SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 + Intel Arc A350M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

94 Score

Top 6% Ranking

94 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

96%

GPU

92%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390

63,765 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A350M

24,647 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 + Intel Arc A350M: A Laptop Duo with a 93rd-Percentile CPU and 70th-Percentile GPU

This pairing combines AMD's top-tier Strix Halo mobile processor with Intel's entry-level Arc 3 discrete GPU in a laptop configuration. The CPU is a 12-core Zen 5 beast that lands in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU sits in the 70th percentile of all GPUs, making for a highly asymmetric build where processing power vastly outpaces graphics throughput. The combined percentile of 82 reflects a system that excels at compute-heavy tasks but will need careful settings management for modern gaming. No measured FPS data exists for this exact combination in the FACT PACK, so all frame rate discussions below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The Intel Arc A350M is built on the Xe-HPG architecture using the DG2-128 chip, fabricated on TSMC's 6 nm process with 7,200 million transistors packed into a 157 mm² die. The GPU operates with a base clock of 1150 MHz and a boost clock of 2200 MHz, with memory running at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). The memory subsystem consists of 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, yielding 112.0 GB/s of bandwidth — a modest figure that will constrain performance in texture-heavy workloads and higher-resolution rendering.

The shader configuration includes 768 shading units, 48 texture mapping units, and 24 render output units. The GPU delivers 52.80 GPixel/s pixel rate and 105.6 GTexel/s texture rate, with FP32 performance rated at 3.379 TFLOPS and FP16 at 6.758 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio). Ray tracing hardware is present with 6 dedicated RT cores, though the overall compute throughput suggests RT workloads will be challenging at higher settings. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern graphics APIs.

In benchmark terms, the Arc A350M scores 24,546 in Geekbench OpenCL and 24,747 in Geekbench Vulkan, with an average benchmark score of 24,647. This places it in the 70th percentile of all GPUs. The nearest rivals show a tight cluster: the AMD Radeon RX 590 scores 24,744 (0.4% ahead), the NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile scores 24,763 (0.5% ahead), the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT scores 24,442 (0.8% behind), and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 scores 24,277 (1.5% behind). This indicates the A350M performs essentially on par with a desktop RX 590 and GTX 1630, but trails the RTX A5000 Mobile by a negligible margin. For rendering tasks, the 4 GB VRAM and 112 GB/s bandwidth will limit large scene complexity, while the 3.379 TFLOPS FP32 throughput provides acceptable performance for entry-level 3D work.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24,828 and a single-core score of 1,976, alongside a Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 3,918 and single-core score of 303. In PassMark testing, the processor achieves 42,912 in multithread, 3,967 in single-thread, 148,508 in integer math, 94,666 in floating point math, 506,170 in data compression, 26,027 in data encryption, 40,888 in extended instructions, and 55,248 in random string sorting. The average benchmark score for the CPU is 63,765, placing it in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs.

The nearest CPU rivals paint a competitive picture. The Intel Core i9-13900KS scores 64,051 (0.4% ahead of the Ryzen), while the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G scores 63,331 (0.7% behind). The AMD EPYC 7343 scores 64,202 (0.7% ahead), and the Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX scores 63,173 (0.9% behind). This places the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 in the same performance tier as flagship desktop and server processors, a remarkable achievement for a mobile chip. The GPU's average score of 24,647 in the 70th percentile is far less impressive, creating a significant gap between compute and graphics capabilities.

The combined percentile of 82 reflects this imbalance. In CPU-bound workloads like compilation, data processing, and multi-threaded rendering, the system will perform at near-flagship levels. In GPU-bound scenarios like gaming at high resolutions or GPU-accelerated rendering, the Arc A350M will become the limiting factor. The data suggests a system that can handle heavy computational tasks with ease but requires moderate graphics settings for smooth gameplay.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 is a 12-core, 24-thread processor built on the Zen 5 architecture with the codename Strix Halo. It operates at a base clock of 3.20 GHz and boosts up to 5.00 GHz, with a TDP of 55 W. The CPU is fabricated on TSMC's 4 nm process and uses the AMD Socket FP11. Cache configuration includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and a substantial 64 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support includes LPDDR5X with a quad-channel interface, delivering 256.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth, and ECC memory is supported. The chip includes integrated Radeon 8050S graphics and connects via PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes.

The benchmark results reveal a processor that excels in both single-threaded and multi-threaded workloads. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1,976 and PassMark single-thread score of 3,967 indicate strong per-core performance, suitable for responsive everyday use and lightly-threaded applications. The multi-core scores — 24,828 in Cinebench R23 and 42,912 in PassMark — demonstrate exceptional parallel throughput, rivaling desktop-class processors like the Intel Core i9-13900KS, which scores just 0.4% higher on average.

Data-heavy workloads show particular strength. The PassMark data compression score of 506,170 and random string sorting score of 55,248 indicate excellent performance for database operations, file compression, and data analytics. The encryption score of 26,027 and extended instructions score of 40,888 suggest robust cryptographic and SIMD processing capabilities. The integer math score of 148,508 and floating point score of 94,666 further confirm the CPU's versatility across different computation types. For real-world workloads, this translates to fast code compilation, smooth video encoding, efficient spreadsheet calculations, and responsive virtual machine hosting — all while maintaining a mobile-friendly 55 W TDP.

FAQ

Q: How does the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 compare to the Intel Core i9-13900KS?

A: The Ryzen scores 63,765 on average, which is 0.4% behind the i9-13900KS's 64,051. This places the mobile AMD chip within a rounding error of Intel's flagship desktop processor.

Q: What is the GPU's performance tier relative to other graphics cards?

A: The Arc A350M sits in the 70th percentile of all GPUs with an average score of 24,647. It performs nearly identically to the AMD Radeon RX 590 (0.4% apart) and the NVIDIA GTX 1630 (1.5% apart).

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 supports ECC memory, making it suitable for workstation and server-like applications where data integrity is critical.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of this CPU?

A: The processor uses quad-channel LPDDR5X memory with a bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s, which is substantial for a mobile chip and supports the large L3 cache effectively.

Q: Is the Arc A350M capable of ray tracing?

A: Yes, the GPU includes 6 dedicated ray tracing cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, but given its modest FP32 throughput of 3.379 TFLOPS, ray tracing performance will be limited to lower settings.

Q: How does this system's combined percentile rank it overall?

A: The combined percentile is 82, reflecting a strong CPU (93rd percentile) paired with a mid-tier GPU (70th percentile), resulting in an above-average but not top-tier overall system.

Who Should Build It

This laptop combination targets users who prioritize computational throughput over graphical performance. Software developers will benefit from the 12-core/24-thread CPU with 64 MB L3 cache, which compiles code quickly and handles virtual machines efficiently. Data analysts and researchers working with large datasets will appreciate the 256.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and the data compression score of 506,170, which accelerates database queries and scientific computing. Students in engineering or computer science fields will find the processor powerful enough for simulations and heavy multi-threaded applications, while the integrated Radeon 8050S graphics provide a fallback when the discrete GPU is unnecessary.

Small business workstations handling financial modeling, 3D CAD, or video transcoding will see strong CPU performance, though GPU-accelerated tasks will be modest. Content creators working primarily with CPU-based rendering or encoding will extract maximum value from this build, while those relying heavily on GPU acceleration should look elsewhere. Gamers at 1080p with medium settings will find the Arc A350M adequate, but those seeking high-refresh or high-resolution gaming will be disappointed. This system is best suited for a professional or academic user who needs exceptional multi-core performance in a portable form factor and treats gaming as a secondary concern.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this specific CPU+GPU combination, so all frame rate figures below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations. The Arc A350M's 70th percentile GPU score of 24,647, combined with the CPU's 93rd percentile performance, suggests the GPU will be the primary constraint in gaming scenarios. Based on the GPU's proximity to the RX 590 and GTX 1630 (within 1.5%), performance at 1080p ultra settings would likely range from 30-50 FPS in modern AAA titles, depending on optimization. Esports titles like Counter-Strike 2 or Valorant could exceed 60 FPS at medium-to-high settings, given their lighter GPU requirements.

At 1440p, the 4 GB VRAM and 112 GB/s bandwidth will likely cause performance to drop below playable thresholds in modern games, with estimates in the 20-35 FPS range for demanding titles. The 6 RT cores provide some ray tracing capability, but the modest 3.379 TFLOPS FP32 throughput suggests enabling RT effects could halve frame rates. The CPU's strong single-thread score of 1,976 in Cinebench R23 ensures that frame pacing will be consistent, with no CPU-induced stuttering in most titles. For the best experience, users should plan on 1080p gaming with medium presets and consider disabling ray tracing to maintain smooth frame rates.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This build will not sustain high-refresh rates in most titles. The GPU's 70th percentile score suggests 1080p medium settings for 60+ FPS in competitive titles, but AAA games will likely fall below 60 FPS. The CPU's strong single-thread performance prevents bottlenecks, but the GPU is the limiting factor.

Streaming: The 12-core/24-thread CPU handles encoding efficiently, with the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24,828 providing ample headroom for x264 encoding while gaming. The GPU's modest performance may require lower in-game settings to maintain stream quality without frame drops.

Video editing: CPU-based editing workflows will be smooth, with the PassMark multithread score of 42,912 handling timeline scrubbing and export efficiently. GPU-accelerated effects will be limited by the Arc A350M's 3.379 TFLOPS, so 4K previews and heavy color grading may lag.

3D rendering: CPU rendering in Blender or similar tools will be strong, with the 24-thread processor rivaling the i9-13900KS within 0.4%. GPU rendering will be slower, with the A350M's 3.379 TFLOPS and 4 GB VRAM restricting scene complexity and render times.

Software development: Compilation times will be short, with the integer math score of 148,508 indicating fast build processing. The 64 MB L3 cache and 256 GB/s memory bandwidth support large codebases and rapid context switching across multiple containers or VMs.

Student and office work: Everyday productivity is excellent, with the single-thread score of 3,967 in PassMark ensuring responsive applications. The CPU's 93rd percentile rank means spreadsheet calculations, document processing, and web browsing are instantaneous, while the GPU handles light graphical tasks adequately.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class system pairing the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390, a 12-core/24-thread Zen 5 processor from the Strix Halo family, with the Intel Arc A350M, an entry-level Alchemist-generation discrete GPU. The CPU is manufactured on TSMC's 4 nm process with a 55 W TDP, while the GPU uses TSMC's 6 nm process with a 25 W TDP. The combination yields a combined percentile of 82, placing it above the majority of systems but well below top-tier gaming or workstation rigs.

The CPU's 93rd percentile ranking makes it one of the fastest mobile processors available, matching desktop flagships like the Core i9-13900KS within 0.4%. In contrast, the GPU's 70th percentile ranking places it in mid-tier territory, comparable to older desktop cards like the RX 590 and GTX 1630. This creates a system that is unequivocally CPU-dominant, with a processing capability that far exceeds its graphical throughput. For users seeking a laptop that excels at computation, this pairing delivers exceptional value in its processing power; for gamers, it represents a compromise that requires setting adjustments.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance asymmetry between the two components is stark. The CPU's average benchmark score of 63,765 is in the 93rd percentile, while the GPU's 24,647 is in the 70th percentile — a gap of 23 percentile points. In CPU-bound workloads such as software compilation, data processing, and multi-threaded rendering, the system performs at near-flagship desktop levels, with the Ryzen matching the i9-13900KS within 0.4%. The GPU never constrains these tasks, allowing the processor to operate at full potential.

Conversely, in GPU-bound workloads like gaming at high settings, 3D rendering with GPU acceleration, or machine learning inference, the Arc A350M becomes the limiting factor. The GPU's 3.379 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 112 GB/s bandwidth will cap frame rates and render times well below what the CPU could theoretically support. The CPU's 256 GB/s memory bandwidth and 64 MB L3 cache do not compensate for the GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit memory bus. The tie to the RX 590 and GTX 1630 (within 1.5%) indicates that gaming performance will mirror those older cards, regardless of the CPU's capabilities.

The bottleneck direction is clear: the GPU limits graphics-intensive tasks, while the CPU has headroom to spare. For users who predominantly run CPU-heavy workloads, this imbalance is irrelevant. For those mixing gaming with productivity, the system will feel fast in general use but underwhelming in graphically demanding scenarios. The 70th percentile GPU is adequate for entry-level gaming at 1080p medium settings, but the 93rd percentile CPU suggests the system could handle far more if a stronger GPU were paired with it.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 + Intel Arc A350M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390

Intel Arc A350M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

FAQ

Who Should Build It

Gaming Performance

Usage Scenarios

Build Overview

Balance and Bottleneck

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds