SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 + Intel Arc A570M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

96 Score

Top 4% Ranking

96 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 4% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

96%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390

63,765 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A570M

58,239 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 and Intel Arc A570M pairing represents a high-end laptop configuration, placing in the 91st percentile for combined performance. This analysis relies exclusively on synthetic benchmark data, as the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU-GPU combination. All gaming frame rate discussions are therefore estimates extrapolated from the component benchmark scores, not observed results.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK explicitly contains no measured FPS data for this combination, so any frame rate figures presented here are estimates based on the individual benchmark scores of the CPU and GPU. The data indicates this pairing is positioned for high-refresh-rate 1080p gaming and capable 1440p play, with the GPU’s 88th percentile ranking serving as the primary constraint for frame rates.

The Intel Arc A570M’s 5.325 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 8 GB GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus suggest it can handle modern titles at 1080p with high detail settings, though the 224.0 GB/s bandwidth may limit performance in texture-heavy scenes at higher resolutions. At 1440p, the GPU’s 83.20 GPixel/s pixel rate and 166.4 GTexel/s texture rate indicate playable frame rates for competitive titles, but demanding AAA games may require settings reductions to maintain smooth performance.

The Ryzen AI Max PRO 390’s 93rd percentile CPU ranking ensures the processor is not the bottleneck in most gaming scenarios. Its 24 threads and 64 MB L3 cache provide ample headroom for game logic, physics calculations, and background tasks. The 256.0 GB/s memory bandwidth from LPDDR5X quad-channel support is particularly beneficial for integrated graphics scenarios, though this build uses a discrete GPU.

For esports titles like Counter-Strike 2 or Valorant, the combination of a strong CPU and mid-range GPU should deliver high frame rates at 1080p, likely exceeding 144 Hz in many scenarios. For visually intensive single-player games, the Arc A570M’s 16 ray tracing cores enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing, but the modest 5.325 TFLOPS compute means ray-traced workloads will significantly impact frame rates, making it more suitable for hybrid rendering modes or ray tracing disabled at 1440p.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 63,765, placing it in the 93rd percentile of all processors. This positions it slightly below the Intel Core i9-13900KS, which scores 64,051 with a -0.4% delta, and the AMD EPYC 7343 at 64,202 with a -0.7% delta. Conversely, it outperforms the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G by 0.7% (63,331) and the Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX by 0.9% (63,173). These tight margins, all within approximately one percent, indicate the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 sits at the upper edge of desktop-class performance in a mobile form factor.

In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 24,828 multi-core and 1,976 single-core. The multi-core result reflects strong sustained performance from its 12 cores and 24 threads, while the single-core score of 1,976 demonstrates competitive per-thread efficiency from the Zen 5 architecture. PassMark tests show 42,912 in multithread and 3,967 in single-thread, reinforcing this balanced profile. Data-heavy workloads score 506,170 in compression and 26,027 in encryption, while floating-point math reaches 94,666 and integer math 148,508.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 58,239, placing it in the 88th percentile of all graphics cards. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT, scores 58,392 with a -0.3% delta, meaning the Arc A570M is effectively performance-equivalent to a previous-generation flagship desktop GPU in this specific benchmark. The AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM scores 58,085 with a +0.3% delta, showing the Intel part also slightly exceeds that mid-range card. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 58,239 represents the sole GPU benchmark in the data set.

The combined picture shows a CPU that punches at desktop-class levels and a GPU that, while not top-tier, outperforms its mobile positioning suggests. The 91st combined percentile confirms this pairing as a high-end laptop configuration, though the GPU’s lower percentile relative to the CPU indicates the graphics card is the performance ceiling in GPU-bound workloads.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the AMD Socket FP11, which is a mobile-specific socket, meaning CPU upgrades are not practical in the conventional desktop sense. The platform supports LPDDR5X memory with quad-channel configuration, delivering 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth, and includes ECC memory support for data integrity in professional workloads. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes, while the GPU connects via PCIe 4.0 x8.

Memory is soldered LPDDR5X, so upgrading RAM after purchase is not feasible. The 256.0 GB/s bandwidth is substantial for a laptop platform, exceeding what many desktop systems achieve with dual-channel DDR4 or DDR5, and it directly benefits both CPU-intensive tasks and the integrated Radeon 8050S graphics. The presence of ECC support suggests this platform targets workstation-adjacent use cases where data accuracy is critical.

The GPU, despite being labeled as IGP slot width, is a discrete chip with a 75 W TDP. The FACT PACK lists no suggested PSU, and the laptop form factor means power delivery is fixed by the manufacturer. The 75 W TDP for the GPU combined with the CPU’s 55 W TDP indicates a total package around 130 W, which is moderate for a high-performance laptop and should be manageable within a well-designed cooling solution.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be external GPU connectivity, as the PCIe Gen 4 x8 interface on the GPU suggests the system supports bandwidth-hungry peripherals. However, the mobile form factor limits internal expansion. For users seeking more graphics performance, the only realistic path is a new laptop, as neither the FP11 socket nor the soldered memory allows component-level upgrades.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets users who need desktop-class CPU performance in a portable laptop. The 93rd percentile CPU makes it ideal for content creators working with video editing, 3D rendering, and software compilation, where the 24 threads and 64 MB L3 cache accelerate multi-threaded workloads. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24,828 and PassMark multithread score of 42,912 confirm strong parallel processing capability.

Gamers at 1080p will find this pairing well-suited, as the GPU’s 88th percentile ensures high frame rates in most titles, while the CPU prevents bottlenecking in CPU-intensive simulations or strategy games. The 8 GB VRAM is adequate for 1080p high-detail textures, though 1440p gaming may require texture quality reductions in some titles. The 16 ray tracing cores enable RT effects, but frame rates will vary significantly based on implementation.

Developers and data scientists benefit from the CPU’s PassMark data compression score of 506,170 and encryption score of 26,027, which indicate strong performance in data processing and secure computation tasks. The ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running calculations. Students in engineering or computer science programs will appreciate the multi-core performance for compilation and simulation projects, while the integrated Radeon 8050S provides a fallback graphics solution that can handle display output and light GPU tasks independently.

Small business workstations requiring CPU-heavy applications like database management or financial modeling will find the 93rd percentile CPU performance more than sufficient. The combination of high single-thread and multi-thread scores means both interactive productivity applications and batch processing tasks perform well. The GPU’s capabilities are secondary for these workloads but provide headroom for visualization or light CAD work.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data reveals a CPU-favored balance, with the processor ranking in the 93rd percentile versus the GPU’s 88th percentile. This means the GPU is the limiting factor in graphics-intensive workloads, while the CPU provides significant headroom for compute-heavy tasks. In gaming, the Arc A570M will cap frame rates before the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 reaches its limits, particularly at higher resolutions or with ray tracing enabled.

The CPU’s nearest rival comparisons show it performs within 1% of the Intel Core i9-13900KS, a desktop flagship, while consuming only 55 W TDP. This efficiency advantage means the laptop’s thermal and power budget can be allocated more generously to the GPU in sustained workloads, though the GPU’s 75 W TDP still caps its performance. For CPU-bound tasks like video encoding or 3D rendering, the processor will deliver near-desktop performance without throttling.

The memory subsystem plays a critical role in balancing this pairing. The 256.0 GB/s LPDDR5X bandwidth benefits both the CPU and the integrated graphics, but the discrete GPU has its own 224.0 GB/s GDDR6 bandwidth. In mixed workloads where both the CPU and GPU are active, the system can feed both components without memory contention, reducing potential bottlenecks.

In GPU-bound scenarios at 1440p, the Arc A570M’s 224.0 GB/s bandwidth and 128-bit bus will likely limit performance in bandwidth-sensitive titles. The CPU’s 256.0 GB/s memory bandwidth cannot compensate for the GPU’s narrower bus, so users should expect the GPU to be the primary constraint in high-resolution gaming. Conversely, in CPU-bound scenarios like physics simulation or AI inference on the CPU, the processor’s 24 threads and high clock speeds prevent the GPU from being idle.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A570M is built on the DG2-256 chip using the Xe-HPG architecture, manufactured on TSMC’s 6 nm process with 11,500 million transistors on a 269 mm² die. It features 2,048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation units, along with 16 dedicated ray tracing cores. The GPU operates at a base clock of 900 MHz and a boost clock of 1300 MHz, with memory clocked at 1750 MHz for 14 Gbps effective GDDR6 speed.

The 8 GB GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus delivers 224.0 GB/s bandwidth, which is modest for a GPU in this performance class. The 5.325 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 10.65 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1) indicate strong compute capability for a mobile part, and the 83.20 GPixel/s pixel rate and 166.4 GTexel/s texture rate provide solid rasterization throughput. The 16 RT cores enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing, a feature that remains uncommon in this GPU tier.

The Geekbench OpenCL score of 58,239 places the Arc A570M in the 88th percentile, with its nearest rival being the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT at 58,392 (-0.3% delta). This is a remarkable result, as it suggests the mobile Intel GPU matches a previous-generation desktop flagship in compute performance. However, OpenCL scores do not directly translate to gaming frame rates, and the 128-bit memory bus may limit real-world gaming performance relative to the compute score.

For rendering workloads, the 16 RT cores and 5.325 TFLOPS FP32 provide entry-level ray tracing and decent rasterization performance. The 10.65 TFLOPS FP16 throughput supports AI-accelerated features like Intel XeSS, which can improve frame rates in supported titles. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern APIs.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 is a 12-core, 24-thread processor based on the Zen 5 architecture, codenamed Strix Halo, manufactured on TSMC’s 4 nm process. It operates at a base clock of 3.20 GHz and boosts to 5.00 GHz, with a 55 W TDP. The CPU features 80 KB L1 cache per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 64 MB shared L3 cache, providing substantial cache hierarchy for memory-intensive workloads.

The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24,828 and single-core score of 1,976 demonstrate strong performance across both parallel and single-threaded tasks. The PassMark multithread score of 42,912 and single-thread score of 3,967 reinforce this balanced profile. The CPU’s 93rd percentile ranking places it among the top processors available, with its nearest rival being the Intel Core i9-13900KS at a -0.4% delta, indicating near-identical average performance.

Real-world workloads benefit from the CPU’s 24 threads, which excel in video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation. The PassMark floating-point math score of 94,666 and integer math score of 148,508 indicate strong arithmetic throughput for scientific computing and financial modeling. The data encryption score of 26,027 and compression score of 506,170 show capability in security and data management tasks.

The 256.0 GB/s memory bandwidth from quad-channel LPDDR5X support is a standout feature, providing more bandwidth than most desktop platforms. This benefits both CPU-intensive data processing and the integrated Radeon 8050S graphics. The ECC memory support adds reliability for professional use, and the 4 nm process node contributes to the 55 W TDP, making this a highly efficient processor for a laptop form factor.

Build Overview

This build pairs the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 with the Intel Arc A570M in a laptop form factor, creating a system that ranks in the 91st combined percentile. The CPU’s 93rd percentile and GPU’s 88th percentile indicate a high-end configuration, though the CPU is the stronger component. The pairing is unusual in mixing AMD’s latest Zen 5 architecture with Intel’s discrete graphics, but the benchmark data shows both components perform well relative to their peers.

The overall tier is upper-mid-range to high-end for laptops, with CPU performance rivaling desktop flagship processors like the Intel Core i9-13900KS. The GPU delivers desktop-class compute performance but is constrained by its mobile form factor and memory bandwidth. The 12-core/24-thread CPU with 5.00 GHz boost clock provides exceptional multi-threaded performance, while the 8 GB GPU handles 1080p gaming and light 1440p workloads.

This combination is best described as a workstation-class CPU paired with a mid-range gaming GPU, creating a system that excels in productivity and compute tasks while offering solid but not exceptional gaming performance. The 91st combined percentile confirms this is a premium laptop configuration, suitable for users who prioritize CPU performance for professional workloads but still want discrete GPU capabilities for gaming or GPU-accelerated tasks.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 91, placing this laptop configuration in the top tier of all systems.

Q: How does the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 compare to the Intel Core i9-13900KS?

A: The Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 scores 63,765 on average, which is 0.4% lower than the Core i9-13900KS’s 64,051, making them effectively performance-equivalent.

Q: What memory type and bandwidth does the CPU support?

A: The CPU supports LPDDR5X memory in a quad-channel configuration, delivering 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth, and also supports ECC memory.

Q: How much VRAM does the Intel Arc A570M have, and what is its bus width?

A: The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: Does the GPU support hardware ray tracing?

A: Yes, the Arc A570M features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing in supported games and applications.

Q: What is the CPU’s boost clock and TDP?

A: The CPU boosts up to 5.00 GHz with a 55 W TDP, and the GPU has a 75 W TDP, making a combined thermal envelope of approximately 130 W.

Q: What socket does the CPU use, and is it upgradeable?

A: The CPU uses AMD Socket FP11, which is a mobile socket, so CPU upgrades are not practical in a laptop form factor.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 + Intel Arc A570M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390

Intel Arc A570M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Gaming Performance

Benchmark Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

Who Should Build It

Balance and Bottleneck

GPU Analysis

CPU Analysis

Build Overview

FAQ

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds