SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 + Intel Arc A370M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

95 Score

Top 5% Ranking

95 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 5% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

97%

GPU

93%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395

77,740 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A370M

29,175 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 is a 16-core, 32-thread Zen 5 mobile processor with a 3.00 GHz base clock and 5.10 GHz boost, built on TSMC's 4 nm process, and it carries an integrated Radeon 8060S GPU. It is paired with the Intel Arc A370M, a 4 GB GDDR6 discrete GPU based on the Xe-HPG "Alchemist" architecture. This is a laptop-class build with a combined percentile of 85. The dataset contains no measured FPS rows for this exact pairing — the measured FPS field is empty and dataIsMeasured is false — so all frame-rate discussion below is estimated from the benchmark scores.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming — The CPU's single-thread scores (Geekbench 2464, Cinebench R23 2044) are strong enough to keep a game's frame queue fed. The GPU's FP32 throughput is 4.198 TFLOPS with 112.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth, which is a mid-range figure. The CPU sits at the 95th percentile while the GPU sits at the 74th, so the GPU will be the limiting component in high-refresh gaming. The 4 GB frame buffer will constrain texture sizes in modern titles.

Streaming — The 16-core, 32-thread CPU with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35314 has substantial headroom to handle game logic and streaming encode simultaneously. The PassMark data compression score of 690650 and the data encryption score of 35455 indicate the CPU can process the compression and encryption load that streaming requires without strain.

Video editing — The multi-thread scores — Geekbench 20992, Cinebench R23 35314, and PassMark multithread 54934 — place the CPU at the 95th percentile, which supports export and preview workloads. The GPU's OpenCL score of 29676 and Vulkan score of 28673 can accelerate effects and compositing, but the 4 GB frame buffer will limit the size of large projects.

3D rendering — The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core 35314 and PassMark floating-point math score of 128682 provide a strong base for CPU-based rendering. The GPU has 8 RT cores for hardware ray tracing, but at the 74th percentile it will be the slower partner in a final frame render; the CPU is the engine for this workload.

Software development — The PassMark integer math score of 200665 and the extended instructions score of 56346 indicate strong code generation and execution throughput. The 16 cores and 32 threads allow parallel compilation, and the data compression score of 690650 helps with packaging large builds.

Student and office work — The single-thread PassMark score of 4147 and the 55 W CPU TDP make this a capable laptop for daily productivity. The integrated Radeon 8060S provides a secondary graphics path, and the discrete GPU handles heavier visual tasks when needed.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 77740, placing it at the 95th percentile of all CPUs. In Cinebench R23, the multi-core score is 35314 and the single-core is 2044; in R15, the multi-core is 5463 and single-core is 316. Geekbench shows 20992 multi-core and 2464 single-core. PassMark multithread is 54934 and single-thread is 4147. The remaining PassMark scores are data compression 690650, encryption 35455, extended instructions 56346, find prime numbers 303, floating point math 128682, integer math 200665, physics 3481, and random string sorting 76177.

The CPU's nearest rivals in the database are tightly packed: the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX averages 76513 (1.6% lower), the AMD EPYC Embedded 8224P averages 76492 (1.6% lower), the Intel Core i9-14900K averages 79097 (1.7% higher), and the AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX averages 76212 (2.0% lower). The 395's 77740 sits between the i9-14900K and the Threadripper.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 29175, at the 74th percentile. Its Geekbench OpenCL score is 29676 and Vulkan is 28673. Its nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH (29197, -0.1%), the AMD FirePro W8000 (29211, -0.1%), the AMD Radeon RX 470 (28996, +0.6%), and the AMD Radeon RX 6800M (28874, +1.0%). The GPU is within one percentage point of all four.

The combined picture is a laptop with a top-tier CPU and a mid-range GPU. The combined percentile of 85 reflects the CPU's high position, while the GPU's 74th percentile is the weaker side of the pairing.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses AMD Socket FP11 and the Zen 5 "Strix Halo" architecture. It supports LPDDR5X memory in a quad-channel configuration with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth and ECC. The PCIe interface is Gen 4 with 16 lanes from the CPU, and the GPU connects through PCIe 4.0 x8. The CPU is not multiplier unlocked, so overclocking is not a path.

The GPU is marked as end-of-life with a release date of 2022-03-29, so a sensible next upgrade is a newer discrete GPU with a higher percentile. The CPU remains active, so the platform can accept a new GPU without changing the processor. The CPU's integrated Radeon 8060S provides a fallback graphics path alongside the discrete Arc A370M.

The TDP is 55 W for the CPU and 35 W for the GPU. No PSU recommendation is listed in the data, so power supply guidance is not available from this dataset.

Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU's 95th percentile versus the GPU's 74th percentile shows a clear performance gap. The CPU's average score of 77740 is far above the GPU's 29175, so the CPU is the dominant component in the pairing. For CPU-bound workloads — compilation, data compression, floating-point math — the CPU will carry the load without the GPU being involved. For GPU-bound workloads such as rasterized game rendering or GPU-accelerated effects, the GPU's 4.198 TFLOPS and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth become the ceiling.

The FPS scaling follows this balance. The CPU's single-thread scores can feed a frame queue faster than the GPU can render, so in most games the GPU will be the frame-rate limiter. In CPU-bound titles, the GPU will still be the cap because it is the lower-percentile component. The bottleneck shifts only when the workload is purely computational, at which point the GPU is idle.

FAQ

Q: What socket does the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 use?

A: AMD Socket FP11.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, ECC memory is supported.

Q: What is the GPU's memory bandwidth?**

A: The GPU has 112.0 GB/s of bandwidth over a 64-bit GDDR6 bus with 4 GB of capacity.

Q: How many ray tracing cores does the GPU have?

A: The Intel Arc A370M has 8 RT cores.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this build?

A: The combined CPU+GPU percentile is 85.

Q: Is the GPU still in production?

A: No, the GPU is marked as end-of-life; the CPU is active.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this exact pairing?

A: No, the measured FPS field is empty and dataIsMeasured is false, so all FPS figures are estimates.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets a laptop that needs a high-end mobile CPU with a mid-range discrete GPU. Gamers who want high frame rates will get the CPU headroom, but the GPU will cap frame rates in demanding titles. Content creators working with video and 3D will benefit from the CPU's 35314 Cinebench R23 multi-core score and the GPU's OpenCL 29676 for effects. Software developers will use the 16 cores and 32 threads, plus the integer math 200665 for builds. Students and office workers get a 55 W TDP platform with a single-thread score of 4147 for everyday tasks. Small business workstations can leverage the ECC memory support and the CPU's 95th percentile for reliable compute.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 has 16 cores and 32 threads on the Zen 5 "Strix Halo" architecture. The base clock is 3.00 GHz and the boost is 5.10 GHz. The die is manufactured by TSMC on a 4 nm process, with a die size of 2x 70.6 mm². The cache is 80 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 64 MB shared L3. The memory interface is LPDDR5X, quad-channel, with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth and ECC support. The CPU includes an integrated Radeon 8060S GPU, and the PCIe is Gen 4 with 16 lanes from the CPU.

The benchmark data shows a strong multi-threaded processor: Cinebench R23 multi-core 35314, Geekbench multi-core 20992, and PassMark multithread 54934. The single-thread is also solid for a laptop — 2044 in Cinebench R23 and 2464 in Geekbench. The 95th percentile is reflected in the tight rivalry with the Threadripper PRO 9945WX and the Ryzen 9 8945HX, both within 2% of the 395's score.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build (buildClass "laptop") pairing the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 with the Intel Arc A370M. The combined percentile is 85. The CPU is the dominant component at the 95th percentile, while the GPU sits at the 74th. The pairing is an unusual one: a top-tier 16-core mobile processor alongside a mid-range discrete GPU. The result is a laptop that is CPU-heavy in most workloads, with the GPU providing moderate graphics performance.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A370M is a 4 GB GDDR6 GPU on a 64-bit bus with 112.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The chip is DG2-128, based on the Xe-HPG "Alchemist" architecture, built on TSMC's 6 nm process with 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die. The base clock is 1550 MHz, boost is 2050 MHz, and the memory clock is 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). The GPU has 1024 shading units, 64 TMUs, 32 ROPs, and 8 RT cores. The pixel rate is 65.60 GPixel/s, texture rate is 131.2 GTexel/s, FP32 is 4.198 TFLOPS, and FP16 is 8.397 TFLOPS (2:1). It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The TDP is 35 W, and it connects via PCIe 4.0 x8.

In Geekbench, the GPU scores 29676 OpenCL and 28673 Vulkan, placing it at the 74th percentile. Its average score is 29175. It is within 0.1% of the Radeon RX Vega M GH and the FirePro W8000, and 1.0% above the Radeon RX 6800M in the benchmark database. The GPU is end-of-life, released 2022-03-29.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this combination — the measured FPS field is empty and dataIsMeasured is false. All frame-rate estimates below are derived from the benchmark scores.

The CPU's single-thread scores (Cinebench R23 2044, Geekbench 2464) indicate that the CPU will not be the bottleneck in most games. The GPU's 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth set a mid-range ceiling. The GPU's nearest rival, the Radeon RX 6800M (1.0% lower score), suggests the A370M would deliver frame rates in a similar range to that GPU at comparable settings. The CPU's 95th percentile is high enough to keep the GPU fed, but the GPU's 74th percentile means frame rates will be GPU-limited.

The 4 GB frame buffer will constrain texture size and resolution in demanding titles. The 8 RT cores provide ray-traced effects, but the GPU's 112 GB/s bandwidth will limit ray-traced scenes. Since no measured FPS data exists, exact frame rate expectations cannot be given — only that the CPU will be the strong partner and the GPU the limiting one.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 + Intel Arc A370M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395

Intel Arc A370M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Usage Scenarios

Benchmark Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

Balance and Bottleneck

FAQ

Who Should Build It

CPU Analysis

Build Overview

GPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds