SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 + Intel Arc A530M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

97 Score

Top 3% Ranking

97 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 3% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

97%

GPU

96%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395

80,762 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A530M

46,614 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 is a 16-core, 32-thread Zen 5 mobile processor paired with the Intel Arc A530M, a 6nm Xe-HPG mobile GPU. This build class is laptop, and the combined percentile is 90. The CPU alone sits at the 95th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU sits at the 85th percentile of all GPUs. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination: `measuredFpsUltraByGame` is empty, `pairRankByFps` is null, and `dataIsMeasured` is false. All gaming frame-rate discussion below is therefore an estimate from benchmark scores, not a measured result.

CPU Analysis

The Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 is a 16-core, 32-thread processor with a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. It is built on the Zen 5 architecture, manufactured on TSMC's 4 nm process, and designed for AMD Socket FP11. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 64 MB of shared L3. This is a mobile processor with a 55 W TDP, and it supports LPDDR5X memory on a quad-channel interface with 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth. ECC memory support is enabled, which is unusual for a mobile platform and points toward serious compute work.

The benchmark results show a processor that is far stronger in multithreaded work than in lightly threaded tasks. Cinebench R23 multi-core scores 35061, while single-core scores 2012.5. Cinebench R15 tells the same story: 5247 multi-core and 306 single-core. Passmark multithread scores 51502, while single-thread scores 4078. The broad Passmark results reinforce the pattern: integer math scores 190720, floating-point math scores 120533, extended instructions scores 52067, data compression scores 639356, and data encryption scores 32840. Random string sorting adds 70150, and the specialized find-prime-numbers test scores 284.

These numbers place the CPU at the 95th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 80762. Its nearest rivals are workstation-class processors. It is exactly level with the Intel Xeon 638, whose average score is 80723 with a deltaPct of 0. It is 0.1% ahead of the Intel Xeon w5-2565X, which scores 80671. It is 0.4% behind the AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, which scores 81103, and 0.4% behind the Intel Xeon w5-3535X, which scores 81115. Those deltas are tiny. For real workloads, the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 is effectively trading blows with Xeon-class silicon, but in a laptop power envelope.

What does this mean for actual use? The 16-core / 32-thread design is the engine for compilation, rendering, compression, and other parallel workloads. The single-thread score of 4078 keeps everyday applications and lightly threaded games responsive. The CPU also includes a Radeon 8060S integrated GPU, so the platform has a built-in graphics option in addition to the discrete Arc A530M. The data shows a CPU that is clearly above the current laptop mainstream, and the 4 nm process means the performance comes at a relatively modest 55 W TDP.

Balance and Bottleneck

This pairing is CPU-forward. The CPU is at the 95th percentile, while the GPU is at the 85th percentile. The combined percentile is 90, which is high, but the gap between the two components is the key bottleneck signal. In CPU-heavy workloads such as data compression, integer math, or encryption, the CPU is clearly the dominant resource. In GPU-heavy workloads such as gaming or GPU-accelerated rendering, the Arc A530M will be the component most likely to limit performance.

There is no measured FPS data in the FACT PACK to show frame scaling across settings or resolutions. `dataIsMeasured` is false, and `measuredFpsUltraByGame` is empty. The only quantitative guidance available is the percentile spread and the average scores. The CPU's average benchmark score is 80762, while the GPU's average benchmark score is 46614. The GPU's nearest-rival list reinforces the idea that this is a midrange mobile GPU: it is tied with the AMD Radeon RX 5600M at 46601, and it is 0.2% behind the AMD Radeon RX 6550M at 46702. A CPU this strong paired with a GPU of that class suggests the GPU becomes the pacing factor in most graphically intensive scenarios.

The bottleneck may shift by workload. For multithreaded productivity, the CPU is the main performer and the GPU is nearly irrelevant. For gaming, the GPU's FP32 throughput of 3.994 TFLOPS and its 224.0 GB/s memory bandwidth define the practical ceiling. The CPU has enough single-thread strength, with a Passmark single-thread score of 4078, to avoid being the obvious weak link in typical games. Still, without measured FPS data, the exact relationship between CPU and GPU load cannot be quantified directly.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's exact benchmark profile is strong. Cinebench R23 multi-core scores 35061, and single-core scores 2012.5. Cinebench R15 multi-core scores 5247, while single-core scores 306. Passmark multithread scores 51502, and Passmark single-thread scores 4078. The average benchmark score for the CPU is 80762, placing it at the 95th percentile.

The GPU's exact benchmark profile is more modest. Geekbench OpenCL scores 49735, and Geekbench Vulkan scores 43492. The average benchmark score is 46614, putting the Arc A530M at the 85th percentile. Its nearest rivals are all within a narrow band: the AMD Radeon RX 5600M scores 46601 with a deltaPct of 0, the AMD Radeon RX 6550M scores 46702 with a deltaPct of -0.2, the NVIDIA RTX A2000 scores 46043 with a deltaPct of 1.2, and the NVIDIA RTX 5880 Ada Generation scores 45972 with a deltaPct of 1.4. In practical terms, the GPU is part of a tight midrange cluster.

The combined picture is a laptop with a 90th-percentile platform ranking, driven mostly by CPU strength. A 95th-percentile CPU and an 85th-percentile GPU do not make a perfectly balanced gaming machine, but they do make a very capable all-round system. The CPU's workstation-class multi-core scores will show up in rendering, compiling, and heavy productivity, while the GPU's 85th-percentile position gives it a solid but not class-leading gaming profile.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU side is ready for high-refresh gaming, with a single-thread score of 4078 and a multithread score of 51502. The GPU is the more likely limiting factor. Since the Arc A530M is 0.2% behind the Radeon RX 6550M and tied with the RX 5600M, gamers should expect a midrange mobile GPU experience. No measured FPS data exists, so the exact refresh rate cannot be stated.

Streaming: The 16-core / 32-thread CPU is well suited to streaming. Passmark multithread scores 51502, giving background encoding and stream overhead plenty of headroom to coexist with a running game. Data compression scores 639356, which is useful for reducing stream data, and encryption scores 32840 for secure connections.

Video editing: Video editing leans on both CPU and GPU. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35061 and 256.0 GB/s memory bandwidth handle timeline and export tasks well. The GPU's OpenCL score of 49735 supports GPU-accelerated effects, while 8 GB of GDDR6 VRAM and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth provide a reasonable memory pool for graphics work.

3D rendering: CPU rendering is the stronger side of this build. Cinebench R23 multi-core scores 35061, and Passmark floating-point math scores 120533, indicating solid floating-point throughput. The GPU offers 12 ray-tracing cores and DirectX 12 Ultimate support, but its FP32 throughput of 3.994 TFLOPS and 85th-percentile rank mean it is not the primary render engine.

Software development: Development workloads such as compilation, static analysis, and dependency resolution rely on integer, compression, and branch-heavy workloads. Passmark integer math scores 190720, extended instructions scores 52067, and data compression scores 639356. The 16-core / 32-thread layout allows parallel builds to scale effectively.

Student and office work: For everyday productivity, the CPU's single-thread score of 4078 makes interactions quick and responsive. The 55 W TDP and 4 nm process keep the platform mobile-friendly, while ECC memory support adds data integrity for research and small-business documents. The GPU is not the focus in this scenario, but the integrated Radeon 8060S gives a usable fallback display solution.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK does not contain measured FPS rows for the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 combined with the Intel Arc A530M. The `measuredFpsUltraByGame` field is empty, `pairRankByFps` is null, and `dataIsMeasured` is false. Therefore, no exact per-game or per-resolution frame rates can be reported. The following is an estimate based on benchmark scores.

The Arc A530M's average score of 46614 places it at the 85th percentile, close to the AMD Radeon RX 5600M at 46601 and the AMD Radeon RX 6550M at 46702. It is slightly ahead of the NVIDIA RTX A2000 by 1.2% and the NVIDIA RTX 5880 Ada Generation by 1.4%. That cluster of GPUs should deliver a midrange gaming experience in a mobile platform. The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 VRAM on a 128-bit bus with 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which defines its memory ceiling. Its FP32 throughput of 3.994 TFLOPS defines raw shader performance.

What can be said without measured FPS data is that the CPU will not be the primary limit in most gaming scenarios. The CPU's 95th percentile and strong single-thread score make it more than capable of feeding the Arc A530M. Ultra-quality settings will likely push the GPU into its midrange performance zone, while lower settings would create more headroom. Exact frame-rate numbers are not available in the FACT PACK, so those expectations are estimates.

FAQ

Q: What CPU is in this build?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395, a 16-core, 32-thread Zen 5 mobile processor with a base clock of 3.00 GHz, a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, and a 55 W TDP.

Q: What GPU is paired with the CPU?

A: The Intel Arc A530M, a DG2-256 Xe-HPG / Alchemist mobile GPU with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Does the FACT PACK include measured gaming FPS for this exact combination?

A: No. `measuredFpsUltraByGame` is empty, `pairRankByFps` is null, and `dataIsMeasured` is false. Any FPS discussion for this build is an estimate from benchmark scores.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The CPU's average score is 80762. It is level with the Intel Xeon 638 at 80723, 0.1% ahead of the Intel Xeon w5-2565X at 80671, and 0.4% behind both the AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX at 81103 and the Intel Xeon w5-3535X at 81115.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The GPU's average score is 46614. It is tied with the AMD Radeon RX 5600M at 46601, 0.2% behind the AMD Radeon RX 6550M at 46702, and ahead of the NVIDIA RTX A2000 by 1.2% and the NVIDIA RTX 5880 Ada Generation by 1.4%.

Q: What memory support does the CPU platform have?

A: The CPU supports LPDDR5X memory with a quad-channel interface, 256.0 GB/s bandwidth, and ECC memory support.

Q: What graphics APIs does the Intel Arc A530M support?

A: It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Who Should Build It

This build is for users who want a laptop with a workstation-class CPU and a midrange discrete GPU. Gamers should choose it if they plan to play at settings that match a GPU in the 85th percentile, rather than expecting desktop-class ultra-high frame rates. Content creators will benefit more from the CPU side, especially those who render, compile, compress, or run heavy multithreaded workloads. The CPU's 95th percentile and 35061 Cinebench R23 multi-core score make this a strong portable workstation.

Software developers are another clear fit. Integer math at 190720, data compression at 639356, and extended instructions at 52067 all point to strong build and analysis performance. The 16-core / 32-thread layout helps parallel compilation. Students and office users get a mobile part with a 4078 single-thread score and a 55 W TDP, which is responsive and efficient. Small-business workstations can use ECC memory support and the 90th-percentile combined ranking as evidence of a reliable high-tier laptop platform.

The target user is not someone looking for a dedicated high-end gaming GPU. The target user is someone who needs serious CPU performance in a laptop and wants a solid, capable GPU for everyday gaming and accelerated tasks. The Arc A530M's nearest rivals are the RX 5600M and RX 6550M, so the gaming experience should be judged accordingly.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build that combines AMD's Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 with Intel's Arc A530M. The CPU is a Strix Halo-generation Zen 5 mobile part, and the GPU is a DG2-256 Alchemist mobile part. The `buildClass` field is laptop, so the entire platform is mobile.

The combined percentile is 90, which places this build in the high tier of the database. The CPU at the 95th percentile carries the platform, while the GPU at the 85th percentile provides solid graphics support. Both components are listed as Active production parts. The CPU was released on 2025-01-05, and the GPU was released on 2023-07-31. The overall impression is a high-tier mobile workstation with a midrange gaming GPU.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses AMD Socket FP11. Memory support is LPDDR5X through a quad-channel interface with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth and ECC. The CPU-attached PCIe interface is Gen 4 with 16 lanes. The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which is sufficient for its class.

The CPU TDP is 55 W, and the GPU TDP is 65 W. The FACT PACK does not list a suggested PSU, so no PSU headroom figure can be given. Because this is a laptop, the conventional upgrade path is limited. The data does not identify a specific replacement CPU or GPU. A sensible future direction would be a discrete GPU with a higher average score than the Arc A530M's 46614, but no such product is named in the FACT PACK.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A530M is built on the DG2-256 chip using the Xe-HPG architecture under the Alchemist generation label. It is manufactured on TSMC's 6 nm process, with 11,500 million transistors on a 269 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 42.8 million per mm². The GPU has 1536 shading units, 96 texture mapping units, 48 raster output units, and 12 ray-tracing cores. The FACT PACK does not list a tensor core count.

Clocks are 900 MHz base and 1300 MHz boost. The memory runs at 1750 MHz, or 14 Gbps effective, across a 128-bit bus, delivering 224.0 GB/s. Pixel rate is 62.40 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 124.8 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 3.994 TFLOPS, while FP16 performance is 7.987 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio. The 65 W TDP and "IGP" slot width confirm that this is a mobile-style integrated-part form factor.

For rendering and compute, the GPU's Geekbench OpenCL score of 49735 is the more relevant number, while the Vulkan score of 43492 speaks to graphics API performance. The average score of 46614 puts it at the 85th percentile. It matches the AMD Radeon RX 5600M at 46601, trails the AMD Radeon RX 6550M by 0.2%, and leads the NVIDIA RTX A2000 by 1.2% and the RTX 5880 Ada Generation by 1.4%. In this build, the GPU is a competent midrange mobile part, but the CPU remains the stronger compute engine by percentile and by raw benchmark score.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 + Intel Arc A530M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395

Intel Arc A530M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Benchmark Performance

Usage Scenarios

Gaming Performance

FAQ

Who Should Build It

Build Overview

Upgrade Path and Platform

GPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds