SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 + Intel Arc A570M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

95 Score

Top 5% Ranking

95 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 5% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

93%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 385

43,326 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A570M

58,239 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 and Intel Arc A570M pairing represents a laptop-class build that sits at the 88th percentile overall, placing it firmly in the upper tier of mobile hardware. The CPU is a Zen 5-based Strix Halo part with 8 cores and 16 threads, while the GPU is an Alchemist-generation Arc 5 Mobile chip with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data — so all frame rate discussion below is estimated from the benchmark scores and should be treated as projections rather than lab results.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A570M is built on the DG2-256 die using TSMC's 6 nm process, with 11,500 million transistors packed into a 269 mm² die. The GPU operates with a base clock of 900 MHz and a boost clock of 1300 MHz, which are modest figures for a mobile part, but the architecture compensates through its 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 raster output pipelines. The memory subsystem consists of 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, delivering 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). This bandwidth is a limiting factor for high-resolution textures, but it is adequate for 1080p-class workloads.

The pixel rate is 83.20 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 166.4 GTexel/s, which are workmanlike numbers for a mobile GPU. The FP32 throughput is 5.325 TFLOPS, with FP16 doubling to 10.65 TFLOPS via a 2:1 ratio. The GPU includes 16 ray tracing cores, though no tensor core count is listed, and it supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8, which is sufficient for a mobile part. The sole benchmark score available is Geekbench OpenCL at 58,239, which places the GPU at the 88th percentile of all GPUs.

The nearest rival comparisons show a tight cluster. The Arc A570M scores 0.3% behind the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT, 0.3% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM, 0.5% behind the NVIDIA P102-100, and 0.7% behind the AMD Radeon PRO V710. These deltas are all within a single percentage point, meaning the Arc A570M trades blows with a mix of desktop and professional cards in compute tasks. For rendering, the ray tracing hardware is present but limited by the modest clock speeds and bandwidth; expect RT workloads to run but not excel. The 8 GB VRAM is a hard ceiling for large scenes, so texture-heavy projects will need careful asset management.

Gaming Performance

Since no measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination, all gaming figures are estimates derived from the GPU's OpenCL score and the CPU's multi-threaded performance. The Arc A570M's 88th percentile GPU rank suggests it can handle modern titles at 1080p with medium-to-high settings, but the 224.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 8 GB VRAM will cap performance in texture-heavy games. At 1440p, the GPU will struggle to maintain high frame rates in demanding titles, and 4K is not a realistic target except for older or lighter esports games.

The CPU's strong multi-core scores — Cinebench R23 multi-core at 28,424 — ensure that gaming workloads are not CPU-bound in most scenarios. The 5.00 GHz boost clock helps single-threaded performance, which is critical for game logic and physics. However, the GPU is the limiting factor in GPU-bound scenarios. For esports titles like Counter-Strike or Valorant, the combination should push well past 100 FPS at 1080p low settings, based on the GPU's compute throughput. For AAA titles, expect 60-80 FPS at 1080p medium, with drops below 60 FPS when ray tracing is enabled.

The data indicates a balanced pairing for 1080p gaming, but the estimates carry significant uncertainty because no measured FPS rows exist. The 128-bit memory bus is a clear bottleneck for higher resolutions, so users targeting 1440p should temper expectations. The GPU's 5.325 TFLOPS FP32 is roughly comparable to mid-range mobile parts, but the 16 RT cores are lower in count than high-end desktop GPUs, so ray tracing performance will be modest at best.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 is a Zen 5 architecture part from the Strix Halo codename family, built on TSMC's 4 nm process. It features 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 3.60 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The cache hierarchy consists of 80 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 32 MB of shared L3 cache. The CPU supports LPDDR5X memory over a quad-channel bus, providing 256.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth, and it includes ECC memory support. The socket is AMD FP11, and the CPU integrates Radeon 8050S graphics, though the discrete Arc A570M handles the primary rendering workload.

The CPU's benchmark scores are consistently strong. Cinebench R15 multi-core hits 2,865, single-core 404; R20 multi-core 11,938, single-core 1,685; and R23 multi-core 28,424, single-core 4,012. PassMark results show multi-thread at 32,075, single-thread at 3,995, and integer math at 105,056, with floating point at 69,580. The data compression score is 379,448, and encryption is 18,978. The average benchmark score is 43,326, placing the CPU at the 88th percentile of all CPUs.

The nearest rivals show a very tight competition. The Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 is 0.2% behind the AMD Ryzen AI 9 465, 0.3% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, 0.8% behind the AMD Ryzen 7 170, and 0.9% behind the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7745. These deltas are negligible, meaning the CPU is effectively performance-equivalent to these four rivals in aggregate benchmarks. For real workloads, the 8-core/16-thread configuration handles multi-threaded tasks like video encoding and 3D rendering well, while the 5.00 GHz boost clock ensures snappy single-threaded response. The 55 W TDP is efficient for a laptop part, and the quad-channel memory support is a significant advantage for memory-bound workloads.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The Arc A570M's 88th percentile GPU score and 5.325 TFLOPS FP32 suggest it can drive 1080p esports titles at high frame rates, likely exceeding 120 FPS in lighter games. The CPU's 4,012 single-core score in Cinebench R23 ensures no bottleneck in game logic, but the 224.0 GB/s bandwidth may limit frame pacing in fast-paced scenes.

Streaming: The 8-core CPU with 16 threads and strong multi-thread scores (28,424 in Cinebench R23) can handle encoding workloads, while the GPU's dedicated video hardware (implied by DirectX 12 Ultimate support) offloads the encode stream. The quad-channel memory bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s provides ample headroom for simultaneous gaming and encoding, but the 8 GB VRAM may be tight if the game uses high-resolution textures.

Video editing: The CPU's PassMark multi-thread score of 32,075 and floating-point math of 69,580 indicate solid performance in timeline scrubbing and effect rendering. The GPU's 10.65 TFLOPS FP16 throughput accelerates preview rendering, though the 8 GB VRAM limits the size of projects that can be worked on without proxy files.

3D rendering: Cinebench R23 multi-core at 28,424 puts the CPU in a strong position for CPU-based rendering, while the GPU's OpenCL score of 58,239 supports GPU-accelerated renderers. The 32 MB L3 cache helps with scene data reuse, but the GPU's 128-bit memory bus will prolong render times for large scenes.

Software development: The CPU's 3,995 single-thread score and 105,056 integer math score provide fast compilation times for single-threaded build steps, while the 16 threads accelerate parallel builds. The 256.0 GB/s memory bandwidth reduces cache misses during large codebase indexing, and the 88th percentile overall rank makes this a capable developer laptop.

Student and office work: The 8-core CPU with 4 nm process efficiency and 55 W TDP delivers all-day battery potential, while the GPU handles light graphics tasks. The 88th percentile combined rank ensures smooth multitasking across office suites, browsers, and video calls, though the discrete GPU is overkill for basic productivity.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 43,326, ranking at the 88th percentile of all CPUs. Its closest rival, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 465, scores 43,431, a delta of -0.2%, meaning the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 is essentially tied. The Intel Core Ultra 9 386H scores 43,210 (0.3% behind), the AMD Ryzen 7 170 scores 43,689 (0.8% ahead), and the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 scores 43,704 (0.9% ahead). This cluster of rivals is within a single percentage point, so the CPU is not a differentiator in aggregate performance.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 58,239, also at the 88th percentile of all GPUs. The nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT, scores 58,392 (0.3% ahead), while the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM scores 58,085 (0.3% behind). The NVIDIA P102-100 scores 58,528 (0.5% ahead), and the AMD Radeon PRO V710 scores 58,657 (0.7% ahead). Again, the differences are negligible, placing the Arc A570M in a very competitive performance band.

The combined percentile is 88, which indicates that both components are equally well-positioned relative to their respective markets. The CPU and GPU are both in the upper tier, but neither is a standout performer — they are both solid mid-to-high-end parts that deliver consistent, predictable performance. The combined picture is a laptop that can handle most workloads without embarrassment, but it will not win any performance crowns.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread count?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 has 8 cores and 16 threads.

Q: How much VRAM does the Intel Arc A570M have?

A: The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus.

Q: What is the CPU's boost clock speed?

A: The boost clock is 5.00 GHz, with a base clock of 3.60 GHz.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the AMD Ryzen AI 9 465?

A: The Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 scores 43,326, which is 0.2% behind the Ryzen AI 9 465's 43,431.

Q: What is the GPU's memory bandwidth?

A: The Arc A570M has 224.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports ECC memory with LPDDR5X over a quad-channel bus.

Q: What is the GPU's FP32 performance?

A: The GPU achieves 5.325 TFLOPS FP32 and 10.65 TFLOPS FP16.

Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU and GPU are both at the 88th percentile, which suggests a well-balanced pairing rather than a lopsided one. The CPU's strong multi-thread scores (28,424 in Cinebench R23, 32,075 in PassMark) are more than sufficient to feed the GPU in gaming workloads, so the CPU will not be a bottleneck in most scenarios. However, the GPU's 224.0 GB/s memory bandwidth is the weaker link — it is 12.5% lower than the CPU's 256.0 GB/s, and the 128-bit bus is a known constraint for high-resolution textures.

In CPU-bound workloads like software compilation or data compression, the CPU is the limiting factor, but its 88th percentile rank means it performs admirably. In GPU-bound workloads like 3D rendering or gaming at high settings, the GPU's 5.325 TFLOPS FP32 and 8 GB VRAM will cap performance. The FPS scaling, while estimated, suggests that lowering resolution from 1440p to 1080p will yield significant gains because the GPU is bandwidth-limited rather than compute-limited. The CPU's quad-channel memory support (256.0 GB/s) is a clear advantage, but it does not directly help the GPU, which has its own dedicated memory.

The bottleneck profile is workload-dependent: gaming and GPU compute are GPU-limited, while productivity and multi-threaded tasks are CPU-limited. The 32 MB L3 cache on the CPU helps with data reuse, but the GPU's 16 RT cores are the weakest aspect for future ray tracing titles. Overall, the pairing is balanced, but the GPU's memory subsystem is the primary constraint for high-end gaming.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build (buildClass: "laptop") combining the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 CPU with the Intel Arc A570M GPU. The CPU is a mobile Zen 5 part with 8 cores and 16 threads, a 5.00 GHz boost clock, and 32 MB of L3 cache, while the GPU is an Alchemist-generation Arc 5 Mobile chip with 8 GB GDDR6 and 16 RT cores. Both components sit at the 88th percentile of their respective categories, and the combined percentile is also 88, indicating a consistent tier of performance.

The overall tier is upper-mid-range to high-end for mobile hardware. The CPU's 43,326 average score and the GPU's 58,239 OpenCL score place this build in the top 12% of all systems, which is respectable for a laptop. The CPU's 55 W TDP is efficient, and the GPU's 75 W TDP is modest, making this a thermally manageable pairing. The build is not a flagship, but it is a capable workhorse for a wide range of tasks, from gaming to content creation.

The release dates (CPU in January 2025, GPU in July 2023) mean the GPU is a generation older than the CPU, but the performance data shows they are well-matched. The CPU's Zen 5 architecture is newer, but the GPU's Xe-HPG architecture holds its own in compute benchmarks. This is a pairing that makes sense for a laptop where power and thermals are constrained, and the 88th percentile combined rank reflects a solid, balanced system.

Who Should Build It

This build targets users who need a laptop that can handle both productivity and gaming without compromise. Gamers at 1080p will find the Arc A570M's performance adequate for medium-to-high settings in modern titles, based on its 88th percentile GPU rank and 5.325 TFLOPS FP32. Users at 1440p should expect lower frame rates, and 4K gaming is not practical. The CPU's 8 cores and 16 threads will not bottleneck gaming, and the 5.00 GHz boost clock ensures smooth frame pacing.

Content creators — video editors, 3D artists, and developers — will benefit from the CPU's 28,424 Cinebench R23 multi-core score and the GPU's 10.65 TFLOPS FP16 for accelerated previews. The 256.0 GB/s memory bandwidth helps with large datasets, and the 32 MB L3 cache speeds up repeated access patterns. Software developers will appreciate the 105,056 integer math score for compilation and the 3,995 single-thread score for interactive tooling.

Students and office workers will find this build overpowered for basic tasks, but the 88th percentile combined rank means it will handle any academic software, including CAD or statistical packages. Small business workstations that need to run virtual machines or moderate data analysis will also be well-served. The key limitation is the GPU's 8 GB VRAM, which caps the size of textures and models that can be worked with. For users who prioritize portability and battery life, the 55 W CPU TDP is a plus, but the discrete GPU will draw power under load. This is a versatile build for users who want one laptop to do everything, with the caveat that it is not a specialist tool for either extreme gaming or extreme compute.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 + Intel Arc A570M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 385

Intel Arc A570M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

CPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

Benchmark Performance

FAQ

Balance and Bottleneck

Build Overview

Who Should Build It

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds