SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Max 390 + Intel Arc A350M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

94 Score

Top 6% Ranking

94 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

95%

GPU

92%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen AI Max 390

56,273 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A350M

24,647 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Ryzen AI Max 390 sits on the AMD Socket FP11 platform, a mobile-first socket designed for the Strix Halo generation. This is not a traditional desktop socket with upgradeable CPUs; the FP11 package is typically soldered to the motherboard, meaning the processor itself is not a field-replaceable unit. The platform supports LPDDR5X memory in a quad-channel configuration, delivering 256.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth, which is exceptionally high for a mobile part and directly feeds both the CPU cores and the integrated Radeon 8050S graphics. ECC memory is supported, a feature more commonly found in workstation-class hardware, which adds a layer of stability for long-running compute tasks.

The CPU provides 16 PCIe Gen 4 lanes, which is the sole PCIe connectivity from the processor. This is sufficient for a primary discrete GPU and one or two NVMe SSDs, but it is not a high-expansion platform. The integrated graphics, Radeon 8050S, uses the same memory pool, so upgrading memory capacity or speed would benefit both CPU and iGPU workloads. However, the memory is LPDDR5X, which is typically soldered as well, meaning memory upgrades post-purchase are unlikely. The platform's power envelope is modest, with the CPU rated at 55 W TDP and the discrete GPU at 25 W TDP, so the total system power draw is low enough that a standard laptop power adapter suffices; there is no need for a high-wattage PSU in a desktop sense, and the suggestedPsu field is null for the GPU, reinforcing that this is an integrated mobile solution.

For a sensible next upgrade path, the data suggests this is a closed platform. The CPU is not swappable, the memory is soldered, and the GPU is a discrete part (Intel Arc A350M) that is also typically soldered in a laptop chassis. The only realistic upgrade is storage, via the Gen 4 lanes, or an external GPU enclosure if the laptop supports it, though the bandwidth limitations of an external connection would bottleneck high-end cards. The platform's strength lies in its balance at the point of purchase, not in future expandability. Users coming from older DDR4-based laptops with lower core counts will see a generational leap in memory bandwidth and CPU throughput, but those looking to incrementally upgrade components over time should look elsewhere.

# Benchmark Performance

The AMD Ryzen AI Max 390 delivers strong multi-threaded performance, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 36064 and a single-core score of 5091. In Cinebench R20, the scores are 15146 multi-core and 2138 single-core, while the older R15 test yields 3635 multi-core and 513 single-core. These numbers place the CPU at the 91st percentile among all CPUs, indicating it outperforms the vast majority of processors in the database. The average benchmark score for the CPU is 56273, which is nearly identical to the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470 (56306, a -0.1% delta) and the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX (56555, a -0.5% delta). It edges out the Intel Core i9-14900HX (56004, a +0.5% delta) and the Intel Core 7 253PQE (55919, a +0.6% delta). In practical terms, the Ryzen AI Max 390 trades blows with a high-end desktop Threadripper PRO in average score, which is remarkable for a 55 W mobile part.

On the GPU side, the Intel Arc A350M scores 24546 in Geekbench OpenCL and 24747 in Geekbench Vulkan, averaging 24647. This places the GPU at the 70th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon RX 590 (24744, a -0.4% delta), the NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile (24763, a -0.5% delta), and the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT (24442, a +0.8% delta). The A350M is essentially on par with a last-generation desktop RX 590 in compute benchmarks, but it does so at a 25 W TDP, making it far more efficient. The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 81, reflecting a system that is well above average but not at the very top tier.

The combined picture is one of a CPU that punches far above its power class and a GPU that is competent but not class-leading. The CPU's 91st percentile rank will handle the most demanding CPU-bound workloads, while the GPU's 70th percentile rank means it will manage medium settings at 1080p in modern games. The discrepancy between the two is significant: the CPU is a top-10% part, while the GPU is a top-30% part. This creates a system where the CPU is rarely the bottleneck, and the GPU will often be the limiting factor in gaming and graphics workloads. Note that no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data — so all FPS discussion is estimated from the benchmark scores.

# FAQ

Q: What is the socket and memory type for the AMD Ryzen AI Max 390?

A: The CPU uses AMD Socket FP11, which is a mobile socket. It supports LPDDR5X memory in a quad-channel configuration, providing 256.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth.

Q: How does the Ryzen AI Max 390 compare to the Intel Core i9-14900HX in average benchmark score?

A: The Ryzen AI Max 390 has an average benchmark score of 56273, which is 0.5% higher than the Intel Core i9-14900HX's score of 56004.

Q: What is the GPU's VRAM capacity and bus width?

A: The Intel Arc A350M has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 112.0 GB/s.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: Yes, the Ryzen AI Max 390 includes integrated Radeon 8050S graphics, which can be used when the discrete GPU is not needed or for additional display outputs.

Q: What is the production status of the Intel Arc A350M?

A: The Intel Arc A350M is listed as "End-of-life," meaning it is no longer in active production, though the CPU is still "Active."

Q: What is the process node for the CPU and GPU?

A: The CPU is manufactured on a 4 nm process by TSMC, while the GPU uses a 6 nm TSMC process.

Q: What are the CPU's clock speeds?

A: The base clock is 3.20 GHz, and the boost clock is 5.00 GHz.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The performance data reveals a clear imbalance between the CPU and GPU in this pairing. The CPU's 91st percentile rank vastly exceeds the GPU's 70th percentile rank, indicating that the processor is the stronger component by a wide margin. In CPU-bound workloads such as multi-threaded rendering, data compression, and physics simulations, the Ryzen AI Max 390 will deliver top-tier performance. For instance, the PassMark multithread score of 41737 and the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 36064 show a processor that can handle heavy compute without breaking a sweat. The PassMark data compression score of 487145 and encryption score of 25097 further confirm this, making the CPU the clear workhorse.

However, in graphics-bound workloads like gaming or GPU-accelerated rendering, the Intel Arc A350M becomes the limiting factor. With an average benchmark score of 24647, the GPU is only 0.4% behind the AMD Radeon RX 590 and 0.5% behind the NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile. This means that in gaming, the GPU will typically be the bottleneck, capping frame rates well below what the CPU could theoretically support. The estimated FPS scaling, derived from the GPU's benchmark scores, suggests that at 1080p with high settings, the A350M will struggle to maintain high refresh rates, whereas the CPU would have no trouble feeding a much more powerful GPU.

The memory bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s from the CPU's quad-channel LPDDR5X is a double-edged sword. It provides ample bandwidth for the CPU's 12 cores and 24 threads, but the GPU only has 112.0 GB/s of bandwidth on its own 64-bit bus, which is a fraction of the CPU's memory throughput. This disparity means that in mixed workloads where both CPU and GPU are active, the CPU will not be starved for data, but the GPU could be, especially at higher resolutions. The system's combined percentile of 81 reflects this balance: it is a high-performing machine overall, but users should not expect the GPU to match the CPU's elite status.

# CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen AI Max 390 is a 12-core, 24-thread processor based on the Zen 5 architecture, codenamed Strix Halo. It is manufactured on a 4 nm TSMC process, with a die size of 2x 70.6 mm². The base clock is 3.20 GHz, and it boosts up to 5.00 GHz, which is a healthy boost range for a 55 W TDP part. The cache hierarchy consists of 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and a substantial 64 MB of shared L3 cache. This large L3 cache is beneficial for workloads that reuse data sets, such as databases and scientific computing.

The benchmark scores paint a picture of a CPU that excels in both single-threaded and multi-threaded tasks. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 5091 is strong, placing it near the top of mobile processors. The multi-core score of 36064 is exceptional, rivaling desktop HEDT parts like the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX, which it trails by only 0.5% in average score. The PassMark integer math score of 146519 and floating point math score of 90594 indicate strong general-purpose compute, while the extended instructions score of 38716 shows good SIMD throughput for AVX-512-style workloads.

The CPU's real-world implications are significant. For software development, the 24 threads will compile code quickly, and the single-thread performance ensures snappy responsiveness in IDEs. For data encryption, the PassMark score of 25097 suggests robust AES performance, which is critical for VPNs and secure file transfers. The find prime numbers score of 316 is modest, but that is a specific workload that favors certain architectures. The 91st percentile ranking means that in most CPU-bound applications, this processor will outperform 91% of all CPUs in the database, making it a top-tier choice for mobile workstations, despite its 55 W TDP.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The Intel Arc A350M's 70th percentile rank and average score of 24647 suggest that 1080p gaming at medium settings is achievable, but high refresh rates (above 100 FPS) will be difficult in demanding titles. The GPU is on par with the RX 590, so esports titles like CS:GO or Valorant may hit high frame rates, but AAA games will likely stay in the 40-60 FPS range. The CPU's 91st percentile ensures no CPU-side frame drops.

Streaming: The 12-core, 24-thread CPU is well-suited for streaming. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 36064 means that x264 encoding at medium presets will not tax the CPU significantly, leaving headroom for the game and streaming software. The GPU's lack of AV1 encoding is a minor drawback, but the CPU's power more than compensates.

Video editing: The combination of a fast CPU and a mid-range GPU is ideal for video editing. The CPU's PassMark multithread score of 41737 will handle 4K timeline scrubbing and export rendering, while the GPU's 3.379 TFLOPS FP32 performance accelerates effects and color grading. The 256.0 GB/s memory bandwidth is a boon for loading large video files.

3D rendering: The CPU is the star here, with Cinebench R23 multi-core scores that rival desktop Threadripper PRO chips. For CPU-based rendering (e.g., Blender Cycles CPU mode), this processor will deliver near-desktop performance. The GPU's 6 RT cores and 768 shading units provide some acceleration for GPU rendering, but its 4 GB VRAM will limit scene complexity.

Software development: The 24 threads and 5.00 GHz boost clock make this an excellent development machine. Compilation times will be short, and the single-core score of 5091 ensures fast IDE operations. The ECC memory support is a bonus for long-running test suites that need data integrity.

Student and office work: This is overkill for basic tasks, but the efficiency is notable. The 55 W CPU TDP and 25 W GPU TDP mean long battery life, and the integrated Radeon 8050S can handle office productivity without engaging the discrete GPU. The 91st percentile CPU ensures that even the most complex spreadsheets or virtual machines run smoothly.

# Who Should Build It

This CPU+GPU pairing is targeted at mobile users who need high CPU performance without a massive power draw. Gamers at 1080p resolution with medium settings will find the Arc A350M adequate, but the real appeal is the CPU. Content creators who render videos or 3D scenes will benefit enormously from the 12-core, 24-thread Zen 5 processor, which sits in the 91st percentile of all CPUs. Software developers compiling large codebases will see significant time savings, and the ECC memory support makes it suitable for data integrity-sensitive workloads.

Students in engineering or data science programs will appreciate the CPU's compute power for simulations and analysis, while the efficient power envelope means they can carry it to class without a charger. Small business workstations that run virtual machines, databases, or financial modeling will find the multi-threaded performance and memory bandwidth sufficient for demanding applications. The GPU, while not a gaming powerhouse, is sufficient for 3D modeling in CAD software and light video editing, making this a balanced mobile workstation rather than a gaming laptop.

# Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build (buildClass: "laptop") combining the AMD Ryzen AI Max 390 CPU with the Intel Arc A350M GPU. The CPU is a 12-core, 24-thread Zen 5 part with a 55 W TDP, and the GPU is a 25 W mobile discrete part based on Xe-HPG architecture. The combined percentile is 81, indicating that this system outperforms 81% of all recorded CPU+GPU pairings in the database. The pairing is unusual in that the CPU is significantly more powerful than the GPU, but this is a deliberate design for mobile workstations where CPU compute is prioritized over gaming performance.

The overall tier is upper-midrange. The CPU is in the top 10% of all processors, while the GPU is in the top 30% of all GPUs. This means the system is capable of heavy productivity work, light to medium gaming, and moderate creative workloads. It is not a high-end gaming rig, nor is it a render farm, but it occupies a sweet spot for professionals who need a powerful CPU in a portable chassis. The build is end-of-life for the GPU, but the CPU is still in active production, suggesting that this pairing may be found in older or clearance laptops.

# GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A350M is an entry-level mobile GPU based on the Xe-HPG architecture, codenamed Alchemist (Arc 3 Mobile). It is manufactured on a 6 nm TSMC process with 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 45.9M per mm². The GPU has 768 shading units, 48 texture mapping units, and 24 raster output units. It features 6 ray tracing cores, which is a modest count but does provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing for supported games. The clock speeds are 1150 MHz base and 2200 MHz boost, with memory running at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective).

The memory subsystem consists of 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 112.0 GB/s. This is a significant limitation, as 4 GB VRAM is insufficient for high-texture gaming at 1080p in modern titles, and the narrow 64-bit bus restricts bandwidth to roughly half of what a 128-bit card would offer. The pixel rate is 52.80 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 105.6 GTexel/s, which are moderate figures. The FP32 performance is 3.379 TFLOPS, and FP16 is 6.758 TFLOPS (2:1), which is adequate for compute tasks but not class-leading.

In benchmark terms, the A350M scores 24546 in Geekbench OpenCL and 24747 in Geekbench Vulkan, averaging 24647. This places it at the 70th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 590 (24744, -0.4% delta), the NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile (24763, -0.5% delta), and the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT (24442, +0.8% delta). The A350M is essentially a desktop RX 590 equivalent in compute, which is impressive for a 25 W part, but the 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit bus will hamper its real-world gaming performance at higher resolutions. For rendering tasks, the 6 RT cores provide some ray tracing capability, and the API support for DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4 ensures broad compatibility with modern software. However, given its end-of-life production status, this GPU is a legacy part that will be outclassed by newer integrated graphics in future CPUs.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Max 390 + Intel Arc A350M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen AI Max 390

Intel Arc A350M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds