SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 + Intel Arc A370M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

94 Score

Top 6% Ranking

94 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

94%

GPU

93%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388

49,796 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A370M

29,175 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 and Intel Arc A370M represent a distinctly asymmetric pairing: a high-end 8-core Zen 5 mobile processor paired with a modest entry-level discrete GPU. The data shows a system with exceptional CPU throughput for its class, but with graphics capabilities that will define its practical limits for gaming and GPU-accelerated workloads. This analysis is based strictly on the provided benchmark scores, as no measured FPS data exists for this exact combination.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: This pairing is not suited for high-refresh gaming at demanding settings. The Intel Arc A370M sits at the 74th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 29175. Its 4 GB of GDDR6 memory and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth are entry-level specifications. While the CPU, with its 90th percentile ranking and a PassMark single-thread score of 4185, can feed frames rapidly, the GPU will be the limiting factor, making high-refresh 1080p gaming at high settings unrealistic. Expect lower graphical presets to achieve playable, rather than high-refresh, frame rates.

Streaming: The CPU's strength is a major asset here. The Ryzen AI Max+ 388's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 18759 and PassMark multi-thread score of 33486 provide ample headroom for encoding video while a game runs. The GPU's lack of dedicated tensor cores and its end-of-life production status suggest that hardware-accelerated encoding features are less robust than on newer architectures. The system can handle the workload, but the quality and efficiency of the GPU-side encoding may be a limitation compared to more modern hardware.

Video Editing: The system is capable for this task, but with caveats. The CPU's high integer and floating-point performance (PassMark integer math: 109588, floating point math: 72722) will accelerate timeline operations, codec conversion, and rendering. However, the GPU's limited 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit memory bus will hinder work with large, high-resolution compositing projects or complex effects that rely heavily on GPU acceleration. The 74th GPU percentile indicates it is adequate for basic to moderate video editing, but it is not a professional-grade solution for this workload.

3D Rendering: The CPU is the undisputed workhorse for 3D rendering. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 18759 is just 0.1% behind the Intel Core 9 273PE (avgScore 49845) and 0.8% ahead of the Intel Core i5-14600KF (avgScore 49394), demonstrating elite multi-threaded performance. For CPU-based rendering engines, this system will be very fast. The Arc A370M's 4.198 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is modest, so GPU-accelerated rendering will be slower, and the 4 GB VRAM will restrict the size and complexity of scenes that can be rendered on the GPU.

Software Development: This is a strong scenario for this build. The CPU's high single-thread score of 4185 (PassMark) ensures fast compilation of single-threaded tasks and a responsive IDE. The multi-threaded performance excels at parallel build processes and running multiple virtual machines or containers. The CPU's 32 MB of shared L3 cache and support for ECC memory (true) further enhance stability and performance in development environments. The GPU is largely irrelevant for most coding tasks, making the powerful CPU the primary asset.

Student and Office Work: The system is overwhelmingly overqualified for this category. The CPU's 90th percentile performance will handle any document, spreadsheet, or web browsing task with ease, and its power efficiency (55 W TDP) is favorable for a laptop. The presence of a discrete GPU, even an entry-level one, adds no practical benefit for these workloads, but the overall system will be exceptionally responsive. The primary consideration is that the 4 GB GPU memory is irrelevant here, so the system's value is entirely in its CPU and platform features.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance balance is heavily skewed towards the CPU. The Ryzen AI Max+ 388 is a top-tier mobile processor, ranking in the 90th percentile of all CPUs. In contrast, the Arc A370M ranks in the 74th percentile of all GPUs. This creates a scenario where the GPU will be the bottleneck in virtually any graphics-intensive task. In gaming, the CPU can easily compute game logic and physics, but the GPU will struggle to keep up with rendering demands, particularly at higher resolutions and graphical settings. The data indicates that frame rates will be governed by the GPU's 4.198 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 65.60 GPixel/s pixel rate.

Conversely, in CPU-bound tasks like code compilation, 3D rendering (CPU-based), and data processing, the CPU is the primary engine, and the GPU sits largely idle. The PassMark data compression score of 400887 and encryption score of 20092 highlight the CPU's massive throughput advantage. There is no scenario where the CPU is the limiting factor for the GPU; the bottleneck is unidirectional. The system is a powerful workstation CPU with a modest graphics companion, not a balanced gaming or GPU-compute platform.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 and Intel Arc A370M combination. The following frame rate expectations are estimates derived from the GPU's benchmark scores and its percentile position relative to other GPUs.

The Arc A370M's average benchmark score of 29175 places it just 0.6% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 470 (avgScore 28996) and 1.0% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 6800M (avgScore 28874). This suggests the GPU offers performance in the range of older, mid-range desktop components. At 1080p with high/ultra settings, gamers can expect playable frame rates in less demanding titles like esports games. For AAA titles, the 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit memory bus (112.0 GB/s bandwidth) will be significant constraints, likely forcing users to lower textures and other VRAM-intensive settings to maintain smooth performance. At 1440p or 4K, the GPU's compute power and memory bandwidth are insufficient for a consistent experience, and frame rates will drop considerably. The system is best considered a 1080p gaming machine for titles that are not exceptionally demanding.

Who Should Build It

The target user for this build is a professional or power user whose primary workload is CPU-intensive and who needs a discrete GPU for basic, non-demanding graphics tasks. This includes software developers who require fast compilation and virtualization, engineers running simulations, and analysts processing large datasets. The CPU's 90th percentile performance and high PassMark integer math score (109588) are ideal for these roles. The system is also suitable for students in STEM fields who need a powerful processor for computational work but do not have a heavy GPU workload. For gamers, the target audience is those who play older or less demanding titles at 1080p and are willing to compromise on graphical settings. It is not a system for high-refresh gaming or for users who want to play the latest AAA games at high fidelity. The combined percentile of 82 reflects that the system is strong overall, but its gaming potential is capped by the GPU.

Benchmark Performance

The combined system percentile is 82, indicating it outperforms the majority of systems in the database. The CPU is the primary driver of this score. The Ryzen AI Max+ 388's average benchmark score is 49796, placing it at the 90th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival is the Intel Core 9 273PE, which scores 49845, a difference of -0.1%, making the two effectively identical in overall CPU performance. It also leads the Intel Core i5-14600KF (49394) by 0.8% and the AMD Ryzen 9 7900 (49228) by 1.2%. In specific tests, the CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 18759 and single-core score of 1960 demonstrate strong scaling. The PassMark single-thread score of 4185 is excellent, and the multi-thread score of 33486 is robust.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 29175, placing it at the 74th percentile of all GPUs. In Geekbench, it scores 29676 in OpenCL and 28673 in Vulkan. Its nearest rival is the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH, which scores 29197, a difference of -0.1%. The combined picture is a system with top-tier CPU performance that is only marginally better than its closest competitors, but a GPU that is comfortably mid-range, sitting just above older parts like the Radeon RX 470.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A370M is an entry-level mobile GPU based on the Xe-HPG architecture, built on a 6 nm process at TSMC. It features 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 112.0 GB/s, which is a significant limiting factor for performance at higher resolutions. Its 1024 shading units deliver 4.198 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, and its 8 RT cores provide some hardware ray tracing capability, though the overall compute power is modest. The GPU is DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and Vulkan 1.4 compliant. Its benchmark scores indicate it performs at the level of a mid-range GPU from a previous generation. The 74th percentile ranking and an average score of 29175 show it is not a performance part. For rendering, the 4 GB VRAM will be the primary bottleneck, preventing the use of large textures or complex scenes in GPU-accelerated renderers. The GPU's end-of-life production status also suggests it is a legacy component.

FAQ

Q: Is the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 CPU faster than the Intel Core i5-14600KF?

A: Yes, the average benchmark score of the Ryzen AI Max+ 388 (49796) is 0.8% higher than the Intel Core i5-14600KF (49394), indicating marginally better overall CPU performance.

Q: What is the performance class of the Intel Arc A370M GPU?

A: The Arc A370M ranks in the 74th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 29175. This places it just 0.6% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 470 (28996), indicating it is an entry-level to mid-range part.

Q: What kind of memory does the system use?

A: The CPU supports LPDDR5X memory on a quad-channel bus, providing 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU uses 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus with a bandwidth of 112.0 GB/s.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: Yes, the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 includes integrated Radeon 8060S graphics, though the system also has the discrete Intel Arc A370M.

Q: Is the CPU's performance good for multi-threaded workloads?

A: Yes, the CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score is 18759 and its PassMark multi-thread score is 33486, ranking it in the 90th percentile of all CPUs, which is excellent for tasks like 3D rendering and video encoding.

Q: What is the socket type for this CPU?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 uses the AMD Socket FP11, which is a mobile platform socket.

Q: How much L3 cache does the CPU have?

A: The CPU has a total of 32 MB of shared L3 cache, along with 1 MB of L2 cache per core and 80 KB of L1 cache per core.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build (buildClass: "laptop") consisting of an AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 (8-core, 16-thread Zen 5 processor) paired with an Intel Arc A370M discrete GPU. The system sits at the 82nd percentile overall, driven almost entirely by the CPU's strong 90th percentile ranking. The CPU is a high-performance mobile processor with a 55 W TDP, while the GPU is a 35 W entry-level part. In the context of the database, this system is a high-end CPU platform with a complementary, rather than high-performance, graphics solution. It is a tier above a typical integrated-graphics laptop for gaming and GPU tasks, but it is not in the same class as systems pairing this CPU with a much more powerful GPU.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 is an 8-core, 16-thread processor based on the Zen 5 architecture, codenamed "Strix Halo". It is manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC, with a die size of 2x 70.6 mm². The CPU has a base clock of 3.60 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. It supports ECC memory (true) and features a quad-channel LPDDR5X memory interface with a bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s. The CPU's benchmark scores are exceptional. Its average benchmark score of 49796 places it in the 90th percentile, making it one of the fastest mobile processors tested. The single-thread score of 4185 (PassMark) is excellent for responsiveness and lightly-threaded applications. The multi-threaded performance is equally impressive, with a Cinebench R23 score of 18759 that rivals desktop processors from a previous generation. The 32 MB of shared L3 cache is sizeable and helps with gaming and productivity tasks. The data suggests this CPU can handle the most demanding computational workloads, from complex simulations to heavy multi-tasking, with ease.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The system is built on the AMD Socket FP11 platform, which is a mobile-specific socket. The CPU supports PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The memory support is LPDDR5X, which is typically soldered on mobile platforms, meaning memory upgrades are likely not possible. The GPU is a separate, end-of-life (production status: "End-of-life") component. The CPU has a TDP of 55 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 35 W, suggesting a combined load of 90 W for the primary components. The suggested PSU field is null, but the low TDPs indicate that a standard laptop power adapter is sufficient.

Given the platform's constraints, a sensible upgrade path is limited. The CPU is already at the top of its class (90th percentile), so upgrading it would offer minimal gains. The most impactful upgrade would be to replace the Intel Arc A370M with a more powerful GPU, but this is often not possible in laptops due to the soldered and proprietary nature of mobile components. The data does not specify the availability of external GPU support. Therefore, users looking for more graphics performance would likely need to consider a completely new system with a higher-end GPU. The CPU's performance headroom is so large that it could easily support a much faster GPU, but the platform's physical limitations may prevent this.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 + Intel Arc A370M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388

Intel Arc A370M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Usage Scenarios

Balance and Bottleneck

Gaming Performance

Who Should Build It

Benchmark Performance

GPU Analysis

FAQ

Build Overview

CPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds