SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i3-12100F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

89 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 11% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
81%
VS
GPU
98%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i3-12100F

13,494 Benchmark Score
Top 19% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D

77,712 Benchmark Score
Top 2% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i3-12100F paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D is a study in extremes, pitting a 4-core entry-level desktop processor against a flagship 32 GB graphics card. The CPU, part of the Alder Lake generation built on Intel's 10 nm process, offers 4 cores and 8 threads with a base clock of 3.30 GHz and a boost clock of 4.30 GHz. Its modest 58 W TDP and 12 MB of shared L3 cache position it as a budget-oriented part, yet its benchmark scores tell a story of surprising single-threaded competence. The GPU, by contrast, is a monolithic powerhouse: a Blackwell 2.0 architecture chip on TSMC's 5 nm node, housing 92,200 million transistors on a 750 mm² die, with 32 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 512-bit bus delivering 1.79 TB/s of bandwidth. This pairing creates a massive imbalance that the data quantifies precisely.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i3-12100F delivers a benchmark profile that highlights its dual nature: strong for lightly-threaded tasks, adequate for moderate multi-threading, but clearly limited in heavily parallel workloads. In 3DMark tests, the CPU scores 893 in single-thread, 1,659 in 2-thread, 2,859 in 4-thread, and 4,026 in 8-thread tests, with a max-thread score of 4,023. The fact that 8-thread and max-thread scores are nearly identical (4,026 vs 4,023) confirms that the 4 cores / 8 threads configuration is fully saturated at 8 threads; adding more logical processors yields no gain. This is a classic sign of a CPU that excels in responsiveness for everyday tasks but will bottleneck in multithreaded rendering or compilation.

Cinebench results reinforce this interpretation. The R23 multicore score of 11,860 is respectable for a 4-core part, while the single-core score of 1,674 shows strong per-core performance. The ratio between multicore and single-core scores (roughly 7:1) is typical for a design with only four physical cores. In Geekbench, the multicore score of 7,252 versus a single-core score of 1,932 indicates that scaling beyond a couple of cores is efficient but limited by the physical core count. PassMark data further illustrates the CPU's character: integer math scores 40,978, floating-point math scores 31,977, and extended instructions score 10,842, but the find prime numbers test scores just 60, a very low figure that suggests weakness in certain integer-heavy algorithms.

The CPU's percentile ranking of 68 against all CPUs places it in the upper third of all processors, which is remarkable for a 4-core part. Its average benchmark score of 13,494 puts it in direct competition with the Intel Core 3 N355 (13,492, 0% delta), the Intel Core i5-9500 (13,452, 0.3% faster), and the Intel Core 5 120UL (13,594, 0.7% slower), while edging out the Intel Core i7-1250U (13,351, 1.1% faster). This means the i3-12100F trades blows with older 6-core desktop chips and modern low-power mobile parts, proof of Alder Lake's efficient architecture. For real workloads, this translates to snappy web browsing, responsive office applications, and decent performance in lightly threaded games, but it will struggle in video encoding or 3D scene rendering that scales beyond 8 threads.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, the CPU often becomes the limiting factor, but the measured frame rates are still high. Counter-Strike 2 hits 392 FPS, Valorant reaches 431 FPS, and Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege achieves 466 FPS, all at 1080p ultra settings. These numbers indicate that for esports titles, the combination delivers well above 240 Hz refresh rates, although the CPU's 4-core limit may cause occasional frame dips in crowded scenes.

Streaming: The 4-core / 8-thread configuration is a weak point for simultaneous gaming and encoding. While the GPU can handle encoding offload, CPU-intensive streaming overlays or software encoding would strain the i3-12100F. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 4,051 suggests limited headroom for background tasks; expect stutter if streaming from the CPU while gaming at high settings.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 11,860 and PassMark multithread score of 14,015 indicate that 4K video exports will be slow, especially compared to higher-core-count alternatives. The single-core strength (Cinebench R23 single-core 1,674) helps with timeline scrubbing and effects preview, but final renders will take significantly longer than on a 6- or 8-core processor.

3D rendering: This is the weakest area for the CPU. The 3DMark max-thread score of 4,023 and Cinebench R20 multicore score of 4,981 show that CPU-based rendering in Blender or Maya will be bottlenecked by the 4-core design. The GPU, however, can offload some rendering tasks, but pure CPU rendering workloads will disappoint.

Software development: Compilation tasks that are multithreaded will benefit from the 8 threads, but the PassMark data compression score of 160,452 and encryption score of 8,071 indicate strong performance for zip/archive operations and basic cryptography. The single-thread score of 3,444 in PassMark suggests fast compilation of single files, but full project builds using all cores will take longer than on higher-core CPUs.

Student and office work: This is where the pairing shines. The single-thread scores (3DMark single-thread 893, Geekbench single-core 1,932) ensure snappy UI responsiveness in word processors, spreadsheets, and web browsers. The 58 W TDP means low power draw, and the CPU's performance is more than adequate for 99% of office tasks, making this an excellent productivity machine.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread count?

A: The Intel Core i3-12100F has 4 cores and 8 threads, based on the Alder Lake architecture.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals in average benchmark score?

A: The i3-12100F scores 13,494 on average. The Intel Core 3 N355 scores 13,492 (0% difference), the Intel Core i5-9500 scores 13,452 (0.3% slower), the Intel Core 5 120UL scores 13,594 (0.7% faster), and the Intel Core i7-1250U scores 13,351 (1.1% slower).

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The GeForce RTX 5090 D features 32 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 512-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 1.79 TB/s.

Q: What is the GPU's percentile ranking among all GPUs?

A: The RTX 5090 D sits at the 92nd percentile, meaning it outperforms 92% of all GPUs in the database.

Q: What is the combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The build has a combined percentile of 80, indicating it performs better than 80% of all tested pairs.

Q: What is the suggested PSU for this build?

A: The suggested power supply is 950 W, given the GPU's 575 W TDP and the CPU's 58 W TDP.

Q: Does the CPU support DDR5 memory?

A: Yes, the i3-12100F supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, with a dual-channel memory bus.

Balance and Bottleneck

Benchmark results indicate a severe bottleneck in CPU-bound scenarios. The CPU's percentile of 68 versus the GPU's percentile of 92 shows a clear mismatch, with the processor being the limiting factor in most tasks. The FPS data across games confirms this: at 1080p, the pair averages 216.6 FPS across all games, ranking 118th out of 3,732 pairs, placing it in the top 3% of all pairs for average FPS. However, this average is skewed by the GPU's immense power; the CPU limits peak frame rates in lightly-threaded games.

Evidence of the bottleneck appears when comparing resolutions. In Counter-Strike 2, FPS drops from 392 at 1080p to 260 at 1440p and 145 at 4K, showing that the CPU can maintain high frame rates at low resolutions but the GPU becomes the limit as resolution increases. In Cyberpunk 2077, the drop is less severe (88 to 79 to 57), indicating that this game is more GPU-bound. The 3DMark 2-thread score of 1,659 versus 8-thread score of 4,026 shows that doubling threads from 2 to 8 only doubles performance, meaning the CPU cannot feed the GPU efficiently in multi-threaded game engines. For workloads like video editing or 3D rendering that use all cores, the CPU's max-thread score of 4,023 will significantly cap the GPU's potential in tasks like GPU-accelerated rendering, where the CPU must prepare data for the GPU.

Gaming Performance

Measured FPS at ultra settings across 50 games provides a comprehensive picture. At 1920x1080, the build delivers exceptional performance in esports and light titles: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive runs at 866 FPS, Roblox at 507 FPS, and Valorant at 431 FPS. Heavier titles still perform admirably at 1080p: Grand Theft Auto V hits 179 FPS, Fortnite 188 FPS, and Call of Duty: Warzone 134 FPS. However, the most demanding games reveal the CPU bottleneck: Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 88 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 105 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended drops to just 57 FPS.

At 2560x1440, frame rates scale as expected, with the GPU taking on more load. Valorant still hits 409 FPS, Counter-Strike 2 runs at 260 FPS, and Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege reaches 306 FPS. Cyberpunk 2077 drops to 79 FPS, while Red Dead Redemption 2 runs at 79 FPS. At 3840x2160, the GPU's 32 GB memory and raw power shine: Valorant maintains 379 FPS, Counter-Strike 2 runs at 145 FPS, and Cyberpunk 2077 manages 57 FPS. The data shows that at 4K, the GPU is the primary driver, and the CPU bottleneck diminishes, making this a viable 4K gaming setup for most titles, though the 4-core CPU will still cause stutters in CPU-intensive scenes.

Who Should Build It

This combination targets two distinct user groups. First, gamers who demand maximum frame rates at 1080p or 1440p in esports and competitive titles will find the build exceptional, as evidenced by the 431 FPS in Valorant and 392 FPS in Counter-Strike 2 at 1080p. The high refresh rates (above 240 Hz in many titles) make this ideal for competitive play, provided the games are not heavily CPU-bound.

Second, content creators who primarily use GPU-accelerated workflows will benefit from the RTX 5090 D's compute capabilities. The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 44,065 and Geekbench OpenCL score of 310,674 indicate massive parallel processing power for video encoding, 3D rendering, and AI workloads. However, these users must be aware that CPU-bound tasks like timeline rendering or physics simulations will be slow due to the i3-12100F's limited multi-threading.

Students and office workers will find this build overkill but functional, with the CPU's strong single-thread performance (Geekbench single-core 1,932) ensuring smooth productivity apps. Small business workstations running database or virtualization software would be better served by a higher-core CPU, as the PassMark multithread score of 14,015 suggests the processor will bottleneck in multi-VM environments.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 13,494, placing it at the 68th percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core 3 N355, scores 13,492, a 0% difference, showing they are statistically identical. The Intel Core i5-9500 scores 13,452 (0.3% slower), while the Intel Core 5 120UL scores 13,594 (0.7% faster) and the Intel Core i7-1250U scores 13,351 (1.1% faster). This tight grouping shows the i3-12100F is a solid mid-pack performer.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 77,712, placing it at the 92nd percentile. Its nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon RX 6650M XT (76,904, 1.1% slower), the AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT (78,940, 1.6% faster), and the NVIDIA Tesla P100 variants (79,396 and 79,605, 2.1% and 2.4% faster respectively). The combined picture shows a CPU that is adequate but unremarkable, paired with a GPU that is near the top of its class. The combined percentile of 80 reflects this imbalance, with the GPU dragging the pair's overall standing down from what the GPU alone would achieve.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build pairing a 4-core Intel Alder Lake CPU with a flagship NVIDIA Blackwell GPU. The CPU, with its 58 W TDP and 10 nm process, is a budget-oriented part designed for basic computing, while the GPU, with a 575 W TDP and 5 nm process, is a top-tier enthusiast component. The combined percentile of 80 indicates this pairing outperforms 80% of all tested CPU+GPU combinations, but this is almost entirely due to the GPU's strength. The build's tier is "high-end GPU with entry-level CPU," a configuration that excels in GPU-bound tasks like high-resolution gaming and GPU compute but falls short in CPU-intensive workloads like physics simulation and multithreaded rendering.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i3-12100F uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, allowing for high-bandwidth connectivity to the GPU and NVMe SSDs. The platform's memory support means users can choose between cost-effective DDR4 or faster DDR5, depending on motherboard choice.

The GPU connects via PCIe 5.0 x16, which is fully compatible with the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 lanes, ensuring no bandwidth bottleneck. The suggested PSU of 950 W provides ample headroom for the GPU's 575 W TDP and the CPU's 58 W TDP, with room for additional peripherals.

For a sensible next upgrade, replacing the i3-12100F with a higher-core-count Alder Lake or Raptor Lake CPU on the same Socket 1700 would alleviate the CPU bottleneck. The data shows the CPU's 4-core limit is the primary constraint, so upgrading to a 6- or 8-core part would improve multithreaded performance and reduce stutters in CPU-bound games. The GPU, with its 92nd percentile ranking, is already near the top of its class, so it would not need upgrading for several generations. The launch MSRP of the CPU is $97, while the GPU's launch MSRP is 2,299 USD, reflecting the extreme price disparity between the two components.