SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 + Intel Arc A730M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

97 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 3% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
97%
VS
GPU
96%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395

77,740 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A730M

45,592 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 and Intel Arc A730M pairing targets a niche laptop segment where CPU-centric workloads dominate, but the GPU still carries enough weight for capable 1080p gaming and creative acceleration. The CPU is a 16-core, 32-thread Zen 5 part with a 55 W TDP, while the GPU is a 12 GB GDDR6 mobile part with an 80 W TDP and a 84th percentile standing among all GPUs. The combined system places in the 90th percentile overall, indicating a high-tier mobile workstation that leans heavily on its processor for heavy lifting.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 uses the AMD Socket FP11, which is a mobile platform socket. This means the CPU is soldered or mounted in a way that typically precludes user-level upgrades; the platform is designed for a fixed configuration rather than a swappable processor. The memory support is LPDDR5X, which is also soldered in most laptop designs, so there is no DIMM slot upgrade path. The memory bus is quad-channel, providing a memory bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s, which is substantial for a mobile part and directly feeds the integrated Radeon 8060S graphics if used.

The CPU supports PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only). This is a critical constraint for the discrete GPU: the Intel Arc A730M uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, which matches the CPU’s lane allocation. In a laptop, this means the GPU has a full 16-lane connection, avoiding the bandwidth bottlenecks seen in some thin-and-light designs that use x8 or x4 links. The platform also supports ECC memory, which is unusual for a mobile chip and points to workstation or server-class usage scenarios.

The TDP figures are 55 W for the CPU and 80 W for the GPU. There is no suggested PSU in the fact pack, so power supply headroom cannot be quantified. However, the combined 135 W thermal envelope suggests that a laptop chassis must have robust cooling and a power adapter capable of sustaining both components under load. The fact that the GPU is marked as "slot width: IGP" is notable—it might be integrated into the package or a dedicated module, but the 80 W TDP indicates a dedicated graphics solution rather than a low-power integrated unit.

A sensible next upgrade, given the soldered nature of the platform, would be to consider a future laptop model with a newer CPU generation. The production status for the CPU is "Active," so it is still current, whereas the GPU is marked "End-of-life." This means the GPU is at the end of its production cycle, but the CPU is not. If upgrading within the same chassis is impossible, the user would need to move to a different laptop platform. The absence of a launch MSRP for both components means no pricing guidance is available, but the platform’s high combined percentile suggests it is a premium configuration.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU benchmarks show a strong multi-core performer. In Cinebench R23, the multicore score is 35314, which places it in the 95th percentile among all CPUs. The single-core score in the same test is 2044. The Geekbench multicore score is 20992, and the single-core score is 2464. The Passmark multithread score is 54934, with a single-thread score of 4147. The average benchmark score for the CPU is 77740.

The GPU benchmarks are more limited in scope but still informative. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the score is 1732. Geekbench OpenCL yields 70352, and Geekbench Vulkan yields 64693. The average benchmark score for the GPU is 45592, placing it in the 84th percentile among all GPUs.

The combined percentile for the build is 90, which indicates that the CPU is the dominant contributor to the overall performance tier. The CPU’s nearest rivals show how close the competition is: the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX has an average score of 76513, which is 1.6% lower than the 395. The AMD EPYC Embedded 8224P scores 76492, also 1.6% lower. The Intel Core i9-14900K scores 79097, which is 1.7% higher. The AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX scores 76212, 2.0% lower. This places the 395 in a tight cluster with top-tier desktop and workstation chips, despite being a mobile 55 W part.

The GPU’s rivals show a similar tight grouping: the AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT scores 45384 (0.5% lower than the A730M), the NVIDIA RTX 5880 Ada Generation scores 45972 (0.8% higher), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile scores 45152 (1.0% lower), and the NVIDIA RTX A2000 scores 46043 (1.0% higher). The A730M sits in the middle of this pack, meaning its raw compute is comparable to a workstation card like the RTX A2000, but it lacks the specific driver optimizations of those professional parts.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 is built on the Zen 5 architecture, with the codename Strix Halo. The manufacturing process is TSMC’s 4 nm node, and the die size is reported as 2x 70.6 mm². The CPU has 16 cores and 32 threads, with a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 64 MB of shared L3. This large L3 cache is critical for multi-threaded workloads that share data across cores.

The benchmark results indicate a processor that excels at parallel tasks. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 35314 is 1.6% higher than the Threadripper PRO 9945WX and 2.0% higher than the Ryzen 9 8945HX, both of which are desktop or high-end mobile parts. The single-core score of 2044 in Cinebench R23 is respectable but not class-leading, as the 95th percentile is driven by multi-core performance. The Geekbench scores reinforce this: the multicore score of 20992 is nearly 8.5 times the single-core score of 2464, showing strong scaling with thread count.

The Passmark suite provides additional insights. The data encryption score is 35455, and the data compression score is 690650. The floating point math score is 128682, while the integer math score is 200665. The extended instructions score is 56346, and the find prime numbers score is 303. The random string sorting score is 76177. These numbers show a processor that handles encryption and compression efficiently, which is relevant for database servers or virtualization hosts. The physics score from Passmark is 3481, which is part of the overall multithread score.

For real workloads, the 16 cores and 32 threads mean that video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation will see near-linear scaling up to the thermal limits. The 55 W TDP is low for this core count, so sustained all-core workloads may cause the boost clock to drop, but the 5.10 GHz boost on a single core ensures snappy single-threaded response. The integrated Radeon 8060S is present, but the discrete A730M will handle graphics duties, so the iGPU can be used for compute offload if the driver supports it.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The Intel Arc A730M’s 84th percentile GPU standing suggests it can handle 1080p gaming at high settings, but there is no measured FPS data for this exact pairing. The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1732 is modest, indicating that 144Hz gaming at 1080p is plausible for esports titles, but demanding AAA games will likely see frame rates in the 60–90 FPS range at high settings. The CPU’s strong single-core score of 2044 in Cinebench R23 ensures that the processor will not bottleneck the GPU in most games.

Streaming: The CPU has 16 cores, which is more than enough to handle game capture, encoding, and streaming simultaneously. The Passmark data compression score of 690650 indicates fast compression for stream encoding. The GPU also supports hardware encoding via Intel’s media engine, though specific encoder details are not in the fact pack. The combined 90th percentile means the system can handle a game and an encoding workload without major frame drops.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 35314 is 2.0% higher than the Ryzen 9 8945HX, which is a known content-creation beast. The CPU’s 64 MB of L3 cache helps with timeline scrubbing and preview rendering. The GPU’s 12 GB of VRAM is ample for 4K video timelines and effects. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 70352 indicates the GPU can accelerate rendering tasks, though not at the level of a dedicated workstation card.

3D rendering: The CPU’s Passmark floating point math score of 128682 suggests strong FP32 performance, which is critical for CPU-based rendering engines. The GPU’s FP32 performance is 12.60 TFLOPS, which is decent for a mobile part. The 24 ray tracing cores provide hardware acceleration for RT workloads, but the lack of measured FPS data means exact RT performance is unknown. The GPU’s 12 GB GDDR6 memory with 336.0 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient for most 3D scenes at 1080p.

Software development: The CPU’s 32 threads and 64 MB L3 cache are ideal for compiling large codebases. The Passmark integer math score of 200665 shows strong integer throughput, which is what compilers use. The ECC memory support adds stability for long builds. The GPU is less relevant here, but its presence means developers can run GPU-accelerated tests or simulations.

Student and office work: The CPU’s single-core score of 2464 in Geekbench ensures that office applications and web browsing are responsive. The 55 W TDP means the laptop can run quietly under light loads. The GPU is overkill for office work, but it provides headroom for future needs like CAD or light video editing. The platform’s 90th combined percentile indicates that this is a premium machine, so students would only need it for demanding engineering or media curricula.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s core and thread count?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 has 16 cores and 32 threads.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory size and type?

A: The Intel Arc A730M has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory.

Q: Does the platform support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports ECC memory.

Q: What is the CPU’s socket type?

A: The CPU uses AMD Socket FP11.

Q: What is the GPU’s production status?

A: The GPU is marked as End-of-life.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the Intel Core i9-14900K?

A: The CPU’s average benchmark score is 77740, which is 1.7% lower than the i9-14900K’s score of 79097.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile is 90.

Who Should Build It

This CPU+GPU pairing is aimed at mobile professionals who need extreme multi-core performance in a laptop form factor. The CPU’s 95th percentile standing makes it suitable for engineers running finite element analysis, data scientists training machine learning models, and video editors working with 8K footage. The GPU’s 84th percentile means it can handle moderate GPU compute tasks, but it is not a top-tier renderer.

The 55 W CPU TDP with 16 cores is a sweet spot for creators who need to render on the go without a desktop. The 12 GB of VRAM on the GPU allows for larger texture sets in 3D modeling. The ECC memory support is a draw for students in computer science or physics who need data integrity.

Small business workstations could also benefit, especially if the workload involves database operations (given the high data compression score) or virtualization (32 threads allow multiple VMs). The platform’s 90th combined percentile suggests it is a high-end offering, so it is not intended for budget-conscious users. Gamers at 1080p will find it capable, but the CPU is the star here, not the GPU.

Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU is clearly the dominant component in this pairing. The CPU’s percentile is 95, while the GPU’s is 84, a gap of 11 points. This means that in CPU-bound workloads like compilation or 3D rendering, the CPU will be the limiting factor only if it hits its thermal envelope. The GPU, meanwhile, will be the bottleneck in gaming. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1732 is the only direct GPU gaming metric, and it is modest.

The CPU’s single-core score of 2044 in Cinebench R23 is high enough to feed the GPU in most games, so the GPU will be the frame rate limiter in GPU-bound scenes. In CPU-bound titles like strategy games, the CPU’s 16 cores will provide ample headroom. The memory bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s for the CPU is high, but the GPU has its own 336.0 GB/s bandwidth, so there is no shared memory bottleneck.

The FPS scaling cannot be inferred from the fact pack because there is no measured FPS data. However, the GPU’s percentile relative to its rivals suggests it will perform within 1% of the RTX A2000 in raw compute. This means that in games, the A730M will likely match or slightly trail the RTX A2000, which is a workstation card not optimized for gaming. The CPU will not bottleneck the GPU at 1080p, but at 720p or lower resolutions, the CPU’s single-core performance could become a factor.

Build Overview

This is a laptop build, as indicated by the build class. The CPU is a 16-core Zen 5 mobile processor with a 55 W TDP, and the GPU is a 12 GB Intel Arc A730M with an 80 W TDP. The combined thermal output is 135 W, which requires a robust cooling solution. The overall tier from the percentiles is high: the CPU is in the 95th percentile, the GPU is in the 84th percentile, and the combined system is in the 90th percentile.

This pairing is unusual because the CPU is far more powerful relative to its peers than the GPU is. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 77740 is only 1.7% lower than the Intel Core i9-14900K, a desktop part, while the GPU’s average score of 45592 is within 1% of the NVIDIA RTX A2000. This indicates a system designed for CPU-intensive work, with the GPU providing adequate but not exceptional graphics performance.

Gaming Performance

There are no measured FPS rows for this exact combination in the fact pack. The dataIsMeasured flag is false, so all FPS figures discussed are estimates drawn from the benchmark scores. The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1732 is the primary data point for gaming performance. This score is 0.8% higher than the RTX 5880 Ada Generation, which is a workstation card, and 1.0% lower than the RTX 5090 Mobile, a gaming laptop GPU.

Based on this, the A730M should deliver playable frame rates at 1080p with high settings for most modern titles. Esports games like CS:GO or Valorant, which are CPU-bound, will see high FPS because the CPU’s single-core score is strong. AAA games like Cyberpunk 2077 or Assassin’s Creed will be GPU-bound, and the A730M’s 12 GB of VRAM will allow high texture settings, but the raw compute is not enough for 144Hz at 1080p on ultra settings. The 24 ray tracing cores are present, but the 12.60 TFLOPS FP32 performance suggests that ray tracing at high settings will be taxing.

The CPU’s 32 threads will not be a limiting factor in gaming; even at 1080p, the GPU will be the bottleneck. For 1440p, the GPU’s performance will drop further, and the system is better suited for 1080p gaming. The lack of measured FPS data means these are estimates, but the benchmark scores point to a solid 1080p gaming experience rather than a high-refresh or high-resolution monster.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A730M is built on the Xe-HPG architecture, specifically the DG2-512 chip, and belongs to the Alchemist generation (Arc 7 Mobile). The manufacturing process is TSMC’s 6 nm node, with 21,700 million transistors on a 406 mm² die. The transistor density is 53.4 million per mm². The GPU has 3072 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 96 raster operation units. It also has 24 ray tracing cores, but no tensor cores are listed in the fact pack.

The clocks are a base of 1100 MHz and a boost of 2050 MHz. The memory runs at 1750 MHz, with an effective data rate of 14 Gbps. The memory bus is 192 bits wide, providing 336.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The 12 GB of GDDR6 memory is a significant advantage for modern games with large texture packs.

The pixel rate is 196.8 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 393.6 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 12.60 TFLOPS, and FP16 is 25.19 TFLOPS (at a 2:1 ratio). The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x16, which matches the CPU’s lane allocation.

The benchmark scores show a GPU that is competitive with workstation parts. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 70352 is close to the RTX A2000’s average, and the Vulkan score of 64693 is also in that range. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1732 is the only gaming-specific metric, and it indicates mid-range performance. The GPU’s 84th percentile means it is better than most discrete GPUs, but it is not in the top tier. For rendering, the 24 RT cores provide hardware acceleration, but the lack of tensor cores means no dedicated AI acceleration hardware, which could limit some modern upscaling techniques. The 12 GB VRAM is sufficient for 4K textures in many titles, but the compute power will be the limiting factor.