SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Max 390 + Intel Arc A550M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

96 Score

Top 4% Ranking

96 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 4% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

95%

GPU

96%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen AI Max 390

56,273 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A550M

49,737 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen AI Max 390 and Intel Arc A550M form a laptop pairing that lands in the 89th combined percentile, a strong result for mobile computing. The CPU is a 12-core Zen 5 part built for heavy throughput, while the GPU is an end-of-life Alchemist design that still competes with desktop-class discrete graphics from a few generations ago. Benchmark data shows a system with genuine multi-core muscle and credible 1080p-class rendering capability, though no measured FPS data exists for this exact combination, so all frame-rate discussion here is estimated from the synthetic scores.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The Intel Arc A550M is built on the Xe-HPG architecture from the Alchemist generation, fabricated on TSMC's 6 nm process with 21,700 million transistors on a 406 mm² die. The GPU operates at a base clock of 900 MHz and boosts to 2050 MHz, which is a wide clock range that allows it to stay efficient at idle and ramp up under load. Memory is 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, delivering 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth. That bus width is narrow by desktop standards, but the effective 14 Gbps memory speed partially compensates, and 8 GB is a workable capacity for 1080p gaming with moderate texture settings.

The shading complex consists of 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 render output units. Pixel rate is 131.2 GPixel/s and texture rate is 262.4 GTexel/s, figures that place the A550M in the upper mid-range of mobile GPUs. The FP32 throughput is 8.397 TFLOPS, with FP16 rated at 16.79 TFLOPS (2:1). These are raw compute numbers that translate to solid but not spectacular performance in modern titles. The card includes 16 ray tracing cores, which is modest in count but present, so ray-traced effects are possible at reduced settings and resolutions. Tensor cores are not listed in the data, which means AI-accelerated features like DLSS-style upscaling are not available; the card relies on standard rasterization and any driver-level scaling.

In Geekbench compute tests, the A550M scores 49894 in OpenCL and 49580 in Vulkan. Those scores are within 0.5% of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti's average of 49957, and within 2.4% of the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT's 50951. The A550M also beats the RX 6800 XT by 2.6%, as that rival averages 48477. This is an extraordinary result for a mobile GPU, as it places the A550M in the 86th percentile of all GPUs, meaning it outperforms the vast majority of both mobile and desktop parts. The rendering picture is one of a capable 1080p card that can handle high settings in most titles, with the caveat that the 8 GB VRAM and 224 GB/s bandwidth may throttle performance in texture-heavy scenes at higher resolutions.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The Ryzen AI Max 390 posts a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 36064 and a single-core score of 5091. In R20, the multi-core result is 15146 and single-core is 2138, while R15 shows 3635 multi-core and 513 single-core. PassMark results include a multi-thread score of 41737, single-thread of 4028, integer math at 146519, floating point math at 90594, and extended instructions at 38716. The CPU's average benchmark score is 56273, placing it in the 91st percentile of all CPUs.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 49737 from the two Geekbench compute tests, and it sits in the 86th percentile of all GPUs. When combined, this pairing achieves an 89th combined percentile, which indicates a system where both major components are above average but the CPU is the stronger of the two. The nearest CPU rivals tell a tight story: the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470 scores 56306, which is 0.1% higher, and the Intel Core i9-14900HX scores 56004, which is 0.5% lower. The AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX is 0.5% higher at 56555, and the Intel Core 7 253PQE is 0.6% lower at 55919. These deltas are all under a single percentage point, meaning the Ryzen AI Max 390 is positioned squarely in a competitive cluster of high-end desktop and laptop CPUs.

The combined picture is one of balanced but CPU-leaning performance. The CPU ranks 5 percentile points higher than the GPU, so multi-threaded workloads will see the processor as the star, while gaming will be limited by the GPU's 86th percentile standing. The lack of measured FPS data means we cannot state exact frame rates, but the synthetic scores suggest that CPU-bound scenarios like simulation and physics-heavy games will run very well, while GPU-bound scenarios at high resolutions will be the bottleneck.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The AMD Ryzen AI Max 390 is a 12-core, 24-thread processor based on the Zen 5 architecture, part of the Strix Halo family. It is fabricated on TSMC's 4 nm process with a die size of 2x 70.6 mm². Base clock is 3.20 GHz with a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, and the TDP is rated at 55 W, which is modest for a 12-core part and speaks to the efficiency of the Zen 5 design. The cache hierarchy is substantial: 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 64 MB of shared L3. This large L3 pool is critical for gaming and data-heavy workloads, as it reduces memory latency and improves hit rates.

Memory support is LPDDR5X over a quad-channel bus, yielding 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth. That is a high figure for a mobile CPU and enables the integrated Radeon 8050S graphics to perform well, though this system pairs the CPU with the discrete Arc A550M instead. ECC memory is supported, which is unusual for a mobile part and suggests workstation-oriented flexibility. The PCIe implementation is Gen 4 with 16 lanes from the CPU, sufficient for a discrete GPU and fast NVMe storage.

In Cinebench R20, the multi-core score of 15146 represents strong sustained throughput, while the single-core score of 2138 indicates excellent per-thread performance. The R23 multi-core score of 36064 is particularly telling, as it places this 55 W mobile part within 0.5% of the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX, a desktop workstation chip. PassMark multi-thread of 41737 and integer math of 146519 reinforce the picture of a CPU that can handle compilation, rendering, and scientific computing with ease. The floating point math score of 90594 and extended instructions score of 38716 suggest strong SIMD performance, which benefits video encoding and machine learning workloads. The data compression score of 487145 is exceptionally high, indicating that archiving, file extraction, and database operations will be very fast.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The 89th combined percentile masks a 5-point gap between the CPU's 91st percentile and the GPU's 86th percentile. This gap defines the balance of the system. In CPU-bound workloads, such as video encoding, 3D scene preparation, software compilation, and office multitasking, the Ryzen AI Max 390 will be the driving force, and the GPU will not hold it back. In GPU-bound workloads, such as gaming at high settings and resolutions, the Arc A550M becomes the limiting factor.

Since no measured FPS data exists for this combination, we cannot cite specific frame-rate deltas. However, the percentile difference suggests that in a typical 1080p gaming scenario, the GPU will cap performance before the CPU reaches its limit. The CPU's single-core score of 5091 in R23 is sufficient to feed even high-refresh displays in most titles, so the bottleneck will appear in GPU rendering throughput rather than CPU frame generation. The GPU's 8.397 TFLOPS FP32 and 224 GB/s bandwidth are the ceiling for gaming performance.

In multi-threaded productivity tasks, the balance shifts. The CPU's 36064 R23 multi-core score will dominate rendering and export times, and the GPU's compute scores are secondary. For tasks that leverage both, such as video editing with GPU-accelerated effects, the system is well-matched, but the CPU is the stronger component. The practical takeaway is that this is a system where the CPU has headroom for future GPU upgrades, but the GPU is adequate for current 1080p gaming and light 1440p.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 89, placing the system in the top 11% of all configurations in the database.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the Intel Core i9-14900HX?

A: The Ryzen AI Max 390 has an average benchmark score of 56273, which is 0.5% higher than the i9-14900HX's 56004.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The Intel Arc A550M has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s and an effective memory clock of 14 Gbps.

Q: Does this GPU support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the Arc A550M has 16 ray tracing cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), so ray-traced effects are available.

Q: What is the CPU's boost clock speed?

A: The Ryzen AI Max 390 boosts up to 5.00 GHz from a base clock of 3.20 GHz.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this combination?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU pairing, so all FPS discussion is estimated from benchmark scores.

Q: What is the TDP of each component?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 55 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 60 W.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The Ryzen AI Max 390 uses the AMD Socket FP11, which is a mobile socket, so the CPU is not upgradeable in the traditional sense. The platform supports LPDDR5X memory over a quad-channel interface with ECC capability, and the memory is likely soldered, so RAM upgrades are not feasible. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes, which is enough for a discrete GPU and storage. The GPU, Intel Arc A550M, is marked as "IGP" for slot width, meaning it is integrated into the system board, so it cannot be swapped out either.

The TDP figures are 55 W for the CPU and 60 W for the GPU, totaling 115 W for the core components. No suggested PSU is listed in the data, and since this is a laptop, the power delivery is handled by the system's internal adapter. The production status of the GPU is "End-of-life," which means new units are not in production, but the performance is still competitive. A sensible next upgrade for this system would be to move to a newer laptop with a higher-tier GPU, as the CPU's 91st percentile ranking leaves room for a more powerful graphics solution. The CPU's 256.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 64 MB L3 cache are already high-end, so the platform itself is not a bottleneck for most tasks.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

High-refresh gaming: The Arc A550M's 86th percentile rank and 8.397 TFLOPS FP32 suggest it can drive 1080p at high settings, and the CPU's single-core score of 5091 in R23 ensures it will not bottleneck frame generation. However, the 8 GB VRAM and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth may limit texture quality at 1440p, so high-refresh play is best suited to 1080p panels. The GPU's proximity to the RTX 5070 Ti in compute scores supports this.

Streaming: The CPU's 24 threads and 36064 R23 multi-core score provide ample headroom for software encoding while gaming, and the PassMark data compression score of 487145 indicates fast handling of stream data. The GPU's 16 RT cores and DirectX 12 Ultimate support allow for hardware-accelerated effects, though the lack of tensor cores means AI-based upscaling is not available.

Video editing: The CPU's 12 cores and 24 threads, combined with a floating point math score of 90594, handle timeline scrubbing and export rendering efficiently. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p and light 4K editing, and the Vulkan score of 49580 shows strong compute for GPU-accelerated effects.

3D rendering: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 36064 places the CPU within 0.5% of a desktop Threadripper PRO 3955WX, making it excellent for CPU-based rendering. The GPU's OpenCL score of 49894 is competitive for GPU rendering, but the 8 GB VRAM may limit scene complexity.

Software development: The integer math score of 146519 and multi-thread score of 41737 indicate fast compilation times for large codebases. The 64 MB L3 cache reduces cache misses, and the 24 threads handle parallel builds effectively.

Student and office work: The single-thread score of 4028 in PassMark and 5091 in R23 ensure snappy responsiveness in document editing and web browsing. The 55 W CPU TDP and 60 W GPU TDP combine for a power-efficient package suitable for all-day battery use, though the exact battery life is not in the data.

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

This is a laptop-class build, as indicated by the buildClass field, combining the AMD Ryzen AI Max 390 with the Intel Arc A550M. The CPU is a mobile Zen 5 part from the Strix Halo family, and the GPU is a mobile Alchemist design from Intel. The combined percentile of 89 places this system in the upper tier of all configurations, with the CPU at 91 and the GPU at 86. The CPU is a 12-core, 24-thread processor with a 5.00 GHz boost clock and 64 MB of L3 cache, while the GPU offers 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and 8.397 TFLOPS of FP32 compute. This is a high-end mobile workstation and gaming hybrid, suited for users who need strong multi-core processing and credible discrete graphics in a single portable unit. The data shows no measured FPS, but the synthetic scores indicate a system that outperforms the vast majority of laptops and even many desktops from previous generations.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

Gamers at 1080p resolution are the primary target, as the GPU's 86th percentile rank and 8 GB VRAM support high settings in most titles, and the CPU's single-core score of 5091 in R23 ensures smooth frame pacing. Content creators working with video and 3D will benefit from the CPU's 36064 R23 multi-core score, which rivals desktop workstation chips, and the GPU's OpenCL score of 49894 accelerates effects and previews. Software developers will find the integer math score of 146519 and 24 threads ideal for compilation and testing, while the 64 MB L3 cache speeds up iterative builds.

Students and office workers in demanding fields, such as engineering or data science, will appreciate the 91st percentile CPU for analysis and simulation tasks, and the 256.0 GB/s memory bandwidth handles large datasets. Small business workstations that run virtual machines or database applications will see strong performance from the PassMark multi-thread score of 41737 and data compression score of 487145. The system is not ideal for 4K gaming, as the GPU's 224.0 GB/s bandwidth and 8 GB VRAM are limiting, but for 1080p gaming, content creation, and productivity, this pairing is a strong choice. The end-of-life status of the GPU means it is not a future-proof investment, but the CPU's high percentile ranking ensures the platform remains relevant for years.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Max 390 + Intel Arc A550M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen AI Max 390

Intel Arc A550M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

FAQ

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds