SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 + Intel Arc B390

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

87 Score

Top 13% Ranking

87 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 13% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

GPU Bottleneck

CPU

98%

GPU

77%

Your GPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a more powerful graphics card to better utilize your CPU.

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392

90,541 Benchmark Score

Top 2% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc B390

1,482 Benchmark Score

Top 23% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

GPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 + Intel Arc B390

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 paired with the Intel Arc B390 is a laptop-class combination that lands in the 53rd percentile overall among all CPU+GPU pairings, placing it squarely in the mid-range of the performance distribution. The CPU is a high-end mobile processor with a 96th percentile rank among all CPUs, while the GPU sits at just the 9th percentile among all GPUs, creating an extreme imbalance where the processor vastly outclasses the graphics solution. This pairing delivers exceptional compute and productivity throughput but severely limited graphics capability, making it unsuitable for gaming beyond light or older titles.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 is a 12-core, 24-thread mobile processor built on TSMC's 4 nm process node, using the Zen 5 architecture under the Strix Halo codename. Its base clock is 3.20 GHz with a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, and it carries a 55 W TDP. The chip uses the AMD Socket FP11 and supports LPDDR5X memory over a quad-channel bus with 256.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth and ECC support. The CPU provides Gen 4 PCIe with 16 lanes and includes integrated Radeon 8060S graphics.

The cache hierarchy consists of 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 64 MB of shared L3 cache. The die size is listed as 2x 70.6 mm², indicating a dual-die configuration. With a production status of Active and a release date of January 5, 2026, this is a current-generation part aimed at high-performance mobile workloads.

Benchmark results show a PassMark multithread score of 45,231 and a single-thread score of 3,927. The average benchmark score across all tests is 90,541, which places the CPU in the 96th percentile of all CPUs. In integer math, the chip scores 152,414; in floating-point math, 99,548; and in extended instructions, 45,666. Data compression scores 554,760, data encryption scores 27,784, and random string sorting scores 59,487. Physics testing yields 2,887, and prime number finding scores 320.

Against its nearest rivals, the Ryzen AI Max+ 392 trails the Intel Xeon 654 by 0.2% (90,717 vs 90,541) and the AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX by 0.7% (91,199 vs 90,541). It leads the Intel Xeon w7-2575X by 2.7% (88,172 vs 90,541) and the Intel Xeon 6736P by 3% (87,864 vs 90,541). This places the chip in a tight cluster with enterprise Xeon processors and the top mobile Ryzen part, indicating that for multi-threaded workloads the Ryzen AI Max+ 392 is essentially at parity with the fastest mobile silicon available.

The 12-core/24-thread configuration with 64 MB of L3 cache makes this CPU exceptionally strong for heavily threaded tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation. The single-thread score of 3,927 is competitive with desktop-class parts, meaning everyday responsiveness and lightly threaded applications will run smoothly. The 256.0 GB/s memory bandwidth, enabled by quad-channel LPDDR5X, is particularly notable for integrated-graphics scenarios and memory-bound compute tasks.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc B390 is an integrated graphics processor built on Intel's 3 nm process using the Xe3-LPG architecture, part of the Panther Lake chip and the Arc Graphics-M (Panther Lake) generation. It operates with a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 2500 MHz. The GPU has 1,536 shading units, 48 texture mapping units, and 24 raster output pipelines, along with 12 ray tracing cores. Its pixel rate is 60.00 GPixel/s and texture rate is 120.0 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is rated at 7.680 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 15.36 TFLOPS (2:1). The GPU's TDP is 80 W, and it uses system-shared memory with bandwidth that is system dependent.

Memory is entirely system-shared, meaning the GPU draws from the CPU's LPDDR5X pool. In this pairing, the Ryzen AI Max+ 392 provides 256.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth, which is generous for an integrated GPU and should reduce some of the typical shared-memory bottlenecks. However, the GPU itself is the limiting factor regardless of available bandwidth.

The only benchmark score available is 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, where the Arc B390 scores 1,482. This places the GPU in the 9th percentile among all GPUs, which is an extremely low position. Its nearest rivals are all legacy NVIDIA parts: the GeForce GT 520MX (score 1,463, deltaPct 1.3%), GeForce 800M (score 1,460, deltaPct 1.5%), GeForce GT 625 OEM (score 1,446, deltaPct 2.5%), and GeForce GT 710 (score 1,443, deltaPct 2.7%). The Arc B390 leads each of these by small margins, but these rivals are over a decade old and represent entry-level desktop and mobile graphics from that era.

For rendering workloads, the 7.680 TFLOPS FP32 figure is modest by modern standards, and the 12 ray tracing cores are present but limited in number. The 60.00 GPixel/s pixel rate and 120.0 GTexel/s texture rate are sufficient for basic 2D and light 3D tasks but will struggle with modern game engines at higher resolutions or detail settings. The DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) API support and Vulkan 1.4 compatibility mean the GPU is feature-complete from a software standpoint, but raw performance is the constraint. This is not a GPU designed for demanding rendering work; it is a basic integrated solution for productivity and media consumption.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The measuredFpsUltraByGame field is empty, and dataIsMeasured is false. Therefore, all gaming performance figures presented here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores, not measured results.

Based on the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1,482 and its 9th percentile ranking, gaming performance will be limited to low resolutions and modest settings. The nearest GPU rivals — GT 520MX, GeForce 800M, GT 625 OEM, and GT 710 — are all parts that cannot handle modern AAA titles at acceptable frame rates. The Arc B390's 7.680 TFLOPS FP32 throughput does provide some raw compute, but the 24 ROPs and 48 TMUs will bottleneck fill-rate-heavy workloads.

At 1080p with low settings, esports titles and older games should be playable, but modern demanding games will likely run at low frame rates. The CPU's strong single-thread score of 3,927 prevents it from being a bottleneck in gaming, so the GPU will be the sole constraint. The system-shared memory with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth helps the GPU access data quickly, but the GPU's compute and rasterization resources are simply too limited for high-refresh gaming. Frame generation, ray tracing, or high-detail presets are not realistic expectations for this pairing. The 12 RT cores are present but their performance level, given the overall GPU percentile, suggests ray-traced workloads will run at very low frame rates.

Balance and Bottleneck

This pairing is dramatically unbalanced, with the CPU in the 96th percentile and the GPU in the 9th percentile. The CPU is one of the fastest mobile processors available, while the GPU is among the slowest in the current database. In any graphics-intensive workload — gaming, 3D rendering, video encoding with GPU acceleration — the Arc B390 will be the limiting factor by a wide margin.

The CPU's average benchmark score of 90,541 against the GPU's 1,482 illustrates the gulf in capability. In CPU-bound tasks like data compression (554,760), integer math (152,414), and floating-point math (99,548), the Ryzen AI Max+ 392 performs at a level comparable to enterprise Xeon processors. The GPU does not contribute to these workloads, and the CPU handles them independently.

In mixed workloads, such as gaming where the CPU handles game logic and physics while the GPU renders frames, the CPU will finish its work quickly and wait for the GPU. The PassMark physics score of 2,887 and single-thread score of 3,927 confirm that game logic and AI calculations will proceed without CPU constraint. The FPS ceiling will be set entirely by the GPU. For productivity tasks that are CPU-bound, the system performs at a high level; for anything GPU-bound, performance drops to the 9th percentile level. The combined percentile of 53 reflects this averaging of extremes, not a balanced system.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 90,541, placing it in the 96th percentile of all CPUs. This is a top-tier result, with the chip trailing the Intel Xeon 654 by just 0.2% and the AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX by 0.7%, while leading the Intel Xeon w7-2575X by 2.7% and the Intel Xeon 6736P by 3%. The multithread score of 45,231 and single-thread score of 3,927 are both strong, and the data compression score of 554,760 is particularly high, suggesting excellent performance in compression and archival workloads.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 1,482 on 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, placing it in the 9th percentile of all GPUs. It leads the GeForce GT 520MX by 1.3%, GeForce 800M by 1.5%, GeForce GT 625 OEM by 2.5%, and GeForce GT 710 by 2.7%. These margins are small, and all rivals are older, low-end parts.

The combined picture is of a system where the CPU carries the entire performance load. The combined percentile of 53 is a midpoint that obscures the extremes. In CPU-heavy tasks, this system performs like a high-end workstation; in GPU-heavy tasks, it performs like a decade-old entry-level laptop. The data shows a platform designed for compute and productivity, not graphics.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: Not viable. The GPU's 9th percentile ranking and 1,482 Steel Nomad score indicate frame rates far below what high-refresh monitors require, even at 1080p low settings. The CPU is not the constraint, but the GPU cannot deliver the frames.

Streaming: The CPU's 24 threads and strong multithread score of 45,231 can handle software encoding for streaming while gaming, but the GPU's low performance means the game itself will run poorly. Streaming older or light titles may work, but modern games will not.

Video editing: CPU-based editing and encoding will perform well given the 99,548 floating-point score and 152,414 integer score. However, GPU-accelerated effects and rendering will be slow due to the Arc B390's 7.680 TFLOPS FP32 and limited ROPs.

3D rendering: CPU rendering (e.g., ray tracing on CPU) will benefit from 12 cores and 24 threads, with performance comparable to Xeon-class parts. GPU rendering will be severely limited by the 9th percentile GPU, making this a poor choice for GPU-accelerated renderers.

Software development: Compilation and build tasks will excel. The high integer math score of 152,414 and data compression score of 554,760 indicate fast code compilation, packaging, and archival operations. The 64 MB L3 cache further aids repeated compilation tasks.

Student and office work: Fully adequate. The CPU's single-thread score of 3,927 handles document editing, spreadsheet calculations, and web browsing smoothly. The GPU is sufficient for 2D desktop compositing and video playback. Office workloads will not stress either component meaningfully.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users whose primary workload is CPU-intensive compute on a laptop platform. Software developers compiling large codebases will benefit from the 24 threads and high integer performance. Researchers and analysts working with large datasets will use the 256.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 64 MB L3 cache effectively. Students in engineering or scientific fields who run simulations or data analysis tools will find the CPU adequate.

Small business workstations running database operations, financial modeling, or server-side tasks in a mobile form factor are a plausible use case, given the CPU's parity with Xeon processors. Content creators who work primarily in CPU-bound workflows — such as audio processing, batch photo editing, or CPU-rendered 3D — may find value, provided they do not need GPU acceleration.

Gamers at any resolution should avoid this build. The GPU's 9th percentile ranking makes even 720p low settings questionable for modern titles. Users who need integrated graphics for basic display output while relying on external GPU docks or cloud rendering may find the CPU compelling, but this is a niche scenario.

Build Overview

This build combines the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392, a 12-core/24-thread mobile CPU with Zen 5 architecture, with the Intel Arc B390, an integrated GPU based on Xe3-LPG with 1,536 shading units. The build class is laptop, and the combined percentile is 53, indicating a mid-range overall position driven by the CPU's 96th percentile and GPU's 9th percentile.

The system is best described as a compute-focused mobile platform. The CPU delivers performance comparable to enterprise Xeon processors in multi-threaded workloads, with a 0.2% deficit to the Intel Xeon 654 and a 2.7% lead over the Intel Xeon w7-2575X. The GPU, however, sits at the bottom of the performance distribution, comparable to NVIDIA parts from the early 2010s. Users should treat this as a CPU-centric system with basic graphics capability, not a balanced multimedia or gaming platform.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's percentile ranking among all CPUs?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 is in the 96th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 90,541.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rivals in 3DMark Steel Nomad?

A: The Intel Arc B390 scores 1,482, leading the NVIDIA GeForce GT 520MX by 1.3%, GeForce 800M by 1.5%, GeForce GT 625 OEM by 2.5%, and GeForce GT 710 by 2.7%.

Q: What memory bandwidth does the CPU support?

A: The CPU supports LPDDR5X memory over a quad-channel bus with 256.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth, and it also supports ECC memory.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for gaming performance?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this combination. All gaming performance discussion is based on benchmark score estimates.

Q: What is the CPU's architecture and process node?

A: The CPU uses Zen 5 architecture (Strix Halo codename) built on TSMC's 4 nm process, with a die size of 2x 70.6 mm².

Q: How many cores and threads does the CPU have?

A: The CPU has 12 cores and 24 threads, with a base clock of 3.20 GHz and boost clock of 5.00 GHz.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 53, which is the midpoint of the CPU's 96th percentile and GPU's 9th percentile.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 + Intel Arc B390

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392

Intel Arc B390

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Bottleneck Detected

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

GPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Benchmark Performance

Usage Scenarios

Who Should Build It

Build Overview

FAQ

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds