SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Max 390 + Intel Arc A370M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

94 Score

Top 6% Ranking

94 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

95%

GPU

93%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen AI Max 390

56,273 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A370M

29,175 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen AI Max 390 + Intel Arc A370M

This laptop pairing combines AMD's top-tier Strix Halo mobile CPU with Intel's entry-level Arc 3 discrete GPU, creating a system where processing muscle vastly outstrips graphics capability. The Ryzen AI Max 390 ranks in the 91st percentile among all CPUs, while the Arc A370M sits in the 74th percentile among GPUs, giving the combination an 83rd percentile overall rank. The data shows a machine built for compute-heavy productivity tasks, not high-end gaming.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Ryzen AI Max 390 is built on the Zen 5 architecture, codenamed Strix Halo, and uses the AMD Socket FP11 interface. This is a mobile platform, so the upgrade path is fundamentally different from a desktop system — the CPU is soldered to the motherboard, and the socket offers no user-accessible upgrade options. The platform supports LPDDR5X memory across a quad-channel interface, delivering 256.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth, which is exceptionally high for a mobile part and feeds both the CPU cores and the integrated Radeon 8050S graphics.

The CPU provides 16 PCIe Gen 4 lanes, which is the sole interface for discrete components like the Arc A370M GPU. The GPU itself connects via a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which is narrower than the full x16 width but sufficient for a GPU of this class. The CPU has a 55 W TDP, while the GPU draws 35 W, suggesting a combined thermal envelope that is modest by gaming laptop standards. The GPU is marked as "IGP" slot width, indicating it is designed to be integrated into a compact mobile chassis rather than a user-replaceable module.

Given the soldered nature of both the CPU and the discrete GPU, the sensible next upgrade for this platform is none — this is a sealed system. The realistic upgrade path is external: a higher-resolution external monitor to take advantage of the GPU's output capabilities, or a USB-based storage solution if the internal drive fills up. The CPU's support for ECC memory is notable for professional workloads, but the LPDDR5X memory is also soldered, so memory capacity cannot be expanded post-purchase. The platform is what it is at the time of purchase; the long-term value depends entirely on the initial configuration.

Benchmark Performance

The Ryzen AI Max 390 delivers strong multi-threaded performance that places it in the top 10% of all CPUs. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 36,064 points in multi-core and 5,091 points in single-core, with the multi-core result being the standout figure. The Cinebench R20 scores are 15,146 multi-core and 2,138 single-core, while the older R15 test yields 3,635 multi-core and 513 single-core. The PassMark multithread score of 41,737 and single-thread score of 4,028 reinforce the picture of a CPU that excels at parallel workloads.

The CPU's average benchmark score is 56,273, placing it at the 91st percentile overall. Its nearest rival is the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470, which scores 56,306 — a negligible 0.1% difference. The Intel Core i9-14900HX scores 56,004, which is 0.5% behind, while the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX is 0.5% ahead at 56,555. The Intel Core 7 253PQE trails by 0.6% at 55,919. These margins are within noise, meaning the Ryzen AI Max 390 trades blows with high-end desktop and mobile parts from the previous generation.

The Intel Arc A370M presents a different story. Its average benchmark score is 29,175, placing it at the 74th percentile among all GPUs. In Geekbench OpenCL, it scores 29,676, and in Vulkan, it scores 28,673. The GPU's nearest rival is the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH at 29,197, just 0.1% ahead, and the AMD FirePro W8000 at 29,211, also 0.1% ahead. The AMD Radeon RX 470 is 0.6% behind at 28,996, and the AMD Radeon RX 6800M — a much higher-tier mobile GPU — is 1% behind at 28,874, which is surprising given the RX 6800M's reputation. The combined percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing is 83, reflecting the CPU's dominance over the GPU in the overall performance picture.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This is not the system for high-refresh gaming. The Arc A370M's 74th percentile GPU rank and its modest 4 GB of memory indicate it will struggle at high settings. The CPU is more than capable, but the GPU becomes the limiting factor.

Streaming: The CPU's 12 cores and 24 threads provide ample headroom for encoding and streaming simultaneously. The PassMark data compression score of 487,145 and data encryption score of 25,097 indicate the CPU can handle the background load of streaming software without compromising game performance.

Video editing: The multi-core Cinebench R23 score of 36,064 suggests the CPU can handle 4K video timelines and export tasks with ease. The GPU's 74th percentile rank means it will handle GPU-accelerated effects, but the CPU will do the heavy lifting for rendering.

3D rendering: The Cinebench scores translate directly to rendering workloads. The R23 multi-core score of 36,064 places this CPU in the upper echelon for mobile rendering, capable of handling complex scenes in Blender or similar software. The GPU's 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 performance is modest but usable for preview rendering.

Software development: The PassMark integer math score of 146,519 and floating point math score of 90,594 indicate strong performance for compilation and code execution. The 24 threads will shorten build times for large projects.

Student and office work: This is overkill for basic productivity. The single-thread score of 4,028 in PassMark ensures snappy application responsiveness, and the 256.0 GB/s memory bandwidth handles multitasking with ease. The 91st CPU percentile is wasted on word processing, but it future-proofs the system for heavier academic software.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance asymmetry between the CPU and GPU is stark. The Ryzen AI Max 390 sits at the 91st percentile for CPUs, while the Arc A370M sits at the 74th percentile for GPUs. This means the GPU is the bottleneck in graphics-intensive workloads, while the CPU is the bottleneck in purely compute-bound tasks — but the latter is a rare scenario. The CPU's average benchmark score of 56,273 is nearly double the GPU's 29,175, indicating the CPU has far more headroom than the GPU can utilize.

In gaming, the GPU will be the limiting factor in almost every scenario. The Arc A370M's 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus with 112.0 GB/s bandwidth will constrain texture loading and resolution scaling. The CPU's quad-channel LPDDR5X memory bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s is shared with the integrated Radeon 8050S, but the discrete GPU has its own dedicated memory, so there is no contention. The GPU's 1024 shading units and 32 ROPs are entry-level figures, and the 8 RT cores are insufficient for meaningful ray tracing at playable frame rates.

The CPU's 91st percentile rank means it will never bottleneck the GPU in this configuration. In CPU-bound games, the Ryzen AI Max 390 will deliver high frame rates, but the GPU will cap the overall performance well below what the CPU can feed. The PassMark physics score of 2,761 is modest, but this is a measure of the CPU's physics simulation capability, which is ample for gaming. The bottleneck is unambiguously the GPU for all visual workloads.

FAQ

Q: Is the AMD Ryzen AI Max 390 a good CPU for multi-threaded workloads?

A: Yes. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 36,064 places it at the 91st percentile among all CPUs, and it trades within 0.6% of rivals like the Intel Core i9-14900HX and AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX.

Q: How does the Intel Arc A370M compare to other GPUs?

A: The Arc A370M scores 29,175 on average, placing it at the 74th percentile. It is within 1% of the AMD Radeon RX 470 and AMD Radeon RX 6800M, though the latter result is surprising given the RX 6800M is a higher-tier part.

Q: Can this system handle 4K video editing?

A: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 36,064 indicates strong rendering capability, and the 256.0 GB/s memory bandwidth supports large timelines. The GPU's 74th percentile rank is adequate for acceleration, but the CPU is the primary workhorse.

Q: What memory type does this platform use?

A: The CPU supports LPDDR5X memory in a quad-channel configuration, delivering 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth. ECC memory is also supported.

Q: Is the GPU upgradeable?

A: No. The GPU is marked as "IGP" slot width, indicating it is integrated into the laptop chassis and not user-replaceable. The CPU is also soldered to the AMD Socket FP11 platform.

Q: What is the CPU's single-thread performance?

A: The Cinebench R23 single-core score is 5,091, and the PassMark single-thread score is 4,028. This places the CPU in the 91st percentile overall, with strong responsiveness for everyday tasks.

Q: Does this system support ray tracing?

A: The Intel Arc A370M has 8 RT cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, but its 74th percentile GPU rank and 4 GB memory suggest ray tracing performance will be limited.

Who Should Build It

This laptop configuration targets users who need extreme CPU performance in a mobile form factor but do not prioritize gaming. The 91st percentile CPU rank makes it ideal for software developers compiling large codebases, video editors working with high-resolution footage, and 3D artists rendering complex scenes. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 36,064 is competitive with desktop workstation CPUs, so professionals who need to move between office and field locations will benefit.

Students in engineering or data science programs will find the CPU's 24 threads and 256.0 GB/s memory bandwidth useful for simulation software and large datasets. Small business workstations that handle accounting, database management, or CAD software will run these workloads with ease, though the GPU is underpowered for GPU-accelerated CAD rendering. Gamers at 1080p with low settings will find the Arc A370M playable, but this is not a gaming laptop — it is a portable workstation with a discrete GPU for basic graphics acceleration.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows, so all frame rate expectations below are estimates based on the benchmark scores. The Arc A370M's 74th percentile rank and 4 GB GDDR6 memory suggest that modern games will run at 1080p with low-to-medium settings, targeting 30-60 FPS depending on the title. The GPU's 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 65.60 GPixel/s pixel rate are entry-level figures, so demanding games will require significant settings reductions.

The CPU will not be a limiting factor in gaming, given its 91st percentile rank and high single-thread performance. The PassMark single-thread score of 4,028 ensures that CPU-bound games will run smoothly, but the GPU's 112.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 64-bit bus will cap performance in GPU-bound scenes. Esports titles like CS:GO or Valorant may achieve high frame rates, but recent AAA releases will likely struggle at high settings. The 8 RT cores are present but too few for practical ray tracing, so expect to disable that feature. These are estimates, not measured results — actual performance will vary by game and driver optimization.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build combining the AMD Ryzen AI Max 390, a 12-core Zen 5 mobile processor, with the Intel Arc A370M, an entry-level discrete GPU from the Alchemist generation. The CPU is built on TSMC's 4 nm process and features 64 MB of shared L3 cache, while the GPU uses TSMC's 6 nm process with 7,200 million transistors. The combined percentile rank of 83 places this system in the upper tier of laptop configurations, driven almost entirely by the CPU's 91st percentile position.

The pairing is unusual: a top-tier CPU with a mid-tier GPU. The CPU's average benchmark score of 56,273 is nearly double the GPU's 29,175, creating a system that is extremely capable for compute tasks but only average for graphics. The CPU's integrated Radeon 8050S graphics may actually be competitive with the discrete Arc A370M, though the discrete GPU has the advantage of dedicated memory. This is a workstation-class CPU with a gaming-lite GPU, targeting users who need raw processing power above all else.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen AI Max 390 is a 12-core, 24-thread processor based on the Zen 5 architecture, codenamed Strix Halo. It operates at a base clock of 3.20 GHz and boosts up to 5.00 GHz, with a TDP of 55 W. The CPU is manufactured on TSMC's 4 nm process with a die size of 2x 70.6 mm², and it is part of the Ryzen AI Max generation released in January 2025. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 64 MB of shared L3 cache.

The benchmark results paint a clear picture of a multi-threaded powerhouse. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 36,064 is the headline figure, placing the CPU in the 91st percentile. The PassMark multithread score of 41,737 and integer math score of 146,519 reinforce this, while the data compression score of 487,145 shows exceptional throughput for archival and compression workloads. The single-thread scores — 5,091 in Cinebench R23 and 4,028 in PassMark — are strong but not class-leading, indicating that the CPU's 5.00 GHz boost clock is effective for lightly threaded tasks.

The CPU's nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470, scores within 0.1%, making them effectively identical in performance. The Intel Core i9-14900HX is 0.5% behind, and the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX is 0.5% ahead. These results show that the Ryzen AI Max 390 competes directly with desktop workstation CPUs, making it one of the fastest mobile processors available. The 4 nm process and 55 W TDP indicate high efficiency, though the 256.0 GB/s memory bandwidth is the real differentiator — it feeds both the CPU and integrated graphics, providing a unified memory pool that is rare in mobile platforms.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Max 390 + Intel Arc A370M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen AI Max 390

Intel Arc A370M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Upgrade Path and Platform

Benchmark Performance

Usage Scenarios

Balance and Bottleneck

FAQ

Who Should Build It

Gaming Performance

Build Overview

CPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds