SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i3-12100F + Intel Arc B570

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

86 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 14% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
81%
VS
GPU
91%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i3-12100F

13,494 Benchmark Score
Top 19% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc B570

20,556 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i3-12100F and Intel Arc B570 pairing is a desktop build that lands at the 67th overall percentile for all CPU+GPU combinations, with a combined average of 86.1 FPS across the tested game suite. This places it firmly in the upper-midrange tier of systems, appealing to builders who want strong 1080p performance without chasing flagship components. The data shows a straightforward, practical machine: a four-core processor paired with a modern midrange graphics card, delivering a balanced experience for its class.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i3-12100F is built on the Alder Lake architecture, using the Alder Lake-S die on Intel's 10 nm process. It is a 4-core, 8-thread processor with a base clock of 3.30 GHz and a boost clock of 4.30 GHz. The chip has a TDP of 58 W, making it a low-power option that is easy to cool with a capable air cooler. It supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory across a dual-channel bus, though it does not support ECC memory. The CPU connects via Intel Socket 1700 and provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU itself.

Benchmark results reveal a processor with solid single-thread strength and adequate multi-thread performance for its size. In Cinebench R23, the chip scores 1674 points single-core and 11860 points multi-core. The single-core score is particularly strong, reflecting the Alder Lake architecture’s efficiency in lightly-threaded tasks. The multi-core score is respectable for a 4-core part, but the data shows a clear ceiling: the 3DMark 16-thread score of 4051 is nearly identical to the 8-thread score of 4026 and the max-thread score of 4023. This indicates the processor is fully saturated at 8 threads, and additional workloads beyond that point will not yield more performance. In PassMark, the multithread score is 14015, with integer math at 40978 and floating-point math at 31977, showing balanced performance across different instruction types.

The CPU’s percentile ranking of 68th among all CPUs is notable. It sits right alongside the Intel Core 3 N355, which has an identical average benchmark score of 13492 versus the i3-12100F’s 13494. It is also within 0.3% of the Intel Core i5-9500 (13452) and 1.1% ahead of the Intel Core i7-1250U (13351). The only rival it trails is the Intel Core 5 120UL, which is 0.7% faster. This positioning suggests the i3-12100F competes directly with older six-core parts and modern low-power chips, offering similar overall throughput despite its lower core count. The advantage comes from its higher single-thread performance, which is crucial for everyday responsiveness and gaming.

For real workloads, the data indicates this CPU handles office productivity, web browsing, and light content creation without issue. The Geekbench multicore score of 7252 and single-core of 1932 support this interpretation. The PassMark data encryption score of 8071 and compression score of 160452 suggest reasonable performance in file archiving and encryption tasks, though the 4-core limit will show in heavily parallel workloads like video encoding or 3D rendering. The Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 4981 reflects a chip that can handle occasional rendering jobs but is not designed for sustained professional workloads.

Benchmark Performance

The core CPU benchmark scores paint a picture of a capable entry-level processor. In Cinebench R15, it scores 1195 multi-core and 168 single-core. The R20 results show 4981 multi-core and 703 single-core. The R23 scores, mentioned earlier, are 11860 multi-core and 1674 single-core. These numbers indicate a processor that punches above its weight in single-threaded applications, which is the dominant factor in most games and everyday software.

On the GPU side, the Intel Arc B570 delivers strong results. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it scores 2649. The Geekbench OpenCL score is 83514, and the Vulkan score is 96844, showing strong compute capabilities across different APIs. The PassMark G3D score is 14195, with a G2D score of 661 and a GPU compute score of 7281. The GPU’s average benchmark score is 20556, placing it at the 65th percentile among all GPUs. It performs almost identically to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile (20534, 0.1% faster) and the Intel Arc A750 (20582, 0.1% slower). It also edges out the NVIDIA Quadro M4000M by 0.4% and is 0.5% ahead of the AMD Radeon R9 M390X (20662, -0.5% deltaPct).

The combined picture is a system that is balanced but slightly CPU-limited in many scenarios. The CPU’s 68th percentile is marginally higher than the GPU’s 65th percentile, suggesting the processor is not the primary bottleneck in most workloads. However, the pair’s combined percentile of 67th shows that neither component is dramatically outclassing the other. The average FPS across the game suite is 86.1, which is a strong figure for 1080p gaming. The pair ranks 3052 out of 3732 pairs by FPS, meaning it sits above the median but not in the top tier, consistent with its midrange positioning.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc B570 is built on the Xe2-HPG architecture, codenamed Battlemage, using TSMC’s 5 nm process. The chip, designated BMG-G21, contains 19,600 million transistors on a 272 mm² die, giving it a transistor density of 72.1 million per mm². The GPU has 2304 shading units, 144 texture mapping units, and 80 raster output units. It also includes 18 ray tracing cores, though it lacks dedicated tensor cores. The memory subsystem consists of 10 GB of GDDR6 on a 160-bit bus, delivering 380.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock runs at 2375 MHz, which translates to 19 Gbps effective.

The clock speeds are fixed at 2500 MHz for both base and boost, which simplifies power delivery and thermal management. The pixel rate is 200.0 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 360.0 GTexel/s. The FP32 throughput is 11.52 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 23.04 TFLOPS, indicating a 2:1 ratio for mixed-precision workloads. The TDP is 150 W, requiring a 450 W suggested PSU and a single 8-pin power connector. The card is dual-slot and uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which is sufficient for its bandwidth needs.

For rendering and compute tasks, the Arc B570’s performance is solid but not exceptional. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2649 places it in the midrange tier for DX12 workloads. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 96844 is notably higher than the OpenCL score of 83514, indicating that the GPU performs better in Vulkan-optimized applications. The PassMark DirectX scores show variance: DirectX 11 scores 118, DirectX 12 scores 72, DirectX 10 scores 65, and DirectX 9 scores 164. This pattern suggests the GPU is strongest in older DirectX 9 titles and modern Vulkan/DX12 workloads, but struggles with some DX12-specific implementations. The G3D score of 14195 confirms its position near the RTX 3070 Mobile and Arc A750.

The 10 GB VRAM is a practical amount for 1080p and 1440p gaming, and the 380 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient to feed the 2304 shading units. The 18 ray tracing cores provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing, which is a feature that was previously absent in this price segment. However, the lack of dedicated tensor cores means AI-accelerated features like DLSS are not available; instead, the GPU relies on its raw compute for any upscaling or frame generation, which may impact performance in titles that depend on such features. The display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1, supporting modern high-refresh monitors.

Who Should Build It

The data shows this pairing is ideal for gamers targeting 1080p resolution with high settings. The measured FPS in esports titles like Valorant (304 FPS at 1080p) and Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (293 FPS) indicates that competitive players will have a smooth experience on high-refresh monitors. For triple-A titles, the system handles 1080p well, with Cyberpunk 2077 hitting 39 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 36 FPS, and Control at 55 FPS. These are playable figures, though not at the highest refresh rates. At 1440p, the system becomes more constrained, with most games dropping below 60 FPS, but still playable in less demanding titles.

Content creators who work primarily with photos and light video editing will find the 4-core CPU sufficient for basic tasks, but the data suggests that heavy rendering jobs will be slow. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 11860 is adequate for occasional 1080p video exports, but for 4K or complex effects, a higher-core-count CPU would be necessary. The GPU’s compute performance, however, can accelerate certain tasks like OpenCL-based filters in photo editors, with a score of 83514 in Geekbench OpenCL.

Software developers and students compiling code will appreciate the single-thread performance, which is strong for tasks like code compilation in smaller projects. The PassMark single-thread score of 3444 indicates responsive application performance. Small business workstations running office suites, accounting software, and web applications will find the CPU sufficient for daily tasks, and the GPU adds capability for presentations or light graphical work. The 58 W TDP of the CPU makes it an efficient choice for systems that run all day, and the 150 W GPU TDP keeps the total power draw manageable.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the CPU and GPU is generally good, but the data reveals specific workload-dependent bottlenecks. In CPU-bound scenarios, the 4-core limit becomes apparent. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 4051 is nearly the same as the 8-thread score of 4026, confirming that the processor cannot scale beyond 8 threads. This means in games that utilize more than 4 cores or 8 threads, the CPU will become the limiting factor. Examples from the game data include Microsoft Flight Simulator, which scores 48 FPS at 1080p, and Fortnite at 64 FPS — both are known to be CPU-intensive.

In GPU-bound scenarios, the Arc B570 is the limiting factor. At 4K resolution, most games see a significant drop in FPS, such as Cyberpunk 2077 dropping to 19 FPS and Red Dead Redemption 2 to 18 FPS. This indicates the GPU cannot maintain playable frame rates at 4K in demanding titles. The pair’s percentile rankings show the CPU at 68th and GPU at 65th, meaning the CPU is slightly more capable relative to its peers, but the difference is small. The combined percentile of 67th aligns closely with both individual scores, suggesting neither component is severely mismatched.

The FPS scaling across resolutions confirms that the GPU becomes the primary constraint as resolution increases. For instance, Call of Duty: Warzone goes from 134 FPS at 1080p to 119 FPS at 1440p to 101 FPS at 4K, showing that the system maintains high frame rates even at 4K in esports titles. However, in more demanding games like Cyberpunk 2077, the drop from 39 FPS at 1080p to 19 FPS at 4K is steep, indicating the GPU’s limits. For the most balanced experience, the system is best suited to 1080p gaming, where the CPU can keep up with the GPU’s output in most titles.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data across 51 games paints a comprehensive picture of the system’s gaming capabilities. At 1080p with ultra settings, the system delivers high frame rates in competitive titles: Valorant leads at 304 FPS, followed by Counter-Strike: Global Offensive at 293 FPS, and Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege at 158 FPS. Call of Duty: Warzone hits 134 FPS, Counter-Strike 2 runs at 133 FPS, and Minecraft achieves 131 FPS. For less demanding games, Roblox hits 171 FPS and To The Core reaches 133 FPS.

In single-player and story-driven games, the performance is more moderate. The Medium runs at 28 FPS, which is below the playable threshold for many, while Red Dead Redemption 2 runs at 36 FPS and Cyberpunk 2077 at 39 FPS. Control hits 55 FPS, Greedfall at 59 FPS, and Grand Theft Auto V at 60 FPS. These numbers indicate that the system can handle 1080p gaming at playable but not always smooth frame rates in the most demanding titles. Ark: Survival Ascended is the worst performer at 19 FPS, making it unplayable at ultra settings.

At 1440p, the frame rates drop significantly. Valorant remains playable at 259 FPS, and Counter-Strike: Global Offensive at 201 FPS, but most games fall below 60 FPS. Call of Duty: Warzone manages 119 FPS, Counter-Strike 2 at 88 FPS, and Roblox at 114 FPS. In demanding titles, Cyberpunk 2077 drops to 29 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 to 27 FPS, and The Medium to 23 FPS. These figures suggest 1440p gaming is viable only in esports or older titles, not in modern AAA games at ultra settings.

At 4K, the system is largely unsuitable for modern gaming. Valorant still hits 207 FPS, and Counter-Strike: Global Offensive runs at 119 FPS, but most other games fall below 40 FPS. Call of Duty: Warzone manages 101 FPS, but Cyberpunk 2077 drops to 19 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 to 18 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended to 6 FPS. The data clearly shows that 4K gaming is only possible in the least demanding titles.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s single-thread performance compared to its rivals?

A: The Intel Core i3-12100F scores 1674 in Cinebench R23 single-core. It is 0.3% faster than the Intel Core i5-9500 and 1.1% faster than the Intel Core i7-1250U, but 0.7% slower than the Intel Core 5 120UL.

Q: How does the GPU compare to the Intel Arc A750?

A: The Arc B570 has an average benchmark score of 20556, while the Arc A750 scores 20582. The B570 is 0.1% slower than the A750, making them nearly identical in overall performance.

Q: Can this system run Cyberpunk 2077 at 1080p?

A: Yes, at 1080p with ultra settings, Cyberpunk 2077 runs at an average of 39 FPS. This is playable but not smooth, and lowering settings would be required for higher frame rates.

Q: What is the suggested power supply for this build?

A: The suggested PSU for the Arc B570 is 450 W. The CPU has a TDP of 58 W, so a 450 W power supply provides sufficient headroom for both components.

Q: Does the CPU support DDR5 memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i3-12100F supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, allowing builders to choose either memory type.

Q: What is the GPU’s VRAM capacity and bandwidth?

A: The Arc B570 has 10 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus, delivering 380.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p gaming.

Q: How does the system perform in esports titles like Valorant?

A: The system excels in esports, with Valorant running at 304 FPS at 1080p and 259 FPS at 1440p. Counter-Strike 2 runs at 133 FPS at 1080p, making it ideal for competitive gaming.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i3-12100F uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory. This provides flexibility for builders, but the platform is tied to 12th Gen processors. The CPU has 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, while the GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which is adequate for its bandwidth needs. The motherboard will also provide additional PCIe lanes for storage and peripherals, though the exact count depends on the chipset.

For a sensible next upgrade, the data suggests focusing on the CPU first, as the 4-core limit is the most significant constraint. Moving to a higher-core-count 12th Gen processor, such as a Core i5 or i7 on the same socket, would provide more threads for productivity and better performance in CPU-bound games. This would be a drop-in upgrade without changing the motherboard or memory. Alternatively, the GPU could be upgraded to a higher-tier Arc or rival card, but the CPU would likely become the bottleneck in many scenarios, so a CPU upgrade is recommended first.

The 58 W TDP of the CPU and 150 W TDP of the GPU mean that a 450 W PSU is sufficient for the current configuration. If upgrading to a more powerful CPU or GPU, a higher-wattage PSU would be necessary, but the data does not specify the exact requirements for such upgrades. The platform supports PCIe Gen 5 for the CPU, so future storage devices using that interface will be compatible. The dual-channel memory support means adding more RAM is straightforward, provided the motherboard has available slots.

Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core i3-12100F with the Intel Arc B570 in a desktop configuration. The CPU is a 4-core, 8-thread processor from the Alder Lake generation, while the GPU is a Battlemage architecture card with 10 GB of VRAM. The combined percentile ranking is 67th, placing it above the median for all CPU+GPU pairs. The average FPS across the tested games is 86.1, with the pair ranking 3052 out of 3732 pairs.

The CPU’s strength lies in its single-thread performance, which is competitive with older six-core processors. The GPU’s performance is nearly identical to the Arc A750 and the RTX 3070 Mobile, making it a solid midrange option. The system is best suited for 1080p gaming at high settings, where it delivers playable frame rates in most titles and excellent frame rates in esports games. For 1440p, it is limited to less demanding games, and 4K is only viable in the lightest titles. The build is a practical choice for gamers on a budget who do not require maximum settings, and it offers a clear upgrade path to a higher-core-count CPU on the same socket.