SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 + Intel Arc B370

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

87 Score

Top 13% Ranking

87 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 13% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

GPU Bottleneck

CPU

98%

GPU

76%

Your GPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a more powerful graphics card to better utilize your CPU.

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392

90,541 Benchmark Score

Top 2% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc B370

1,184 Benchmark Score

Top 24% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

GPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 + Intel Arc B370: A High-CPU, Entry-GPU Mobile Hybrid

This pairing presents a striking asymmetry: a top-tier 12-core Zen 5 mobile processor with a 96th-percentile CPU benchmark ranking, matched with an integrated-class Intel Arc B370 GPU that sits at the 5th percentile among all GPUs. The data shows a system built for heavy compute and multitasking, not for graphics-intensive gaming. The CPU is a genuine powerhouse, trading blows with workstation-class Xeon parts, while the GPU delivers only entry-level 3D performance. This is a laptop configuration for developers, analysts, and productivity users who need serious multi-threaded muscle, not for gamers seeking high frame rates. There are no measured FPS rows for this exact combination in the FACT PACK; all gaming discussion below is estimated from the benchmark scores.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is anchored by the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392, which uses the AMD Socket FP11 and is built on the Zen 5 architecture (codenamed Strix Halo). This is a mobile-class socket, meaning the upgrade path is essentially limited to what the laptop chassis offers; the processor is not user-upgradeable in the traditional desktop sense. The CPU supports LPDDR5X memory over a Quad-channel bus, delivering a substantial 256.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth. This wide memory interface is a key differentiator, as it provides the CPU with ample data throughput for compute-heavy workloads like data compression and encryption, which the benchmark scores reflect.

Memory support includes ECC memory, a feature typically reserved for workstation and server platforms. This makes the platform viable for error-sensitive tasks such as financial modeling, scientific computing, or long-running data processing where data integrity is paramount. The CPU provides Gen 4, 16 Lanes (CPU only) for PCIe connectivity, which is sufficient for a fast NVMe SSD and a discrete GPU, though the system also carries an integrated GPU. The 55 W TDP for the CPU is modest for a 12-core part, indicating a design focused on sustained multi-threaded performance within a mobile power envelope.

For a sensible next upgrade, users should focus on the GPU side, as the CPU is already near the top of its class. The Intel Arc B370 is an integrated graphics solution with a 25 W TDP and no power connectors, drawing power from the system. Given the CPU's 96th-percentile ranking, the most impactful upgrade would be pairing it with a significantly more capable discrete GPU. However, the PCIe Gen 4 lanes and the mobile form factor limit this to what the specific laptop model supports. The 256.0 GB/s memory bandwidth is a strong foundation for such an upgrade, ensuring the CPU and a future discrete GPU would not be starved for data. The platform's ECC support and high core count suggest that the intended upgrade path is toward more serious workstation tasks, rather than gaming.

Balance and Bottleneck

This system is heavily unbalanced, with the CPU vastly outperforming the GPU. The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 scores in the 96th percentile among all CPUs, while the Intel Arc B370 sits in the 5th percentile among all GPUs. In any workload that relies on graphics processing, the GPU will be the primary bottleneck. The CPU will be left waiting for the GPU to complete rendering tasks, which is evident in the 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1184, a very low figure that places the GPU near the bottom of the database.

In compute-heavy workloads that do not involve graphics, the CPU is the dominant performer. The PassMark multithread score of 45231 and floating-point math score of 99548 indicate that the processor is capable of handling complex calculations and multi-threaded tasks without breaking a sweat. The bottleneck there would be memory bandwidth or storage speed, not the CPU cores. The PassMark data compression score of 554760 is exceptionally high, suggesting that the CPU can process large datasets quickly, but the GPU cannot render the results visually at a similar pace.

The combined percentile for this pair is 51, which reflects the average of the two extremes. Benchmark results indicate that in gaming, the frame rate will be dictated almost entirely by the GPU. In productivity applications like video editing, the CPU will handle encoding and effects processing, but the GPU will struggle with real-time previews or GPU-accelerated effects. The system is best suited for tasks where the CPU does the heavy lifting and the GPU is used for basic display output or light acceleration.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU benchmarks are impressive across the board. The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 achieves a PassMark multithread score of 45231, placing it in the 96th percentile of all CPUs. Its PassMark single-thread score is 3927, which is strong for a mobile part. The data shows strong performance in specific workloads: integer math at 152414, floating-point math at 99548, and extended instructions at 45666. The data encryption score is 27784, and the data compression score is 554760, the latter being a standout figure for server-like tasks. The random string sorting score is 59487, and the find prime numbers score is 320.

The CPU's average benchmark score is 90541, which is nearly identical to its nearest rivals. It trails the Intel Xeon 654 by -0.2% (score 90717), the AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX by -0.7% (score 91199), and leads the Intel Xeon w7-2575X by 2.7% (score 88172) and the Intel Xeon 6736P by 3.0% (score 87864). This places the Ryzen AI Max+ 392 in the same performance tier as workstation-class Xeon processors, which is remarkable for a mobile CPU. The PassMark physics score is 2887, indicating solid performance for simulation tasks.

The GPU benchmarks are starkly different. The Intel Arc B370 scores 1184 in 3DMark Steel Nomad (DX12). This places it in the 5th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 (score 1186, delta -0.2%), ATI Radeon HD 5770 (score 1190, delta -0.5%), and AMD Radeon HD 7650M (score 1192, delta -0.7%). The data shows it is slightly ahead of the AMD FirePro M2000 (score 1168, delta 1.4%). This is legacy-level performance, and the combined picture is a system that excels at CPU-bound tasks but fails at GPU-bound ones.

Gaming Performance

There are no measured FPS rows for this exact combination in the FACT PACK, so all frame rates discussed here are estimates based on the benchmark scores. The Intel Arc B370 GPU's 3DMark score of 1184 is in the 5th percentile, which strongly suggests that gaming performance will be very low. The GPU's 6.144 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 48.00 GPixel/s pixel rate are figures that align with entry-level integrated graphics from several generations ago.

For esports titles at low resolutions and settings, the system might achieve playable frame rates around 30-60 FPS, but this is speculative. For modern AAA titles, the expected performance is poor, likely below 30 FPS even at 1080p with low settings. The Radeon 8060S integrated graphics on the CPU are not used in this configuration, as the system is paired with the Intel Arc B370. The CPU's high single-thread score of 3927 will help avoid CPU-side frame drops, but the GPU will be the limiting factor.

Users should not expect a smooth gaming experience. The system is not designed for gaming, and the benchmark data clearly indicates that any GPU-intensive application will struggle. The 25 W TDP of the GPU confirms its low-power, integrated nature. Frame rates will be estimates only, and the data suggests that this pairing is unsuitable for all but the most basic 2D or legacy 3D games.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets users who prioritize CPU compute performance above all else. The 96th-percentile CPU makes it ideal for content creators who work with large datasets, such as video editors handling 4K or 8K footage, where the multithread score of 45231 and data compression score of 554760 will significantly speed up rendering and export times. Software developers compiling large codebases will benefit from the 12 cores and 24 threads, and the ECC memory support ensures stability during long build processes.

Students in engineering or scientific fields will find the CPU's floating-point math score of 99548 useful for simulations and numerical analysis. Small business workstations running databases or virtual machines will see strong performance, given the CPU's data encryption score of 27784. However, the 5th-percentile GPU means this is not for gamers or 3D designers who need real-time rendering. The target user is someone who needs a powerful mobile workstation for CPU-bound tasks and is willing to accept minimal graphics capability.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc B370 is an integrated GPU built on the Xe3-LPG architecture (chip codename Panther Lake) using Intel's 3 nm process. It has 1280 shading units, 40 texture mapping units, and 20 raster output units. The GPU operates at a base clock of 300 MHz and boosts to 2400 MHz. It includes 10 ray tracing cores, though its performance is not suited for RT workloads given the low overall score.

Memory is System Shared, meaning it uses the main system LPDDR5X memory, with bandwidth described as System Dependent. This is a significant limitation, as the GPU competes with the CPU for memory bandwidth, though the CPU's 256.0 GB/s quad-channel interface helps mitigate this. The GPU's pixel rate is 48.00 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 96.00 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 6.144 TFLOPS, and FP16 is 12.29 TFLOPS (2:1).

The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1184 is the only benchmark, placing it at the 5th percentile. This score indicates that the GPU is only suitable for basic display output, office applications, and video playback. The 12 Ultimate (12_2) DirectX and Vulkan 1.4 API support mean modern games will run, but at very low settings and resolutions. For rendering, the GPU is not viable for any serious 3D work, as its performance is comparable to GPUs from over a decade ago, like the ATI Radeon HD 5770.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 is a 12-core, 24-thread processor based on the Zen 5 architecture (Strix Halo), manufactured on TSMC's 4 nm process. It has a base clock of 3.20 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 64 MB of L3 cache. The CPU supports LPDDR5X memory over a Quad-channel bus, providing 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth, and supports ECC memory.

The PassMark multithread score of 45231 places it in the 96th percentile, rivaling workstation Xeon processors. Its single-thread score of 3927 is strong for a mobile part. The CPU's real-world strengths are in multi-threaded tasks: the integer math score of 152414 and floating-point math score of 99548 indicate excellent performance in number-crunching. The data compression score of 554760 is exceptionally high, making it ideal for file archiving, database operations, and data analytics. The extended instructions score of 45666 shows good support for modern SIMD workloads.

The CPU's 55 W TDP is modest, suggesting efficient power management. The average benchmark score of 90541 is within 1% of the Intel Xeon 654 and AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX, confirming its high-end standing. The 12 cores and 24 threads are well-suited for parallel workloads like video encoding, 3D rendering (CPU-based), and software compilation. The ECC support is a differentiator for workstation use, ensuring data integrity in long-running tasks.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's percentile ranking among all CPUs?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 scores in the 96th percentile of all CPUs, indicating top-tier performance.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Intel Arc B370 scores 1184 in 3DMark Steel Nomad, which is -0.2% behind the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 and -0.5% behind the ATI Radeon HD 5770, placing it in the 5th percentile.

Q: Does this system support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports ECC memory, which is a feature typically found in workstation and server platforms.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of this platform?

A: The CPU supports LPDDR5X memory over a Quad-channel bus, providing 256.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth.

Q: What is the CPU's multithread benchmark score?

A: The CPU achieves a PassMark multithread score of 45231, which is a strong result for a mobile processor.

Q: Is this system suitable for modern gaming?

A: No, the GPU's 3DMark score of 1184 is in the 5th percentile, indicating very low gaming performance that would struggle with modern titles.

Q: What is the power consumption of the CPU and GPU?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 55 W, while the GPU has a TDP of 25 W, making this a relatively power-efficient mobile configuration.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This scenario is not viable. The GPU's 5th-percentile score and low 6.144 TFLOPS FP32 performance would not sustain high frame rates, even at 1080p. The CPU's strong single-thread score of 3927 would not compensate for the GPU bottleneck.

Streaming: CPU-based streaming is possible. The multithread score of 45231 can handle encoding at high bitrates, but the GPU cannot render games at high quality, so the overall experience would be poor. The data compression score of 554760 helps with stream encoding efficiency.

Video editing: The CPU's floating-point math score of 99548 accelerates effects and color grading, while the data compression score of 554760 speeds up export. However, GPU-accelerated previews will lag due to the 5th-percentile GPU.

3D rendering: CPU-based rendering is excellent, with the extended instructions score of 45666 and 12 cores providing strong performance. GPU-based rendering is not viable; the 1184 3DMark score is far too low for any modern renderer.

Software development: This is a strong use case. The 12 cores and 24 threads handle compilation well, and the ECC memory support prevents crashes during long builds. The integer math score of 152414 helps with code analysis and static checks.

Student and office work: The CPU's single-thread score of 3927 ensures snappy responsiveness in office applications. The GPU is sufficient for document rendering and spreadsheets. The 256.0 GB/s memory bandwidth ensures smooth multitasking with many open applications.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 + Intel Arc B370

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392

Intel Arc B370

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Bottleneck Detected

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Upgrade Path and Platform

Balance and Bottleneck

Benchmark Performance

Gaming Performance

Who Should Build It

GPU Analysis

CPU Analysis

FAQ

Usage Scenarios

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds