SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Max 390 + Intel Arc A770M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

95%

GPU

90%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen AI Max 390

56,273 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A770M

18,383 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

AMD Ryzen AI Max 390 paired with Intel Arc A770M is a laptop-class combination that lands in the 77th percentile overall, indicating a solidly above-average mobile platform. The CPU is a 12-core Zen 5 part with a 91st percentile ranking, while the GPU sits at the 62nd percentile, making this a processor-heavy pairing where the graphics card is the limiting factor in most workloads.

FAQ

Q: How does the AMD Ryzen AI Max 390 compare to its closest rival, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470?

A: The Ryzen AI Max 390 scores 56,273 on average across all benchmarks, which is just 0.1% lower than the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470's 56,306. This puts the two processors in a statistical tie, with the Max 390 trailing by a negligible margin.

Q: What is the performance gap between the Ryzen AI Max 390 and the Intel Core i9-14900HX?

A: The Ryzen AI Max 390 leads the Core i9-14900HX by 0.5% in average benchmark score. Both CPUs are effectively equal in overall computing power despite the Intel chip being a flagship gaming processor.

Q: How does the Intel Arc A770M compare to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile?

A: The Arc A770M averages 18,383 across GPU benchmarks, which is 1.2% higher than the RTX 3060 Mobile's 18,159. The Intel GPU holds a slight edge, though both sit in the same performance tier.

Q: What is the combined percentile ranking for this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The build lands in the 77th percentile when combining CPU and GPU performance. This means it outperforms roughly three-quarters of all laptop configurations in the database.

Q: What memory type and bandwidth does the Ryzen AI Max 390 support?

A: The CPU supports LPDDR5X memory in a quad-channel configuration, delivering 256.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth. It also supports ECC memory, which is unusual for a mobile processor.

Q: What is the architecture and process node of the Ryzen AI Max 390?

A: The CPU uses Zen 5 architecture, codenamed Strix Halo, built on TSMC's 4 nm process node. The die size is listed as 2x 70.6 mm², and the chip supports PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes.

Q: What DirectX feature level does the Intel Arc A770M support?

A: The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), along with OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4. It also features 32 ray tracing cores for hardware-accelerated ray tracing workloads.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The Arc A770M's 16.79 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 62nd percentile ranking place it in the mid-range mobile GPU tier. With 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus delivering 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth, the GPU can handle 1080p high-refresh gaming in many titles. However, the CPU's 91st percentile ranking far exceeds the GPU's capability, so frame rates will be dictated by the graphics card in most scenarios.

Streaming: The Ryzen AI Max 390's 12 cores and 24 threads provide substantial headroom for encoding while gaming. The CPU's PassMark multithread score of 41,737 and Cinebench R23 multicore score of 36,064 indicate strong parallel processing capability for background tasks. The GPU's 4,096 shading units and 256 texture mapping units also assist with encode workloads, though the CPU is the more capable component here.

Video Editing: The combination of a powerful 12-core CPU and a GPU with 16 GB of VRAM makes this a viable laptop for video editing. The CPU's PassMark integer math score of 146,519 and floating point math score of 90,594 show strong number-crunching ability for timeline processing. The GPU's 16.79 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 524.8 GTexel/s texture rate handle effects and rendering acceleration.

3D Rendering: The CPU leads in rendering workloads with a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 36,064, placing it near the top of laptop processors. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,278 indicates moderate rasterization performance, while its 32 ray tracing cores provide hardware RT support. For CPU-based rendering, the 12-core Zen 5 chip is the clear workhorse.

Software Development: The Ryzen AI Max 390's PassMark data compression score of 487,145 and encryption score of 25,097 indicate strong performance for build tooling and cryptographic operations. The 64 MB of shared L3 cache reduces memory latency for compilation tasks. The quad-channel LPDDR5X memory with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth further supports rapid code compilation.

Student and Office Work: This configuration is overkill for standard productivity tasks, with the CPU's single-thread PassMark score of 4,028 handling everyday applications with ease. The integrated Radeon 8050S GPU provides a fallback for display output, while the discrete Arc A770M ensures compatibility with accelerated applications. The 55 W CPU TDP suggests reasonable battery life potential for all-day use.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data clearly indicates a CPU-heavy imbalance in this pairing. The Ryzen AI Max 390 sits in the 91st percentile of all CPUs, while the Intel Arc A770M ranks only in the 62nd percentile of GPUs. This 29-percentage-point gap means the GPU will be the primary bottleneck in most graphics-intensive workloads.

In gaming scenarios, the CPU's PassMark single-thread score of 4,028 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 5,091 ensure that processor-side frame pacing is not a concern. The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 11,774 and DirectX 12 score of 70 indicate mid-range graphics throughput, so frame rates will be capped by the Arc A770M's rendering capabilities.

For compute workloads, the balance shifts. The GPU's PassMark GPU compute score of 4,778 is modest, while the CPU's PassMark multithread score of 41,737 dominates. OpenCL and Vulkan scores of 89,494 and 74,422 respectively show the GPU is competent for general compute, but the CPU remains the stronger compute resource.

The memory subsystem favors the GPU side, with the Arc A770M's 512.0 GB/s bandwidth doubling the CPU's 256.0 GB/s. This means the GPU has ample memory throughput for its 16 GB frame buffer, while the CPU's quad-channel LPDDR5X provides sufficient bandwidth for its 12 cores without starving them.

The CPU's 64 MB of shared L3 cache helps mitigate the bottleneck in mixed workloads by keeping frequently accessed data close to the cores. The GPU's 32 ray tracing cores add RT capability, but the overall GPU performance tier limits ray tracing to lighter loads.

Who Should Build It

1080p Gamers: Users targeting 1080p gaming will find the Arc A770M adequate for medium-to-high settings in most titles. The GPU's 62nd percentile ranking and 16 GB VRAM handle current games at this resolution, though the CPU's 91st percentile ensures it will never be the limiting factor.

Content Creators: Video editors and 3D artists benefit from the CPU's strong multicore scores, particularly the Cinebench R23 multicore result of 36,064. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM accommodates larger textures and longer timelines without memory swapping.

Software Developers: The CPU's data compression score of 487,145 and extended instructions score of 38,716 indicate strong performance for code compilation and scientific computing. The 24 threads handle parallel builds efficiently, making this suitable for professional development work.

Students: For students in STEM fields, the combination provides more than enough power for simulation software and programming assignments. The CPU's floating point math score of 90,594 supports numerical analysis workloads, while the GPU handles visualization tasks.

Small Business Workstations: The ECC memory support and 24-thread CPU make this viable for reliability-conscious small business deployments. The 55 W TDP suggests manageable thermal requirements for workstation-class laptops, and the integrated Radeon 8050S provides a backup display solution.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen AI Max 390 is a 12-core, 24-thread mobile processor built on Zen 5 architecture with the Strix Halo codename. It operates at a base clock of 3.20 GHz and boosts up to 5.00 GHz, manufactured on TSMC's 4 nm process node. The chip features 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 64 MB of shared L3 cache.

In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 36,064 in multicore and 5,091 in single-core tests. These results place it in the 91st percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 56,273. The nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470, scores 56,306, just 0.1% higher, while the Intel Core i9-14900HX trails by 0.5%.

PassMark results show a multithread score of 41,737 and a single-thread score of 4,028. The integer math score of 146,519 and floating point math score of 90,594 demonstrate balanced compute capability. Data compression hits 487,145, while encryption reaches 25,097, showing strong throughput for these specific workloads.

The CPU supports LPDDR5X memory in quad-channel configuration with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth and ECC capability. PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes provides connectivity for the discrete GPU and storage. The integrated Radeon 8050S GPU offers fallback graphics, and the 55 W TDP keeps power requirements moderate for a mobile part.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU-GPU combination. All frame rate expectations are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and relative GPU positioning.

Based on the Arc A770M's PassMark G3D score of 11,774 and its 1.2% advantage over the RTX 3060 Mobile, the GPU should deliver playable frame rates at 1080p in most titles. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,278 suggests the GPU handles modern DX12 games competently, while the DirectX 12 PassMark score of 70 indicates consistent API performance.

At 1440p, the GPU's 16.79 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 512.0 GB/s memory bandwidth will sustain moderate settings, but frame rates will drop noticeably compared to 1080p. The 16 GB VRAM provides ample capacity for high-resolution textures, though the GPU's raw throughput limits overall resolution scaling.

The CPU's strong single-thread performance, evidenced by the Cinebench R23 single-core score of 5,091 and PassMark single-thread score of 4,028, ensures that frame pacing in CPU-bound scenes is not an issue. The 64 MB L3 cache helps maintain consistent frame times in open-world titles with large asset streams.

Ray tracing workloads will be limited by the GPU's 32 RT cores and mid-range rasterization performance. The Vulkan score of 74,422 indicates solid API efficiency, which may help in Vulkan-based titles, but the GPU's overall 62nd percentile ranking caps high-end gaming experiences.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 56,273, placing it in the 91st percentile of all CPUs. Its closest rival, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470, scores 56,306 with a delta of -0.1%, meaning the Max 390 is effectively identical. The Intel Core i9-14900HX scores 56,004 with a +0.5% delta, and the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX scores 56,555 with a -0.5% delta, all within 1% of each other.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 18,383, placing it in the 62nd percentile of all GPUs. The AMD Radeon RX 460 scores 18,373 with a delta of 0.1%, the AMD FirePro D500 scores 18,533 with a delta of -0.8%, and the AMD Radeon Pro 5700 scores 18,189 with a delta of 1.1%. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile scores 18,159 with a delta of 1.2%.

Key CPU scores include Cinebench R15 multicore at 3,635 and single-core at 513, Cinebench R20 multicore at 15,146 and single-core at 2,138, and Cinebench R23 multicore at 36,064 and single-core at 5,091. PassMark scores include multithread at 41,737, single-thread at 4,028, integer math at 146,519, and floating point at 90,594.

Key GPU scores include 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 at 2,278, Geekbench OpenCL at 89,494, Geekbench Vulkan at 74,422, PassMark G3D at 11,774, and PassMark GPU compute at 4,778. The combined percentile of 77 reflects the CPU's strong performance dragging up the GPU's more modest showing.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses AMD Socket FP11, which is specific to the Strix Halo mobile platform. Memory support is limited to LPDDR5X in quad-channel configuration with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth and ECC capability. The platform provides PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes for the CPU, while the GPU connects via PCIe 4.0 x16.

The GPU is listed as end-of-life production status, meaning no direct upgrade within the same architecture is available. The 120 W TDP for the GPU and 55 W TDP for the CPU suggest a combined platform power draw that typical laptop power supplies can handle. No suggested PSU figure exists in the data, so power supply requirements are not quantified.

A sensible next upgrade would focus on the GPU side, since the CPU's 91st percentile ranking leaves little headroom for improvement. The quad-channel memory and ECC support are already high-end features, and the 12-core Zen 5 processor is near the top of its class. The platform's PCIe Gen 4 support means newer GPUs would function, but the mobile form factor limits upgrade options.

The integrated Radeon 8050S GPU provides a fallback if the discrete Arc A770M fails or is disabled. The 16 GB GDDR6 memory on the GPU is substantial, and the 512.0 GB/s bandwidth is a strong asset. Future upgrades would likely require a full platform change rather than component swaps.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build combining the AMD Ryzen AI Max 390 with the Intel Arc A770M, landing in the 77th combined percentile. The CPU is a 12-core, 24-thread Zen 5 processor with a 91st percentile ranking, while the GPU is a mid-range mobile part at the 62nd percentile.

The pairing produces a system that is computationally excellent but graphically moderate. The CPU's 36,064 Cinebench R23 multicore score and 5,091 single-core score place it among the best mobile processors, while the GPU's 11,774 PassMark G3D score and 2,278 Steel Nomad DX12 result indicate mainstream gaming capability.

The 16 GB GDDR6 VRAM on the GPU is a highlight, providing enough memory for high-resolution textures and larger workloads. The CPU's 64 MB L3 cache and quad-channel LPDDR5X memory with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth create a strong memory subsystem. The platform overall represents a capable mobile workstation that excels in CPU-heavy tasks while offering solid, if not exceptional, graphics performance.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Max 390 + Intel Arc A770M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen AI Max 390

Intel Arc A770M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

FAQ

Usage Scenarios

Balance and Bottleneck

Who Should Build It

CPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

Benchmark Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds