SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 + Intel Arc A380M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

86 Score

Top 14% Ranking

86 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 14% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

GPU Bottleneck

CPU

98%

GPU

74%

Your GPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a more powerful graphics card to better utilize your CPU.

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392

90,541 Benchmark Score

Top 2% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A380M

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

GPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 and Intel Arc A380M pairing represents a distinct configuration in the mobile computing space, combining a high-end 12-core CPU with a modest, entry-level discrete GPU. The benchmark data shows a significant performance disparity between the two components, with the processor clearly dominating the system's overall capability. The CPU's average benchmark score of 90,541 places it in the 96th percentile among all processors, while the GPU's average benchmark score is listed as 0, with a 50th percentile ranking among all GPUs. This configuration is classified as a laptop build, and its combined percentile ranking is 73, indicating a system that is substantially stronger in CPU-bound tasks than in GPU-accelerated workloads.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance data reveals a stark imbalance between the CPU and GPU in this system. The Ryzen AI Max+ 392's multi-threaded Passmark score of 45,231 and single-thread score of 3,927 are indicative of a processor that can handle demanding computational tasks with ease, placing it in the 96th percentile of all CPUs. In contrast, the Arc A380M's benchmark scores are absent from the data, and its 50th percentile ranking among all GPUs suggests mid-pack performance at best. This configuration will be severely bottlenecked by the GPU in any graphics-intensive workload. The CPU is capable of feeding far more frames than the GPU can render, making the Arc A380M the primary limiting factor in gaming and 3D rendering tasks.

The bottleneck shifts depending on the workload type. For CPU-bound tasks such as data compression, encryption, and software compilation, the Ryzen AI Max+ 392 will perform at its full potential, as evidenced by its strong Passmark scores in integer math (152,414) and floating-point math (99,548). However, in any workload that relies on GPU acceleration, the Arc A380M's 4.096 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 186.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth will be the constraining factor. The CPU's 256.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth is actually higher than the GPU's, which is an unusual situation that further highlights the GPU's limitations. For gaming at any resolution above 1080p, the GPU will be the clear bottleneck, and even at 1080p, the CPU's performance headroom will go largely unused. The data indicates a system where the CPU is over-provisioned relative to the GPU, creating a scenario where users will see excellent performance in productivity and compute tasks but will be limited to low or medium graphics settings in games.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Ryzen AI Max+ 392 is built on the AMD Socket FP11 platform, which is specific to this mobile processor. The CPU supports LPDDR5X memory in a quad-channel configuration, providing 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is a notable advantage for integrated graphics and memory-intensive tasks. ECC memory is supported, a feature typically found in workstation-class systems. The processor provides 16 PCIe Gen 4 lanes, which is the only PCIe connectivity listed for the CPU. The Arc A380M uses an MXM-A (3.1) bus interface, which is a modular form factor commonly found in laptops. This MXM module is a 35W part, and the system's power supply requirements will be dictated by the combined TDP of the CPU (55W) and GPU (35W), totaling 90W for these two components alone.

The upgrade path for this specific configuration is limited by the mobile form factor. The CPU is soldered to the motherboard, and the GPU is an MXM module, which offers some potential for replacement, but this is dependent on the laptop manufacturer's design. A sensible next upgrade would be to replace the Arc A380M with a more powerful MXM module, should one be available and compatible with the system's thermal and power delivery design. However, the data does not provide any information on alternative GPU options. The CPU's 55W TDP and the GPU's 35W TDP suggest a system that is relatively power-efficient, leaving headroom for a higher-TDP GPU in theory, but this is speculative. The platform's support for ECC memory and its high memory bandwidth make it more suited for workstation tasks, but the GPU's limitations would need to be addressed to unlock the full potential of such an upgrade. The lack of a suggested PSU figure and the mobile design indicate that power supply is a fixed aspect of the laptop's design, not a user-serviceable component.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile for this build is 73, which places it in the upper-middle tier of all system configurations. This is heavily influenced by the CPU's 96th percentile ranking, while the GPU sits at the 50th percentile.

Q: How does the Ryzen AI Max+ 392 compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Xeon 654?

A: The Ryzen AI Max+ 392 has an average benchmark score of 90,541, while the Intel Xeon 654 scores 90,717. This puts the Ryzen AI Max+ 392 at a 0.2% performance deficit relative to the Xeon 654, making them statistically equivalent in performance.

Q: What is the memory configuration of the Ryzen AI Max+ 392?

A: The processor supports LPDDR5X memory in a quad-channel configuration, providing 256.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth. It also supports ECC memory, which is a feature commonly associated with workstation-class reliability.

Q: What is the GPU's memory bandwidth, and how does it compare to the CPU's?

A: The Intel Arc A380M has a memory bandwidth of 186.0 GB/s, which is lower than the CPU's 256.0 GB/s. This is an unusual configuration where the CPU has faster memory access than the dedicated GPU, which can exacerbate the GPU bottleneck in memory-intensive graphics workloads.

Q: Does the Arc A380M support modern graphics APIs?

A: Yes, the GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. This means it is technically capable of running games that utilize the latest graphics features, though its raw performance will limit the quality settings.

Q: What is the production status and release date of the CPU and GPU?

A: The CPU is listed as Active with a release date of January 5, 2026. The GPU is also listed as Active, with a release date of January 23, 2023. Both components are currently in production.

Q: Is there any measured FPS data available for this specific combination?

A: No, there are no measured FPS rows for this exact combination. All frame rate discussions are estimates based on the benchmark scores, as the data indicates that the FPS measurements are not measured but estimated.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets users who prioritize CPU compute performance over graphics capability. For software developers, the Ryzen AI Max+ 392's strong multi-threaded performance, evidenced by its Passmark multithread score of 45,231, makes it an excellent choice for compiling code, running virtual machines, and other parallel workloads. Students and researchers in fields like data science or engineering will benefit from the CPU's high integer math score of 152,414 and floating-point math score of 99,548, which accelerate numerical simulations and data analysis. For small business workstations handling spreadsheets, databases, and office productivity, the CPU's 96th percentile ranking ensures smooth multitasking and responsive performance.

However, the Arc A380M limits the system's appeal for gamers and content creators who rely heavily on GPU acceleration. Gamers at 1080p with low to medium settings might find the GPU acceptable for esports titles, but the 50th percentile GPU ranking suggests it is not suited for high-refresh-rate or high-resolution gaming. Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will find the CPU's performance in tasks like data encryption (27,784) and extended instructions (45,666) to be strong, but the GPU's 4.096 TFLOPS of FP32 performance will cause significant bottlenecks in render times and effects processing. This is a system for users who need a powerful CPU for heavy compute tasks and only require basic GPU acceleration for display output and light graphics work.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 is a 12-core, 24-thread processor based on the Zen 5 architecture, codenamed Strix Halo. It operates at a base clock of 3.20 GHz and can boost up to 5.00 GHz, built on a 4 nm process at TSMC with a die size of 2x 70.6 mm². The CPU has a 55W TDP and features a cache hierarchy of 80 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 64 MB of shared L3 cache. This is a mobile processor, part of the Ryzen AI Max generation, and it includes integrated Radeon 8060S graphics.

The benchmark scores paint a picture of a high-performance processor. The Passmark single-thread score of 3,927 is strong, indicating excellent per-core performance that benefits lightly-threaded applications and general responsiveness. The multithread score of 45,231 places the CPU in the 96th percentile of all CPUs, evidence of its ability to handle heavily parallel workloads. Specific scores like integer math (152,414) and floating-point math (99,548) show proficiency in both general-purpose and scientific computing tasks. The data compression score of 554,760 is particularly high, suggesting excellent performance in file archiving and compression utilities. The find prime numbers score of 320 is a notably lower score, but this is a specific test that measures a particular type of integer workload. Compared to its nearest rivals, the CPU is essentially tied with the Intel Xeon 654 (0.2% slower) and AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX (0.7% slower), while being 2.7% faster than the Intel Xeon w7-2575X and 3% faster than the Intel Xeon 6736P. This places the Ryzen AI Max+ 392 in the upper echelon of mobile processors, rivaling some server-class chips in compute throughput.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A380M is a mobile graphics chip based on the Xe-HPG architecture, specifically the Alchemist generation. It is built on a 6 nm process at TSMC, with a die size of 157 mm² and 7,200 million transistors. The GPU has 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 96-bit bus, providing 186.0 GB/s of bandwidth. It operates at a base clock of 1550 MHz with a boost clock of 2000 MHz, and its memory runs at 1937 MHz (15.5 Gbps effective). The GPU has 1,024 shading units, 64 TMUs, and 32 ROPs, along with 8 ray tracing cores. It is a 35W part and is designed for laptops with a 50th percentile ranking among all GPUs.

The benchmark scores for this GPU are empty, so a direct performance comparison is not possible from the data. However, the specifications provide some insight. The FP32 performance of 4.096 TFLOPS is modest by modern standards, indicating that it will handle basic graphics tasks and older or less demanding games at low settings. The 8 ray tracing cores enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing, but the overall compute power will likely limit its effectiveness in enabling ray tracing at playable frame rates in modern titles. The 186.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth is sufficient for 1080p gaming but may become a bottleneck at higher resolutions. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with the latest graphics APIs. The 50th percentile ranking suggests it is an average performer in the current GPU landscape, meaning it will serve as an entry-level solution for gaming and light content creation, but it will not be able to keep pace with the demands of high-end rendering or modern AAA games at high settings.

Gaming Performance

There is no measured FPS data available for this exact CPU and GPU combination. The data explicitly indicates that the FPS measurements are estimated, not measured. Therefore, all gaming performance figures are qualitative estimates based on the benchmark scores.

Based on the CPU's 96th percentile ranking and the GPU's 50th percentile ranking, the Arc A380M will be the limiting factor in gaming. The CPU's massive performance headroom will not translate into high frame rates if the GPU cannot render frames fast enough. For modern AAA games at 1080p, the Arc A380M's 4.096 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 6 GB of VRAM will likely only allow for low to medium graphics settings to achieve playable frame rates. At 1440p or 4K, the GPU will struggle significantly, and users should expect to lower settings to their minimum values or reduce resolution. Esports titles like Counter-Strike or League of Legends, which are less demanding, may run at higher frame rates, potentially exceeding 60 FPS at 1080p with medium settings. However, the lack of measured data means these are estimates. The GPU's 8 ray tracing cores support ray tracing, but the low compute power suggests that enabling this feature will cause a significant performance drop, making it impractical for most gaming scenarios. The CPU's 3,927 single-thread score ensures that it will not bottleneck the GPU in gaming, meaning that any performance issues will be solely due to the GPU's limitations.

Build Overview

This build pairs the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392, a top-tier mobile CPU, with the Intel Arc A380M, an entry-level mobile GPU. The system is classified as a laptop, and its combined percentile ranking is 73. This places the overall system in the upper-middle tier, but the individual components are at opposite ends of the performance spectrum. The CPU is in the 96th percentile, while the GPU is in the 50th percentile. This is a highly unbalanced pairing, where the CPU is over-provisioned for the GPU's capabilities.

The configuration is best understood as a high-performance CPU platform with a basic graphics solution. The CPU's 12 cores, 24 threads, and 64 MB of L3 cache make it a powerhouse for productivity, development, and compute tasks. The Arc A380M, with its 6 GB of VRAM and 4.096 TFLOPS, is sufficient for display output and light graphics work, but it is not designed for serious gaming or GPU-accelerated rendering. This is a system that will excel in CPU-intensive workloads, but its graphics capabilities are strictly entry-level. The build's overall tier is defined by its CPU dominance, making it a specialized tool for users who need maximum processing power in a mobile form factor without the need for high-end graphics.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 90,541, placing it in the 96th percentile of all CPUs. Its closest rival is the Intel Xeon 654, which scores 90,717, a difference of 0.2%, indicating the Ryzen AI Max+ 392 is essentially a performance peer of a server-class Xeon processor. The GPU's average benchmark score is 0, with a 50th percentile ranking. This lack of a score is notable, but the percentile ranking indicates it is a mid-tier performer. The combined percentile for the build is 73.

The individual CPU benchmarks show exceptional performance. The multithread score of 45,231 is the key indicator of its prowess in parallel workloads, while the single-thread score of 3,927 ensures strong performance in everyday tasks. The integer math score of 152,414 and floating-point math score of 99,548 demonstrate a balance between general-purpose and scientific computing capabilities. The data compression score of 554,760 is a standout, suggesting the CPU is outstanding for file compression and archiving. The combined picture is one of a CPU that can handle the most demanding computational tasks with ease, paired with a GPU that will only handle basic graphics duties. The 73rd combined percentile reflects this disparity, showing that the system's overall performance is dragged down by the GPU, despite the CPU's high ranking.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: This scenario is not well-served by this build. The Arc A380M's 50th percentile ranking and 4.096 TFLOPS of FP32 performance will likely prevent it from achieving high frame rates at 1080p in most modern games, and the lack of measured FPS data confirms it is a secondary consideration. The CPU's 3,927 single-thread score will not be the bottleneck, but the GPU will limit the experience to lower settings and frame rates.

Streaming: The CPU's 12 cores and 24 threads are more than capable of handling the encoding workload for streaming. The multithread score of 45,231 and extended instructions score of 45,666 indicate that the CPU can handle real-time encoding without impacting game performance, though the game's frame rate will still be limited by the GPU.

Video Editing: Video editing software can leverage both CPU and GPU. The CPU's strong multithread score will accelerate timeline scrubbing, effects processing, and export encoding. However, the GPU's 6 GB of VRAM and 186.0 GB/s of bandwidth will limit its ability to handle complex effects, 4K timelines, or GPU-accelerated rendering, making this a mixed scenario where the CPU does the heavy lifting.

3D Rendering: This workload is heavily GPU-dependent. The Arc A380M's 4.096 TFLOPS will render scenes slowly, and its 6 GB of VRAM may not be enough for complex scenes. The CPU's high floating-point math score (99,548) will help with CPU-based rendering, but the overall render times will be disappointing for users expecting high performance.

Software Development: This is an ideal scenario for this build. The CPU's 96th percentile ranking, strong integer math score (152,414), and multithread score (45,231) make it excellent for compiling large codebases, running multiple virtual machines, and executing test suites. The GPU is irrelevant for most development tasks, making this a perfect fit for a developer workstation.

Student and Office Work: For general productivity, document editing, spreadsheets, and web browsing, this build is massively over-powered. The CPU's single-thread score of 3,927 ensures instant responsiveness, and the 12 cores will handle any multitasking demands with ease. The GPU is more than sufficient for office applications and video playback, making this a very capable, if excessive, machine for standard academic and office tasks.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 + Intel Arc A380M

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392

Intel Arc A380M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Bottleneck Detected

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Balance and Bottleneck

Upgrade Path and Platform

FAQ

Who Should Build It

CPU Analysis

GPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

Build Overview

Benchmark Performance

Usage Scenarios

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds