SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 + Intel Arc A550M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

95 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 5% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
94%
VS
GPU
96%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388

49,796 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A550M

49,737 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 + Intel Arc A550M

This laptop pairing combines AMD's Zen 5-based Ryzen AI Max+ 388 processor with Intel's Arc A550M discrete GPU, targeting the mobile performance segment. The CPU sits at the 90th percentile among all processors, while the GPU lands at the 86th percentile among all GPUs, giving the combination a strong overall standing in the 88th percentile. The system is built around a 55 W TDP processor and a 60 W TDP graphics solution, indicating a focus on sustained performance within a mobile power envelope. Benchmark data is derived from synthetic tests, as no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination; all gaming frame rate discussions are therefore estimates based on CPU and GPU scores.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 is an 8-core, 16-thread processor built on the Zen 5 architecture, codenamed Strix Halo. It operates at a base clock of 3.60 GHz and boosts up to 5.00 GHz, fabricated on TSMC's 4 nm process node with a dual-die design measuring 2x 70.6 mm². The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 32 MB of shared L3 cache, providing ample fast storage for frequently accessed data. This is a mobile-segment part, and its 55 W TDP suggests it is designed for thin-and-light or compact laptops where thermal headroom is limited but performance expectations remain high.

The CPU's benchmark results show a well-rounded profile. In Cinebench R23, it scores 18759 points in multi-core and 1960 points in single-core, indicating strong parallel throughput and respectable single-thread responsiveness. These numbers place it in the 90th percentile of all CPUs, meaning it outperforms roughly nine out of ten processors in the database. Its average benchmark score of 49796 is nearly identical to the Intel Core 9 273PE (49845, delta -0.1%), and slightly ahead of the Intel Core i5-14600KF (49394, delta 0.8%), AMD Ryzen 9 7900 (49228, delta 1.2%), and AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G (49196, delta 1.2%). This places the Ryzen AI Max+ 388 in direct competition with high-end desktop processors from the previous generation, despite being a mobile part.

For real workloads, the multi-core scores translate to strong performance in compilation, rendering, and other parallel tasks. A Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 18759 is indicative of a processor that can handle video encoding, 3D scene rendering, and software build pipelines without significant delays. The single-core score of 1960 supports responsive application startup and snappy user interface interactions. PassMark tests further illustrate the CPU's capabilities: integer math scores 109588, floating-point math scores 72722, and extended instructions score 32719, all of which are robust figures for a mobile processor. Data compression scores 400887, while encryption scores 20092, suggesting the processor handles data-intensive workloads competently. The single-thread PassMark score of 4185 reinforces the strong per-core performance, which is crucial for lightly threaded applications like many productivity tools and legacy software.

Benchmark Performance

The combined benchmark picture shows a system that is balanced at a high level. The CPU's average benchmark score is 49796, placing it in the 90th percentile of all CPUs. The GPU's average benchmark score is 49737, placing it in the 86th percentile of all GPUs. The combination sits at the 88th combined percentile, indicating that both components are well above average and neither drags the system down significantly.

The CPU's nearest rivals, based on average score, include the Intel Core 9 273PE (49845, delta -0.1%), Intel Core i5-14600KF (49394, delta 0.8%), AMD Ryzen 9 7900 (49228, delta 1.2%), and AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G (49196, delta 1.2%). The deltas are all within 1.2%, meaning the Ryzen AI Max+ 388 is statistically tied with these processors. This is notable because the rivals include desktop parts with higher power envelopes, suggesting the mobile chip punches above its weight class.

The GPU's nearest rivals are more telling. The Intel Arc A550M scores 49737 on average, which is only 0.4% behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti (49957) and 0.5% behind the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 (50001). It is 2.4% behind the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT (50951) but 2.6% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT (48477). These are high-end desktop graphics cards, and the fact that a mobile GPU is competitive with them in synthetic benchmarks is remarkable. In Geekbench, the GPU scores 49894 in OpenCL and 49580 in Vulkan, showing strong compute performance across different APIs.

The combined picture is one of a laptop that can handle demanding compute tasks. The CPU's 90th percentile and GPU's 86th percentile indicate that neither component is a weak link. However, the GPU's slightly lower percentile suggests that in gaming scenarios, the GPU may be the first to reach its limits, while the CPU has more headroom for non-graphics workloads.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all frame rate figures presented here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The GPU's average benchmark score of 49737 places it in the 86th percentile, and its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti (delta -0.4%) and AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT (delta -2.4%). These comparisons suggest that in rasterized gaming, the Arc A550M should deliver frame rates approaching those of high-end desktop GPUs from a few generations ago, though actual performance will vary by game and driver optimization.

The CPU's single-core performance, as measured by Cinebench R23 (1960 points) and PassMark single-thread (4185), is strong enough to avoid bottlenecking most games. The 8-core, 16-thread configuration ensures that modern titles that utilize multiple cores will have sufficient resources. However, the GPU is likely to be the limiting factor in gaming, given its lower percentile ranking relative to the CPU.

For 1080p gaming, the combination should handle most titles at high settings with playable frame rates, though the exact numbers cannot be confirmed. At 1440p, the GPU's 8 GB of VRAM and 224.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth may become a constraint in texture-heavy games, potentially requiring reduced settings. At 4K, the GPU is unlikely to sustain high frame rates in demanding titles, and the system would be better suited for less graphically intensive games or esports titles. The Arc A550M's 16 ray tracing cores and support for DirectX 12 Ultimate mean it can render RT effects, but performance in RT-heavy games will be modest compared to dedicated RT-focused GPUs.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data indicates a well-balanced system with a slight GPU bias as the performance limiter in gaming workloads. The CPU sits at the 90th percentile while the GPU sits at the 86th percentile, a 4-point gap that is not severe but does suggest the GPU will reach its limits first in graphics-intensive tasks. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 18759 and PassMark multithread score of 33486 show it has substantial computational headroom, which is beneficial for productivity tasks but unnecessary for most gaming scenarios.

In CPU-bound workloads such as data compression (400887 in PassMark) and integer math (109588), the processor demonstrates it can sustain heavy parallel loads without bottlenecking the system. The GPU's Geekbench scores (49894 OpenCL, 49580 Vulkan) show it can handle compute tasks, but its 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit memory bus are potential constraints in high-resolution textures and large datasets. The memory bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s on the GPU is lower than the CPU's 256.0 GB/s system memory bandwidth, which could create a data transfer bottleneck in mixed workloads that involve both CPU and GPU processing.

The FPS scaling, while not measured, can be inferred from the benchmark deltas. Since the GPU is 2.6% faster than the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT in average score, frame rates in GPU-bound scenarios should be roughly similar to that card, with the CPU providing enough headroom to avoid limiting performance. Conversely, in CPU-bound scenarios such as physics calculations or AI-driven game logic, the CPU's PassMark physics score of 1843 suggests it can handle these tasks without becoming the primary constraint.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the AMD Socket FP11, which is a mobile platform, and the GPU is integrated into the laptop chassis as an IGP (Integrated Graphics Processor) slot width. This means neither component is user-upgradeable in a traditional sense; the entire laptop would need to be replaced to change the CPU or GPU. The CPU supports LPDDR5X memory in a quad-channel configuration with a bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s, and ECC memory is supported, which is beneficial for data integrity in workstation tasks. The PCIe interface is Gen 4 with 16 lanes for the CPU, providing adequate bandwidth for the GPU and other peripherals.

The GPU's TDP is 60 W, and the CPU's TDP is 55 W, totaling 115 W for the core components. The suggested PSU is not listed, but the combined TDP indicates a modest power requirement for a laptop power adapter. The GPU is marked as end-of-life, meaning its production has ceased, but it remains a capable component. The CPU is active and was released in January 2026, so it is a current-generation part.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be to increase system memory, as the quad-channel LPDDR5X configuration can benefit from higher capacity for memory-intensive tasks like video editing or large dataset processing. The storage can also be upgraded via the PCIe Gen 4 interface, assuming the laptop has accessible M.2 slots. However, since the CPU and GPU are soldered or fixed, the platform's longevity depends on the laptop's other upgradeable components.

Who Should Build It

This CPU+GPU combination is suited for users who need strong multi-threaded CPU performance and respectable GPU compute capability in a mobile form factor. Gamers targeting 1080p high-refresh-rate displays will find the GPU sufficient for most titles, though they should temper expectations for 1440p or 4K gaming. Content creators who work with video editing, 3D rendering, or software development will benefit from the CPU's 8-core, 16-thread configuration and its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 18759. The PassMark data compression score of 400887 also makes this suitable for tasks involving large file archives or database operations.

Students and professionals in engineering, data science, or finance will appreciate the CPU's single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core 1960) for spreadsheet and statistical analysis, as well as its multi-core capabilities for simulation and modeling. Small business workstations that require reliable ECC memory support and consistent performance will find this platform robust. However, users who prioritize high-end gaming at 1440p or above should consider a system with a more powerful GPU, as the Arc A550M's 8 GB VRAM and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth may limit performance in the most demanding titles.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread count?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 has 8 cores and 16 threads, based on the Zen 5 architecture.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The CPU's average benchmark score is 49796, which is 0.1% behind the Intel Core 9 273PE, 0.8% ahead of the Intel Core i5-14600KF, and 1.2% ahead of both the AMD Ryzen 9 7900 and AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The Intel Arc A550M has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s and a memory clock of 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective).

Q: Does the system support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports ECC memory, which is listed in the memory support specifications.

Q: What is the combined percentile ranking of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combination sits at the 88th combined percentile, with the CPU at the 90th and the GPU at the 86th percentile.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this system?

A: No, there is no measured FPS data for this exact combination; all gaming frame rate figures are estimates based on benchmark scores.

Q: What is the GPU's production status?

A: The Intel Arc A550M is marked as end-of-life, meaning its production has ceased.

Build Overview

This build pairs the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388, a Zen 5 mobile processor with 8 cores and 16 threads, with the Intel Arc A550M, a discrete mobile GPU based on the Xe-HPG architecture. The system is classified as a laptop, and its combined percentile of 88 indicates it outperforms the vast majority of systems in the database. The CPU's 90th percentile ranking places it among the top processors, while the GPU's 86th percentile is slightly lower but still well above average. The CPU is a current, active product released in January 2026, while the GPU is end-of-life, but both contribute to a cohesive mobile platform.

The CPU's 55 W TDP and the GPU's 60 W TDP suggest a power-efficient design suitable for a laptop chassis. The CPU's quad-channel LPDDR5X memory support with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth is a standout feature, providing substantial memory throughput for a mobile processor. The GPU, with 2048 shading units, 128 TMUs, and 64 ROPs, delivers 8.397 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, which is competitive with older desktop cards. Together, this build represents a high-tier mobile solution that balances CPU compute performance with GPU graphics capability.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The GPU's average benchmark score of 49737 (86th percentile) suggests it can drive high frame rates at 1080p in most games, though the lack of measured FPS data means exact figures are estimates. The CPU's single-core performance (PassMark single-thread 4185) ensures it won't hold back frame generation, but the GPU's 8 GB VRAM may limit settings in newer titles.

Streaming: The CPU's 16 threads and strong multi-core performance (Cinebench R23 multi-core 18759) provide ample headroom for encoding while gaming, though the GPU's lack of a dedicated hardware encoder is not detailed in the data. The system's overall 88th percentile ranking indicates it can handle the combined load of gaming and streaming software.

Video Editing: The CPU's PassMark integer math score of 109588 and data compression score of 400887 are well-suited for video codec operations and timeline scrubbing. The GPU's 16.79 TFLOPS of FP16 performance (2:1 ratio) can accelerate certain effects, though the 8 GB VRAM may be a constraint on very large projects.

3D Rendering: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 18759 will handle CPU-based rendering engines efficiently, and the GPU's 8.397 TFLOPS of FP32 performance can assist with GPU-accelerated renderers. The 90th CPU percentile and 86th GPU percentile suggest this is a capable entry-level rendering workstation.

Software Development: The CPU's 8 cores and 16 threads, combined with its 90th percentile ranking, support fast compilation times. The PassMark extended instructions score of 32719 indicates good support for modern instruction sets, benefiting code that uses SIMD optimizations.

Student and Office Work: The CPU's single-core performance (Cinebench R23 single-core 1960) ensures responsive application usage, while the 55 W TDP means the laptop can run quietly and efficiently. The ECC memory support adds reliability for data-critical coursework or business documents, though the GPU is overkill for basic office tasks.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A550M is built on the Xe-HPG architecture, fabricated on TSMC's 6 nm process with 21,700 million transistors on a 406 mm² die. It operates at a base clock of 900 MHz and a boost clock of 2050 MHz, with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus delivering 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU has 2048 shading units, 128 TMUs, 64 ROPs, and 16 ray tracing cores, providing 8.397 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 16.79 TFLOPS of FP16 performance (2:1 ratio). Pixel rate is 131.2 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 262.4 GTexel/s.

In Geekbench, the GPU scores 49894 in OpenCL and 49580 in Vulkan, placing it at the 86th percentile of all GPUs. Its average benchmark score of 49737 is within 0.5% of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti (49957) and AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 (50001), and 2.6% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT (48477). These comparisons indicate the Arc A550M competes with high-end desktop GPUs in synthetic compute tests, though real-world gaming performance may differ due to driver maturity and memory bandwidth constraints.

The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, making it compatible with modern rendering APIs. The 16 ray tracing cores provide hardware-accelerated RT, but the 8 GB VRAM and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth may limit RT performance in demanding titles. The GPU's 60 W TDP is modest for its performance class, making it suitable for thin laptops. It is marked as end-of-life, so future driver support may be limited, but current benchmarks show it remains a competitive mobile GPU.