SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 + Intel Arc A770M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

96%

GPU

90%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390

63,765 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A770M

18,383 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This is a laptop-class pairing that combines a 12-core Zen 5 processor with a mobile discrete GPU, landing in the 78th percentile overall. The CPU is the clear dominant force, sitting in the 93rd percentile among all processors, while the GPU sits at the 62nd percentile. This creates a system where the processor vastly outpaces the graphics solution in raw compute capability, a dynamic that shapes every workload discussion below.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data paints an unambiguous picture of a CPU-bound system. The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 scores 24,828 points in Cinebench R23 multi-core, placing it in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs, while the Intel Arc A770M GPU sits at the 62nd percentile in the graphics hierarchy. That 31-percentage-point gap between the two components’ percentile rankings is the single most important statistic for understanding this pairing’s behavior.

In CPU-intensive workloads, the processor’s 12 cores and 24 threads deliver scores that rival desktop-class parts. The Ryzen AI Max PRO 390’s average benchmark score of 63,765 puts it within 0.4% of the Intel Core i9-13900KS and 0.7% of the AMD EPYC 7343, both of which are far larger and more power-hungry parts. This means the CPU will rarely be the limiting factor in any task; it has headroom to spare.

The GPU presents a different story. With a PassMark G3D score of 11,774 and an average benchmark score of 18,383, the Arc A770M sits within 1.2% of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile and 1.1% of the AMD Radeon Pro 5700. This is a mid-tier mobile graphics solution that will become the primary constraint in graphics-heavy scenarios. The 16.79 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 512.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth are respectable, but they are the ceiling when the CPU could process far more.

The bottleneck shifts depending on workload type. For multi-threaded CPU tasks like compiling code or rendering with CPU-based engines, the GPU is irrelevant and the CPU runs at near-peak efficiency. For gaming or GPU-accelerated rendering, the Arc A770M becomes the limiting factor, with the CPU often waiting on the graphics pipeline. The lack of measured FPS data prevents quantifying this precisely, but the percentile disparity strongly suggests that frame rates will be dictated by the GPU in virtually all gaming scenarios.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The Arc A770M’s 62nd percentile ranking and 16.79 TFLOPS FP32 performance suggest it can handle 1080p gaming at medium-to-high settings, but frame rates at 144Hz or higher would require significant settings reductions. The CPU’s PassMark single-thread score of 3,967 ensures it will not bottleneck the GPU’s output in most titles.

Streaming: The CPU’s 24 threads and strong multi-core scores make software encoding a viable option. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24,828 provides ample headroom for simultaneous game and encode workloads, though the GPU’s Xe-HPG architecture includes hardware encoding capabilities that could offload this work.

Video editing: This is a strong scenario for this pairing. The CPU’s PassMark floating-point math score of 94,666 and data compression score of 506,170 indicate excellent performance for codecs and timeline operations. The GPU’s 16 GB GDDR6 memory is sufficient for 4K timeline scrubbing and effects, though the 62nd percentile GPU ranking means heavy color grading or motion graphics will feel mid-range.

3D rendering: Mixed results here. CPU-based rendering engines will perform exceptionally well given the 24,828 Cinebench R23 multi-core score. GPU-accelerated renderers will be limited by the Arc A770M’s 16.79 TFLOPS FP32 throughput, which places it near the RTX 3060 Mobile — capable but not class-leading.

Software development: The CPU shines here. The PassMark multi-thread score of 42,912 and integer math score of 148,508 indicate fast compilation times and responsive parallel builds. The 64 MB shared L3 cache helps with large codebases. The GPU is largely irrelevant for this workload.

Student and office work: This pairing is massively overqualified. The PassMark single-thread score of 3,967 handles document processing and web browsing effortlessly, while the 24 threads and 93rd CPU percentile make even heavy multitasking feel instantaneous. The 55W CPU TDP suggests efficient operation for extended sessions.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 is a 12-core, 24-thread processor built on the Zen 5 architecture using TSMC’s 4 nm process node. It belongs to the Strix Halo family and operates within a 55W TDP envelope, which is remarkably efficient for the performance on offer. Base clock is 3.20 GHz with a 5.00 GHz boost clock, and the chip uses the AMD Socket FP11 interface for mobile platforms.

The cache hierarchy is substantial: 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 64 MB L3 pool. This large L3 cache helps explain the strong PassMark data compression score of 506,170, which benefits from data staying close to the cores. Memory support includes quad-channel LPDDR5X with 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth and ECC capability, which is unusual for a mobile part and speaks to professional use cases.

Benchmark results place this chip firmly in the high-end category. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24,828 is within 0.7% of the AMD EPYC 7343 server processor, demonstrating that this mobile chip can match server-class throughput in threaded workloads. The single-core Cinebench R23 score of 1,976 and PassMark single-thread score of 3,967 indicate strong per-core performance for responsiveness. The PassMark physics score of 2,773 and find prime numbers score of 323 suggest the CPU handles complex calculations efficiently.

The nearest rival data shows the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 trading blows with desktop enthusiast parts. It trails the Intel Core i9-13900KS by only 0.4% in average benchmark score while leading the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G by 0.7% and the Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX by 0.9%. This is a processor that punches far above its mobile positioning.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who need exceptional CPU performance in a laptop form factor but do not require top-tier gaming graphics. Software developers compiling large projects will benefit from the 24,828 Cinebench R23 multi-core score and the 148,508 integer math PassMark score, both of which indicate rapid build times.

Data professionals working with large datasets will appreciate the 506,170 data compression score and the ECC memory support, which ensures reliability during long compute jobs. The 256.0 GB/s memory bandwidth from the quad-channel LPDDR5X configuration supports memory-intensive analytics.

Video editors who work primarily in CPU-based codecs will find the 24 threads and 64 MB L3 cache well-suited to their workflow. The GPU’s 16 GB VRAM provides enough capacity for 4K projects, though the 62nd GPU percentile means the graphics card will be the upgrade path for heavier effects work.

Gamers at 1080p who accept medium settings will find this system adequate, as the Arc A770M’s performance near the RTX 3060 Mobile suggests playable frame rates in most titles. Users seeking 1440p high-refresh gaming should look elsewhere, as the GPU is the clear limiting factor.

Students and office workers will find this system vastly more capable than needed, but the 55W CPU TDP and efficient Zen 5 architecture mean battery life should not suffer excessively for the performance available.

FAQ

Q: How does the CPU performance compare to desktop processors?

A: The Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 scores 24,828 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, which places it within 0.4% of the Intel Core i9-13900KS and 0.7% of the AMD EPYC 7343 in average benchmark scores, indicating desktop-class multi-threaded performance in a mobile package.

Q: Is the GPU sufficient for modern gaming?

A: The Intel Arc A770M sits at the 62nd percentile among all GPUs with a PassMark G3D score of 11,774, placing it within 1.2% of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile. This indicates capable 1080p gaming, but the GPU is the system’s primary bottleneck.

Q: What memory configuration does this system use?

A: The CPU supports quad-channel LPDDR5X memory with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth and ECC capability. The GPU has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus with 512.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: How does this CPU compare to the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G?

A: The Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 leads the Ryzen AI 7 450G by 0.7% in average benchmark score, despite the 450G being a newer part. The 390’s 12 cores and 24 threads provide substantial multi-threaded capability.

Q: Can this system handle 3D rendering workloads?

A: CPU-based rendering will perform excellently given the 24,828 Cinebench R23 multi-core score. GPU-accelerated rendering will be limited by the Arc A770M’s 16.79 TFLOPS FP32 compute, which is mid-range for a mobile GPU.

Q: What is the production status of these components?

A: The CPU is listed as Active with an January 2025 release date, while the GPU is marked End-of-life. This means the processor is current, but the graphics solution is a previous-generation part.

Q: Does the CPU support overclocking?

A: No, the multiplier is locked on the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390, so users cannot adjust clock multipliers for higher performance.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination in the data. The FACT PACK contains no measured frame rate information, so all gaming performance figures here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and GPU percentile rankings.

Based on the Intel Arc A770M’s 62nd percentile position and its PassMark G3D score of 11,774, this system should deliver playable frame rates at 1080p with medium-to-high settings in most modern titles. The GPU’s proximity to the RTX 3060 Mobile, within 1.2% in average benchmark score, provides a reference point for expected performance — that GPU is known to handle 1080p gaming well but struggles at 1440p with max settings.

The 16 GB GDDR6 memory and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for high-resolution textures, but the 16.79 TFLOPS FP32 compute limits raw shader throughput. Games that are heavily GPU-bound will see frame rates dictated entirely by the Arc A770M, while the CPU’s 3,967 PassMark single-thread score ensures it will not be a limiting factor in most titles.

The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,278 and Geekbench Vulkan score of 74,422 indicate moderate DirectX 12 and Vulkan performance. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, meaning it is feature-complete for modern APIs. Ray tracing is supported via 32 dedicated RT cores, but performance in RT-enabled titles will be limited by the GPU’s mid-tier position.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU delivers exceptional benchmark results across the board. Cinebench R23 multi-core scores 24,828 points, while single-core scores 1,976. Cinebench R15 shows 3,918 multi-core and 303 single-core. The PassMark suite reveals strong integer math performance at 148,508, floating-point math at 94,666, and data compression at 506,170. The multi-thread score of 42,912 and single-thread score of 3,967 reinforce the CPU’s balanced capability.

The GPU benchmarks show a mid-tier mobile part. 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 scores 2,278, while Geekbench OpenCL scores 89,494 and Vulkan scores 74,422. PassMark G3D scores 11,774, with DirectX 12 at 70 and DirectX 11 at 69. The PassMark GPU compute score of 4,778 indicates moderate compute throughput for a mobile GPU.

The CPU’s average benchmark score of 63,765 places it in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs, with a combined percentile of 78 for the pairing. The CPU leads the Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX by 0.9% and trails the Intel Core i9-13900KS by 0.4%. The GPU’s average benchmark score of 18,383 places it in the 62nd percentile, leading the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile by 1.2% and trailing the AMD FirePro D500 by 0.8%.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class system combining the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 processor with the Intel Arc A770M mobile GPU. The combined percentile ranking of 78 indicates a system that performs above average but is not at the enthusiast tier. The CPU is a modern, active production part from the Strix Halo family, while the GPU is an end-of-life Alchemist generation mobile part.

The 93rd percentile CPU represents the system’s core strength, delivering performance that rivals desktop processors in a 55W envelope. The 62nd percentile GPU is the weak link, providing mid-range graphics capability that will satisfy mainstream users but not enthusiasts. This is a workstation-leaning build where CPU throughput takes priority over gaming frame rates.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A770M is built on the Xe-HPG architecture using TSMC’s 6 nm process, with a die size of 406 mm² containing 21,700 million transistors. The chip, designated DG2-512, operates at a base clock of 1650 MHz and boost clock of 2050 MHz, with memory clocked at 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective).

Memory configuration includes 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, delivering 512.0 GB/s bandwidth. The GPU has 4,096 shading units, 256 TMUs, and 128 ROPs, with 32 dedicated ray tracing cores. Pixel rate is 262.4 GPixel/s and texture rate is 524.8 GTexel/s. FP32 compute is 16.79 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 33.59 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio). The GPU consumes 120W and connects via PCIe 4.0 x16.

Benchmark results show a mid-tier mobile GPU. The PassMark G3D score of 11,774 and DirectX 12 score of 70 indicate competent DirectX 12 performance, while the Geekbench OpenCL score of 89,494 suggests reasonable compute capability. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,278 places it in the lower-mid range of modern GPUs.

The GPU’s average benchmark score of 18,383 places it within 1.2% of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile, a well-regarded mobile part. However, the 62nd percentile ranking means it sits below the majority of current GPUs. For rendering workloads, the 16.79 TFLOPS FP32 and 33.59 TFLOPS FP16 performance provide adequate compute, but the GPU will not compete with higher-tier mobile parts in GPU-accelerated rendering. The 16 GB VRAM is generous for a mobile GPU and supports large textures and complex scenes, but the underlying compute throughput limits the practical benefit.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 + Intel Arc A770M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390

Intel Arc A770M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Balance and Bottleneck

Usage Scenarios

CPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

FAQ

Gaming Performance

Benchmark Performance

Build Overview

GPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds