SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 + Intel Arc A570M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

97 Score

Top 3% Ranking

97 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 3% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

97%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395

77,740 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A570M

58,239 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 and Intel Arc A570M combine a mobile 16-core Zen 5 processor with an Xe-HPG mobile GPU. In the database, the CPU sits at the 95th percentile of all CPUs, the GPU at the 88th percentile of all GPUs, and the pairing at the 92nd combined percentile. The entry contains no measured gaming FPS rows for this exact combination, so frame-rate analysis must be treated as an estimate drawn from benchmark scores.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A570M uses Intel’s Xe-HPG architecture and is listed in the Alchemist Arc 5 Mobile generation. The chip is DG2-256, manufactured on TSMC’s 6 nm process, with 11,500 million transistors on a 269 mm² die and a transistor density of 42.8M / mm². The GPU is a 75 W part with a slot width classed as IGP and a PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface. Its memory configuration is 8 GB GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, producing 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock is 1750 MHz, described as 14 Gbps effective. Core clocks are 900 MHz base and 1300 MHz boost.

The GPU contains 2,048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, 64 ROPs, and 16 ray-tracing cores. No tensor-core count is recorded in the database entry. Pixel rate is 83.20 GPixel/s, texture rate is 166.4 GTexel/s, FP32 throughput is 5.325 TFLOPS, and FP16 throughput is 10.65 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio. The API list includes DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), Vulkan 1.4, and OpenGL 4.6.

In terms of benchmark results, the Arc A570M scores 58,239 in Geekbench OpenCL, which places it at the 88th percentile of all GPUs. That score is 0.3% behind the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT, which averages 58,392. It is 0.3% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM, which averages 58,085. It is 0.5% behind the NVIDIA P102-100, which averages 58,528, and 0.7% behind the AMD Radeon PRO V710, which averages 58,657. These deltas show the A570M performing in the same compute band as those near rivals despite its relatively modest clocks.

For rendering, the FP32 and FP16 figures are the relevant compute resources. The 16 RT cores add ray-traced geometry capability, although the database provides no dedicated ray-tracing benchmark for this GPU. The 8 GB frame buffer and 224.0 GB/s memory bandwidth are the likely constraints in texture-heavy rendering scenes. The OpenCL score indicates that compute-oriented rendering tasks are viable, but the GPU is not the strongest component in this pairing.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU’s single-thread scores, including Cinebench R23 single-core at 2,044 and Passmark single-thread at 4,147, provide a strong base for high frame rates. The GPU’s 88th percentile standing is more likely to limit graphically demanding titles, while esports-style games should be the better case. Exact frame rates remain estimates because no measured FPS rows exist.

Streaming: With 16 cores and 32 threads, plus a Passmark multithread score of 54,934, the CPU has enough throughput to handle a game and encoding workload simultaneously. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, but there is no streaming-specific benchmark in the data.

Video editing: Cinebench R23 multicore at 35,314 and Geekbench multicore at 20,992 cover timeline and export processing. The GPU’s FP16 throughput of 10.65 TFLOPS can assist half-precision compute tasks. The CPU’s quad-channel LPDDR5X memory path, rated at 256.0 GB/s, helps move large frame buffers during editing work.

3D rendering: The CPU’s multicore strength, shown by a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 35,314 and a Passmark multithread score of 54,934, makes this pairing usable for CPU rendering. The GPU’s OpenCL score of 58,239 adds GPU compute capability, and the 16 RT cores provide ray-tracing hardware. Render times are not measured in the database.

Software development: Passmark data compression at 690,650, data encryption at 35,455, extended instructions at 56,346, integer math at 200,665, and multithread at 54,934 all point to strong build, compression, and encryption workflows. The 16-core/32-thread layout allows parallel compilation.

Student and office work: Passmark single-thread at 4,147 indicates responsive everyday application use. The 55 W CPU TDP and laptop class make it a portable system, and ECC memory support is useful for data-integrity-oriented office tasks.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 uses the Zen 5 architecture with the codename Strix Halo. It is built on TSMC’s 4 nm process with a die size of 2x 70.6 mm². The processor has 16 cores and 32 threads, with a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. TDP is 55 W, the socket is AMD Socket FP11, and the market segment is mobile. The cache hierarchy is 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 64 MB of shared L3. Memory support is LPDDR5X over a quad-channel bus with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth, and ECC is enabled. PCIe support is Gen 4 with 16 lanes from the CPU only. The processor also includes integrated Radeon 8060S graphics. The multiplier is locked, and the production status is active, with a release date of 2025-01-05.

Benchmark results reinforce this as a high-end mobile CPU. Cinebench R15 multicore is 5,463 and single-core is 316. Cinebench R23 multicore is 35,314 and single-core is 2,044. Geekbench multicore is 20,992 and single-core is 2,464. Passmark multithread is 54,934, single-thread is 4,147, integer math is 200,665, floating point math is 128,682, extended instructions is 56,346, data compression is 690,650, data encryption is 35,455, random string sorting is 76,177, physics is 3,481, and find prime numbers is 303.

The average benchmark score is 77,740, placing the CPU at the 95th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals show how strong this mobile part is. The Ryzen AI Max+ 395 is 1.6% above the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX, which averages 76,513, and 1.6% above the AMD EPYC Embedded 8224P, which averages 76,492. It is 2.0% above the AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX, which averages 76,212. It trails the Intel Core i9-14900K by 1.7%, with the Intel part averaging 79,097. In real workloads, this means the CPU can handle both heavily threaded tasks and lightly threaded tasks without being the limiting component.

Balance and Bottleneck

The percentile positions provide the clearest evidence of balance in this pairing. The CPU is at the 95th percentile, while the GPU is at the 88th percentile. That difference means the CPU is the stronger relative half of the system. In graphics-heavy workloads, the Arc A570M is the more likely bottleneck because its percentile is lower and its 8 GB frame buffer is modest by current standards. In CPU-heavy tasks such as 3D rendering, compilation, or data processing, the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 has enough multicore throughput to carry the workload.

Exact FPS scaling cannot be derived from this data because the measuredFpsUltraByGame object is empty and dataIsMeasured is false. The database provides no per-game measured frame rates for this exact combination. Therefore, bottleneck analysis must rely on the 95th versus 88th percentile split rather than on measured scaling curves. The CPU’s memory path is also unusually strong for a mobile part, with quad-channel LPDDR5X at 256.0 GB/s, while the GPU’s memory path is narrower at 128-bit and 224.0 GB/s.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data. The measuredFpsUltraByGame object is empty and dataIsMeasured is false. All FPS discussion in this section is therefore estimated from benchmark scores, not from gameplay captures.

The CPU’s single-thread scores of 2,044 in Cinebench R23 and 4,147 in Passmark indicate strong frame delivery potential. The GPU’s OpenCL score of 58,239 and 88th percentile position indicate solid but not top-tier rendering capacity. The 8 GB GDDR6 frame buffer and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth will matter at ultra settings in modern titles, where large textures and high memory pressure can reduce performance. The 16 RT cores and DirectX 12 Ultimate support enable ray-traced effects, but the database provides no measured ray-tracing frame rate. Esports and lighter titles should be the strongest gaming case, while demanding AAA games are more likely to be limited by the GPU.

Who Should Build It

Gamers looking for a laptop with a strong CPU and a capable mid-high GPU are the primary audience. The 95th percentile CPU can handle simulation and background tasks, while the 88th percentile GPU can handle rendering in most games at suitable settings. Exact frame rates need measurement for specific titles.

Content creators in video and 3D workflows fit this pairing well. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 35,314 and video-oriented GPU FP16 throughput of 10.65 TFLOPS support rendering pipelines. The 16 RT cores add ray-traced rendering resources.

Software developers are also well served. Passmark data compression at 690,650, data encryption at 35,455, and integer math at 200,665 indicate strong throughput for code builds, compression tasks, and cryptographic operations. The 16-core/32-thread layout supports parallel workloads.

Students and small business workstations can use this as a mobile system with strong single-thread response, ECC memory support, and a 55 W CPU TDP. The laptop class makes it a portable workstation rather than a desktop replacement in the traditional sense.

FAQ

Q: Is there a measured FPS table for this CPU and GPU combination?

A: No. The database entry has an empty measuredFpsUltraByGame object and dataIsMeasured is false, so no measured game frame rates are available for this exact pairing.

Q: How does the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 compare to the Intel Core i9-14900K in aggregate benchmarks?

A: The Ryzen AI Max+ 395 averages 77,740, while the Core i9-14900K averages 79,097. The delta is -1.7%, meaning the Core i9-14900K is 1.7% ahead in this database’s aggregate score.

Q: What memory does the CPU support?

A: The CPU supports LPDDR5X memory over a quad-channel bus with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth, and ECC memory is enabled.

Q: Does the Intel Arc A570M have ray tracing hardware?

A: Yes. The database lists 16 RT cores, and the API list includes DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), Vulkan 1.4, and OpenGL 4.6. No tensor-core count is recorded.

Q: What is the build class of this system?

A: The buildClass field is laptop, the CPU market segment is mobile, and the combined percentile of the pairing is 92.

Q: What are the Arc A570M’s memory specifications?

A: The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, with 224.0 GB/s bandwidth, a 1750 MHz memory clock, and 14 Gbps effective speed.

Build Overview

This pairing is a laptop-class configuration. The CPU is the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395, a mobile 16-core/32-thread Zen 5 part, and the GPU is the Intel Arc A570M, an Alchemist Arc 5 Mobile GPU with 8 GB GDDR6 memory. The buildClass field is laptop, and the overall tier from the database is the 92nd combined percentile. No FPS-based pair rank is assigned, because pairRankByFps is null and the entry has no measured FPS data.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 77,740, placing it at the 95th percentile of all CPUs. The GPU’s average benchmark score is 58,239, placing it at the 88th percentile of all GPUs. The combined percentile for this pairing is 92.

Key CPU scores include Cinebench R23 multicore at 35,314, Cinebench R23 single-core at 2,044, Geekbench multicore at 20,992, Geekbench single-core at 2,464, Passmark multithread at 54,934, and Passmark single-thread at 4,147. The only listed GPU benchmark is Geekbench OpenCL at 58,239. These numbers show a very strong CPU paired with a strong but lower-placed GPU, making the CPU the anchor of the system’s benchmark profile.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses AMD Socket FP11, and the database lists no other socket compatibility. Memory support is LPDDR5X over a quad-channel interface with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth and ECC enabled. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes, while the GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface.

The GPU’s suggestedPsu field is null, so no PSU recommendation is listed. The CPU TDP is 55 W and the GPU TDP is 75 W, indicating a laptop-oriented power envelope rather than a high-draw desktop design. Because this is a laptop-class build, component-level upgrades are constrained by the platform. The CPU is already at the 95th percentile, so the more logical future upgrade would be a system configuration with a higher-percentile GPU, which would address the larger relative gap in graphics performance.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 + Intel Arc A570M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395

Intel Arc A570M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

CPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Gaming Performance

Who Should Build It

FAQ

Build Overview

Benchmark Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds