SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 + Intel Arc A730M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

97 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 3% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
97%
VS
GPU
96%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395

80,762 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A730M

45,592 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 is a 16-core, 32-thread mobile processor built on the Zen 5 architecture, codenamed Strix Halo, and manufactured on TSMC's 4 nm process. It operates with a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, with a thermal design power of just 55 W. This combination of high core count and relatively modest power envelope is striking — it suggests a chip that can sustain heavy multi-threaded workloads without the thermal overhead typically associated with 16-core parts in laptops.

The cache hierarchy is substantial: 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 64 MB L3 pool. That large L3 is likely a key contributor to the processor's strong performance in data-heavy tasks, as it reduces the need to constantly fetch data from memory. The CPU supports LPDDR5X memory over a quad-channel interface, delivering 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth — a figure that rivals some desktop platforms. ECC memory support is also present, which positions this chip for workstation-class reliability.

Benchmark results underscore the processor's capability. In Cinebench R23, the multicore score of 35,061 points is exceptional for a 55 W mobile part, while the single-core score of 2,012.5 points indicates strong per-thread performance for everyday responsiveness and lightly threaded applications. The Cinebench R15 numbers — 5,247 multicore and 306 single-core — follow the same pattern. PassMark results further illuminate the chip's character: integer math scores 190,720, floating-point math 120,533, and extended instructions 52,067. Data compression scores 639,356 and encryption 32,840, suggesting this CPU handles archival, database, and security workloads with ease. The multithread PassMark score of 51,502 places it in the 95th percentile among all CPUs, meaning it outperforms roughly 95% of processors in the database.

Relative to its nearest rivals, the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 is tightly clustered with several Intel Xeon workstation parts. It trails the Intel Xeon 638 by a negligible 0% margin in average score, sits 0.1% ahead of the Intel Xeon w5-2565X, and is 0.4% behind both the AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX and Intel Xeon w5-3535X. This positioning is remarkable: a 55 W mobile chip trading blows with high-end server and workstation processors that typically draw multiples of its power. The data implies the Zen 5 architecture's efficiency is not just a marketing claim but a measurable advantage in real workloads.

For real-world use, these scores translate to snappy compilation times, fluid 4K video editing timelines, and rapid dataset processing. The single-thread score of 4,078 in PassMark ensures that everyday tasks — web browsing, office documents, light coding — feel instantaneous. The multi-threaded might, meanwhile, means the chip never feels out of its depth when the workload scales across all 32 threads.

FAQ

Q: How does the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 compare to its closest rival, the Intel Xeon 638?

A: The AMD chip's average benchmark score is 80,762, while the Intel Xeon 638 scores 80,723, a delta of 0%. They are effectively tied in overall performance, despite the AMD part being a mobile processor with a 55 W TDP.

Q: What is the CPU's percentile ranking among all processors?

A: The Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 sits in the 95th percentile of all CPUs in the database, meaning it outperforms 95% of processors tracked.

Q: Does the CPU support error-correcting memory?

A: Yes, ECC memory support is listed as present. This is a significant feature for users running long-duration compute tasks where data integrity is critical, such as scientific simulations or financial modeling.

Q: What memory type and bandwidth does this processor use?

A: It uses LPDDR5X memory with a quad-channel interface, providing 256.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth. This is a high figure that helps feed the 16 cores and the integrated Radeon 8060S graphics.

Q: How fast is the single-core performance for everyday tasks?

A: The Cinebench R23 single-core score is 2,012.5 points, and PassMark single-thread is 4,078. These numbers indicate strong per-core performance suitable for responsive application loading, web browsing, and office productivity.

Q: Is the processor's boost clock significantly higher than its base clock?

A: Yes, the base clock is 3.00 GHz and the boost clock reaches 5.10 GHz, a 2.1 GHz uplift. This allows the chip to run efficiently at low loads and ramp up substantially when demanding tasks require it.

Q: What is the production status and release date?

A: The production status is listed as "Active," and the release date is January 5, 2025. It is a current-generation part rather than a legacy product.

Usage Scenarios

The Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 is a versatile chip, and the benchmark data supports its use across several demanding scenarios.

For high-refresh gaming, the CPU's strong single-core score of 4,078 in PassMark ensures that game logic and physics threads have ample headroom. The 95th percentile CPU ranking means it will not bottleneck modern graphics cards in most titles, though the integrated Radeon 8060S graphics and the paired discrete GPU will determine the final frame rates.

Streaming and content creation are clear strengths. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 35,061 and PassMark multithread score of 51,502 indicate that encoding video while gaming or running multiple applications is handled without breaking a sweat. The 16 cores and 32 threads provide the parallel throughput needed for live encoding, scene rendering, and simultaneous capture.

Video editing workflows benefit enormously from the processor's data compression score of 639,356 and floating-point math score of 120,533. These translate to fast timeline scrubbing, quick export times, and smooth effects processing in 4K or higher resolutions. The 256.0 GB/s memory bandwidth further aids in handling large video files.

3D rendering is another area where the chip excels. The Cinebench R23 multicore score is directly relevant to CPU-based rendering engines like Blender's Cycles or V-Ray. The 95th percentile ranking suggests this laptop CPU can rival workstation desktops in render times, making it viable for professional animators and architects.

Software development benefits from the high integer math score of 190,720 and extended instructions score of 52,067. Compilation of large codebases, running test suites, and managing virtual machines all scale well with the 32 threads, reducing iteration times for developers.

Student and office work is almost overkill for this processor. The single-thread performance ensures snappy spreadsheet calculations and document processing, while the massive multi-threaded headroom means the laptop will remain capable for years without feeling sluggish as software becomes more demanding.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data presents an interesting balance question. The CPU's 95th percentile ranking among all processors is matched against the GPU's 84th percentile among all graphics cards. This suggests the CPU is the stronger component relative to its peers, which could lead to scenarios where the CPU is waiting on the GPU in graphics-intensive tasks.

In gaming, the bottleneck will likely be the Intel Arc A730M. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1,732 and Geekbench OpenCL score of 70,352 indicate solid mid-to-high range performance, but the CPU's capability is higher in relative terms. This means in CPU-light games, the GPU will be the limiting factor for frame rates. In contrast, in simulation-heavy games or those with complex AI, the CPU's strength will shine, and the GPU becomes the constraint.

For productivity workloads, the CPU is the clear driver. The PassMark multithread score of 51,502 and data compression score of 639,356 are directly responsible for performance in rendering, encoding, and compilation. The GPU plays a supporting role in these tasks, accelerating effects or previews but not defining the overall throughput.

The memory system is a potential equalizer. The CPU's 256.0 GB/s bandwidth is high, but the GPU's 336.0 GB/s bandwidth is comparable. In a shared memory laptop architecture, the CPU and GPU compete for bandwidth, which could throttle both under heavy simultaneous load. The LPDDR5X memory and quad-channel interface mitigate this, but the data suggests that sustained combined workloads may see diminishing returns.

The 55 W CPU TDP and 80 W GPU TDP indicate a balanced thermal envelope. Neither component is so power-hungry that it starves the other, but in a thin laptop chassis, thermal throttling could be a factor. The benchmark scores reflect steady-state performance, so real-world sustained loads may be slightly lower if cooling is inadequate.

Who Should Build It

This CPU+GPU pairing is aimed at mobile professionals and enthusiasts who need workstation-class CPU performance in a laptop form factor.

Gamers at 1080p or 1440p will find the combination capable, though the GPU is the limiting factor at higher resolutions. The CPU's 95th percentile ensures no gaming bottleneck, but the GPU's 84th percentile means frame rates will be moderate to high, not extreme.

Content creators — video editors, 3D artists, and animators — are the primary target. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 35,061 and the data compression score of 639,356 make this a mobile rendering powerhouse. A creator who needs to edit 4K footage on location or render scenes while traveling will benefit immensely.

Software developers working on large codebases will appreciate the integer math score of 190,720 and the 32 threads. Compilation times drop significantly, and running multiple VMs or containers is feasible without stuttering.

Students in engineering or computer science programs, where heavy computation is required, will find this laptop more than sufficient for coursework and research projects. The 95th percentile CPU ranking ensures it handles MATLAB simulations, CAD models, or machine learning experiments with ease.

Small business workstations that need to handle financial modeling, database management, or data analysis will benefit from the ECC memory support and the high encryption score of 32,840. The reliability of ECC, combined with the raw throughput, makes this a dependable tool for business-critical tasks.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows, so all frame rate discussions are estimates based on the benchmark scores.

The Intel Arc A730M's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1,732 is a strong indicator of DirectX 12 gaming performance. This score suggests the GPU can handle modern titles at 1080p with high settings and achieve playable frame rates, likely in the 60-90 FPS range for most AAA games, depending on optimization.

In lighter esports titles like Counter-Strike 2 or Valorant, the GPU's compute power, combined with the CPU's single-core score of 4,078, should push frame rates well above 144 FPS at 1080p, making high-refresh gaming viable. The 12 GB GDDR6 memory provides ample capacity for textures at 1080p and 1440p.

For more demanding titles like Cyberpunk 2077 or Alan Wake 2, the 12.60 TFLOPS FP32 compute and 24 RT cores enable ray tracing, but the 84th GPU percentile suggests these features will require upscaling or reduced settings to maintain smooth frame rates. Expect 30-50 FPS at 1080p with ray tracing enabled, and 60+ FPS with ray tracing off.

The 196.8 GPixel/s pixel rate and 393.6 GTexel/s texture rate indicate solid rasterization throughput. This means non-ray-traced games will perform better than the RT numbers suggest. The GPU's 84th percentile places it near the AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT (0.5% ahead) and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile (1% ahead), giving a rough estimate of its competitive standing.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 80,762, placing it in the 95th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are tightly clustered: the Intel Xeon 638 scores 80,723 (0% delta), the Intel Xeon w5-2565X scores 80,671 (0.1% faster), the AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX scores 81,103 (0.4% faster), and the Intel Xeon w5-3535X scores 81,115 (0.4% faster). This grouping shows the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 is a top-tier mobile CPU that matches server-class silicon.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 45,592, placing it in the 84th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT at 45,384 (0.5% faster), the NVIDIA RTX 5880 Ada Generation at 45,972 (0.8% slower), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile at 45,152 (1% faster), and the NVIDIA RTX A2000 at 46,043 (1% slower). The GPU is competitive with these professional and high-end mobile parts.

The combined percentile for this system is 90, meaning it outperforms 90% of all CPU+GPU combinations in the database. This is a strong overall showing, driven primarily by the CPU's exceptional ranking. The GPU is above average but not at the same elite tier as the CPU.

The data paints a clear picture: this is a CPU-first build. The processor is the star, with the GPU providing solid but not spectacular support. For workloads that are CPU-bound, this system will be exceptional. For GPU-bound tasks, it will be good, but not class-leading.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build pairing the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 with the Intel Arc A730M. The CPU is a 16-core, 32-thread Zen 5 mobile processor with a 55 W TDP, while the GPU is a 12 GB GDDR6 mobile graphics solution with an 80 W TDP.

The overall tier, based on the 90th combined percentile, is high-end. This system sits above the vast majority of laptops in the database, with the CPU being the primary driver of its lofty position. The GPU, while in the 84th percentile, is a step below the CPU's 95th percentile ranking.

This pairing makes sense for a workstation-class laptop. The CPU provides exceptional multi-threaded performance for professional workloads, while the GPU handles graphics acceleration and gaming adequately. It is not a pure gaming laptop — the GPU is not top-tier — but it is a well-rounded machine for creators and professionals who need CPU muscle above all else.

The 55 W CPU TDP and 80 W GPU TDP suggest a total system power draw that is manageable in a laptop chassis, likely requiring a substantial cooling solution but not an exotic one. The 4 nm CPU process and 6 nm GPU process indicate modern manufacturing that balances performance and efficiency.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A730M is a mobile graphics processor based on the Xe-HPG architecture, codenamed Alchemist, from the Arc 7 Mobile generation. It is built on TSMC's 6 nm process with 21,700 million transistors on a 406 mm² die. The GPU has 3,072 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 96 raster operation units, along with 24 ray tracing cores.

The GPU operates at a base clock of 1100 MHz and a boost clock of 2050 MHz, with memory running at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). It is equipped with 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering 336.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth. This is a substantial memory pool and bandwidth figure, suitable for high-resolution textures and modern game assets.

Compute performance is rated at 12.60 TFLOPS FP32 and 25.19 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1 rate). The pixel rate is 196.8 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 393.6 GTexel/s. These figures indicate strong rasterization throughput for a mobile GPU, though not at the level of the very best desktop parts.

The 24 RT cores provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing, and the GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, meaning it is fully compatible with modern game APIs and features like mesh shaders and variable rate shading.

Benchmark results place the GPU in the 84th percentile of all GPUs. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 1,732, Geekbench OpenCL is 70,352, and Geekbench Vulkan is 64,693. The average benchmark score is 45,592. These numbers suggest the GPU performs well in both compute and graphics workloads, with the Vulkan score being notably strong.

For rendering workloads, the FP32 compute of 12.60 TFLOPS and the OpenCL score of 70,352 indicate the GPU can accelerate 3D rendering in applications like Blender or Octane, though it is not a professional-grade compute part. The 12 GB memory is sufficient for most scenes, and the 336.0 GB/s bandwidth keeps the data flowing.

The GPU's production status is "End-of-life," meaning it is a legacy part. This is important context: the architecture is mature, and driver optimizations may have plateaued. However, the benchmark scores suggest it remains a capable GPU for 1080p and 1440p gaming, as well as light to moderate compute tasks.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses AMD Socket FP11, which is a mobile-specific socket. This means the CPU is soldered to the motherboard and cannot be upgraded in a traditional sense. The platform is locked to the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395, so users should consider the CPU's 95th percentile performance as a long-term commitment.

Memory support is LPDDR5X with a quad-channel interface, providing 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This memory is also soldered, so it cannot be upgraded. The 256.0 GB/s bandwidth is high for a laptop and should remain sufficient for years.

The CPU provides PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes. This is a standard interface for modern GPUs and NVMe SSDs. The GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16, which is fully compatible. There is room for expansion via NVMe storage, though the exact number of M.2 slots is not specified in the data.

The integrated Radeon 8060S graphics provide a fallback if the discrete GPU fails or for power-saving tasks. The CPU's 55 W TDP and GPU's 80 W TDP suggest a combined power draw of around 135 W under full load, plus other system components. A typical laptop power adapter of 150-200 W would be adequate, though the suggested PSU is not listed.

The upgrade path for this system is limited. The CPU and memory are soldered, and the GPU is an end-of-life part. The most sensible upgrade would be to replace the entire laptop when performance becomes insufficient. The CPU's 95th percentile ranking means this is unlikely to be necessary for several years, as it will remain competitive with future mobile processors.

For users considering this platform, the key takeaway is that the CPU is the star and will not need upgrading. The GPU, while 84th percentile, may become a bottleneck sooner, but the 12 GB memory and modern feature set give it longevity. The platform is a complete package — what you buy is what you get, but the data suggests it is a very capable package.