SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 + Intel Arc A370M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

96 Score

Top 4% Ranking

96 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 4% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

98%

GPU

93%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392

90,541 Benchmark Score

Top 2% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A370M

29,175 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 + Intel Arc A370M

This laptop pairing combines AMD's top-tier Zen 5 mobile processor with Intel's entry-level Arc 3 discrete GPU, creating a system that sits in the 85th percentile overall among all builds. The CPU is a 12-core, 24-thread powerhouse that ranks in the 96th percentile against all CPUs, while the GPU, with a 74th percentile ranking, is decidedly more modest. The result is a machine with exceptional processing headroom for productivity and content creation, but one where gaming performance will be constrained by the graphics solution.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The Intel Arc A370M's 74th percentile GPU ranking and 4 GB of GDDR6 memory suggest it can handle esports titles at medium-to-high settings, but it lacks the raw throughput for demanding AAA games at high refresh rates. The CPU's PassMark single-thread score of 3927 and multithread score of 45231 mean it will never be the limiting factor in frame pacing, but the GPU's 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 compute will cap frame rates well below what the processor could theoretically feed.

Streaming: The CPU's 96th percentile ranking and 24 threads provide ample headroom for simultaneous game capture, encoding, and broadcast software. The PassMark data encryption score of 27784 and data compression score of 554760 indicate strong throughput for encoding workloads, though the GPU's limited VRAM and bandwidth (112.0 GB/s) may restrict high-bitrate local recording at higher resolutions.

Video editing: The Ryzen AI Max+ 392 excels here, with a floating point math score of 99548 and integer math score of 152414 that indicate robust processing for filter chains, color grading, and timeline scrubbing. The 64 MB of shared L3 cache and quad-channel LPDDR5X memory with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth support smooth multi-stream editing. The Arc A370M's 1024 shading units can accelerate effects rendering, but 4 GB VRAM will limit work with large 4K timelines or complex compositions.

3D rendering: CPU-based rendering is a strong suit, with the multithread score of 45231 placing it in the 96th percentile and within 0.7% of the AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX. The GPU offers 8 ray tracing cores and DirectX 12 Ultimate support, but its FP32 throughput of 4.198 TFLOPS and 64-bit memory bus mean GPU-accelerated renders will be slow; the system is better suited to CPU ray tracing workloads where the 24 threads can be fully utilized.

Software development: Compilation times will be short, given the CPU's extended instructions score of 45666 and random string sorting score of 59487, both indicating strong integer and branch-heavy performance. The 12 cores and 24 threads handle parallel builds efficiently, while the 96th percentile ranking ensures responsiveness even under heavy load. The GPU's Vulkan 1.4 and OpenGL 4.6 support provide modern graphics APIs for development and testing.

Student and office work: This is overwhelmingly capable hardware for productivity tasks, with the single-thread score of 3927 ensuring snappy application launches and document handling. The 55W TDP CPU in a laptop chassis offers substantial performance, though battery life may be shorter than more modest configurations. The GPU's 74th percentile ranking is more than sufficient for office graphics, spreadsheets, and presentation work.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A370M is built on TSMC's 6 nm process with the DG2-128 chip, containing 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die. It operates at a base clock of 1550 MHz and boost clock of 2050 MHz, with 1024 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, and 32 raster output units. The memory subsystem is the most significant limitation: 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus delivers 112.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is low by modern standards and will constrain performance in texture-heavy scenes and higher resolutions.

The GPU includes 8 ray tracing cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), meaning it can handle hardware-accelerated ray tracing effects, but the modest compute resources will keep ray-traced performance at playable levels only in lighter implementations. The FP32 throughput of 4.198 TFLOPS and FP16 of 8.397 TFLOPS (2:1) place it in the entry-level discrete segment. Pixel rate of 65.60 GPixel/s and texture rate of 131.2 GTexel/s are adequate for 1080p gaming at medium settings but will struggle at higher resolutions.

Benchmark results show a Geekbench OpenCL score of 29676 and Vulkan score of 28673, with an average benchmark score of 29175. This places it in the 74th percentile of all GPUs, essentially tied with the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH (0.1% behind) and AMD FirePro W8000 (0.1% behind), while sitting 1% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 6800M. The GPU's 35W TDP and IGP slot width indicate it is designed for thin-and-light laptops, trading performance for thermal efficiency.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 90541, ranking in the 96th percentile against all CPUs. This places it 0.2% behind the Intel Xeon 654, 0.7% behind the AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX, and 2.7% ahead of the Intel Xeon w7-2575X, and 3% ahead of the Intel Xeon 6736P. The multithread score of 45231 and single-thread score of 3927 together show balanced performance across both heavily threaded and lightly threaded workloads.

The GPU's average benchmark score of 29175 lands in the 74th percentile, nearly identical to the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH (0.1% below) and AMD FirePro W8000 (0.1% below), while 0.6% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 470 and 1% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 6800M. The combined system percentile is 85, indicating that the CPU carries the overall build performance significantly more than the GPU.

The data shows a pronounced asymmetry: the processor is a top-tier part, while the graphics solution is mid-pack. For CPU-bound tasks like compilation, rendering, and data processing, this system will perform near the top of the laptop class. For GPU-bound tasks like gaming and GPU-accelerated rendering, it will perform at a more modest level, roughly on par with mid-range discrete GPUs from several years ago.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who need exceptional CPU performance in a laptop form factor and accept moderate GPU capability. Content creators working with code, large datasets, or CPU-based rendering will find the 96th percentile CPU performance transformative for their workflows. The 24 threads and 64 MB L3 cache handle parallel workloads with ease, and the quad-channel memory with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth provides ample data throughput for memory-intensive applications.

Software developers will benefit from the strong integer math score of 152414 and extended instructions score of 45666, which translate to faster builds, quicker test runs, and smoother IDE performance. Students in engineering or computer science programs will have more than enough processing power for simulations, virtual machines, and compile-heavy coursework. The GPU, while not a gaming powerhouse, is fully capable of driving multiple displays and handling general-purpose compute tasks.

Small business workstations that run database queries, financial modeling, or scientific computing will see strong performance, with the data compression score of 554760 indicating excellent throughput for data-heavy workloads. Gamers should look elsewhere or pair this CPU with a stronger GPU, as the Arc A370M will limit frame rates in modern titles, particularly at higher resolutions and quality settings where the 4 GB VRAM and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth become bottlenecks.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance here is heavily skewed toward the CPU. The processor's 96th percentile ranking versus the GPU's 74th percentile creates a system where the GPU is the clear performance ceiling for graphics workloads. In gaming, the Arc A370M will be the limiting factor in nearly every scenario; the CPU has more than enough headroom to feed even the GPU's maximum output at 1080p, but the GPU's modest compute resources will cap frame rates well below what the processor could support.

For productivity and compute workloads, the CPU is the star, and the GPU plays a supporting role. Tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering, and data processing that leverage the CPU's 24 threads will see performance near the top of the laptop segment. The memory bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s, provided by quad-channel LPDDR5X, is a strong asset for the CPU and helps avoid memory-bound stalls in multithreaded workloads.

The GPU's bandwidth limitation is the most significant bottleneck in gaming scenarios. With only 112.0 GB/s available, texture streaming and memory-intensive effects will be constrained at 1080p and above. The 4 GB VRAM capacity will also force lower texture quality settings in modern games. The CPU, by contrast, has no such constraints; its 64 MB L3 cache and high bandwidth memory support ensure it is rarely starved for data.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination — the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data, so all frame rate figures are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The GPU's average benchmark score of 29175 and 74th percentile ranking suggest 1080p gaming at medium settings is achievable in most titles, with frame rates in the 40-60 range for demanding games and higher for esports titles. The 4 GB VRAM will require texture quality reductions in newer games, and the 64-bit memory bus will limit performance in bandwidth-sensitive scenes.

At 1080p with ultra settings, the Arc A370M's 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 compute and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth will likely produce frame rates in the 30-40 range for AAA titles, with drops below 30 in the most demanding scenes. Competitive games like CS2 or Valorant, which rely more on CPU performance, could see 60-100+ FPS at lower settings, given the CPU's strong single-thread score of 3927. The GPU's DirectX 12 Ultimate support means it can use modern rendering features, but the hardware resources to drive them at high quality are limited.

At 1440p, the GPU will struggle; the modest texture rate of 131.2 GTexel/s and pixel rate of 65.60 GPixel/s are insufficient for high-quality rendering at this resolution. Users should expect to run at low-to-medium settings with reduced resolution scaling to maintain playable frame rates. The CPU will remain underutilized in gaming scenarios, meaning the system's overall gaming performance is firmly in the entry-level discrete GPU tier.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 is a 12-core, 24-thread processor built on the Zen 5 architecture, codenamed Strix Halo, and fabricated on TSMC's 4 nm process. The die consists of two 70.6 mm² chiplets, with a base clock of 3.20 GHz and boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The 55W TDP in a mobile form factor is a substantial power envelope for a laptop CPU, indicating sustained performance is prioritized over battery efficiency.

The cache hierarchy is generous: 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 64 MB of shared L3 cache. This large L3 pool benefits workloads with significant data reuse, such as database operations and scientific computing. The CPU supports LPDDR5X memory over a quad-channel interface, delivering 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth, and includes ECC support — features more commonly found in workstation or server platforms.

Benchmark results confirm the CPU's top-tier status. The multithread score of 45231 ranks in the 96th percentile, with the nearest rival being the AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX at 0.7% ahead. The single-thread score of 3927 indicates strong per-core performance for lightly threaded workloads. The floating point math score of 99548 and integer math score of 152414 show balanced arithmetic throughput, while the find prime numbers score of 320 and physics score of 2887 are lower, suggesting some workloads with specific instruction patterns may not extract the full potential of the architecture.

The integrated Radeon 8060S graphics offer a fallback option, though the discrete Arc A370M will be the primary graphics solution in this build. The CPU's PCIe Gen 4 support with 16 lanes provides adequate bandwidth for the GPU and storage devices. The production status is Active, with a release date of January 2026.

Build Overview

This laptop build pairs the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392, a 12-core Zen 5 mobile processor, with the Intel Arc A370M, an entry-level discrete GPU from the Alchemist generation. The combination produces a system with a combined percentile of 85, driven almost entirely by the CPU's exceptional 96th percentile performance. The GPU, at the 74th percentile, is a capable but not distinguished component.

The CPU is designed for mobile workstations and high-performance laptops, with its 55W TDP and 24 threads targeting content creators, developers, and power users who need desktop-class compute performance on the go. The GPU, with its 35W TDP and 4 GB VRAM, is suited for thin-and-light laptops where space and thermal constraints limit larger graphics solutions. The pairing is logical for productivity-focused machines but represents an odd combination for gaming, where the GPU will be the limiting factor.

Overall, this is a system for users who prioritize CPU performance above all else. The 85th combined percentile places it in the upper tier of laptop builds, but the specific balance of CPU and GPU capabilities means it excels at compute tasks while offering only modest gaming performance. The quad-channel memory and 256.0 GB/s bandwidth provide a solid foundation for the CPU, while the GPU's 112.0 GB/s bandwidth and 4 GB memory capacity define its performance envelope.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's overall performance ranking?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 ranks in the 96th percentile against all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 90541.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Intel Arc A370M has an average benchmark score of 29175, placing it 0.1% behind the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH and 0.1% behind the AMD FirePro W8000, while sitting 0.6% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 470.

Q: What memory configuration does the CPU support?

A: The CPU supports LPDDR5X memory over a quad-channel interface, delivering 256.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth, with ECC support included.

Q: What is the GPU's memory capacity and bandwidth?

A: The Intel Arc A370M has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing 112.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: Does the GPU support hardware ray tracing?

A: Yes, the Intel Arc A370M includes 8 ray tracing cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2).

Q: How does the CPU compare to the AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX?

A: The Ryzen AI Max+ 392 has an average benchmark score of 90541, which is 0.7% behind the AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX's average score of 91199.

Q: What is the combined system percentile?

A: The combined system percentile for this CPU and GPU pairing is 85, indicating it outperforms 85% of all builds in the database.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 + Intel Arc A370M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392

Intel Arc A370M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Usage Scenarios

GPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Who Should Build It

Balance and Bottleneck

Gaming Performance

CPU Analysis

Build Overview

FAQ

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds