SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 + Intel Arc A730M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

94 Score

Top 6% Ranking

94 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

93%

GPU

96%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 385

43,326 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A730M

45,592 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 + Intel Arc A730M: Database Analysis

The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 pairs an 8-core Zen 5 processor with the Intel Arc A730M discrete GPU in a laptop configuration. This combination sits at the 86th percentile overall, with the CPU at the 88th percentile among all processors and the GPU at the 84th percentile among all graphics cards. The data shows a balanced pairing where neither component dramatically outclasses the other, though the CPU holds a slight edge in relative standing.

FAQ

Q: How does the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 compare to its nearest CPU rivals?

A: The processor's average benchmark score of 43326 is nearly identical to the AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 (43431, -0.2% delta), the Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (43210, +0.3% delta), the AMD Ryzen 7 170 (43689, -0.8% delta), and the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 (43704, -0.9% delta). This places it in a tightly competitive mid-range mobile CPU tier.

Q: What is the GPU's standing relative to other graphics cards?

A: The Intel Arc A730M scores 45592 on average, placing it 0.5% behind the AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT (45384), 0.8% ahead of the NVIDIA RTX 5880 Ada Generation (45972), 1% behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile (45152), and 1% behind the NVIDIA RTX A2000 (46043). It ranks in the 84th percentile of all GPUs.

Q: What memory bandwidth does the CPU support?

A: The Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 supports LPDDR5X memory across a quad-channel bus, delivering 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth. ECC memory is supported. The GPU, by contrast, uses 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus with 336.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: How many cores and threads does the CPU have?

A: The processor has 8 cores and 16 threads, based on the Zen 5 architecture (Strix Halo codename). It features 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 32 MB of shared L3 cache.

Q: What are the clock speeds of the CPU?

A: The base clock is 3.60 GHz with a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The processor has a 55 W TDP and is not multiplier-unlocked.

Q: What API support does the GPU offer?

A: The Arc A730M supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. It includes 24 ray tracing cores and 3072 shading units.

Q: Is the GPU still in production?

A: No, the Intel Arc A730M is marked as end-of-life. The CPU, however, is listed as active production with a release date of 2025-01-05.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The GPU's 12.60 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 196.8 GPixel/s pixel rate suggest solid 1080p capabilities, but the 84th GPU percentile and lack of measured FPS data means expectations should be moderate. The CPU's 88th percentile standing ensures it won't hold back most gaming workloads, though the integrated Radeon 8050S graphics could serve as a fallback for lighter titles when the discrete GPU is idle.

Streaming: The combination of 8 cores and 16 threads, plus a 28424 Cinebench R23 multi-core score, provides enough headroom for encoding while gaming. The Arc A730M's 24 ray tracing cores and 3072 shading units handle rendering tasks, though the lack of tensor core data leaves AI-accelerated encoding features unspecified. The 336.0 GB/s GPU memory bandwidth helps with texture streaming in demanding titles.

Video editing: Multi-core performance is strong with a 11938 Cinebench R20 multi-core score and 105056 Passmark integer math score. The GPU's 12 GB VRAM is generous for timeline previews and effect rendering. The 393.6 GTexel/s texture rate supports compositing workloads, while the CPU's 256.0 GB/s memory bandwidth aids in large file handling.

3D rendering: The GPU's 25.19 TFLOPS FP16 performance (2:1 ratio) indicates capable compute throughput for viewport rendering. The CPU's 69580 Passmark floating-point math score complements this with strong physics and simulation performance. The 1732 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score places the GPU in a competitive position for entry-level rendering tasks.

Software development: The 379448 Passmark data compression score and 18978 data encryption score indicate strong throughput for build pipelines and code compilation. The 16 threads handle parallel compilation well, and the 4012 Cinebench R23 single-core score ensures responsive IDE interaction. The 88th CPU percentile confirms this is a capable development machine.

Student and office work: The 3995 Passmark single-thread score delivers snappy application launches and document editing. The 32 MB shared L3 cache reduces latency for repetitive office tasks. The integrated Radeon 8050S graphics provide a power-efficient fallback for basic display tasks, potentially extending battery life versus always using the discrete GPU.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 is built on the Zen 5 architecture using TSMC's 4 nm process, with the Strix Halo codename. It has 8 physical cores and 16 threads, a configuration that balances multi-threaded throughput against single-core performance. The base clock of 3.60 GHz boosts to 5.00 GHz, which explains the strong single-core results: 404 in Cinebench R15, 1685 in R20, and 4012 in R23. These scores place it in the upper tier of mobile processors, reflected in its 88th percentile ranking.

The cache hierarchy is substantial: 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 32 MB of shared L3. This large L3 pool benefits workloads with shared data access patterns, such as database operations or game engines. The quad-channel LPDDR5X memory interface with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth is unusually wide for a mobile processor, giving the CPU memory throughput that rivals some desktop platforms. ECC support adds reliability for workstation use.

The 55 W TDP is moderate for a mobile chip with this performance level. Passmark scores show 32075 multi-thread, 3995 single-thread, and 1711 physics performance. The 157 Passmark find prime numbers score is notably low relative to other integer tasks, suggesting this workload doesn't scale well with the architecture. Random string sorting at 40784 and extended instructions at 31442 round out the compute profile.

Compared to nearest rivals, the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 is effectively a statistical tie with the AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 (-0.2%), Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (+0.3%), AMD Ryzen 7 170 (-0.8%), and AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 (-0.9%). The data shows no meaningful performance gap between these processors, meaning real-world differences will come down to platform features, power delivery, and cooling rather than raw compute.

Who Should Build It

The combined 86th percentile ranking targets users who need strong multi-threaded CPU performance with capable discrete graphics in a laptop. Gamers at 1080p resolution will find the GPU's 12 GB VRAM and 336.0 GB/s bandwidth adequate for modern titles at medium to high settings, though the lack of measured FPS means exact expectations must be tempered.

Content creators working with video editing software benefit from the CPU's 28424 R23 multi-core score and the GPU's 12.60 TFLOPS FP32 throughput. The 12 GB GDDR6 frame buffer handles 4K timelines and effect-heavy compositions. Software developers gain from the 16 threads and high data compression score of 379448, which accelerates build and packaging tasks.

Students and office workers get a responsive system with a 3995 Passmark single-thread score and 4012 R23 single-core result, ensuring smooth everyday operation. The ECC memory support and 256.0 GB/s bandwidth make this suitable for small business workstations handling financial models or engineering calculations. The integrated Radeon 8050S graphics provide a backup display output, adding redundancy for professional environments.

The Intel Arc A730M being end-of-life means this is a build for those acquiring existing stock or complete laptops, not for future GPU upgrades. The CPU's active production status and 2025-01-05 release date indicate a modern platform with driver support ongoing for the processor, while GPU drivers may see less frequent updates.

Balance and Bottleneck

The 86th combined percentile against 88th CPU and 84th GPU percentiles shows a well-matched pairing with the CPU slightly ahead. In CPU-bound workloads like software compilation or physics simulation, the processor's 32075 Passmark multi-thread score and 1711 physics score drive performance, with the GPU remaining idle. The 88th CPU percentile means it ranks higher relative to other processors than the GPU does relative to other graphics cards.

In GPU-bound scenarios such as high-resolution gaming or 3D rendering, the Arc A730M's 84th percentile and 1732 3DMark Steel Nomad score become the limiting factor. The 196.8 GPixel/s pixel rate and 393.6 GTexel/s texture rate define the ceiling for fill-rate-heavy effects. The CPU's 4012 R23 single-core score ensures it can feed the GPU in most titles, but the 0.5-1% deltas to GPU rivals suggest the Arc A730M is the component that determines frame rate in graphics-heavy titles.

The memory subsystem shows a potential bottleneck: the CPU's 256.0 GB/s bandwidth is lower than the GPU's 336.0 GB/s. This means CPU-bound tasks that heavily access memory may starve the GPU if both compete for the same LPDDR5X pool, though the GPU has its own dedicated GDDR6 memory, mitigating this concern. The integrated Radeon 8050S could offload light graphics tasks, freeing the discrete GPU for demanding workloads.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A730M uses the DG2-512 chip on TSMC's 6 nm process, with 21,700 million transistors on a 406 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 53.4M per mm². It has 3072 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 96 ROPs. The 24 ray tracing cores enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing, though the lack of tensor core data means AI-accelerated features are unspecified in the benchmark database.

Clock speeds are 1100 MHz base and 2050 MHz boost, with memory running at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). The 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus delivers 336.0 GB/s bandwidth. This is a significant capacity for a mobile GPU, allowing high-resolution textures and large scene data. The 12.60 TFLOPS FP32 and 25.19 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1) rates indicate strong compute for both rasterization and compute shaders.

Pixel rate of 196.8 GPixel/s and texture rate of 393.6 GTexel/s position the GPU for 1080p high-refresh gaming and entry-level 1440p. The 80 W TDP makes it a mid-power discrete solution suitable for larger laptops with adequate cooling. API support includes DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern titles and Vulkan-based engines.

Benchmark results show 1732 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, 70352 in Geekbench OpenCL, and 64693 in Geekbench Vulkan. The 84th percentile ranking places it near the AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT (+0.5%), NVIDIA RTX 5880 Ada Generation (-0.8%), NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile (+1%), and NVIDIA RTX A2000 (-1%). This is a competitive mid-range mobile GPU, not a flagship, but with 12 GB of VRAM it offers more capacity than some rivals.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's Cinebench scores scale consistently: 2865 in R15 multi-core, 11938 in R20, and 28424 in R23. Single-core results are 404, 1685, and 4012 across the same tests. These numbers indicate a processor that trades blows with the best mobile chips from the previous generation, as shown by the 0.2-0.9% deltas to nearest rivals. The Passmark suite reinforces this with 32075 multi-thread, 3995 single-thread, 105056 integer math, 69580 floating-point math, 379448 data compression, 18978 data encryption, 31442 extended instructions, and 40784 random string sorting.

The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1732 is a modern DirectX 12 test that stresses ray tracing and mesh shaders. Geekbench scores of 70352 OpenCL and 64693 Vulkan show compute performance that scales with the 3072 shading units. The 45592 average benchmark score and 84th percentile confirm the GPU's mid-range positioning.

Combined, the CPU at 88th percentile and GPU at 84th percentile produce an 86th combined percentile. This indicates a system that performs above average in both compute and graphics, with no glaring weakness. The 43326 CPU average score and 45592 GPU average score are remarkably close, suggesting the components are well-balanced for mixed workloads.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build (buildClass: "laptop") pairing the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 with the Intel Arc A730M. The CPU is a 4 nm Zen 5 part with 8 cores and 16 threads, while the GPU is a 6 nm Xe-HPG part with 12 GB GDDR6. The overall tier, based on the 86th combined percentile, is upper-midrange: strong enough for demanding tasks but not at the flagship level of the 90th+ percentile components.

The CPU's 55 W TDP and GPU's 80 W TDP combine for 135 W of silicon power, which typical laptop cooling solutions can handle with adequate ventilation. The AMD Socket FP11 interface and PCIe Gen 4 x16 GPU connection provide modern connectivity. The CPU's integrated Radeon 8050S graphics offer a fallback display solution, while the GPU's end-of-life status means this is a fixed configuration.

This pairing targets users who want strong CPU performance for productivity and capable GPU performance for gaming and creative work, without the premium cost of flagship components. The 88th CPU percentile ensures future-proofing for several years, while the 84th GPU percentile is adequate for current titles at moderate settings.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination in the FACT PACK, and therefore all FPS values discussed here are estimates derived from benchmark scores rather than direct measurements. The data clearly indicates no measured FPS data is available for the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 with Intel Arc A730M pairing.

Based on the GPU's 1732 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score and 84th percentile ranking, the Arc A730M should handle 1080p gaming at medium to high settings in most titles. The 12 GB VRAM provides headroom for texture-heavy games, while the 336.0 GB/s bandwidth supports high-resolution assets. The 196.8 GPixel/s pixel rate suggests good fill-rate performance for effects-heavy scenes.

The CPU's 4012 R23 single-core score ensures it won't bottleneck the GPU in most titles, while the 16 threads handle background tasks during gaming. The 28424 R23 multi-core score supports streaming and recording while gaming without significant frame drops. For esports titles, the high single-core performance should push frame rates well above 60 FPS, while AAA games at 1440p will likely require medium settings to maintain playable framerates. These are estimates based on the benchmark data, not measured results.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 + Intel Arc A730M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 385

Intel Arc A730M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

FAQ

Usage Scenarios

CPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

Balance and Bottleneck

GPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Build Overview

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds