SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

96 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 4% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
97%
VS
GPU
95%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395

77,740 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile

38,135 Benchmark Score
Top 5% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 is built on the AMD Socket FP11 platform, a mobile-specific socket that pairs the CPU with LPDDR5X memory in a quad-channel configuration. This memory layout delivers 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is exceptionally high for a laptop platform and directly benefits both CPU and integrated graphics workloads. The platform supports ECC memory, a feature typically reserved for workstation-class hardware, making this a notable option for users who require data integrity in compute-heavy tasks.

PCIe connectivity is provided via Gen 4 with 16 lanes available from the CPU. This is the primary expansion interface for discrete GPUs and high-speed NVMe storage. The system supports the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile over a PCIe 4.0 x16 connection, which is the standard interface for this GPU class. The CPU's TDP is rated at 55 W, while the GPU has a TDP of 110 W, giving a combined thermal envelope of 165 W for the core compute components. This is a moderate power requirement for a laptop platform, and the absence of a suggested PSU rating in the data indicates that power delivery is handled by the laptop's internal power supply rather than a user-selectable unit.

For a sensible upgrade path, the platform is constrained by its mobile nature. The CPU is soldered to the FP11 socket, and the GPU is also integrated into the laptop chassis. The most practical upgrades would be memory capacity (though LPDDR5X is typically soldered) and storage via the available PCIe Gen 4 lanes. Users coming from older laptops with slower memory or older PCIe generations will see a substantial jump in bandwidth and I/O throughput. The quad-channel memory controller is a key differentiator, as it provides more than double the bandwidth of typical dual-channel mobile platforms, which is critical for the Radeon 8060S integrated graphics and for CPU-bound workloads that scale with memory throughput.

The platform's ECC support is unusual for a consumer-oriented mobile part and suggests a workstation-grade design philosophy. The 4 nm process node for the CPU and 5 nm for the GPU indicate a modern, power-efficient manufacturing process, which helps balance the 165 W combined TDP within a laptop thermal solution. Overall, this is not a platform designed for incremental upgrades but rather a complete, sealed solution where the performance envelope is fixed at purchase.

Benchmark Performance

The combined benchmark data places this CPU+GPU pairing at the 88th percentile overall, indicating a high-end system that outperforms the vast majority of tested configurations. The CPU itself sits at the 95th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU is at the 81st percentile among all GPUs. This asymmetry is the first sign that the processor is the stronger component relative to its peers.

Looking at CPU benchmarks, the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 35,314 points is substantial, placing it in the upper echelon of mobile processors. The single-core score of 2,044 is also strong, showing balanced performance across both lightly-threaded and heavily-threaded workloads. Geekbench scores of 20,992 (multicore) and 2,464 (single-core) corroborate this picture. In PassMark tests, the multithread score of 54,934 and single-thread score of 4,147 are both high, with the integer math score of 200,665 and floating-point math score of 128,682 showing particular strength in compute-heavy tasks.

The CPU's nearest rivals provide context. The AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX scores 76,513 on average, which is 1.6% lower than this CPU's average benchmark score of 77,740. The Intel Core i9-14900K scores 79,097, which is 1.7% higher. This means the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 is trading blows with desktop-class processors, an impressive feat for a 55 W mobile part. The AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX scores 76,212, 2% lower, confirming that this CPU leads among mobile options.

The GPU benchmark scores are more modest. The PassMark G3D score of 24,926 and GPU compute score of 11,191 are respectable but not class-leading. Geekbench OpenCL scores 159,575 and Vulkan scores 145,807. The GPU's average benchmark score of 38,135 places it at the 81st percentile, with nearest rivals including the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile (38,349, 0.6% higher) and the desktop RTX 4070 (37,648, 1.3% lower). This indicates the RTX 4080 Mobile performs similarly to a mid-range desktop GPU from the same generation.

The combined picture is a system where the CPU is the star performer, ranking near top-tier desktop processors, while the GPU is solidly mid-to-high-end but not exceptional. In gaming, the pair achieves an average of 155 FPS across all tested titles, ranking 1,106th out of 3,861 pairs, which is approximately the 71st percentile for gaming performance.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 is a 16-core, 32-thread processor based on the Zen 5 architecture, codenamed Strix Halo. It operates with a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, with a TDP of 55 W. The 4 nm process node from TSMC allows for high clock speeds within a relatively modest power envelope.

Cache hierarchy consists of 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 64 MB of shared L3 cache. The large L3 cache is particularly beneficial for workloads that exhibit data locality, such as gaming and database operations. The CPU supports LPDDR5X memory across a quad-channel bus with 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is a key advantage over dual-channel competitors.

In benchmark terms, the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 35,314 is approximately 1.6% higher than the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX and 2% higher than the AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX, while being 1.7% lower than the Intel Core i9-14900K. This places it in the same performance tier as high-end desktop processors, despite being a mobile part. The single-core score of 2,044 in Cinebench R23 is competitive for modern workloads, though not record-breaking.

PassMark data reveals specific strengths. The data compression score of 690,650 is exceptionally high, indicating strong performance in archiving and compression tasks. Data encryption scores 35,455, and extended instructions score 56,346, showing robust SIMD and cryptography performance. The integer math score of 200,665 and floating-point math score of 128,682 suggest balanced compute capabilities across different workload types. Physics score of 3,481 is moderate, while the prime number finding score of 303 is relatively low, indicating that the CPU is optimized for real-world tasks rather than synthetic prime calculations.

For real workloads, these numbers translate to excellent performance in video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation. The 32 threads handle heavily parallel workloads efficiently, while the high single-core performance ensures responsiveness in everyday tasks. The 95th percentile ranking among all CPUs underscores that this is a top-tier processor by any measure.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data reveals a clear imbalance between CPU and GPU performance. The CPU sits at the 95th percentile, while the GPU is at the 81st percentile. This 14-percentage-point gap suggests that the CPU is capable of feeding the GPU more data than the GPU can process in many scenarios. In gaming workloads, this typically means the GPU will be the limiting factor at higher resolutions, while the CPU may become the bottleneck at lower resolutions where frame rates are extremely high.

Evidence from the gaming FPS data supports this analysis. At 1080p, many titles show very high frame rates that are likely CPU-limited. For example, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive achieves 515 FPS, and Valorant achieves 521 FPS at 1080p. These frame rates are far beyond what most displays can show (typically 144 Hz or 240 Hz), indicating that the CPU is delivering frames faster than the GPU can render them, or that the game is CPU-bound at these settings. At 4K, the same games drop to 209 FPS and 364 FPS respectively, showing that the GPU becomes more of a factor at higher resolutions.

The average FPS across all games is 155, with the pair ranking 1,106th out of 3,861 pairs. This places the system in the upper tier for gaming, but the CPU's percentile ranking suggests that a more powerful GPU could push frame rates even higher in GPU-bound scenarios. The reverse is also true: in CPU-bound games at low resolutions, the GPU is not the limiting factor, and the CPU's strength is fully utilized.

The PassMark data confirms this asymmetry. The CPU's multithread score of 54,934 is in the top 5% of all CPUs, while the GPU's G3D score of 24,926 is in the top 19% of all GPUs. This means that in compute-heavy workloads that use the CPU (e.g., video encoding, 3D rendering, software compilation), the system will perform near the top of its class. In GPU-heavy workloads (e.g., high-resolution gaming, GPU rendering), the system will perform well but not at the same elite level.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data at ultra settings across 37 games provides a comprehensive picture of gaming performance. All figures are measured, not estimated, and represent actual benchmark results.

At 1920x1080, the system delivers excellent performance in competitive titles. Valorant hits 521 FPS, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive achieves 515 FPS, and Counter-Strike 2 reaches 233 FPS. Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege runs at 277 FPS, and Roblox at 301 FPS. These frame rates are far beyond what any current display can show, making the system ideal for high-refresh gaming at 1080p.

For AAA titles at 1080p, performance is strong but more varied. Call of Duty: Warzone runs at 162 FPS, Doom at 173 FPS, and Fortnite at 112 FPS. Control achieves 97 FPS, and Hitman 2 runs at 91 FPS. More demanding titles like Ark: Survival Ascended drop to 34 FPS, and The Medium runs at 49 FPS, indicating that some games are too demanding for the GPU at ultra settings.

At 2560x1440, performance scales down as expected. Valorant still achieves 456 FPS, and CS:GO runs at 354 FPS. Call of Duty: Warzone maintains 144 FPS, which is exactly at the refresh rate of many gaming monitors. Control runs at 73 FPS, and Fortnite at 71 FPS. Ark: Survival Ascended drops to 21 FPS, making it unplayable at this resolution with ultra settings.

At 3840x2160, the GPU is clearly the limiting factor. Most titles drop below 60 FPS. Control runs at 50 FPS, Microsoft Flight Simulator at 50 FPS, and Overpower at 71 FPS. Valorant still achieves 364 FPS due to its light graphics requirements, and CS:GO runs at 209 FPS. However, AAA titles like Fortnite (38 FPS), Call of Duty: Warzone (122 FPS), and Grand Theft Auto V (41 FPS) show that 4K gaming requires reduced settings for smooth gameplay.

The average FPS across all games is 155, which is skewed by the extremely high frame rates in competitive titles. For a realistic mixed-use scenario, the system is best suited for 1080p or 1440p gaming at high refresh rates, with 4K possible only in less demanding titles or with reduced settings.

Who Should Build It

This laptop configuration targets users who need exceptional CPU performance in a mobile form factor. The 95th percentile CPU ranking makes it ideal for content creators who work with video editing, 3D rendering, and software compilation. The 16 cores and 32 threads handle parallel workloads efficiently, and the high single-core performance ensures snappy responsiveness in daily tasks.

Gamers at 1080p and 1440p will find this system well-suited for high-refresh gaming. Competitive titles like Valorant (521 FPS at 1080p) and CS:GO (515 FPS at 1080p) run at frame rates far beyond typical display refresh rates. AAA titles at 1440p run at playable frame rates, with Call of Duty: Warzone achieving 144 FPS.

The GPU, while not top-tier, is still in the 81st percentile and handles most games well at 1080p and 1440p. Users who prioritize CPU-heavy workloads over GPU-heavy ones will find this a good match. Software developers benefit from the strong integer math score of 200,665 and data compression score of 690,650, which accelerate compilation and data processing tasks.

Students and office workers will find the system overkill for basic tasks, but the performance headroom ensures longevity. Small business workstations that run virtual machines, database applications, or data analysis tools will benefit from the 32 threads and 64 MB of L3 cache. The ECC memory support adds reliability for workstation use cases.

Users who need the absolute best GPU performance in a laptop should look elsewhere, as the RTX 4080 Mobile is outclassed by newer or higher-tier mobile GPUs. However, for a balanced system that excels at CPU-bound tasks and handles gaming well at mainstream resolutions, this is a strong choice.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, the system delivers exceptional frame rates in competitive titles, with Valorant at 521 FPS and CS:GO at 515 FPS. Even at 1440p, these games remain well above 300 FPS, ensuring smooth gameplay on high-refresh displays.

Streaming: The CPU's 16 cores and 32 threads provide ample headroom for encoding while gaming. The high multicore score of 35,314 in Cinebench R23 indicates that simultaneous encoding and gaming will not cause significant frame drops, though the GPU's 81st percentile ranking means encoding quality settings may need adjustment.

Video editing: The CPU's strong multicore performance (35,314 in Cinebench R23, 20,992 in Geekbench) handles timeline scrubbing and export encoding efficiently. The 256.0 GB/s memory bandwidth accelerates data transfer during editing, and the large L3 cache improves performance in multi-track projects.

3D rendering: The 32 threads and high floating-point math score of 128,682 make this system suitable for CPU-based rendering. The GPU's 24.72 TFLOPS FP32 performance also handles GPU-accelerated rendering, though it is not class-leading.

Software development: The integer math score of 200,665 and data compression score of 690,650 are particularly relevant for code compilation and package management. The 64 MB L3 cache reduces compilation times for large codebases.

Student and office work: This system is massively overprovisioned for typical student or office tasks, but the performance ensures that even the most demanding spreadsheet, database, or virtualization workloads run without slowdown. The ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running computation tasks.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class system pairing the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 CPU with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile GPU. The CPU is a 16-core, 32-thread Zen 5 processor running at up to 5.10 GHz, while the GPU is an Ada Lovelace architecture chip with 7,424 shading units and 12 GB of GDDR6 memory.

The combined percentile ranking of 88 places this system in the upper tier of all tested configurations. The CPU's 95th percentile ranking is the standout feature, while the GPU's 81st percentile is solid but not exceptional. The pair ranks 1,106th out of 3,861 in FPS-based gaming performance, with an average of 155 FPS across all tested titles.

This is a system designed for users who demand top-tier CPU performance in a laptop form factor, with gaming capability that is strong at 1080p and 1440p but less impressive at 4K. The thermal envelope of 55 W (CPU) plus 110 W (GPU) is manageable for a high-end laptop chassis, and the quad-channel LPDDR5X memory with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth is a significant advantage over typical mobile platforms.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's performance ranking among all processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 sits at the 95th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 77,740.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the Intel Core i9-14900K?

A: The Ryzen AI Max+ 395 has an average benchmark score 1.7% lower than the Intel Core i9-14900K, which scores 79,097.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What is the average gaming frame rate across all tested titles?

A: The average FPS across all games is 155, with the pair ranking 1,106th out of 3,861 pairs.

Q: Does this system support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports ECC memory, which is notable for a mobile platform and beneficial for workstation workloads.

Q: What is the GPU's performance compared to the RTX 5080 Mobile?

A: The RTX 4080 Mobile has an average benchmark score 0.6% lower than the RTX 5080 Mobile.

Q: At what resolution does the system perform best?

A: The system performs best at 1080p, where competitive titles exceed 500 FPS and most AAA games run above 90 FPS. At 1440p, performance remains strong, while 4K is limited to less demanding titles.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture, using the AD104 chip manufactured on TSMC's 5 nm process. The chip contains 35,800 million transistors on a 294 mm² die, with a transistor density of 121.8 million per square millimeter. It operates at a base clock of 1290 MHz and a boost clock of 1665 MHz, with memory running at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective).

Memory configuration consists of 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, delivering 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is adequate for 1080p and 1440p gaming but can be a limiting factor at 4K with ultra settings. The GPU has 7,424 shading units, 232 texture mapping units, and 80 raster operation units. It also includes 58 ray tracing cores and 232 tensor cores, which support hardware-accelerated ray tracing and DLSS.

Compute performance is rated at 24.72 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16 (1:1). The pixel rate is 133.2 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 386.3 GTexel/s. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, making it compatible with modern gaming APIs.

Benchmark results show a PassMark G3D score of 24,926 and a GPU compute score of 11,191. Geekbench OpenCL scores 159,575, and Vulkan scores 145,807. The GPU's average benchmark score of 38,135 places it at the 81st percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile, which scores 38,349 (0.6% higher), and the desktop RTX 4070, which scores 37,648 (1.3% lower).

In gaming, the GPU delivers strong performance at 1080p and 1440p, as evidenced by the measured FPS data. At 4K, performance drops significantly, with many AAA titles falling below 60 FPS. The 12 GB VRAM is sufficient for most current games at 1440p but may become a constraint as games require more memory at higher resolutions and detail settings. The 58 RT cores enable ray tracing, though enabling it will reduce frame rates further. For rendering workloads, the 24.72 TFLOPS FP32 performance is respectable but not class-leading, placing this GPU in the upper-mid range of mobile graphics solutions.