SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 + Intel Arc A550M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

96 Score

Top 4% Ranking

96 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 4% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

96%

GPU

96%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390

63,765 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A550M

49,737 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 and Intel Arc A550M pairing represents a high-end laptop configuration aimed at users who need both substantial CPU compute and dedicated graphics horsepower. The CPU, a 12-core Zen 5 part with a 93rd percentile ranking, is a workstation-class mobile processor, while the GPU, an Alchemist-generation Arc part at the 86th percentile, offers desktop-class rendering capabilities. The data shows a balanced system that prioritizes productivity and creative workloads, with gaming performance that is substantial but secondary to its compute strengths.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 is built on the Zen 5 architecture, codenamed Strix Halo, and manufactured on TSMC's 4 nm process. It features 12 cores and 24 threads, with a base clock of 3.20 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The cache hierarchy is generous, with 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and a substantial 64 MB of shared L3 cache. This large L3 pool benefits workloads with high data locality, such as database queries and scientific simulations.

Benchmark results indicate a CPU that excels in multi-threaded environments. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 24828 places it in the top tier of mobile processors, while the single-core score of 1976 confirms strong per-thread performance. In PassMark tests, the multithread score of 42912 and integer math score of 148508 highlight its ability to handle parallel workloads, while the floating point math score of 94666 suggests solid performance in scientific and engineering applications that rely on non-integer calculations.

The CPU's average benchmark score of 63765 places it at the 93rd percentile of all CPUs, a commanding position. Its nearest rivals show a tight cluster of competition. The Intel Core i9-13900KS scores 64051, just 0.4% higher, while the AMD EPYC 7343 scores 64202, a 0.7% advantage for the server chip. On the other side, the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G trails by 0.7%, and the Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX trails by 0.9%. This data indicates the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 is effectively neck-and-neck with desktop flagship processors from the previous generation, despite its mobile classification.

Real-world workload interpretation: the Cinebench R15 multicore score of 3918 and R23 score of 24828 translate to fast video encoding and 3D rendering times. The PassMark data compression score of 506170 and random string sorting score of 55248 suggest strong file archiving and data processing capabilities. The data encryption score of 26027, combined with ECC memory support, makes this a viable option for security-sensitive tasks. The extended instructions score of 40888 indicates robust SIMD processing, useful for modern code and media filters.

FAQ

Q: How does the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 compare to the Intel Core i9-13900KS?

A: The average benchmark scores are nearly identical. The Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 scores 63765, while the Core i9-13900KS scores 64051, a delta of -0.4%, meaning the Intel chip is marginally ahead by less than half a percent.

Q: What is the memory configuration for this CPU?

A: The CPU supports LPDDR5X memory across a quad-channel bus, delivering 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth. It also supports ECC memory, which is uncommon in mobile platforms and beneficial for data integrity.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: Yes, it includes a Radeon 8050S integrated GPU, which can handle display output and light graphics tasks, though the system also pairs with a dedicated Intel Arc A550M GPU.

Q: What is the production status of the Intel Arc A550M?

A: The GPU is marked as end-of-life in the production status field, indicating it is no longer actively manufactured, though it remains a capable part.

Q: What PCIe connectivity does the CPU provide?

A: The CPU offers PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes. This is the CPU-only allocation, which is sufficient for a discrete GPU and NVMe storage.

Q: How does the CPU's L3 cache size impact performance?

A: With 64 MB of shared L3 cache, the CPU can hold larger working sets on-die, reducing memory traffic and improving performance in applications with repeated data access, such as simulations and large spreadsheets.

Benchmark Performance

The combined benchmark picture places this system at the 90th percentile overall. The CPU's average benchmark score is 63765, and the GPU's is 49737. No measured FPS data exists for this exact combination; all FPS discussion is estimated from these benchmark scores.

The CPU's 93rd percentile ranking among all CPUs is driven by strong multi-threaded scores. Specifically, the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 24828 is a high-water mark for mobile processors. The single-thread score of 1976 ensures that lightly-threaded tasks like web browsing and Office documents remain responsive.

The GPU's 86th percentile ranking is supported by Geekbench scores. The OpenCL score of 49894 and Vulkan score of 49580 are nearly identical, suggesting consistent performance across different compute APIs. The GPU's nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti, which scores 49957 (0.4% higher), and the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT, which scores 50951 (2.4% higher). The Arc A550M also beats the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT, which scores 48477, by 2.6%.

The combined picture is one of balance. The CPU is slightly above the 93rd percentile, the GPU slightly below the 86th percentile, and the system overall sits at the 90th percentile. This suggests the CPU is the stronger component relative to its peers, but the GPU is no slouch, and neither component will be a severe bottleneck in most mixed workloads.

Who Should Build It

This laptop configuration targets users who need a single machine for heavy CPU and GPU compute without resorting to a desktop. The target audience includes:

Content creators who edit high-resolution video or render 3D scenes, where the CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 24828 and the GPU's 8.397 TFLOPS of FP32 performance are directly applicable.
Software developers compiling large codebases, who benefit from the 24 threads and PassMark multithread score of 42912, as well as the extended instruction support for modern code.
Data analysts and scientists who run simulations or process large datasets, aided by the 64 MB L3 cache and the floating point math score of 94666.
Students in engineering or computer science who need a portable workstation for coursework in CAD, programming, and statistical analysis.
Small business workstations that require ECC memory support and strong encryption performance (PassMark data encryption score of 26027) for secure file handling.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: With the GPU's 86th percentile ranking, this system can handle esports titles and older AAA games at high settings, though the GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth are modest by current standards. The CPU's strong single-thread score of 1976 in Cinebench R23 ensures high frame rates in CPU-bound titles.
Streaming: The 12-core/24-thread CPU provides ample headroom for encoding video while gaming, with the PassMark multithread score of 42912 indicating it can handle simultaneous game and stream workloads.
Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 24828 and the GPU's 16.79 TFLOPS of FP16 performance (2:1 ratio) make this a capable setup for timeline editing and effect rendering in 4K projects.
3D rendering: CPU rendering will be fast with the 24828 multicore score, while GPU rendering in applications that support Vulkan or OpenCL can leverage the 49580 Vulkan score and 8.397 TFLOPS FP32 performance.
Software development: Compilation times benefit from the 24 threads and the PassMark integer math score of 148508. The 64 MB L3 cache helps with incremental builds by keeping frequent code segments on-die.
Student and office work: The single-thread score of 3967 in PassMark ensures snappy UI response in productivity suites, while the data compression score of 506170 indicates fast handling of large spreadsheets and archives.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A550M is based on the Xe-HPG architecture, specifically the DG2-512 chip, manufactured on TSMC's 6 nm process with 21,700 million transistors on a 406 mm² die. It has 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation units, along with 16 dedicated ray tracing cores.

Memory configuration is 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, yielding 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock is 1750 MHz, with an effective data rate of 14 Gbps. The GPU's base clock is 900 MHz, boosting to 2050 MHz, which drives a pixel rate of 131.2 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 262.4 GTexel/s.

Compute performance is rated at 8.397 TFLOPS for FP32 and 16.79 TFLOPS for FP16 (at a 2:1 ratio). This positions the GPU for efficient half-precision workloads, common in AI inference and some rendering pipelines. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 49894 and Vulkan score of 49580 are nearly tied, indicating that the GPU performs consistently regardless of the compute API used.

The GPU's 86th percentile ranking is competitive with older desktop flagships, as evidenced by its nearest rivals: the Radeon RX Vega 64 (0.5% ahead), the RX 6900 XT (2.4% ahead), and the RX 6800 XT (2.6% behind). The RTX 5070 Ti is only 0.4% ahead, which is a remarkable result for a mobile part. However, the 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit bus may limit performance in texture-heavy games at high resolutions, and the end-of-life production status suggests it is a mature, stable product.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data shows a system where the CPU is the stronger component relative to its peer group. The CPU sits at the 93rd percentile, while the GPU sits at the 86th percentile. This delta suggests that in CPU-bound workloads (e.g., physics simulations, code compilation), the system will perform at its peak, while in GPU-bound scenarios (e.g., high-resolution gaming), the GPU may be the limiting factor.

However, the margin is not extreme. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 24828 and the GPU's OpenCL score of 49894 both indicate high absolute performance. In mixed workloads like video editing, where both the CPU (for encoding) and GPU (for effects) are active, the system should maintain good utilization of both components.

The memory bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s (CPU) and 224.0 GB/s (GPU) are in the same ballpark, meaning that neither component will starve the other for data in most applications. The lack of measured FPS data prevents a precise bottleneck analysis, but estimated from the scores, this system is well-balanced for 1440p gaming and 4K productivity. At 1080p, the CPU may become the bottleneck in esports titles with very high frame rates, while at 4K, the GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit bus will be the primary constraint.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build, as indicated by the buildClass field. It pairs a 12-core Zen 5 mobile CPU (AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390) with an Intel Arc A550M discrete GPU. The system's combined percentile is 90, placing it in the top decile of all benchmarked configurations.

The CPU is a 55 W part (TDP), while the GPU is 60 W, making this a reasonably power-efficient pairing for a performance laptop. The production status is "Active" for the CPU and "End-of-life" for the GPU, which means the platform is current, but the GPU is a mature design. Overall, this is a high-tier mobile workstation or enthusiast gaming laptop that prioritizes CPU compute power, with a GPU that is capable but not the absolute fastest in its class.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the AMD Socket FP11 and is part of the Strix Halo platform. Memory support is LPDDR5X, which is typically soldered on mobile platforms, meaning memory upgrades are unlikely. The CPU supports PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes, which is sufficient for the current GPU and standard NVMe storage.

The GPU is on a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, which is current and not a bottleneck. However, the GPU's end-of-life status means future driver optimizations may be limited. The system's PSU requirements are not listed, and no suggested PSU is given, but the combined 55 W CPU and 60 W GPU TDPs suggest a modest power supply for a laptop—likely in the 100-150 W range for the AC adapter.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be a newer GPU with more VRAM, as the 8 GB capacity is the most likely limiting factor for future games. However, given the laptop form factor, this is unlikely to be user-serviceable. On the CPU side, the 12-core configuration is already high-end, and the 93rd percentile ranking suggests that upgrading the CPU would yield diminishing returns. The platform itself is current (release date of 2025-01-05), so the primary upgrade path would be to a future system with a newer GPU generation rather than an incremental component swap.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 + Intel Arc A550M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390

Intel Arc A550M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

FAQ

Benchmark Performance

Who Should Build It

Usage Scenarios

GPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Build Overview

Upgrade Path and Platform

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds