SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 + Intel Arc A770M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

94 Score

Top 6% Ranking

94 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

97%

GPU

90%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395

80,762 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A770M

18,383 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 and Intel Arc A770M form a peculiar pairing: a flagship 16-core mobile CPU built on the current-generation Zen 5 architecture, paired with a mobile GPU that has been designated end-of-life. The benchmark data reveals a stark mismatch in raw processing power versus graphics capability, with the CPU sitting in the 95th percentile of all processors while the GPU finds itself in the 62nd percentile of all GPUs. This analysis explores the implications of this combination for rendering, gaming, content creation, and professional workloads.

FAQ

Q: What are the core and thread counts of the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395?

A: The CPU features 16 cores and 32 threads, built on the Zen 5 architecture with a 4 nm process node from TSMC.

Q: How much memory bandwidth does the CPU have access to?

A: The Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 supports LPDDR5X memory over a quad-channel bus, providing 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: What is the memory configuration of the Intel Arc A770M?

A: The GPU has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 512.0 GB/s.

Q: What is the combined percentile ranking of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile of the build is 79, indicating that it outperforms 79% of all recorded system configurations in the database.

Q: Does the CPU have an integrated GPU?

A: Yes, the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 includes integrated Radeon 8060S graphics.

Q: What is the socket type for this processor?

A: The CPU uses the AMD Socket FP11, which is a mobile platform socket.

Q: Is the GPU considered a current or legacy product?

A: The Intel Arc A770M has a production status of "End-of-life," while the CPU is marked as "Active."

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A770M is built on the Xe-HPG architecture, known by the codename Alchemist, and fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC. The chip, designated DG2-512, contains 21,700 million transistors on a 406 mm² die. Clock speeds are set at a 1650 MHz base and 2050 MHz boost, with memory running at 2000 MHz or 16 Gbps effective. The 16 GB of GDDR6 memory across a 256-bit bus delivers a substantial 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is a strong asset for texture-heavy workloads and high-resolution rendering.

The compute configuration includes 4096 shading units, 256 texture mapping units, and 128 raster output units. The GPU also houses 32 dedicated ray tracing cores, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing in supported titles. Pixel rate is rated at 262.4 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 524.8 GTexel/s. Floating-point performance is rated at 16.79 TFLOPS for FP32 and 33.59 TFLOPS for FP16 with a 2:1 ratio. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern graphics APIs.

Benchmark results for the Arc A770M show a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2278 and a Geekbench OpenCL score of 89494. The Vulkan score is 74422. Passmark tests show a G3D score of 11774 and a GPU compute score of 4778. The GPU's percentile rank of 62 places it below the CPU's standing, and its nearest rival is the AMD Radeon RX 460, with a deltaPct of 0.1. The data suggests this GPU is a mid-range mobile part, capable of handling modern games at reasonable settings, but it is not a high-end solution. The 512.0 GB/s bandwidth is notable, yet the raw compute throughput of 16.79 TFLOPS limits its ceiling in demanding rendering scenarios.

Benchmark Performance

The Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 demonstrates exceptional CPU performance across multiple benchmark suites. In Cinebench R23, it scores 35061 points in multi-core and 2012.5 points in single-core tests. The older Cinebench R15 benchmark shows 5247 multi-core and 306 single-core scores. Passmark results are equally robust: multi-thread score of 51502, single-thread score of 4078, integer math at 190720, floating-point math at 120533, and extended instructions at 52067. Data compression reaches 639356, while data encryption hits 32840. The average benchmark score for the CPU is 80762, placing it in the 95th percentile of all CPUs.

The Intel Arc A770M, by contrast, produces an average benchmark score of 18383, placing it in the 62nd percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 460 (deltaPct 0.1) and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile (deltaPct 1.2). The combined percentile for this system is 79, reflecting the gap between the CPU and GPU performance tiers. The data reveals a system where the processor is operating at a top-tier level, while the graphics solution is merely average among discrete GPUs. The CPU's nearest rivals include the Intel Xeon 638, Intel Xeon w5-2565X, AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, and Intel Xeon w5-3535X, with deltaPct values ranging from -0.4 to 0.1. This indicates the CPU is competitive with high-end server and workstation-class processors, while the GPU is competing with entry-level to mid-range desktop cards from previous generations.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU and GPU combination in the database, so all frame rate expectations are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The CPU's 95th percentile ranking and the GPU's 62nd percentile ranking suggest a system where gaming performance will be dictated almost entirely by the graphics card. The Arc A770M's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2278 and Passmark G3D score of 11774 are indicative of a mid-range mobile GPU. In practical terms, this means the system should handle 1080p gaming at high to ultra settings in most titles, with 1440p requiring some settings reductions for demanding games. The 16 GB VRAM buffer is generous and will prevent memory-related stuttering in modern games, but the compute power of 16.79 TFLOPS will be the limiting factor for frame rates. Esports titles and older games will run at high frame rates, while the latest AAA releases will likely need DLSS or FSR upscaling to achieve smooth performance at higher resolutions. The 512.0 GB/s memory bandwidth should help maintain consistent frame pacing in memory-intensive scenarios, but the GPU's overall compute capability will cap performance well below what the CPU can feed it.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data clearly indicates a CPU-bound system with a GPU bottleneck in gaming and graphics workloads. The CPU sits in the 95th percentile of all processors, while the GPU rests in the 62nd percentile of all GPUs. This 33-point gap is substantial and means the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 will rarely be the limiting factor in any workload. In gaming, the Arc A770M will be the performance ceiling, with the CPU having significant headroom to handle physics, AI, and game logic without breaking a sweat. For content creation, the CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35061 and Passmark multi-thread score of 51502 will accelerate video encoding, 3D rendering, and compilation tasks, while the GPU's Passmark compute score of 4778 will be the constraint for GPU-accelerated rendering. The combined percentile of 79 reflects this imbalance, showing that the system as a whole ranks well, but the component-level disparity means users are paying for CPU performance that may go underutilized in GPU-bound scenarios. The CPU's 95th percentile ranking versus the GPU's 62nd percentile suggests that upgrading the GPU would yield far more tangible performance gains than upgrading the CPU, which is already near the top of the performance spectrum.

Who Should Build It

This system is best suited for users whose workloads prioritize CPU performance over GPU graphics. Software developers compiling large codebases will benefit from the 16 cores and 32 threads, as well as the Passmark extended instructions score of 52067. Students in engineering or data science fields will find the CPU's data encryption score of 32840 and floating-point math score of 120533 valuable for simulations and numerical analysis. Small business workstations handling spreadsheet-heavy tasks, database operations, or virtualization will appreciate the multi-thread score of 51502 and the 95th percentile ranking. The system is also viable for content creators who work primarily with CPU-based rendering, such as video editors using software encoders, where the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35061 shines. However, gamers targeting high refresh rates at 1440p or 4K will find the GPU to be the limiting factor, making this a less ideal choice for that use case compared to systems with a more balanced CPU-GPU pairing.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 is a 16-core, 32-thread processor based on the Zen 5 architecture, codenamed Strix Halo. It operates with a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, within a 55 W TDP. The CPU is fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC, marking it as a leading-edge mobile processor. Cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 64 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support is LPDDR5X over a quad-channel interface, delivering 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth, and ECC memory is supported. The CPU has 16 PCIe Gen 4 lanes and includes integrated Radeon 8060S graphics. The socket is AMD Socket FP11, and the production status is Active with a release date of January 5, 2025.

Benchmark results are impressive. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35061 places the CPU in the top echelon of mobile processors, rivaling desktop parts. The Passmark single-thread score of 4078 indicates strong per-core performance, which is crucial for lightly threaded applications. The floating-point math score of 120533 and integer math score of 190720 demonstrate exceptional computational throughput. The CPU's 95th percentile rank, with an average benchmark score of 80762, puts it in direct competition with Intel Xeon server processors and high-end Ryzen 9 mobile parts. The nearest rival, the Intel Xeon 638, has an average score of 80723, showing a deltaPct of 0. This indicates the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 is performing at a level equivalent to server-grade hardware, making it a powerhouse for multi-threaded workloads like video rendering, scientific computing, and heavy multitasking.

Build Overview

This build combines the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395, a flagship mobile CPU, with the Intel Arc A770M, a mid-range mobile GPU, in a laptop class configuration. The CPU is a top-tier Zen 5 part with 16 cores, while the GPU is an end-of-life Alchemist architecture part with 16 GB of VRAM. The combined percentile of 79 places this system above the majority of recorded configurations, but the component disparity is significant. The CPU's 95th percentile ranking versus the GPU's 62nd percentile ranking creates a lopsided system where the processor far outstrips the graphics card. This is a workstation-oriented build, prioritizing CPU compute and memory bandwidth (256.0 GB/s) over GPU rasterization and ray tracing performance. The system is best described as a high-performance mobile workstation with gaming capabilities, rather than a dedicated gaming laptop. The GPU's 16.79 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 512.0 GB/s memory bandwidth are respectable, but they are not in the same league as the CPU's processing prowess.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the AMD Socket FP11, which is a mobile platform socket, meaning the processor is likely soldered to the motherboard and not user-upgradeable. Memory support is LPDDR5X, which is also typically soldered on mobile platforms, limiting upgradeability. PCIe connectivity is Gen 4 with 16 lanes from the CPU, which is sufficient for a discrete GPU and NVMe storage. The GPU has a TDP of 120 W, and the CPU has a TDP of 55 W, so the system requires adequate cooling but not an excessive power supply. The suggested PSU field is null, but the combined TDP of 175 W indicates a standard laptop power brick should suffice. The GPU is end-of-life, meaning no future driver optimizations are likely to improve its performance significantly. A sensible next upgrade would be to replace the Arc A770M with a newer, higher-performing GPU, but this is constrained by the laptop form factor. Given the CPU's 95th percentile performance, the platform's longevity is tied to the GPU, which is already legacy hardware. For users seeking more graphics performance, a new laptop with a balanced CPU-GPU pairing would be a more practical upgrade path.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's 4078 Passmark single-thread score ensures no bottleneck in game logic, but the GPU's 62nd percentile ranking limits frame rates. Expect 1080p high-refresh gaming to be achievable in esports titles, while AAA games will require lower settings to reach high refresh rates. The 16 GB VRAM helps with textures, but the 16.79 TFLOPS compute will cap performance.

Streaming: The CPU's 16 cores and 32 threads are ideal for software encoding, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35061. The Passmark data compression score of 639356 indicates fast encoding throughput. The GPU can handle the rendering output, but streaming at high quality with a game running simultaneously may strain the GPU.

Video editing: The CPU's multi-thread performance shines in rendering timelines, with a Passmark multi-thread score of 51502. The GPU's 512.0 GB/s bandwidth assists with effects and previews, but its compute score of 4778 may slow down GPU-accelerated exports. This is a capable editing machine for 4K footage, with the CPU handling heavy lifting.

3D rendering: CPU-based rendering in software like Blender or Cinema 4D will be excellent, given the Cinebench R23 score of 35061. GPU-based rendering in engines like Octane or Redshift will be limited by the Arc A770M's compute performance, which is on par with the AMD Radeon RX 460. Expect long render times for complex scenes.

Software development: The 16 cores and 32 threads accelerate compilation, with the Passmark extended instructions score of 52067 indicating strong SIMD performance. The 64 MB L3 cache reduces memory latency for large codebases. This is an excellent machine for developers, with the CPU's 95th percentile ranking ensuring fast build times.

Student and office work: The CPU's single-thread score of 4078 and the system's overall 79th percentile ranking make this overkill for basic productivity. Word processing, spreadsheets, and web browsing will be instant, and the 256.0 GB/s memory bandwidth ensures smooth multitasking. The GPU is sufficient for video playback and light graphics work, making this a high-end but practical choice for students in technical fields.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 + Intel Arc A770M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395

Intel Arc A770M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

FAQ

GPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Gaming Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Who Should Build It

CPU Analysis

Build Overview

Upgrade Path and Platform

Usage Scenarios

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds