SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 + Intel Arc A770M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

94 Score

Top 6% Ranking

94 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

97%

GPU

90%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395

77,740 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A770M

18,383 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 + Intel Arc A770M

This build pairs AMD's top-tier Strix Halo mobile processor with Intel's high-end Arc 7 mobile GPU in a laptop configuration. The CPU sits at the 95th percentile among all processors, while the GPU lands at the 62nd percentile among all graphics cards, creating a system that is heavily weighted toward compute and productivity workloads rather than pure graphics throughput.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 is a 16-core, 32-thread processor built on the Zen 5 architecture, code-named Strix Halo. It uses a 4 nm TSMC process and is packaged on AMD's FP11 socket, targeting the mobile segment. The chip runs at a 3.00 GHz base clock and reaches 5.10 GHz boost, drawing a 55 W TDP. The silicon is composed of two 70.6 mm² dies, and the cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 64 MB L3 pool.

Memory support is LPDDR5X over a quad-channel bus, delivering 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth, with ECC support included. The CPU exposes PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes, and it integrates a Radeon 8060S GPU. The part number is 100-000001099, and production status is active with a release date of January 5, 2025.

Benchmark results place this chip firmly in the top tier of mobile processors. In Cinebench R23, it scores 35,314 in multi-core and 2,044 in single-core. The Geekbench results show 20,992 multi-core and 2,464 single-core. PassMark multi-thread score is 54,934, and single-thread is 4,147. The average benchmark score across all tests is 77,740, which puts the CPU at the 95th percentile of all CPUs.

Comparing to nearest rivals, the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 is 1.6% ahead of the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX (76,513 average score) and 1.6% ahead of the AMD EPYC Embedded 8224P (76,492). It is 2% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX (76,212). Against the Intel Core i9-14900K (79,097), it trails by 1.7%. These deltas are small, indicating the AI Max+ 395 competes at the very top of the desktop and workstation-class CPU spectrum despite being a mobile part.

In specialized PassMark workloads, the CPU shows 690,650 in data compression, 35,455 in data encryption, 56,346 in extended instructions, and 128,682 in floating-point math. Integer math scores 200,665, while physics scores 3,481 and random string sorting scores 76,177. Prime number finding scores 303. These numbers indicate strong throughput in both integer and floating-point tasks, with particularly impressive data compression performance that would benefit archival and database workloads.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A770M is a mobile GPU based on the Xe-HPG architecture, generation Alchemist (Arc 7 Mobile), using a 6 nm TSMC process. The chip, designated DG2-512, contains 21,700 million transistors on a 406 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 53.4 million per mm². It features 4,096 shading units, 256 texture mapping units, and 128 raster output units.

Clock speeds are 1650 MHz base and 2050 MHz boost, with memory running at 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective). The GPU has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth. Pixel rate is 262.4 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 524.8 GTexel/s. FP32 compute is 16.79 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 33.59 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio). The card has 32 ray tracing cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. TDP is 120 W, and it connects via PCIe 4.0 x16. Production status is end-of-life.

Benchmark performance places the Arc A770M at the 62nd percentile of all GPUs, with an average score of 18,383. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it scores 2,278. Geekbench OpenCL score is 89,494, and Vulkan score is 74,422. PassMark G3D score is 11,774, while G2D is 711. DirectX 10, 11, and 12 scores are 56, 69, and 70 respectively, with DirectX 9 at 178. Compute score is 4,778.

The nearest rivals show tight clustering: the Arc A770M is 0.1% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 460 (18,373), 0.8% behind the AMD FirePro D500 (18,533), 1.1% ahead of the AMD Radeon Pro 5700 (18,189), and 1.2% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile (18,159). These deltas are minimal, meaning the Intel GPU sits in a narrow performance band with several older mid-range options.

The 512.0 GB/s memory bandwidth is a notable strength for the GPU, exceeding what the CPU's 256.0 GB/s system memory offers. This suggests the GPU can feed its 4,096 shading units effectively in bandwidth-sensitive workloads. The 16 GB VRAM capacity is generous for a mobile GPU and would handle large textures in rendering or AI inference tasks without spilling to system memory.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's 95th percentile ranking versus the GPU's 62nd percentile creates a substantial performance gap. The combined percentile for this build is 79, reflecting that the CPU is the dominant component in overall system capability. The CPU's average benchmark score of 77,740 is more than four times the GPU's average of 18,383, indicating that this system will excel in CPU-bound tasks while GPU-bound workloads will be comparatively modest.

In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the CPU's 35,314 score places it in contention with high-end desktop processors. Single-core at 2,044 is solid for mobile, though not class-leading. The Geekbench multi-core score of 20,992 reinforces the multi-threaded strength. PassMark's 54,934 multi-thread score and 128,682 floating-point math suggest strong performance in scientific computing and financial modeling where FP32/FP64 throughput matters.

For the GPU, the 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2,278 and PassMark G3D of 11,774 indicate mid-range rasterization capability. The PassMark DirectX 12 score of 70 is low in absolute terms but reflects a synthetic workload that may not translate directly to real gaming performance. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 89,494 shows compute capability that could be leveraged for GPU-accelerated encoding or machine learning inference.

The combined picture is a system that will feel exceptionally fast in CPU-heavy tasks like compilation, rendering, and data processing, while GPU performance will be adequate but not exceptional for gaming or GPU compute. No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all frame rate discussion below is estimated from benchmark scores.

Who Should Build It

This laptop build targets users who prioritize CPU compute power above all else. Software developers compiling large codebases would benefit from the 16 cores and 32 threads, with Cinebench R23 multi-core of 35,314 indicating strong parallel compilation performance. Data scientists and researchers running Python or R workloads would see similar gains from the multi-threaded scores.

Content creators working with video encoding or 3D rendering would find the CPU's 54,934 PassMark multi-thread score useful, though the GPU's 62nd percentile means GPU-accelerated rendering will be limited compared to higher-tier graphics cards. The 16 GB VRAM on the GPU does help with larger scenes, but the raw compute is mid-range.

Students in engineering or computer science fields would benefit from the CPU's performance for simulation and analysis tasks. Small business workstations that run database queries, financial models, or scientific simulations would see strong CPU-bound throughput. The 690,650 data compression score suggests particular strength in archiving or backup workloads.

The 55 W CPU TDP combined with 120 W GPU TDP means this is not an ultra-portable machine; it is a performance laptop intended for stationary or semi-portable use. The 256.0 GB/s memory bandwidth on the CPU side supports memory-intensive computing tasks.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The GPU's 62nd percentile and 16.79 TFLOPS FP32 suggest playable frame rates at 1080p in many titles, but the gap between CPU and GPU performance means the GPU will be the limiting factor. Estimates from the 3DMark score of 2,278 indicate medium settings are more realistic than ultra at high refresh rates.

Streaming: The CPU's 16 cores provide ample headroom for encoding while gaming, and the 35,314 Cinebench R23 multi-core score means software encoding will not bottleneck. The GPU's 512.0 GB/s bandwidth assists with frame buffer management during capture.

Video editing: The CPU's 128,682 floating-point math score and 690,650 data compression score indicate strong performance in codec-heavy workflows. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM helps with timeline rendering, but the 62nd percentile limits effects-heavy projects.

3D rendering: CPU-based rendering would excel with the 35,314 multi-core score, but GPU-based renderers would be limited by the 16.79 TFLOPS FP32 throughput. The 32 RT cores provide some ray tracing capability, though performance will be modest.

Software development: The 20,992 Geekbench multi-core score and 54,934 PassMark multi-thread score indicate fast builds and test suites. The 256.0 GB/s memory bandwidth reduces compilation bottlenecks.

Student and office work: Single-core performance of 2,044 in Cinebench R23 and 4,147 in PassMark ensures responsive everyday use. The 95th percentile CPU ranking means no office workload will stress this system.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all frame rate figures below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The GPU's 62nd percentile and PassMark G3D score of 11,774 indicate mid-range gaming performance. At 1080p with high settings, most titles would run at playable frame rates, but not at high refresh. At 1440p, the GPU would struggle with demanding titles. At 4K, only esports or older titles would be playable.

The CPU's 95th percentile ranking means it will never bottleneck gaming performance; the GPU will always be the constraint. The 16 GB VRAM is sufficient for high-resolution textures, but the raw compute of 16.79 TFLOPS FP32 limits fill-rate-heavy scenes. The 32 RT cores provide ray tracing support, but performance in RT-enabled titles would be lower than non-RT due to the mid-range rasterization baseline.

Balance and Bottleneck

The bottleneck analysis is clear: the GPU limits all graphics workloads. The CPU's 95th percentile versus the GPU's 62nd percentile means the GPU is the weaker link by a wide margin. In gaming, the GPU will cap frame rates. In GPU compute tasks, the 16.79 TFLOPS FP32 will set the ceiling.

Conversely, the CPU's performance is never constrained in this pairing. For CPU-bound tasks like compilation, data processing, or CPU rendering, the GPU is irrelevant. The system is unbalanced in the sense that the CPU is far more capable than the GPU, but this may be intentional for users who need maximum CPU throughput and only occasional GPU acceleration.

The FPS scaling evidence, derived from the 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2,278, suggests that increasing resolution or settings will quickly saturate the GPU. The CPU's 256.0 GB/s memory bandwidth is more than sufficient to feed the GPU's demands, so memory bandwidth is not a bottleneck in either direction.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses AMD Socket FP11, which is a mobile-specific socket. Upgrading the CPU in a laptop is generally not feasible, so the CPU is effectively fixed for the life of the system. The GPU is also integrated into the laptop chassis, so it cannot be upgraded independently.

Memory is LPDDR5X, which is soldered in most mobile designs, meaning the 256.0 GB/s quad-channel configuration is fixed. The system supports PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes from the CPU, which is sufficient for the GPU's PCIe 4.0 x16 interface.

The CPU TDP is 55 W, and the GPU TDP is 120 W, totaling 175 W for the core components. A laptop power supply would need to accommodate this plus other system components. The GPU's production status is end-of-life, so replacement parts may be harder to source over time.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be an external GPU enclosure, if the laptop supports Thunderbolt or USB4 connectivity, to bypass the internal GPU limitation. Alternatively, users could upgrade to a newer laptop with a more balanced CPU-GPU pairing. The CPU's 95th percentile means it will remain relevant for years, but the GPU's 62nd percentile will age more quickly.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's performance percentile among all processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 sits at the 95th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 77,740.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Intel Arc A770M is 0.1% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 460, 0.8% behind the AMD FirePro D500, 1.1% ahead of the AMD Radeon Pro 5700, and 1.2% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile.

Q: What is the combined system percentile?

A: The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 79, reflecting the CPU's dominance over the GPU in overall system capability.

Q: How much memory bandwidth does the CPU support?

A: The CPU supports quad-channel LPDDR5X memory at 256.0 GB/s, with ECC support included.

Q: What is the GPU's VRAM and memory bandwidth?

A: The GPU has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: Is the CPU's clock speed unlocked?

A: No, the multiplier is locked, so overclocking is not supported on this processor.

Q: What is the production status of the GPU?

A: The Intel Arc A770M is end-of-life, while the CPU is still active in production.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build (buildClass: "laptop") that pairs the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395, a 16-core Zen 5 mobile processor, with the Intel Arc A770M, a 16 GB Xe-HPG mobile GPU. The CPU ranks in the 95th percentile of all processors, while the GPU ranks in the 62nd percentile. The combined percentile is 79.

The system is CPU-dominated, with the processor's average benchmark score of 77,740 far exceeding the GPU's 18,383. The CPU offers 256.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth and 64 MB of L3 cache, while the GPU provides 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth and 16 GB of VRAM. This pairing is best suited for users who need maximum CPU compute in a mobile form factor and can tolerate mid-range GPU performance. The overall tier is high for productivity and compute, but mid-range for graphics-intensive workloads.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 + Intel Arc A770M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395

Intel Arc A770M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

GPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Who Should Build It

Usage Scenarios

Gaming Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Upgrade Path and Platform

FAQ

Build Overview

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds