SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i3-12100F + AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

87 Score

Top 13% Ranking

87 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 13% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

81%

GPU

92%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i3-12100F

13,494 Benchmark Score

Top 19% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT

24,442 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i3-12100F paired with the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT is a desktop build that targets a specific performance tier. The CPU sits at the 68th percentile of all processors, while the GPU is at the 70th percentile of all graphics cards, resulting in a combined percentile of 69. This pairing delivers an average frame rate of 103.2 FPS across a wide range of games at 1920x1080, ranking 2573rd out of 3732 possible pairings in the database. The data reveals a system designed for high-refresh 1080p gaming, but the measured FPS figures across different resolutions and titles expose clear strengths and limitations that warrant a closer look.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The foundation of this build is the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports the Core i3-12100F. This is an Alder Lake-S architecture processor, and the socket provides a clear upgrade path within the same generation. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus, giving builders flexibility in choosing memory technology. The platform also offers PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, which is a forward-looking feature that ensures compatibility with the fastest current and near-future storage and expansion cards.

The Core i3-12100F has a TDP of 58 watts, which is modest and indicates that a capable air cooler would be sufficient for most users. The GPU has a TDP of 160 watts, and the suggested PSU for this graphics card is 450 watts. This combined power requirement is manageable, meaning a sensible next upgrade would be a more powerful processor on the same socket. Moving to a higher-core-count Alder Lake CPU would allow the RX 6600 XT to stretch its legs further in multi-threaded workloads, as the current quad-core processor might limit performance in some scenarios. The platform’s support for DDR5 also means a future memory upgrade is possible without changing the motherboard, though the current dual-channel setup is already adequate for this pairing.

Balance and Bottleneck

Benchmark results indicate that this pairing is well-balanced at 1080p, but the balance shifts as resolution increases. The CPU’s single-thread score of 893 in 3dmark and 1674 in Cinebench R23 single-core are strong, which helps in games that rely on a few fast cores. The GPU’s Passmark G3D score of 16461 is substantial, and together they achieve high frame rates in many titles. However, the data from measured FPS shows that in some games, the CPU becomes the limiting factor.

At 1920x1080, the system achieves 155.9 FPS in Counter-Strike 2 and 132.5 FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone, which suggests the CPU can keep up with the GPU’s output in these esports titles. In contrast, in heavily multi-threaded games like Ark: Survival Ascended, the frame rate drops to 23 FPS at 1080p, which is a significant bottleneck. The CPU’s 3dmark 16-thread score of 4051 is nearly identical to its 8-thread score of 4026, indicating that the four physical cores with hyper-threading are saturated. The GPU, however, still has headroom in many titles, as evidenced by the high frame rates in less CPU-intensive games like Valorant at 355.8 FPS. This suggests that the CPU is the primary limiter in CPU-heavy scenarios, while the GPU is the limiter in resolution-heavy scenarios, with the crossover point being around 1440p where frame rates drop by 30-40% compared to 1080p.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, the data is compelling. At 1920x1080, the system delivers 343 FPS in CS:GO and 355.8 FPS in Valorant, which easily exceeds the refresh rate of most high-end monitors. This makes it an excellent choice for competitive shooters where frame rate is paramount.

Streaming is a mixed bag. The CPU’s 4 cores and 8 threads are sufficient for playing and streaming less demanding games, but the Passmark multithread score of 14015 shows its limits. In a game like Fortnite at 74.9 FPS, adding a stream encode might cause stutters, so a dedicated streaming setup or lowering in-game settings would be advisable.

Video editing and 3D rendering are not this system’s primary strengths. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 11860 is respectable for a quad-core, but it is far from the top-tier processors. Data compression (160452) and encryption (8071) scores in Passmark show it can handle light productivity tasks, but heavy 3D rendering will be slow. The GPU’s FP32 performance of 10.60 TFLOPS helps with GPU-accelerated rendering, but the 8 GB VRAM could be a constraint in complex scenes.

For software development, the CPU’s single-thread performance is a boon. The Geekbench single-core score of 1932 indicates fast compilation and code execution for single-threaded tasks. The 12 MB of shared L3 cache helps with frequently accessed data, and the 10 nm process node ensures efficient power draw during long coding sessions.

Student and office work is a comfortable fit. The system is overkill for word processing and web browsing, but the fast single-thread performance ensures snappy application launches. The GPU’s Passmark G2D score of 912 is adequate for 2D workloads, and the overall system responsiveness from the high single-thread scores makes it a pleasant daily driver.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data, which is based on actual benchmarks, shows a pattern of strong performance at 1080p with diminishing returns at higher resolutions. At 1920x1080, the system excels in esports titles, with Counter-Strike: Global Offensive at 343 FPS, Valorant at 355.8 FPS, and Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege at 184 FPS. These numbers confirm that the pairing is ideal for high-refresh competitive gaming.

In AAA titles at 1080p, performance is playable but varies. Call of Duty: Warzone hits 132.5 FPS, and Counter-Strike 2 runs at 155.9 FPS. However, heavy titles like Cyberpunk 2077 only achieve 49.1 FPS, and Red Dead Redemption 2 runs at 42.5 FPS. At 2560x1440, frame rates drop significantly, with Cyberpunk 2077 at 35.4 FPS and Red Dead Redemption 2 at 32.8 FPS, making 1440p gaming a compromise. At 3840x2160, only a few games remain playable, with Valorant at 238.1 FPS being an exception, while most AAA titles fall below 30 FPS. The average FPS across all games at 1080p is 103.2, which is strong, but the variance between titles is wide, reflecting the CPU’s limitations in multi-threaded games.

Who Should Build It

This build is tailored for gamers who prioritize 1080p high-refresh-rate play. The data shows that it is a perfect match for players of Valorant, CS:GO, and Rainbow Six Siege, where it delivers over 180 FPS. It is also suitable for gamers who play a mix of titles and are willing to adjust settings in demanding AAA games to maintain smooth frame rates.

For content creators, this system is a capable entry-level machine. The GPU’s 8 GB VRAM and 256.0 GB/s bandwidth can handle 1080p video editing, and the CPU’s strong single-thread performance helps with timeline scrubbing. However, for professional 3D rendering or 4K video work, the quad-core CPU would be a bottleneck.

Software developers will appreciate the fast compile times for single-threaded tasks, and the 12 MB L3 cache helps with code caching. Students and office workers will find the system more than sufficient for their needs, with the added benefit of being able to play games during downtime. Small business workstations that need a reliable machine for data entry, spreadsheets, and light graphics work would also find this pairing adequate, though the lack of ECC memory support is a consideration for critical data integrity.

FAQ

Q: What is the maximum resolution for smooth gaming?

A: The data shows that 1920x1080 is the sweet spot, with an average FPS of 103.2 across all games. At 2560x1440, many titles drop below 60 FPS, and at 3840x2160, only a few games remain playable.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the main bottleneck?

A: The data indicates that the CPU is the primary limiter in multi-threaded games, as shown by the low FPS in Ark: Survival Ascended (23 FPS at 1080p). The GPU becomes the limiter as resolution increases, with frame rates dropping significantly at 1440p and 4K.

Q: Can this system handle ray tracing?

A: The GPU has 32 ray accelerators, and the architecture supports DirectX 12 Ultimate. However, the measured FPS in games like Cyberpunk 2077 (49.1 FPS at 1080p) suggests that enabling ray tracing would likely reduce performance further, making it a feature for lighter titles.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the GPU?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT has a memory bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s, which is achieved through an 8 GB GDDR6 memory configuration on a 128-bit bus.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the CPU?

A: The Intel Core i3-12100F has a launch MSRP of $97.

Q: How does the CPU perform in single-threaded tasks?

A: The CPU’s 3dmark single-thread score is 893, and its Cinebench R23 single-core score is 1674. This indicates strong performance for tasks like gaming and application loading that rely on single-core speed.

Q: What is the power supply requirement?

A: The GPU has a TDP of 160 W and a suggested PSU of 450 W. The CPU has a TDP of 58 W, so a 450 W power supply should be sufficient for this pairing.

Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core i3-12100F achieves an average benchmark score of 13494, placing it in the 68th percentile of all CPUs. Its closest rival is the Intel Core 3 N355 with an average score of 13492, showing a delta of 0%, meaning performance is essentially identical. It is 0.3% ahead of the Intel Core i5-9500 and 1.1% ahead of the Intel Core i7-1250U, but 0.7% behind the Intel Core 5 120UL.

The AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT has an average benchmark score of 24442, placing it in the 70th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival is the Intel Arc A350M with a score of 24647, which is 0.8% faster. It is also 0.7% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 and 1.1% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER, but 0.8% behind the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti.

The combined picture shows a system where the CPU and GPU are closely matched in their respective percentiles (68th and 70th). The GPU’s Passmark G3D score of 16461 is strong, while the CPU’s Passmark multithread score of 14015 is adequate. The 3dmark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1804 for the GPU indicates solid DirectX 12 performance, and the CPU’s 3dmark 4-thread score of 2859 highlights its gaming potential. This balance is reflected in the measured FPS data, which shows the system performing above average in most games at 1080p.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build that combines a 4-core, 8-thread Intel processor with a mid-range AMD graphics card. The build class is desktop, and the combined percentile of 69 indicates it performs better than roughly two-thirds of all possible CPU-GPU pairings in the database. The pairing is defined by its capability to deliver high frame rates in competitive games at 1080p, while being a reasonable entry point for content creation tasks. The CPU is a 10 nm Alder Lake-S part, and the GPU is a 7 nm RDNA 2.0 part, both representing mature architectures that work well together. The overall tier is solidly mid-range, with the GPU providing the majority of the graphics horsepower and the CPU providing strong single-thread performance to support it.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i3-12100F is a quad-core processor with 8 threads from the Core 12th Gen series. It has a base clock of 3.30 GHz and a boost clock of 4.30 GHz, with a TDP of 58 watts. The architecture is Alder Lake, specifically the Alder Lake-S codename, built on a 10 nm process node by Intel. The die size is 163 mm², and the cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 12 MB of shared L3 cache.

The benchmark scores paint a picture of a processor that excels in single-threaded performance but is limited in multi-threaded tasks. The 3dmark single-thread score of 893 is high, and the Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1674 confirms its strength in lightly-threaded workloads. The Passmark single-thread score of 3444 is also robust. However, the multi-threaded scores show a plateau: the 3dmark 8-thread score of 4026 is nearly identical to the max-thread score of 4023, indicating that the processor cannot scale beyond its 8 threads. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 11860 is respectable but not exceptional, and the Passmark multithread score of 14015 reflects the physical core count limitation.

For real workloads, this means the CPU will handle gaming, web browsing, and office applications with ease, but tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering, and heavy multitasking will be slower than on processors with more cores. The data compression score of 160452 and encryption score of 8071 in Passmark show it can handle these tasks, but the find prime numbers score of 60 is low, suggesting weak integer math performance in certain specialized workloads.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT is based on the Navi 23 chip with RDNA 2.0 architecture, built on a 7 nm process by TSMC. It has 11,060 million transistors on a 237 mm² die, with a transistor density of 46.7M per mm². The GPU features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s. The clocks are a base of 1968 MHz, a boost of 2589 MHz, and a game clock of 2359 MHz, with memory running at 2000 MHz or 16 Gbps effective.

The GPU has 2048 shading units, 128 TMUs, and 64 ROPs, along with 32 ray accelerators for ray tracing support. Its pixel rate is 165.7 GPixel/s, and its texture rate is 331.4 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 10.60 TFLOPS, and FP16 performance is 21.21 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio. The card is dual-slot with a 1x 8-pin power connector and a TDP of 160 watts.

Benchmark results show the GPU’s strengths in compute and graphics. The Passmark G3D score of 16461 is solid, and the Geekbench Vulkan score of 72417 indicates good API performance. The 3dmark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1804 is moderate, suggesting it can handle DirectX 12 titles but is not a top-tier performer. The Passmark GPU compute score of 7520 shows it can handle compute workloads, but the DirectX 12 score of 61 in Passmark is low, which may indicate driver or test-specific issues.

For rendering, the GPU’s 10.60 TFLOPS of FP32 power is adequate for 1080p gaming and light rendering tasks. The 8 GB VRAM is a limitation for high-resolution textures, but for 1080p it is sufficient. The lack of tensor cores means no dedicated AI acceleration, but the 32 ray accelerators provide basic ray tracing capability. Overall, the GPU is a capable 1080p performer that can handle 1440p with reduced settings, as demonstrated by the measured FPS data.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i3-12100F + AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i3-12100F

AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Valorant

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Valorant

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Valorant

Valorant

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Upgrade Path and Platform

Balance and Bottleneck

Usage Scenarios

Gaming Performance

Who Should Build It

FAQ

Benchmark Performance

Build Overview

CPU Analysis

GPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds