SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 + Intel Arc A550M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

97 Score

Top 3% Ranking

97 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 3% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

97%

GPU

96%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395

80,762 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A550M

49,737 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 is a 16-core, 32-thread mobile processor built on the Zen 5 architecture, using the Strix Halo codename and manufactured on TSMC's 4 nm process. The CPU operates with a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, drawing 55 W of TDP. The cache hierarchy consists of 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and a substantial 64 MB of shared L3 cache.

The benchmark results place this CPU in the 95th percentile among all CPUs, indicating top-tier performance. In Cinebench R23, the processor scores 35,061 in multi-core and 2,012.5 in single-core tests. The single-core score suggests strong per-thread performance, which is critical for lightly threaded workloads like legacy applications and certain game engines. The multi-core score, however, is where this chip demonstrates its workstation-class capability, rivaling server processors in raw throughput.

PassMark results reinforce this picture. The multi-thread score of 51,502 and integer math score of 190,720 indicate exceptional parallel processing capability. The floating-point math score of 120,533 further confirms the CPU's strength in scientific and engineering workloads. Data compression and encryption scores of 639,356 and 32,840, respectively, show robust performance in storage and security-related tasks. The extended instructions score of 52,067 suggests strong SIMD and vector processing capabilities, beneficial for multimedia encoding and processing.

Comparing to nearest rivals, the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 sits nearly level with the Intel Xeon 638 (deltaPct 0), slightly ahead of the Intel Xeon w5-2565X (deltaPct 0.1), and marginally behind the AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX (deltaPct -0.4) and Intel Xeon w5-3535X (deltaPct -0.4). This positioning indicates the chip competes with server-class silicon despite being a mobile processor, a signal of the efficiency of the Zen 5 architecture at 4 nm.

The memory subsystem uses LPDDR5X with a quad-channel interface, providing 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is unusually high for a mobile platform and directly supports the integrated Radeon 8060S graphics, which shares this memory. The high bandwidth also benefits memory-intensive workloads such as large dataset manipulation and virtual machine operations. ECC memory support adds reliability for professional use cases.

The CPU connects via PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes, which is adequate for a high-end GPU and NVMe storage. The integrated Radeon 8060S graphics adds further capability, making this a complete package for mobile workstations. The production status is listed as Active, and the release date is January 5, 2025, indicating a current-generation product. The multiplier is locked, so overclocking is not an option, but the stock performance already approaches server-class levels.

# Benchmark Performance

The overall benchmark picture shows a combined percentile of 91 for this CPU+GPU pairing, placing it in the upper echelon of laptop configurations. The CPU alone sits at the 95th percentile, while the GPU holds the 86th percentile. This slight gap suggests the graphics component is the relatively weaker link, though both are high performers.

In Cinebench R15, the CPU scores 5,247 multi-core and 306 single-core. The R23 scores of 35,061 multi-core and 2,012.5 single-core show a scaling factor of roughly 17.4x from single to multi-threaded, which aligns with expectations for a 16-core, 32-thread processor with efficient SMT implementation. The PassMark average benchmark score is 80,762, with nearest rivals within 0.4% of this figure, confirming the CPU's position among top-tier server and workstation chips.

The GPU's Geekbench scores are 49,894 for OpenCL and 49,580 for Vulkan. These nearly identical scores suggest consistent compute performance across different APIs. The average GPU benchmark score is 49,737, placing it at the 86th percentile. The nearest GPU rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti (deltaPct -0.4), AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 (deltaPct -0.5), AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT (deltaPct -2.4), and AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT (deltaPct 2.6). The Intel Arc A550M essentially matches the RTX 5070 Ti in compute benchmarks, which is remarkable for a mobile GPU with 60 W TDP.

The combined picture shows a system that excels in CPU-bound tasks while maintaining strong GPU compute. The 95th percentile CPU means this machine outperforms the vast majority of systems in multi-threaded workloads like video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation. The 86th percentile GPU ensures capable graphics performance for gaming and GPU-accelerated applications. The delta between CPU and GPU percentiles indicates the CPU is the standout component, while the GPU is merely very good rather than exceptional.

There is no measured FPS data for this exact combination, as the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows. This means all gaming performance figures must be estimated from the benchmark scores rather than direct measurements.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The performance data reveals an interesting balance dynamic. The CPU at the 95th percentile significantly outpaces the GPU at the 86th percentile. This gap suggests that in most workloads, the GPU will be the limiting factor, especially in graphics-intensive tasks. However, the CPU's superiority means it will rarely bottleneck the GPU, providing headroom for physics calculations, game logic, and background tasks.

The CPU's memory bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s is a crucial factor. This high bandwidth supports both the CPU and the integrated Radeon 8060S graphics, but the discrete Intel Arc A550M has its own 8 GB GDDR6 memory with 224.0 GB/s bandwidth. The system benefits from having two separate memory pools, avoiding contention between CPU and GPU memory access.

In gaming scenarios, the GPU's 86th percentile ranking will likely cap frame rates in GPU-bound scenes, particularly at higher resolutions. The CPU's high single-thread score of 2,012.5 in Cinebench R23 indicates it can handle game logic and draw call processing without becoming the bottleneck. The multi-thread score of 35,061 ensures smooth performance in games that utilize multiple cores for streaming, physics, and AI.

For productivity workloads, the CPU's dominance means the GPU becomes the limiting factor in GPU-accelerated tasks like rendering or machine learning inference. However, the GPU's 8.397 TFLOPS FP32 performance is substantial, and the 16.79 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1) capability suggests strong performance in half-precision workloads common in AI inference.

The PassMark physics score of 3,189 and find prime numbers score of 284 indicate good computational throughput, though the latter is relatively modest, suggesting the CPU prioritizes broader multi-threaded performance over specific single-thread optimizations in certain algorithms. The random string sorting score of 70,150 shows strong memory subsystem performance, which is critical for database and data processing workloads.

The combined 91st percentile suggests the pairing is well-matched for most professional workloads, with the CPU providing ample headroom for future GPU upgrades or more demanding software that better utilizes parallel CPU resources.

# Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The GPU's 86th percentile ranking and the CPU's 95th percentile position suggest strong potential for high-refresh gaming at 1080p or 1440p. The CPU's high single-thread score of 2,012.5 in Cinebench R23 ensures it can feed frames quickly to the GPU. The FP32 throughput of 8.397 TFLOPS indicates the GPU can handle modern game rendering, though the 8 GB VRAM may limit texture quality at higher resolutions. The 224.0 GB/s memory bandwidth is adequate for 1080p and 1440p gaming, though 4K might strain the memory subsystem.

Streaming: The CPU's 16 cores and 32 threads provide ample resources for encoding video while gaming. The multi-thread score of 35,061 in Cinebench R23 suggests the CPU can handle x264 encoding at high presets without impacting game performance. The data compression score of 639,356 indicates strong throughput for stream packaging and network transmission. The GPU's Vulkan score of 49,580 suggests it can also handle hardware encoding tasks, offloading work from the CPU.

Video Editing: The CPU's 95th percentile ranking makes this an excellent choice for video editing. The floating-point math score of 120,533 supports complex color grading and effects processing. The 64 MB L3 cache helps with timeline scrubbing and preview rendering. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 16.79 TFLOPS FP16 performance accelerate effects and transitions, while the 224.0 GB/s memory bandwidth handles 4K video streams. The high memory bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s on the CPU side helps with large media files.

3D Rendering: The CPU's multi-thread score of 35,061 in Cinebench R23 directly translates to strong CPU-based rendering performance. The GPU's 2048 shading units and 128 TMUs provide significant rasterization throughput for viewport rendering. The FP32 performance of 8.397 TFLOPS supports GPU-based rendering engines. The 64 MB L3 cache helps with scene data, and the 16 RT cores enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing, though with limited RT performance compared to higher-tier GPUs.

Software Development: The CPU's PassMark multi-thread score of 51,502 supports fast compilation of large codebases. The integer math score of 190,720 indicates strong performance in code execution and processing. The data encryption score of 32,840 helps with secure development practices. The extended instructions score of 52,067 supports SIMD-optimized code and modern development tools. The 32 threads allow for parallel builds and multiple concurrent virtual machines or containers.

Student and Office Work: The CPU's single-thread score of 4,078 in PassMark single-thread tests ensures responsive office applications. The 55 W TDP means efficient battery operation for all-day use. The integrated Radeon 8060S graphics provides display output without needing the discrete GPU, saving power for lighter tasks. The 95th percentile CPU performance ensures the system remains responsive even with many applications open simultaneously, and the 91st combined percentile means this system far exceeds typical student and office requirements.

# FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread count?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 has 16 cores and 32 threads.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals in average benchmark score?

A: The CPU's average benchmark score is 80,762. It is exactly level with the Intel Xeon 638 (deltaPct 0), 0.1% ahead of the Intel Xeon w5-2565X, and 0.4% behind both the AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX and Intel Xeon w5-3535X.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The Intel Arc A550M has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: What are the CPU's Cinebench R23 scores?

A: The CPU scores 35,061 in multi-core and 2,012.5 in single-core Cinebench R23 tests.

Q: How does the GPU compare to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti?

A: The Intel Arc A550M has an average benchmark score of 49,737, which is 0.4% lower than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti's score of 49,957.

Q: What is the combined percentile ranking of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 91, with the CPU at the 95th percentile and the GPU at the 86th percentile.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 supports ECC memory.

# GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A550M is a mobile GPU built on the Xe-HPG architecture, using the DG2-512 chip manufactured on TSMC's 6 nm process. The chip contains 21,700 million transistors on a 406 mm² die, with a transistor density of 53.4M per mm². The GPU operates at a base clock of 900 MHz and a boost clock of 2050 MHz, with memory running at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective).

The memory subsystem consists of 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, providing 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This configuration is adequate for 1080p and 1440p gaming but may limit performance at 4K with high texture quality settings. The GPU has 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operations pipelines. It also includes 16 ray tracing cores, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing in supported games.

The compute performance is rated at 8.397 TFLOPS for FP32 and 16.79 TFLOPS for FP16 (2:1 ratio). The pixel rate is 131.2 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 262.4 GTexel/s. These figures indicate solid rasterization performance for a mobile GPU. The API support includes DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern games and applications.

The Geekbench scores are 49,894 for OpenCL and 49,580 for Vulkan, placing the GPU at the 86th percentile. The average benchmark score is 49,737. Comparing to nearest rivals, the GPU is 0.4% behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti and 0.5% behind the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64. It is 2.4% behind the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT but 2.6% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT. This positioning shows the A550M competes with previous-generation high-end desktop GPUs despite being a mobile part.

The TDP is 60 W, which is efficient for the performance level. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x16, providing adequate bandwidth for GPU communication. The display outputs are listed as "Portable Device Dependent," meaning they vary by laptop implementation. The production status is End-of-life, indicating this is a mature product. The GPU's 86th percentile ranking means it outperforms the majority of GPUs in the benchmark database, making it suitable for high-end gaming and compute workloads in a laptop form factor.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the AMD Socket FP11, which is a mobile-specific socket. The memory support is LPDDR5X with a quad-channel interface, providing 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is soldered memory in most implementations, so upgrading RAM is not possible in typical laptop designs. The CPU supports ECC memory, which is valuable for professional workloads requiring data integrity.

The PCIe connectivity is Gen 4 with 16 lanes from the CPU. This provides ample bandwidth for the Intel Arc A550M GPU, which uses PCIe 4.0 x16. The 16 lanes also support NVMe storage at full speed. The integrated Radeon 8060S graphics provides a fallback display output and can handle lighter tasks without engaging the discrete GPU.

The GPU has a TDP of 60 W, which is relatively low for the performance level. The suggested PSU is not specified, but the combined CPU TDP of 55 W and GPU TDP of 60 W suggest a total system power draw that is manageable for a laptop power brick. The GPU's production status is End-of-life, meaning upgrades would involve replacing the entire laptop rather than swapping components.

For a future upgrade path, the primary consideration is the laptop form factor. The buildClass is "laptop," so upgrades are limited to external peripherals and storage. The CPU's high performance at the 95th percentile suggests it will remain relevant for several years. The GPU at the 86th percentile may become the limiting factor sooner, particularly for newer games with higher VRAM requirements.

A sensible next upgrade would involve external GPU support if the laptop provides Thunderbolt or similar connectivity, though this is not specified in the FACT PACK. Alternatively, the integrated Radeon 8060S graphics can handle less demanding tasks, preserving the discrete GPU's lifespan. The 64 MB L3 cache and 256.0 GB/s memory bandwidth provide headroom for future software that better utilizes these resources.

# Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build combining the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 CPU with the Intel Arc A550M GPU. The pairing represents a high-end mobile workstation configuration, with the combined percentile ranking at 91. The CPU is in the 95th percentile, indicating top-tier performance among all CPUs, while the GPU is in the 86th percentile, showing strong but not class-leading graphics capability.

The CPU is a 16-core, 32-thread Zen 5 processor with a 55 W TDP, designed for high-performance mobile computing. The GPU is an Intel Arc A550M with 8 GB GDDR6 memory and a 60 W TDP, based on the Xe-HPG architecture. The system's overall tier is upper-high-end, suitable for demanding professional workloads and high-refresh gaming.

The memory configuration includes LPDDR5X with quad-channel support on the CPU side, providing 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth, and GDDR6 on the GPU side with 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This dual-memory design allows both components to access memory without contention, enhancing overall system performance. The CPU's integrated Radeon 8060S graphics adds flexibility for power-efficient operation.

The build class of "laptop" means all components are integrated into a portable chassis. The production status of the CPU is Active, while the GPU is End-of-life, suggesting the platform is current but the graphics component is being phased out. The 91st combined percentile places this system in the top 9% of all configurations in the benchmark database, making it a formidable mobile computing solution.

# Who Should Build It

This system is ideal for professionals who need desktop-class CPU performance in a mobile form factor. The CPU's 95th percentile ranking and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35,061 make it suitable for video editors working with 4K or 8K footage, as the floating-point math score of 120,533 supports complex effects and color grading. The 64 MB L3 cache and 256.0 GB/s memory bandwidth handle large media files efficiently.

3D artists and animators will benefit from the CPU's multi-thread score of 35,061 in Cinebench R23, which directly translates to faster CPU-based rendering. The GPU's 8.397 TFLOPS FP32 performance accelerates viewport rendering, and the 16 RT cores enable hardware ray tracing for previews. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for moderate-sized scenes but may limit extremely complex projects.

Software developers will appreciate the PassMark multi-thread score of 51,502 for parallel compilation and the integer math score of 190,720 for code execution. The data encryption score of 32,840 supports secure development practices, and the 32 threads allow running multiple virtual machines or containers simultaneously. The extended instructions score of 52,067 indicates strong SIMD performance for optimized code.

Students in engineering, data science, or computer science programs will find the 95th percentile CPU performance handles demanding computational coursework. The single-thread score of 4,078 in PassMark ensures responsive everyday use, while the 55 W TDP provides reasonable battery life. The integrated Radeon 8060S graphics can handle display output during lighter tasks, saving power.

Small business workstations requiring reliable performance for office applications, financial modeling, or database management will benefit from the ECC memory support and the CPU's high multi-thread performance. The data compression score of 639,356 and random string sorting score of 70,150 indicate strong database and data processing capabilities. The combined 91st percentile ensures this system exceeds requirements for most business workloads.

# Gaming Performance

There is no measured FPS data for this exact combination in the FACT PACK, as no measuredFps rows exist. Therefore, all gaming performance figures are estimates based on the benchmark scores rather than direct measurements. The GPU's 86th percentile ranking and FP32 performance of 8.397 TFLOPS suggest this system can handle modern games at high settings in 1080p and 1440p resolutions.

The CPU's high single-thread score of 2,012.5 in Cinebench R23 ensures it will not bottleneck the GPU in most gaming scenarios. The multi-thread score of 35,061 provides ample headroom for games that utilize multiple cores for physics, AI, and streaming. The 64 MB L3 cache helps with game world data, and the 256.0 GB/s memory bandwidth reduces loading times and texture streaming issues.

At 1080p with ultra settings, the GPU's 8.397 TFLOPS FP32 performance should deliver playable frame rates in most titles, though the 8 GB VRAM may require texture quality reductions in some newer games. At 1440p, the GPU's 224.0 GB/s memory bandwidth becomes a more significant factor, and frame rates may drop to the 60-90 FPS range for demanding titles. The GPU's 86th percentile ranking suggests it outperforms the majority of GPUs, but it is not in the top tier.

For competitive gaming at high refresh rates, the CPU's single-thread performance is excellent, but the GPU may limit frame rates in esports titles that rely heavily on GPU rendering. The 16 RT cores enable ray tracing at reduced resolutions or with DLSS-like upscaling, though the RT performance is not comparable to higher-tier GPUs. The GPU's Vulkan score of 49,580 suggests good performance in Vulkan-based games, which are increasingly common.

The overall gaming experience is estimated to be strong for 1080p and 1440p, with the CPU providing exceptional performance and the GPU delivering solid frame rates. The system is not designed for 4K gaming at ultra settings due to the 8 GB VRAM and 224.0 GB/s memory bandwidth constraints. However, for most gamers playing at mainstream resolutions, this configuration should provide a satisfying experience with high settings and smooth frame rates.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 + Intel Arc A550M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395

Intel Arc A550M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds