SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 + Intel Arc A370M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

95 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 5% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
96%
VS
GPU
93%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390

63,765 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A370M

29,175 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 + Intel Arc A370M

This mobile pairing combines a 12-core Zen 5 flagship APU with a discrete Intel Arc A370M GPU, targeting a 93rd-percentile CPU experience alongside a 74th-percentile graphics solution. The CPU's average benchmark score of 63,765 places it within 0.7% of the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G and 0.9% of the Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX, while the GPU's 29,175 average score sits within 1% of the AMD Radeon RX 6800M and 0.6% of the AMD Radeon RX 470. This is a compute-heavy platform where the processor clearly outclasses the graphics component, creating an interesting dynamic for laptop buyers who prioritize CPU-intensive tasks over gaming frame rates.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 is built on the Zen 5 architecture with the Strix Halo codename, manufactured on TSMC's 4 nm process. It packs 12 cores and 24 threads, with a base clock of 3.20 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and a substantial 64 MB of shared L3 cache. This configuration supports ECC memory and runs on the AMD Socket FP11 platform with a 55 W TDP.

Benchmark results reveal a processor that excels in multithreaded throughput. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 24,828 is particularly strong, while the single-core score of 1,976 indicates solid per-thread performance for a mobile part. In PassMark tests, the multithread score of 42,912 and integer math score of 148,508 demonstrate serious computational muscle, while the floating point math result of 94,666 and extended instructions score of 40,888 show balanced execution across different workload types. The data compression score of 506,170 and random string sorting score of 55,248 further reinforce the CPU's capability in data-intensive tasks.

The CPU's 93rd percentile ranking among all processors is backed by its average benchmark score of 63,765, which puts it in elite company. Compared to the Intel Core i9-13900KS, the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 trails by only 0.4% in average score, a remarkable result for a 55 W mobile chip against a desktop flagship. Against the AMD EPYC 7343 server processor, it is just 0.7% behind, while it leads the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G by 0.7% and the Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX by 0.9%. This places the chip in a performance tier that rivals both high-end desktop and server parts from recent generations.

Real-world implications are clear: this CPU can handle heavy compilation workloads, complex spreadsheets, virtualization, and content creation pipelines without breaking a sweat. The single-thread score of 3,967 in PassMark indicates responsive day-to-day operation, while the physics score of 2,773 suggests adequate performance for simulation tasks. The LPDDR5X memory support with quad-channel configuration and 256.0 GB/s bandwidth provides ample memory throughput for memory-bound applications.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's benchmark suite shows a consistent pattern of strong multithreaded performance with competitive single-thread results. In Cinebench R15, the multicore score of 3,918 and single-core score of 303 represent solid generational gains. The R23 results at 24,828 multicore and 1,976 single-core confirm scalability across rendering workloads. PassMark tests further validate the chip's versatility, with the single-thread score of 3,967 matching expectations for a 5.00 GHz boost clock.

The Intel Arc A370M GPU delivers a Geekbench OpenCL score of 29,676 and a Vulkan score of 28,673. These results place the GPU at the 74th percentile among all graphics cards, with an average benchmark score of 29,175. The nearest rivals show tight competition: the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH is just 0.1% ahead, the AMD FirePro W8000 is 0.1% ahead, while the AMD Radeon RX 470 trails by 0.6% and the AMD Radeon RX 6800M trails by 1%. This positions the Arc A370M as a mid-tier mobile GPU that can handle 1080p gaming at moderate settings but is not designed for high-end graphics workloads.

The combined percentile of 84 for this CPU-GPU pairing reflects the asymmetry between the two components. The processor's 93rd-percentile status dominates the overall picture, while the GPU's 74th-percentile ranking pulls the combined score down. Users with CPU-heavy workflows will find this combination highly effective, but those seeking balanced gaming performance may find the GPU underwhelming relative to the CPU's capabilities.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance asymmetry between the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 and the Arc A370M is the defining characteristic of this pairing. The CPU's 93rd-percentile ranking versus the GPU's 74th-percentile ranking creates a situation where the graphics card is almost certain to be the limiting factor in most workloads. For gaming, the GPU will bottleneck the CPU in all but the least demanding titles, meaning the processor's substantial power will often go underutilized.

Evidence from the benchmark scores supports this assessment. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 24,828 suggests rendering performance that could drive a much more powerful GPU, while the Arc A370M's Geekbench OpenCL score of 29,676 indicates modest graphics compute capability. In any workload that involves both CPU and GPU, the GPU will reach its limits first. This includes gaming, video encoding with GPU acceleration, and machine learning inference on graphics hardware.

For pure CPU workloads, however, the picture changes dramatically. The processor's PassMark multithread score of 42,912 and data encryption score of 26,027 show that the CPU can sustain heavy computational loads without assistance. The 256.0 GB/s memory bandwidth from the quad-channel LPDDR5X configuration further ensures that the CPU is not starved for data. In productivity applications, spreadsheet calculations, and software development tasks, the CPU will be the dominant contributor, and the GPU's role becomes secondary or even irrelevant.

The practical implication is that this laptop is best suited for users who prioritize processor performance over graphics. Gamers should expect the GPU to be the limiting factor at any resolution above 720p, while content creators working with CPU-based rendering or encoding will find the platform well-balanced. The 55 W CPU TDP and 35 W GPU TDP also suggest that the system's thermal design can maintain sustained CPU performance, which is often a concern in thin-and-light laptops.

Who Should Build It

The primary audience for this configuration is professionals and power users who need exceptional CPU performance in a mobile form factor. Software developers compiling large codebases will benefit from the 12 cores and 24 threads, with the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 24,828 indicating fast build times and parallel test execution. Data analysts working with large datasets will appreciate the data compression score of 506,170 and the high memory bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s.

Content creators who rely on CPU-based rendering will find the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 well-suited to their needs. The floating point math score of 94,666 and extended instructions score of 40,888 support compute-intensive applications like 3D modeling and scientific simulations. The ECC memory support is a notable feature for professionals who require data integrity in financial modeling or research applications.

Students in engineering, computer science, or data science programs will benefit from the CPU's multithreaded performance for coursework involving simulations, compiler projects, and statistical analysis. The single-thread score of 3,967 ensures responsive performance for everyday tasks like web browsing and document editing. Small business workstations handling inventory management, accounting software, or database operations will find the processor's reliability and throughput advantageous.

Gamers should approach this configuration with caution. The Arc A370M's 74th-percentile ranking means that only less demanding games at lower resolutions will fully utilize the system. Those who occasionally play light titles or esports games will find acceptable performance, but enthusiasts seeking high-refresh gaming should look elsewhere or wait for a GPU upgrade.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Socket FP11 platform is a mobile-specific design, which limits upgradeability compared to desktop systems. The CPU is not socketed in the traditional sense, and the LPDDR5X memory is soldered to the board, meaning memory upgrades are not possible beyond the factory configuration. The 55 W TDP and quad-channel memory configuration are fixed at the platform level.

The PCIe Gen 4 interface with 16 lanes for CPU-only devices provides bandwidth for storage and expansion. The Intel Arc A370M connects via PCIe 4.0 x8, which is sufficient for its bandwidth requirements. For users considering an external GPU enclosure, the available PCIe lanes could support a more powerful graphics solution, though this is not a standard laptop configuration.

The GPU's 35 W TDP and the CPU's 55 W TDP combine for a total of 90 W of component power, which is modest for a laptop. This leaves headroom for a more powerful GPU in a future system revision, but within this specific configuration, users are limited by the soldered components. The Arc A370M's production status is end-of-life, indicating that no further driver optimizations or performance improvements should be expected from Intel for this part.

A sensible next upgrade for users who have already invested in this platform would be an external GPU solution for gaming or GPU-accelerated workloads. The CPU's performance is sufficient to drive a much stronger graphics card, and the PCIe Gen 4 x8 interface on the GPU is adequate for most external enclosures. However, the platform's mobile nature means that any upgrade path is limited to peripherals rather than internal component swaps.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The Arc A370M's 74th-percentile ranking and Geekbench OpenCL score of 29,676 suggest capable 1080p performance at medium settings, but high-refresh gaming at 144 Hz or above will be challenging. The GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth limit texture-heavy scenes and high-resolution assets.

Streaming: The CPU's strong multithreaded performance, with a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 24,828, allows for software-based x264 encoding at high quality while gaming. The 12 cores and 24 threads provide ample headroom for simultaneous game rendering and encoding, though the GPU's modest performance may limit game settings.

Video Editing: CPU-based editing workflows will benefit from the processor's PassMark multithread score of 42,912 and data compression score of 506,170. Timeline scrubbing, effects rendering, and export tasks will be fast, though GPU-accelerated effects in tools like Adobe Premiere will be slower due to the Arc A370M's limited compute.

3D Rendering: CPU rendering in Blender or similar software will be excellent, with the Cinebench R15 multicore score of 3,918 indicating strong performance. GPU rendering is limited by the Arc A370M's 4.198 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, which places it in the lower tier of graphics accelerators.

Software Development: Compilation tasks will be a standout use case, with the CPU's integer math score of 148,508 and extended instructions score of 40,888 supporting fast builds. The 64 MB L3 cache and 256.0 GB/s memory bandwidth reduce latency for large codebases and dependency trees.

Student and Office Work: The single-thread PassMark score of 3,967 ensures snappy responsiveness for productivity applications, while the 80 KB L1 and 1 MB L2 per core provide low-latency access to frequently used data. The ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running calculations and document processing.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A370M is built on the Xe-HPG architecture with the DG2-128 chip, manufactured on TSMC's 6 nm process. It contains 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die, with a transistor density of 45.9 million per square millimeter. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1550 MHz and boosts to 2050 MHz, with memory running at 1750 MHz or 14 Gbps effective.

The memory subsystem consists of 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, providing 112.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is modest by modern standards and will limit performance in high-resolution textures or memory-intensive workloads. The GPU has 1024 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, and 32 raster operation units, along with 8 ray tracing cores. Its pixel rate is 65.60 GPixel/s and texture rate is 131.2 GTexel/s, with FP32 performance of 4.198 TFLOPS and FP16 performance of 8.397 TFLOPS.

The Geekbench OpenCL score of 29,676 and Vulkan score of 28,673 place the Arc A370M at the 74th percentile among all GPUs. Its average score of 29,175 is essentially tied with the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH and AMD FirePro W8000, both at 0.1% difference, while leading the AMD Radeon RX 470 by 0.6% and AMD Radeon RX 6800M by 1%. These comparisons indicate that the A370M performs at a level comparable to older mid-range desktop GPUs from several years ago.

The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, with PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface. Its 35 W TDP is efficient for a discrete mobile GPU, and the 8 ray tracing cores provide entry-level RT capabilities. The 72 billion transistors per die and 45.9 million per square millimeter density reflect a mature 6 nm process. However, the GPU's end-of-life production status means no further hardware revisions are planned.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread count?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 has 12 cores and 24 threads, based on the Zen 5 architecture.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the Intel Core i9-13900KS?

A: The Ryzen AI Max PRO 390's average benchmark score of 63,765 is 0.4% lower than the Intel Core i9-13900KS's 64,051.

Q: What memory configuration does the platform support?

A: The CPU supports LPDDR5X memory in a quad-channel configuration with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth and ECC support.

Q: What is the GPU's VRAM capacity and bandwidth?

A: The Intel Arc A370M has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing 112.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: How does the Arc A370M rank among all GPUs?

A: It ranks at the 74th percentile with an average benchmark score of 29,175, within 1% of the AMD Radeon RX 6800M.

Q: What is the CPU's boost clock speed?

A: The Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 boosts up to 5.00 GHz from a 3.20 GHz base clock.

Q: Does the system support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports ECC memory, which is valuable for professional workloads requiring data integrity.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU-GPU combination, and the FACT PACK contains no measured frame rates for any game or resolution. All gaming performance discussion below is estimated based on benchmark scores and should be treated as approximate rather than verified results.

The Arc A370M's 74th-percentile GPU ranking and Geekbench OpenCL score of 29,676 suggest that 1080p gaming at medium to high settings is achievable in esports titles and older games. The GPU's 4 GB VRAM will be a limiting factor in modern AAA releases, where texture quality and resolution may need to be reduced to stay within memory limits. The 112.0 GB/s bandwidth supports 1080p rendering but will struggle with 1440p or higher resolutions.

The CPU's substantial performance headroom means that frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios, such as open-world games with many NPCs or strategy titles with complex simulations, will be limited by the GPU rather than the processor. The Ryzen AI Max PRO 390's 93rd-percentile ranking ensures that it will not be a bottleneck in any gaming scenario. The 256.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 64 MB L3 cache provide ample data throughput for game logic and asset streaming.

For high-refresh gaming at 144 Hz, users should expect the GPU to fall short in most titles. The 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 performance places the Arc A370M in the lower mid-range tier, comparable to the AMD Radeon RX 470. Ray tracing performance will be minimal despite the 8 RT cores, and DLSS-style upscaling is not available on this Intel architecture. Users seeking competitive frame rates should target 1080p with reduced settings or consider an external GPU solution.