SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 + Intel Arc A350M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

95 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 5% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
97%
VS
GPU
92%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395

77,740 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A350M

24,647 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 is a 16-core, 32-thread mobile processor based on the Zen 5 architecture, built on a 4 nm TSMC process. The Intel Arc A350M is a dedicated entry-level mobile GPU with 4 GB of GDDR6 memory, based on the Xe-HPG architecture. The benchmark data shows a pairing that is exceptionally strong in CPU-bound tasks but noticeably weaker in GPU-bound scenarios, with the CPU sitting in the 95th percentile and the GPU in the 70th percentile.

CPU Analysis

The Ryzen AI Max+ 395 features 16 cores and 32 threads, operating at a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. This configuration is built on the Zen 5 architecture, codenamed Strix Halo, and is manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC. The processor uses a dual-die design with each die measuring 70.6 mm². Cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and a substantial 64 MB of shared L3 cache, which is critical for workloads that benefit from large pooled data.

The data shows outstanding multi-threaded performance. In Cinebench R23, the processor scores 35,314 points in multi-core and 2,044 in single-core. The multi-core score places it in the 95th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 77,740. Comparing to its nearest rivals, the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 is 1.6% ahead of the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX and 1.6% ahead of the AMD EPYC Embedded 8224P. It trails the Intel Core i9-14900K by 1.7%, but beats the AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX by 2.0%. This level of performance is exceptional for a mobile part, matching or exceeding desktop-class processors in heavily threaded workloads.

Geekbench results reinforce this picture: a multi-core score of 20,992 and a single-core score of 2,464. The Passmark suite shows specific strengths: integer math at 200,665, floating-point math at 128,682, and extended instructions at 56,346. Data compression scores 690,650, while data encryption hits 35,455. The multi-thread score is 54,934, with a single-thread score of 4,147. The physics score is 3,481, and random string sorting finishes at 76,177. The find prime numbers score of 303 is relatively lower, suggesting that while the core count helps throughput, certain integer-heavy algorithms may not scale as efficiently.

For real workloads, these scores indicate that the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 can handle video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation with ease. The 64 MB L3 cache and high memory bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s via quad-channel LPDDR5X support data-intensive tasks like large dataset manipulation and virtual machine hosting. The single-core score of 2,044 in Cinebench R23 suggests strong responsiveness in everyday applications and lightly threaded games, though it is not the absolute leader in that metric.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A350M is a compact mobile GPU with 768 shading units, 48 texture mapping units, and 24 raster operation units. It operates at a base clock of 1150 MHz and a boost clock of 2200 MHz. The memory subsystem consists of 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 112.0 GB/s. The memory clock is 1750 MHz, translating to 14 Gbps effective. The GPU includes 6 RT cores for ray tracing, though it has no dedicated tensor cores listed.

The Arc A350M's raw compute figures are modest: FP32 performance is 3.379 TFLOPS, and FP16 is 6.758 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio. Pixel rate is 52.80 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 105.6 GTexel/s. The GPU is manufactured on a 6 nm TSMC process with 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die. Benchmark results show a Geekbench OpenCL score of 24,546 and a Vulkan score of 24,747, giving an average benchmark score of 24,647 and placing it in the 70th percentile of all GPUs.

Against its nearest rivals, the Arc A350M is essentially tied with several older or higher-tier parts. It is 0.4% behind the AMD Radeon RX 590, 0.5% behind the NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile, 0.8% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT, and 1.5% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630. These deltas are within noise, meaning the Arc A350M performs at a level similar to a desktop RX 590 or a GTX 1630. For a mobile GPU with a 25 W TDP, this is respectable, but it is clearly an entry-level solution.

In rendering tasks, the 4 GB VRAM is a limiting factor for modern textures and high-resolution assets. The 112.0 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient for 1080p gaming at medium settings but will struggle with 1440p or high-detail work. The RT cores are present, but with only 6 of them and modest FP32 throughput, ray tracing will be a feature for occasional use rather than a primary capability. The API support is strong, including DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern titles and applications.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Ryzen AI Max+ 395 uses the AMD Socket FP11 and is a mobile part, meaning the upgrade path is limited to the laptop itself rather than component swapping. The processor supports LPDDR5X memory in a quad-channel configuration, providing 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is generous for a mobile platform. ECC memory is supported, which is a notable feature for workstation-class tasks where data integrity is paramount.

PCIe connectivity is Gen 4 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The integrated graphics is a Radeon 8060S, which is a powerful iGPU in its own right, though not benchmarked here. The processor's TDP is 55 W, which is high for a laptop CPU but manageable with a capable cooling solution. The GPU has a TDP of 25 W, and the suggested PSU is not specified, so power supply headroom cannot be quantified from the data. The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which is adequate for its bandwidth needs.

A sensible next upgrade for this system, within the constraints of a laptop, would be to ensure the system has sufficient RAM and storage, as those are often the only user-serviceable components. The CPU's performance ceiling is high enough that it will not be the bottleneck in most tasks; the GPU is the limiting factor. Therefore, users should prioritize maximizing memory capacity and speed, as the quad-channel LPDDR5X will feed the CPU effectively. The platform is not designed for discrete GPU upgrades, so the Arc A350M is the permanent graphics solution unless using an external GPU enclosure, which is not supported by the data.

Who Should Build It

This build targets users who need exceptional CPU horsepower in a mobile form factor but do not require high-end graphics. The 95th percentile CPU performance makes it ideal for software developers compiling large codebases, students running virtual machines or data analysis, and small business workstations handling spreadsheets, databases, and documentation. The multi-core Cinebench R23 score of 35,314 is strong enough for video editing and 3D rendering as a hobby or semi-professional endeavor, though the GPU will slow down real-time previews.

Gamers at 1080p with moderate settings will find the Arc A350M acceptable, but those seeking high-refresh or high-detail experiences should look elsewhere. Content creators working with 4K footage will benefit from the CPU's encoding capabilities, but the 4 GB VRAM will limit GPU-accelerated effects. For professional workstation users, the ECC memory support and high core count make this a compelling option for scientific computing or financial modeling, where CPU throughput is paramount. The 83rd combined percentile indicates a well-above-average overall system, but the imbalance between CPU and GPU is the defining characteristic.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data clearly shows a CPU-bound system. The Ryzen AI Max+ 395 sits in the 95th percentile of all CPUs, while the Arc A350M sits in the 70th percentile of all GPUs. This 25-percentage-point gap means the CPU will routinely outpace the GPU in workloads that use both. In gaming, the CPU will prepare frames far faster than the GPU can render them, especially at higher resolutions where the GPU is the primary constraint.

For CPU-bound tasks like compilation, rendering, and data processing, the system is well-balanced because the GPU is not involved. For GPU-bound tasks like gaming at 1440p or higher, the Arc A350M becomes the limiting factor, and the CPU's power is wasted waiting for the GPU to catch up. The GPU's average benchmark score of 24,647 is comparable to a desktop RX 590, which is a mid-range part from several generations ago. This means that in modern games at ultra settings, the GPU will struggle to maintain high frame rates, regardless of the CPU's capabilities.

The FPS scaling evidence, though not measured, can be inferred from the percentiles. At 1080p, the GPU may be the bottleneck in demanding titles, while at lower resolutions or with reduced settings, the CPU can push higher frame rates. The system's balance is optimized for productivity and multitasking rather than gaming or GPU-accelerated rendering.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, and the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data. Therefore, all frame rate discussions are estimates based on the benchmark scores. The Arc A350M's performance is comparable to the AMD Radeon RX 590, which is a 1080p-class GPU. In esports titles like CS:GO or League of Legends, the CPU's strong single-core performance will allow for high frame rates, potentially exceeding 100 FPS at 1080p with low to medium settings.

For more demanding AAA titles at 1080p ultra settings, the GPU will be the constraint. The 4 GB VRAM will limit texture quality, and the 3.379 TFLOPS FP32 throughput will struggle with modern rendering techniques. Expect playable frame rates in the 30-50 FPS range for titles like Cyberpunk 2077 or Assassin's Creed, assuming medium settings. At 1440p, the GPU will likely fail to maintain 30 FPS in most modern games, making 1080p the practical ceiling.

Ray tracing is technically supported via the 6 RT cores, but performance will be poor. The low pixel rate of 52.80 GPixel/s means that resolution scaling will be noticeable. The GPU is best suited for older titles, indie games, or competitive shooters at 1080p with competitive settings. The CPU will never be the bottleneck in gaming; the GPU is the definitive limiting factor.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 77,740, which places it in the 95th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i9-14900K, scores 79,097, meaning the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 is 1.7% behind a top-tier desktop processor. It is ahead of the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX by 1.6%, the AMD EPYC Embedded 8224P by 1.6%, and the AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX by 2.0%. The Geekbench multi-core score of 20,992 and single-core of 2,464 are strong for a mobile part.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 24,647, placing it in the 70th percentile of all GPUs. Its closest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 590, scores 24,744, a delta of -0.4%. The NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile scores 24,763, a delta of -0.5%. The AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT scores 24,442, meaning the Arc A350M is 0.8% ahead. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 scores 24,277, with the Arc A350M 1.5% ahead. This shows the GPU is firmly in the mid-range of past generations.

The combined percentile is 83, reflecting the system's overall position. The CPU is elite, the GPU is mid-pack. The combined picture is a workstation-grade laptop that can handle intensive CPU workloads but is not designed for high-end gaming or GPU rendering.

Build Overview

This build pairs the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395, a 16-core mobile processor, with the Intel Arc A350M, a 4 GB entry-level mobile GPU, in a laptop form factor. The CPU is a Zen 5 Strix Halo part with a TDP of 55 W, while the GPU is an Alchemist Arc 3 Mobile part with a TDP of 25 W. The system's combined percentile is 83, which is solidly above average, but the distribution is heavily skewed toward the CPU.

The CPU is in the 95th percentile, making it one of the fastest mobile processors available. The GPU is in the 70th percentile, which is decent for an integrated-level dedicated GPU but not impressive by modern standards. This is a system for users who prioritize computation over graphics. It is an excellent choice for developers, data scientists, and power users who need massive multi-threading, but it is a poor choice for gamers or 3D artists who rely heavily on GPU acceleration. The overall tier is high-end CPU with mid-range GPU, resulting in a lopsided but capable machine.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's benchmark percentile?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 is in the 95th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 77,740.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the Intel Core i9-14900K?

A: The Ryzen AI Max+ 395 is 1.7% behind the Intel Core i9-14900K in average benchmark score, with scores of 77,740 and 79,097 respectively.

Q: What is the GPU's VRAM and bandwidth?

A: The Intel Arc A350M has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 112.0 GB/s.

Q: Is the GPU comparable to any desktop parts?

A: Yes, the Arc A350M is 0.4% behind the AMD Radeon RX 590 in average benchmark score, and 1.5% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile for the CPU and GPU pairing is 83.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 supports ECC memory, alongside LPDDR5X in a quad-channel configuration.

Q: What is the gaming performance expectation?

A: No measured FPS data exists for this combination. Based on the GPU's benchmark scores, which are comparable to a Radeon RX 590, 1080p gaming at medium settings is the practical expectation, with lower frame rates at higher resolutions.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming is possible only in esports titles at 1080p, where the CPU's single-core score of 2,464 in Geekbench can drive high frame rates, but the GPU's modest 3.379 TFLOPS will cap performance in demanding games. Streaming is viable, as the CPU's 16 cores can handle encoding via software without significant impact on other tasks, though the GPU's 4 GB VRAM may limit game quality settings while streaming. Video editing in 1080p will be smooth due to the CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35,314, but 4K editing will be hampered by the GPU's limited memory and bandwidth.

3D rendering in CPU-based engines like Blender's Cycles will be excellent, with the multi-thread Passmark score of 54,934 indicating strong throughput, but GPU-accelerated renders will be slow due to the Arc A350M's compute capability. Software development is a prime use case, as the 16 cores and 32 threads, along with a Passmark integer math score of 200,665, will handle compilation and testing environments efficiently. Student and office work will be effortless, with the CPU's high single-thread performance ensuring responsive applications, and the ECC memory support providing stability for long-running calculations. The system is a productivity powerhouse that can handle light gaming, making it suitable for professionals who need CPU performance first and foremost.