, though the presence of the discrete Arc A550M GPU means the integrated solution is unlikely to be the primary graphics path.

Cinebench results paint a clear picture of the CPU's capabilities. In Cinebench R23, the chip scores 17272 points in multi-core and 2438 points in single-core tests. The multi-core score represents strong sustained throughput for a mobile i3-class part, suggesting the hybrid core arrangement effectively manages power and thermal constraints during all-core workloads. The single-core score of 2438 indicates solid per-thread performance, which translates to responsive day-to-day operation and good performance in lightly-threaded applications. In Cinebench R20, the scores are 7254 multi-core and 1023 single-core, while Cinebench R15 shows 1740 multi-core and 245 single-core. These progressive scores across R15, R20, and R23 demonstrate consistent scaling with the increasingly demanding workload versions.

The average benchmark score of 4995 places this CPU at the 59th percentile among all processors. Its nearest rivals are tightly clustered: the Intel Xeon W-2150B scores 4992 (0.1% difference), the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G scores 5002 (-0.1%), the Intel Core i5-13500TE scores 5002 (-0.1%), and the Intel Core i7-1375PRE scores 4985 (0.2%). This clustering within a 0.3% range means the i3-12300HE delivers performance statistically indistinguishable from these competitors in aggregate benchmarking. For real workloads, this translates to multi-threaded productivity tasks like video encoding, compilation, and 3D rendering that scale across all 12 threads, where the processor competes at a level comparable to mid-range desktop and mobile parts from both Intel and AMD.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A550M is a mobile graphics processor based on the Xe-HPG architecture, specifically the DG2-512 chip manufactured on TSMC's 6 nm process. The chip contains 21,700 million transistors on a 406 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 53.4M per mm². Memory configuration includes 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, delivering 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU operates at a base clock of 900 MHz with a boost clock of 2050 MHz, and memory runs at 1750 MHz with 14 Gbps effective data rate. The GPU has a 60 W TDP and connects via PCIe 4.0 x16.

Compute resources include 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, 64 raster operation units, and 16 ray tracing cores. The FACT PACK does not list tensor cores, so AI-accelerated workloads rely on the general compute capabilities. Pixel rate reaches 131.2 GPixel/s and texture rate hits 262.4 GTexel/s. Floating-point performance is rated at 8.397 TFLOPS for FP32 and 16.79 TFLOPS for FP16 with a 2:1 ratio. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, making it compatible with modern gaming APIs including hardware ray tracing through the 16 RT cores.

Benchmark scores from Geekbench show 49894 in OpenCL and 49580 in Vulkan. The average benchmark score of 49737 places this GPU at the 86th percentile among all graphics cards, which is notably high for a mobile part. The nearest competitors are intriguing: the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti scores 49957 (-0.4%), the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 scores 50001 (-0.5%), the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT scores 50951 (-2.4%), and the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT scores 48477 (2.6%). The Arc A550M sits within 0.5% of the RTX 5070 Ti in these compute benchmarks, though this comparison reflects raw compute throughput rather than gaming performance, where driver optimization and feature support play significant roles. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM with 224 GB/s bandwidth provides adequate capacity for 1080p gaming with high textures and some headroom for 1440p in less demanding titles.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The GPU's 86th percentile standing suggests strong 1080p performance, and the CPU's single-core score of 2438 in R23 ensures the processor can feed frames efficiently. The 16 RT cores add ray tracing capability, though the estimated frame rates at ultra settings would likely land below the 144 Hz mark in demanding titles.

Streaming: The 8-core, 12-thread CPU provides enough parallel throughput for game capture and encoding simultaneously, while the GPU's 16.79 TFLOPS FP16 performance can assist with hardware-accelerated encoding workloads. The CPU's multi-core score of 17272 in R23 indicates sufficient headroom for streaming overhead without significantly impacting gaming performance.

Video editing: The combination of CPU multi-core strength and GPU compute capability suits video editing workflows. The CPU's 17272 R23 multi-core score handles timeline operations and effects, while the GPU's 8.397 TFLOPS FP32 and 224 GB/s bandwidth accelerate rendering and preview generation. The 8 GB VRAM provides reasonable capacity for 4K footage with effects.

3D rendering: CPU rendering leverages all 12 threads with the 17272 R23 multi-core score, while GPU rendering benefits from the 2048 shading units and 16.79 TFLOPS FP16 throughput. The 60 W GPU TDP means sustained rendering loads are possible in a laptop chassis, though thermal constraints would influence long-duration renders.

Software development: The 8 cores and 12 threads handle compilation tasks effectively, and the 2438 R23 single-core score ensures responsive IDE operation. The CPU's 59th percentile places it above budget mobile processors, making it suitable for full-stack development, containerized workloads, and local testing.

Student and office work: This configuration exceeds the requirements for document processing, spreadsheets, web browsing, and presentation creation. The CPU's single-core strength and the GPU's 86th percentile ensure smooth multitasking and accelerated web rendering, though the laptop form factor and discrete GPU suggest a user with more demanding needs than typical office work.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this CPU-GPU combination, so the following estimates are derived from the benchmark scores and relative performance positions. At 1080p with ultra settings, the GPU's 86th percentile and its proximity to the RTX 5070 Ti in compute benchmarks suggest strong frame rates in most titles, with 60+ FPS achievable in well-optimized games. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for high-resolution textures at 1080p, though some newer titles with large texture packs may approach capacity limits. The CPU's single-core score of 2438 in R23 indicates it can sustain high frame rates without becoming a bottleneck in most scenarios, though extremely CPU-intensive titles like simulation games may push the processor harder.

At 1440p, the estimated performance would drop as the GPU's 224 GB/s bandwidth and 8.397 TFLOPS FP32 become more limiting. The 128-bit memory bus is narrow for a card at this performance tier, which may impact bandwidth-sensitive scenarios. Ray tracing workloads would see significant frame rate reductions given the 16 RT cores are modest in count, though DirectX 12 Ultimate support means the feature set is modern. Competitive esports titles at 1080p with lower settings could plausibly reach high refresh rates, given the GPU's compute strength and the CPU's single-thread performance. Overall, this pairing is best suited for 1080p gaming with reasonable settings, with 1440p possible in less demanding titles.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU-GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 73, indicating the system outperforms 73% of all benchmarked laptop configurations.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals in average benchmark score?

A: The CPU's average score of 4995 is within 0.2% of its closest competitors, with the Intel Xeon W-2150B at 4992 (0.1% difference) and the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G at 5002 (-0.1%).

Q: What memory types does the processor support?

A: The Intel Core i3-12300HE supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus, though the FACT PACK does not specify maximum capacities or speeds.

Q: Does the GPU support hardware ray tracing?

A: Yes, the Intel Arc A550M includes 16 ray tracing cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), which includes DirectX Raytracing.

Q: What is the GPU's average benchmark score and percentile?

A: The GPU achieves an average benchmark score of 49737, placing it at the 86th percentile among all graphics cards.

Q: What is the CPU's boost clock speed?

A: The CPU boosts up to 4.30 GHz from a base clock of 1900 MHz, which is reflected in its Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2438.

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have and what is its bandwidth?

A: The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 224.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth.

Who Should Build It

This laptop configuration targets users who prioritize graphics performance over raw CPU throughput. The GPU's 86th percentile makes it suitable for gamers playing at 1080p with high to ultra settings, particularly those who want modern features like ray tracing and DirectX 12 Ultimate support. The CPU's 59th percentile covers mainstream productivity tasks, so content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering at moderate complexity would find the balance acceptable. Software developers benefit from the 12 threads for parallel builds and the responsive single-core performance for interactive coding.

Students in engineering or design programs that use GPU-accelerated applications would find this configuration competent, as would small business users running professional software that leverages the GPU's compute capabilities. The 8 GB VRAM suits creative workloads with moderately sized assets. Users who need maximum multi-threaded CPU performance for heavy rendering or simulation workloads would be better served by a system with a higher CPU percentile, as the 59th percentile places this processor below the top tier in CPU-bound tasks.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 17272 and single-core score of 2438 establish its position at the 59th percentile with an average benchmark score of 4995. Rivals are exceptionally close: the Intel Xeon W-2150B trails by 0.1%, the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G leads by 0.1%, and the Intel Core i5-13500TE also leads by 0.1%. The GPU's Geekbench OpenCL score of 49894 and Vulkan score of 49580 average to 49737, placing it at the 86th percentile. The GPU's nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti, leads by just 0.4%, while the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT trails by 2.6%.

The combined picture shows a system where the GPU is substantially stronger relative to its hardware class than the CPU. The 27-point gap between the CPU's 59th percentile and the GPU's 86th percentile indicates the graphics card outperforms its processor counterpart by a wider margin than typical balanced configurations. This asymmetry means the GPU will frequently be underutilized in CPU-bound workloads, while in GPU-bound scenarios the processor has enough headroom to avoid becoming the primary limiter.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build combining the Intel Core i3-12300HE mobile processor with the Intel Arc A550M discrete mobile GPU. The CPU represents Intel's 12th generation Alder Lake-H architecture, while the GPU uses the Xe-HPG architecture with the DG2-512 chip. The combined percentile of 73 places this configuration in the upper-middle tier of all benchmarked systems, with the GPU being the standout component at the 86th percentile. The CPU's 59th percentile is respectable but not exceptional, making this a graphics-first laptop build.

The pairing is notable for its generational alignment: both components come from Intel's current architecture families, and the system uses a mobile form factor with the GPU having a 60 W TDP and the CPU a 45 W TDP. The GPU's production status is end-of-life, which may affect long-term driver support, while the CPU remains active. Overall, this build occupies a distinctive position in the laptop market, offering GPU performance near desktop-class parts from the previous generation while the CPU remains firmly in mid-range mobile territory.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance asymmetry between the 86th percentile GPU and 59th percentile CPU creates a clear bottleneck profile. In GPU-intensive workloads like gaming at high resolutions and graphics rendering, the CPU has sufficient headroom to keep the GPU fed, as evidenced by the CPU's strong single-core score of 2438 in R23. However, in CPU-bound scenarios such as physics simulation, heavy multitasking, or compilation with many threads, the processor becomes the limiting factor, capping overall system performance below what the GPU could theoretically support.

The FPS scaling story reinforces this analysis. Because the GPU is 27 percentile points higher than the CPU, frame rates in GPU-bound games at high settings will be limited by the graphics card's capabilities, but in CPU-bound titles or at lower resolutions where the GPU has spare capacity, the CPU's 59th percentile will constrain maximum frame rates. The 8-core, 12-thread CPU configuration provides enough parallel resources for most workloads, but the 45 W TDP limits sustained all-core performance in a laptop chassis. The GPU's 60 W TDP similarly constrains its peak performance under sustained load, but the compute scores suggest it punches above its power class.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel BGA 1744 socket, which is a ball-grid array package soldered to the motherboard, meaning processor upgrades are not feasible in the traditional sense. The platform supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, so memory upgrades depend on which type the specific laptop implementation uses. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes, while the GPU connects via PCIe 4.0 x16, ensuring the graphics card has sufficient bandwidth for its performance class. The GPU has a 60 W TDP and the CPU a 45 W TDP, totaling 105 W for the core components, though the FACT PACK does not specify a suggested PSU rating.

Given the BGA socket and laptop form factor, the most practical upgrade path involves increasing memory capacity if the system uses DDR5, or replacing the entire laptop platform. The GPU's end-of-life production status suggests driver updates will taper off over time, making future software compatibility a consideration. For users seeking more CPU performance, a system with a higher-percentile processor would be necessary, while those wanting more GPU headroom would look for a graphics card above the 86th percentile. The 8 GB VRAM may become a limiting factor in future games requiring more memory, though the 224 GB/s bandwidth provides adequate throughput for the current performance tier.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i3-12300HE + Intel Arc A550M

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i3-12300HE

Intel Arc A550M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

GPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

Gaming Performance

FAQ

Who Should Build It

Benchmark Performance

Build Overview

Balance and Bottleneck

Upgrade Path and Platform

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds