SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 + Intel Arc A570M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

97 Score

Top 3% Ranking

97 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 3% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

98%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392

90,541 Benchmark Score

Top 2% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A570M

58,239 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 and Intel Arc A570M form a laptop-class pairing that ranks in the 92nd percentile overall, placing it well above the typical mobile configuration. The CPU holds a 96th-percentile position among all processors, while the GPU sits at the 88th percentile among all graphics cards. This creates an interesting dynamic where the processor is the stronger component relative to its peers, but the graphics solution remains highly capable in its own right. The data suggests a balanced platform, though the bottleneck profile shifts depending on whether the workload is compute-heavy or graphics-bound.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data indicates a platform where the CPU is the dominant force in most productivity and compute scenarios, but the GPU becomes the limiting factor in pure rasterization and ray-traced workloads. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 90,541 places it within 0.2% of the Intel Xeon 654 and 0.7% of the AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX, showing that it trades blows with top-tier desktop-class silicon. In contrast, the GPU’s average score of 58,239 is only 0.3% behind the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT, a high-end desktop part, meaning the graphics side is not a weak link in absolute terms.

However, the balance is not perfectly symmetric. The CPU’s multithreaded score of 45,231 and single-thread score of 3,927 indicate a processor that can feed even a fast GPU without creating a CPU-bound scenario in most games. The GPU’s FP32 throughput of 5.325 TFLOPS and memory bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s are sufficient for high-refresh gaming at 1080p and 1440p, but the 8 GB VRAM capacity may become a constraint in texture-heavy titles at higher resolutions. In CPU-bound workloads like data compression, which scores 554,760, the processor is clearly the workhorse, while in GPU-bound tasks like OpenCL compute, which scores 58,239, the graphics card takes over.

The bottleneck analysis shows that the CPU is the primary driver for productivity software, with its floating-point math score of 99,548 and integer math score of 152,414 indicating strong arithmetic throughput. The GPU becomes the limiting factor in gaming and rendering, where its 16 ray-tracing cores and 64 ROPs are the deciding hardware. The data suggests that users who prioritize multi-threaded productivity will see the CPU stretch its legs, while gamers will find the GPU to be the more relevant component, especially when enabling ray tracing or high-resolution textures.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A570M is built on the Xe-HPG architecture, specifically the DG2-256 chip fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC with 11,500 million transistors on a 269 mm² die. The GPU operates at a base clock of 900 MHz and a boost clock of 1300 MHz, with memory running at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). It features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory configuration is adequate for 1080p gaming and light 1440p use, though the bandwidth is modest compared to the CPU’s 256.0 GB/s system memory throughput.

The shading hardware includes 2,048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation processors. The pixel rate is 83.20 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 166.4 GTexel/s. These figures translate to solid 1080p performance, with the FP32 compute rating of 5.325 TFLOPS and FP16 rating of 10.65 TFLOPS (2:1) providing headroom for compute-accelerated effects. The 16 ray-tracing cores are present but not abundant, meaning ray-traced workloads will show playable but not exceptional frame rates. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern game APIs and rendering engines.

The Geekbench OpenCL score of 58,239 places the GPU at the 88th percentile, with its nearest rival being the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT at a delta of -0.3%. This is a remarkable result for a mobile part, indicating that the A570M can compete with high-end desktop GPUs from previous generations. The 8 GB VRAM is the primary limitation for 4K texture sets or heavy modding, but for standard gaming scenarios, the memory size is sufficient. The 128-bit bus width constrains bandwidth, but the effective 14 Gbps speed mitigates this somewhat, making the GPU a strong choice for 1080p ultra settings and competitive 1440p play.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming at 1080p, the Arc A570M’s 5.325 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 83.20 GPixel/s pixel rate are well-suited to pushing frame rates past 144 FPS in esports titles. The 224.0 GB/s memory bandwidth ensures that texture streaming keeps up with fast camera movements, while the 16 RT cores allow for ray-traced effects at reduced settings without collapsing frame times.

Streaming on this platform benefits from the CPU’s 12 cores and 24 threads, which provide ample headroom for encoding workloads alongside game rendering. The passmark_multithread score of 45,231 indicates that the processor can handle simultaneous game, encoder, and chat applications without significant degradation, while the GPU’s OpenCL score of 58,239 ensures that hardware-accelerated encoding or stream effects do not stall.

Video editing workloads are dominated by the CPU’s floating-point math score of 99,548, which accelerates timeline scrubbing, color grading, and export encoding. The 64 MB of shared L3 cache helps keep large media files resident, while the GPU’s 8 GB VRAM and 166.4 GTexel/s texture rate assist with effects previews and GPU-accelerated filters.

3D rendering tasks will split the load between CPU and GPU, with the CPU’s integer math score of 152,414 handling geometry calculations and the GPU’s FP32 throughput of 5.325 TFLOPS accelerating ray tracing and shading. The 12 cores and 24 threads provide strong multi-threaded rendering performance, as evidenced by the 45,231 multithread score, which rivals desktop Xeon processors.

Software development is a strong suit for this platform, given the CPU’s single-thread score of 3,927 for compilation and the extended instructions score of 45,666 for SIMD-optimized code. The 24 threads handle parallel builds efficiently, while the quad-channel LPDDR5X memory with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth reduces cache misses during large project compilations.

Student and office work is handled with ease by the CPU’s 96th-percentile ranking, which ensures responsive application launches and smooth multitasking. The data encryption score of 27,784 and random string sorting score of 59,487 indicate strong performance for database and spreadsheet tasks, while the integrated Radeon 8060S graphics provide a backup for GPU-accelerated workloads when the discrete GPU is idle.

Who Should Build It

This laptop configuration targets users who need desktop-class CPU performance without sacrificing GPU capability. Gamers playing at 1080p or 1440p will find the GPU’s 88th-percentile ranking sufficient for high settings, while the CPU’s 96th percentile ensures no frame drops from processor bottlenecks. Content creators who edit video or render 3D scenes will benefit from the 12 cores and 24 threads, which outperform the Intel Xeon 654 by 0.2% in average benchmark score, making this a viable mobile workstation.

Software developers compiling large codebases or running virtual machines will appreciate the 24 threads and 64 MB L3 cache, which reduce context-switching overhead. Students and small business users will find the platform overkill for basic tasks, but the headroom ensures longevity for future software demands. The quad-channel memory system with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth is particularly useful for data-heavy applications like scientific computing or large spreadsheet analysis, where the CPU’s integer math score of 152,414 shines. The 8 GB GPU memory is a limiting factor for 4K gaming or massive asset libraries, so users targeting those workloads should look elsewhere, but for the vast majority of mobile use cases, this pairing is well-balanced.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 is a mobile processor built on the Zen 5 architecture, codenamed Strix Halo, fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC. It features 12 cores and 24 threads, with a base clock of 3.20 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The CPU is configured for the AMD Socket FP11 and has a TDP of 55 W, making it a high-performance mobile part that still fits within laptop thermal envelopes. The die is composed of two 70.6 mm² chiplets, and the cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 64 MB of shared L3 cache.

Memory support includes LPDDR5X with a quad-channel interface, delivering 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is exceptional for a mobile platform and supports ECC memory. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes, and it includes integrated Radeon 8060S graphics as a fallback. The release date is January 5, 2026, and it is currently in active production. The benchmark results show a multithread score of 45,231 and a single-thread score of 3,927, placing the processor at the 96th percentile among all CPUs.

The average benchmark score of 90,541 is remarkably close to the Intel Xeon 654 at 90,717 (delta -0.2%) and the AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX at 91,199 (delta -0.7%), while beating the Intel Xeon w7-2575X by 2.7% and the Intel Xeon 6736P by 3%. This places the mobile chip in the same performance class as server and high-end desktop processors, which confirms the Zen 5 architecture’s efficiency. The floating-point math score of 99,548 and integer math score of 152,414 indicate strong arithmetic capabilities, while the data compression score of 554,760 shows excellent throughput for archival and storage workloads. The extended instructions score of 45,666 highlights the CPU’s ability to accelerate SIMD workloads, and the physics score of 2,887 suggests adequate performance for simulation tasks.

FAQ

Q: What is the performance class of the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392?

A: The CPU holds the 96th percentile among all processors, with an average benchmark score of 90,541, placing it within 0.7% of the AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX and 0.2% of the Intel Xeon 654.

Q: How does the Intel Arc A570M compare to desktop GPUs?

A: The GPU’s Geekbench OpenCL score of 58,239 places it at the 88th percentile, with a delta of only -0.3% against the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT, indicating performance comparable to high-end desktop parts.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the CPU?

A: The CPU supports LPDDR5X memory on a quad-channel interface, delivering 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is higher than the GPU’s 224.0 GB/s GDDR6 bandwidth.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: Yes, the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 includes Radeon 8060S integrated graphics, providing a fallback display output and basic GPU acceleration when the discrete Arc A570M is not in use.

Q: What is the ray-tracing capability of the GPU?

A: The Intel Arc A570M features 16 ray-tracing cores, which support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing in supported games, though the core count is modest for heavy RT workloads.

Q: What is the TDP of the CPU?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 55 W, which is low enough for mobile use while still delivering 12 cores and 24 threads at boost clocks up to 5.00 GHz.

Q: What is the memory bus width of the GPU?

A: The GPU uses a 128-bit memory bus with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory, running at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective), providing 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Benchmark Performance

The combined performance of this platform is represented by a 92nd-percentile ranking, which reflects the CPU’s 96th-percentile and GPU’s 88th-percentile positions. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 90,541 is the primary driver of this high ranking, while the GPU’s average score of 58,239 contributes significantly to the overall capability. The CPU outperforms the Intel Xeon w7-2575X by 2.7% and the Intel Xeon 6736P by 3%, while remaining within 1% of the Intel Xeon 654 and AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX. The GPU is within 0.5% of the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT and 0.7% of the AMD Radeon PRO V710, showing that the graphics side is not a bottleneck in most scenarios.

The CPU’s individual benchmark scores paint a picture of a well-rounded processor: the multithread score of 45,231 and single-thread score of 3,927 are strong for both parallel and latency-sensitive tasks. The data encryption score of 27,784 and data compression score of 554,760 indicate robust security and storage performance, while the floating-point math score of 99,548 and integer math score of 152,414 show balanced arithmetic capabilities. The find prime numbers score of 320 is relatively low, but this is a niche workload that does not reflect typical usage. The random string sorting score of 59,487 and extended instructions score of 45,666 round out the CPU’s profile as a capable general-purpose processor with strong SIMD support.

When combined, the CPU and GPU offer a platform that can handle a wide range of tasks without significant compromise. The CPU’s 24 threads ensure that background processes do not interfere with foreground applications, while the GPU’s 8 GB VRAM and 2048 shading units provide ample graphics horsepower for modern game engines. The data shows that this is not a budget-oriented pairing, but rather a high-performance mobile solution that competes with desktop-class hardware from previous generations.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build, as indicated by the buildClass field, combining the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 mobile processor with the Intel Arc A570M discrete GPU. The CPU is a 12-core, 24-thread Zen 5 part with a 55 W TDP, while the GPU is an Xe-HPG architecture part with a 75 W TDP, making this a power-conscious pairing that still delivers high performance. The combined percentile of 92 places this build in the top tier of laptop configurations, suitable for demanding workloads like video editing, 3D rendering, and high-refresh gaming.

The CPU’s 96th-percentile ranking means it outperforms the vast majority of processors, including many desktop parts, while the GPU’s 88th-percentile ranking ensures that graphics performance is not a weak point. The platform is well-suited for users who need a single device for both productivity and entertainment, as the CPU’s multithread score of 45,231 and GPU’s OpenCL score of 58,239 cover both compute and graphics workloads. The memory configuration, with quad-channel LPDDR5X at 256.0 GB/s on the CPU side and 8 GB GDDR6 at 224.0 GB/s on the GPU side, provides ample bandwidth for most applications. This is a high-tier mobile build that rivals desktop systems from a few years ago, making it a strong choice for power users who require portability without sacrificing performance.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU-GPU combination, so all frame rate figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations rather than verified results. The GPU’s 88th-percentile ranking and OpenCL score of 58,239 suggest that at 1080p with ultra settings, the Arc A570M can deliver playable frame rates in most titles, with esports games likely exceeding 100 FPS given the 5.325 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 83.20 GPixel/s pixel rate. At 1440p, the GPU will still handle high settings in less demanding games, but the 8 GB VRAM and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth may cause performance drops in texture-heavy titles that require more than 8 GB of memory.

The CPU’s single-thread score of 3,927 ensures that it will not bottleneck the GPU in most gaming scenarios, even at high frame rates, while the 24 threads provide headroom for background tasks like Discord or streaming software. The 16 ray-tracing cores enable hardware RT, but the modest core count means that ray-traced effects will require reduced settings or lower resolutions to maintain smooth gameplay. For competitive gamers, the combination of a strong CPU and capable GPU should deliver high and consistent frame rates at 1080p, making this a viable platform for fast-paced shooters and MOBAs. For single-player titles at 1440p, the GPU will require some settings adjustments to hit 60 FPS, but the overall gaming experience is expected to be solid for a laptop-class device.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 + Intel Arc A570M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392

Intel Arc A570M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Balance and Bottleneck

GPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

Who Should Build It

CPU Analysis

FAQ

Benchmark Performance

Build Overview

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds