SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 + Intel Arc A730M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

96 Score

Top 4% Ranking

96 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 4% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

96%

GPU

96%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390

63,765 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A730M

45,592 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 is a 12-core, 24-thread mobile processor built on the Zen 5 architecture, codenamed Strix Halo. It operates with a base clock of 3.20 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, fabricated on TSMC's 4 nm process node. The cache hierarchy is substantial: 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 64 MB L3 pool. This CPU is paired with a quad-channel LPDDR5X memory interface, delivering 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth, and supports ECC memory. It is designed for the AMD Socket FP11 platform and is currently marked as Active in production, with a release date of January 2025. The processor also integrates a Radeon 8050S graphics unit, though the primary GPU in this configuration is the discrete Intel Arc A730M.

CPU Analysis

The Ryzen AI Max PRO 390's 12 cores and 24 threads provide a strong foundation for both single-threaded responsiveness and heavily parallel workloads. The 5.00 GHz boost clock ensures that lightly threaded tasks, such as everyday application use or older games, receive ample clock speed headroom. The 64 MB of shared L3 cache is a significant asset for workloads that repeatedly access large datasets, reducing latency and improving throughput in scenarios like complex simulations or database queries. The quad-channel LPDDR5X memory controller, with its 256.0 GB/s bandwidth, is a key differentiator for a mobile part, as it feeds the CPU's cores and any integrated graphics with far more data than typical dual-channel designs.

Benchmark results highlight the CPU's capability. In Cinebench R23, the processor scores 24828 points in the multi-core test and 1976 points in the single-core test. This multi-core figure places it in a competitive position against desktop-class parts from a few generations ago. The single-core score of 1976 is strong, indicating that the Zen 5 architecture's IPC improvements are effective. The Passmark suite further breaks down performance: a multi-thread score of 42912, a single-thread score of 3967, and a floating-point math score of 94666. The integer math score of 148508 is particularly high, suggesting robust performance in general computing tasks, compilation, and office productivity.

The CPU's average benchmark score is 63765, placing it in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals in the database include the Intel Core i9-13900KS, which scores 64051 (a delta of -0.4%, meaning the Ryzen is 0.4% slower), and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G, which scores 63331 (a delta of 0.7%, meaning the Ryzen is 0.7% faster). It also sits close to the AMD EPYC 7343 (64202, -0.7%) and the Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX (63173, 0.9%). This indicates that the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 offers performance that is statistically on par with these high-end alternatives, despite being a mobile-focused chip with a 55 W TDP.

Benchmark Performance

The combined picture of this system is defined by a very high-performing CPU paired with a mid-to-high-range mobile GPU. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24828 and Passmark multi-thread score of 42912 demonstrate exceptional processing power for a laptop component, placing it in the 93rd percentile. This suggests that the system will excel in CPU-intensive tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation.

The GPU, an Intel Arc A730M, has an average benchmark score of 45592, placing it in the 84th percentile of all GPUs. In specific tests, it scores 1732 in 3DMark Steel Nomad (DX12), 70352 in Geekbench OpenCL, and 64693 in Geekbench Vulkan. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT (45384, a delta of 0.5% faster for the Intel), the NVIDIA RTX 5880 Ada Generation (45972, -0.8% slower for the Intel), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile (45152, 1% faster for the Intel), and the NVIDIA RTX A2000 (46043, -1% slower for the Intel). This places the Arc A730M in a performance tier that is competitive with professional workstation GPUs and some of the latest high-end mobile offerings.

The system's combined percentile is 89, reflecting a strong overall balance. The CPU's near-parity with the Core i9-13900KS (delta -0.4%) and its slight edge over the Core Ultra 7 265HX (delta 0.9%) suggests that for CPU-bound tasks, this system will not be a bottleneck. Meanwhile, the GPU's performance, while not as dominant as the CPU's, is still robust enough for demanding graphics workloads, as evidenced by its 84th percentile rank and its competitive standing against the RTX A2000.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A730M is built on the Xe-HPG architecture, specifically the Alchemist generation for mobile. It uses the DG2-512 chip, manufactured on a 6 nm process at TSMC, with a substantial 21,700 million transistors on a 406 mm² die. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1100 MHz and a boost clock of 2050 MHz. It features 3072 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 96 raster output pipelines. For hardware-accelerated ray tracing, it includes 24 ray tracing cores.

Memory configuration is a strong point for the A730M. It is equipped with 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, running at an effective speed of 14 Gbps. This yields a memory bandwidth of 336.0 GB/s. This large frame buffer and high bandwidth are advantageous for high-resolution textures and compute workloads that require large data sets. The GPU's pixel rate is 196.8 GPixel/s, and its texture rate is 393.6 GTexel/s. It delivers 12.60 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 25.19 TFLOPS of FP16 performance (2:1 ratio).

In benchmark tests, the A730M's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1732 indicates its DirectX 12 performance. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 70352 and Vulkan score of 64693 show strong compute and API efficiency. The GPU's 84th percentile rank suggests it outperforms a majority of GPUs in the database. Its deltaPct values against rivals show it is essentially tied with the Radeon Pro 5500 XT (0.5%) and the RTX 5090 Mobile (1%), while being slightly behind the RTX 5880 Ada Generation (-0.8%) and RTX A2000 (-1%). This means for rendering and compute tasks, users can expect performance comparable to a professional workstation card like the RTX A2000, which is a solid result for a mobile GPU with an 80 W TDP.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data suggests a system where the CPU is the dominant component, and the GPU is the more likely limiting factor in graphics-intensive scenarios. The CPU's 93rd percentile rank is significantly higher than the GPU's 84th percentile rank. This imbalance implies that in workloads that scale well with core count, such as multi-threaded rendering or video encoding, the CPU will be able to push data as fast as the GPU can process it, and may even be waiting on the GPU.

Specifically, the CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24828 is a top-tier result, while the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1732, while respectable, is not in the same class relative to its peers. In gaming scenarios, this means that at lower resolutions and with lower graphical settings, the CPU will easily feed the GPU, and the frame rate will be limited by the Arc A730M's raw rendering power. However, at higher resolutions like 4K, the load shifts more heavily to the GPU, and the bottleneck will be even more pronounced on the graphics side.

For non-gaming workloads, the balance is more favorable. The GPU's 12.60 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and its 24 ray tracing cores make it a capable accelerator for rendering, but the CPU's massive multi-threading capabilities and high memory bandwidth (256.0 GB/s) ensure that the system as a whole is not held back by the processor. The Passmark integer math score of 148508 further confirms the CPU's ability to handle complex logic and data processing, which is critical for productivity tasks. Overall, the bottleneck is workload-dependent, but the GPU is the primary constraint for pure graphics performance.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is based on AMD's Socket FP11, which is a mobile-specific socket. This means that the CPU is likely soldered to the motherboard, and upgrades to the processor itself are not feasible. The system is classified as a laptop, so the upgrade path is limited to external peripherals or, in some cases, memory and storage, depending on the specific laptop design.

The CPU supports LPDDR5X memory in a quad-channel configuration, offering 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is a fixed characteristic of the platform, so users cannot upgrade memory speed or channel count. The system also supports ECC memory, which is a feature more commonly found in workstation platforms. The GPU, an Intel Arc A730M, is also a mobile component, so it cannot be upgraded in a traditional sense. It connects via PCIe 4.0 x16, but again, this is an integrated part.

The CPU has a TDP of 55 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 80 W. While the FACT PACK does not provide a suggested PSU wattage for the GPU, the combined thermal envelope of roughly 135 W for the primary compute components is modest for a laptop, leaving headroom for other components like the display, storage, and cooling fans. A sensible "next upgrade" for a user of this system would be to invest in high-speed external storage via Thunderbolt or USB4, or a high-quality external GPU enclosure, though the internal GPU is already quite capable. More practically, the upgrade path is to the next generation of laptop, as the socket and mobile nature of the components prevent in-place upgrades.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The combination of a top-tier CPU and a mid-to-high-range GPU will deliver high frame rates at 1080p and 1440p. The CPU's 93rd percentile performance ensures it will not limit frame generation in most titles, and the GPU's 84th percentile rank indicates it can handle modern games with high settings. Users can expect smooth gameplay, though the GPU will be the limiting factor at higher resolutions or with maximum ray tracing enabled.

Streaming: The 12-core/24-thread CPU is exceptionally well-suited for streaming. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24828 and Passmark multi-thread score of 42912 provide ample headroom for encoding video while simultaneously running a game and other applications. The GPU's 12.60 TFLOPS of FP32 performance can also assist with encoding tasks, though the CPU alone is more than capable.

Video editing: This workload benefits from both high CPU core counts and GPU acceleration. The CPU's strong multi-core scores (24828 Cinebench R23, 148508 Passmark integer math) will handle timeline scrubbing and effect processing, while the GPU's 12 GB of VRAM and 336.0 GB/s bandwidth are beneficial for rendering previews and exporting. The system's 256.0 GB/s memory bandwidth on the CPU side also helps with large media files.

3D rendering: The CPU will be the primary workhorse for CPU-based rendering engines. Its score is on par with the Intel Core i9-13900KS (delta -0.4%), making it a formidable rendering processor. For GPU-accelerated rendering, the Arc A730M's 24 ray tracing cores and 12.60 TFLOPS of FP32 performance are competitive with the NVIDIA RTX A2000 (delta -1%), making it suitable for Blender or similar applications.

Software development: Compilation tasks are heavily multi-threaded and memory-bound. The CPU's 24 threads and 64 MB of L3 cache will significantly reduce build times. The Passmark integer math score of 148508 and data compression score of 506170 suggest strong performance in code compilation and handling large codebases.

Student and office work: For typical productivity applications, this system is massively over-powered. The Passmark single-thread score of 3967 ensures snappy responsiveness in web browsers and office suites. However, the high TDP (55 W CPU + 80 W GPU) means this is not an ultraportable, battery-focused device, making it more suitable for a student who also does content creation than one who only needs note-taking.

Who Should Build It

This configuration is tailored for power users who need a mobile workstation that can handle both intensive compute and demanding graphics tasks. The target audience includes content creators who work with 4K video, complex After Effects projects, or 3D modeling in applications like Blender or Maya. The CPU's 93rd percentile performance and the GPU's workstation-class capabilities (comparable to the RTX A2000) make it a viable tool for professional work.

Software developers who compile large codebases, run virtual machines, or work with data science workloads will benefit from the 12 cores/24 threads and the high memory bandwidth. The system's parity with the Core i9-13900KS in average benchmark scores means it can handle desktop-class development tasks on the go.

Gamers who play at 1080p or 1440p with high refresh rates and also engage in content creation or streaming will find this system to be a strong all-rounder. The GPU's performance, while not top-tier, is sufficient for high-quality gaming, and the CPU ensures no frame drops due to processing bottlenecks.

Small business workstations that require ECC memory support (a feature present in this CPU) and handle tasks like financial modeling, CAD, or scientific computing would also be a good fit. However, the "laptop" build class means this is a mobile solution, and the end-of-life status of the GPU is a consideration for long-term procurement. The system is not ideal for users who prioritize battery life or extreme portability, given the combined 135 W TDP of the CPU and GPU.

FAQ

Q: How does the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 compare to the Intel Core i9-13900KS?

A: The Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 has an average benchmark score of 63765, which is 0.4% lower than the Core i9-13900KS's score of 64051. This indicates near-identical overall performance.

Q: What is the memory configuration of this CPU?

A: The CPU supports LPDDR5X memory in a quad-channel configuration, providing 256.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth. It also supports ECC memory.

Q: Is the Intel Arc A730M good for ray tracing?

A: The GPU includes 24 dedicated ray tracing cores. Its performance in ray-traced workloads is reflected in its 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1732, and it is competitive with the NVIDIA RTX A2000, which has a delta of -1% in average benchmark score.

Q: What is the TDP of the CPU and GPU?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 55 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 80 W.

Q: Can the CPU be overclocked?

A: No, the CPU has a locked multiplier (multiplierUnlocked is false), so overclocking is not supported.

Q: What socket does this CPU use?

A: The CPU uses the AMD Socket FP11, which is a mobile platform socket.

Q: What is the GPU's memory bandwidth?

A: The Intel Arc A730M has a memory bandwidth of 336.0 GB/s, utilizing 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus.

Gaming Performance

Note: The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this specific CPU/GPU combination. All frame rate expectations below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and relative performance data.

Based on the benchmark scores, this system is well-positioned for high-refresh-rate gaming at 1080p and 1440p. The CPU's 93rd percentile performance means it will rarely be the bottleneck in gaming, providing consistent frame pacing and high minimum FPS. The GPU, sitting in the 84th percentile, is the primary determinant of raw FPS.

Given the GPU's performance is comparable to the NVIDIA RTX A2000 (delta -1%) and slightly better than the RTX 5090 Mobile (delta 1%), users can expect high settings at 1080p to yield very high frame rates in most esports titles, often exceeding 144 FPS. For AAA games at 1440p, medium-to-high settings should achieve 60-100 FPS. At 4K resolution, the 12 GB VRAM and 336.0 GB/s bandwidth are assets, but the GPU's raw compute power (12.60 TFLOPS FP32) will likely limit performance to 30-60 FPS on high settings, requiring DLSS/FSR upscaling for smoother gameplay. The 24 ray tracing cores are present, but enabling ray tracing will significantly reduce FPS; users should expect to use performance presets or lower resolutions to maintain playable frame rates. Overall, this is a 1080p/1440p gaming machine that can handle 4K with compromises in settings.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 + Intel Arc A730M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390

Intel Arc A730M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

GPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Upgrade Path and Platform

Usage Scenarios

Who Should Build It

FAQ

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds