SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 + Intel Arc B390

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

86 Score

Top 14% Ranking

86 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 14% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

96%

GPU

77%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185

62,839 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc B390

1,482 Benchmark Score

Top 23% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 + Intel Arc B390

This laptop-class pairing combines a 12-core, 24-thread AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 processor with an Intel Arc B390 integrated GPU, landing at the 51st combined percentile across all CPU+GPU pairings. The CPU is the clear star, sitting at the 93rd percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU sits at just the 9th percentile among all GPUs — an extreme imbalance that defines every workload outcome. The data shows a processor capable of desktop-class multi-threaded throughput paired with graphics performance that barely clears entry-level discrete GPUs from over a decade ago.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 is built on TSMC's 4 nm process with a 233 mm² die, using the Gorgon Point codename and a hybrid Zen 5 / Zen 5c architecture. It packs 12 cores and 24 threads, with a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3. This is a mobile-market part with a 28 W TDP, yet its multi-threaded benchmark scores rival desktop processors with far higher power envelopes.

PassMark multi-thread score of 31,817 places this chip at the 93rd percentile of all CPUs, putting it ahead of roughly 93% of the processor market. The average benchmark score of 62,839 sits within 0.2% of the Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX (62,738) and 0.5% above the AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 (62,498). Against the Intel Core i7-13790F, the P185 trails by just 0.4%, and it sits 0.5% behind the Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX (63,173). These deltas are negligible — the P185 is effectively trading blows with mid-range and upper-mid-range desktop processors from Intel's recent generations.

Single-thread performance is equally strong. The PassMark single-thread score of 3,977 demonstrates excellent per-core efficiency, consistent with the 5.10 GHz boost clock and the modern Zen 5 architecture. Integer math scores 117,832, floating-point math scores 70,587, and extended instructions score 26,544 — all indicating strong computational breadth for mixed workloads. The data compression score of 374,429 is exceptionally high, suggesting the chip excels at compression/decompression tasks, while data encryption at 19,612 and random string sorting at 40,557 round out a well-balanced profile.

The 28 W TDP is remarkable given this level of performance. For real workloads, this means sustained multi-threaded throughput that competes with desktop chips while drawing a fraction of the power. The physics score of 1,772 and prime number finding at 129 are comparatively modest, but these are narrow tests that do not reflect the chip's overall capability. The integrated Radeon 890M graphics provide a fallback display output, though the pairing with the Intel Arc B390 suggests the dedicated (or in this case, secondary integrated) GPU handles graphics duties.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU benchmarks paint a picture of a processor that outperforms its mobile classification. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score for the Intel Arc B390 is 1,482, placing it at the 9th percentile of all GPUs — a stark contrast to the CPU's 93rd percentile standing. The GPU's nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce GT 520MX (1,463, 1.3% slower), the NVIDIA GeForce 800M (1,460, 1.5% slower), the NVIDIA GeForce GT 625 OEM (1,446, 2.5% slower), and the NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 (1,443, 2.7% slower). These are all entry-level parts from the early-to-mid 2010s, indicating the Arc B390's performance class.

The combined percentile of 51 reflects the averaging of these two wildly divergent components. The GPU's 9th percentile drags the pairing down from what would otherwise be a top-tier CPU experience. The Arc B390 does feature modern architecture — Xe3-LPG on Intel's 3 nm process with 1,536 shading units, 48 TMUs, 24 ROPs, and 12 ray tracing cores — but its integrated nature and system-shared memory severely limit its output. The FP32 throughput of 7.680 TFLOPS and texture rate of 120.0 GTexel/s are respectable on paper, yet benchmark results show real-world performance far below what those specs might suggest.

The combined picture is a system that crushes CPU-bound tasks but struggles with anything GPU-accelerated. For productivity, compilation, and multi-threaded workloads, this pairing performs at a high level. For gaming or GPU compute, the experience will be constrained by the GPU's 9th percentile standing. The data shows no measured FPS figures for this exact combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data — so all frame rate discussions must be treated as estimates derived from the benchmark scores.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 uses the AMD Socket FP8, a mobile socket that limits upgrade potential to other FP8-compatible processors. The chip supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory over a dual-channel bus with 89.6 GB/s of bandwidth, and it includes ECC memory support — a notable feature for reliability-sensitive workloads. The CPU provides 16 PCIe Gen 4 lanes, which is sufficient for a discrete GPU and NVMe storage, though the integrated nature of the Arc B390 (bus interface: IGP) means it does not consume those lanes.

The CPU's 28 W TDP is exceptionally low, and the GPU's 80 W TDP brings the combined thermal envelope to roughly 108 W. No suggested PSU is listed in the data, but this power profile is well within what a standard laptop power adapter can handle, and it leaves substantial headroom for other components. The system's memory is shared with the GPU (System Shared), meaning total system memory capacity and speed directly impact graphics performance.

A sensible next upgrade would focus on the GPU side, given the CPU's headroom. The P185's performance suggests it could drive a far more capable discrete GPU without becoming the limiting factor. However, the laptop form factor (buildClass: laptop) means upgrades are typically limited to external GPU enclosures or a full platform change. The CPU's 93rd percentile and the GPU's 9th percentile indicate that any upgrade path should prioritize graphics capability first.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this CPU+GPU combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFpsUltraByGame entries. All frame rate expectations must therefore be treated as estimates derived from the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1,482 and its 9th percentile standing. The GPU's nearest rivals — the GeForce GT 520MX, GeForce 800M, GT 625 OEM, and GT 710 — are all parts that struggle with modern games at any resolution above minimal settings.

Based on the GPU's benchmark position, ultra-settings gaming at 1080p is not a realistic expectation for demanding titles. The 7.680 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 12 ray tracing cores are present architecturally, but the integrated nature and system-shared memory bandwidth (System Dependent) will throttle performance in practice. Esports titles and older games may run at playable frame rates, but modern AAA releases will likely require low settings and reduced resolutions to approach 30 FPS.

The CPU's 93rd percentile and strong single-thread score of 3,977 mean that CPU-bound scenarios — such as high-object-count scenes or physics-heavy games — will not be the bottleneck. The GPU will be the limiting factor in virtually all gaming scenarios. The 80 W TDP and 2,500 MHz boost clock suggest the GPU can sustain moderate clocks, but the 300 MHz base clock and shared memory architecture cap its ceiling.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users whose workloads are primarily CPU-intensive with minimal graphics demands. Software developers compiling large codebases will benefit from the 12-core, 24-thread configuration and the 31,817 multi-thread score. Data analysts and scientists working with compression or encryption workloads will find the 374,429 data compression score and 19,612 encryption score valuable. Students and small business users running office productivity suites, web applications, and programming environments will experience responsive performance.

Content creators who work with CPU-rendered tasks — such as audio processing, batch file conversion, or CPU-based video encoding — will see strong throughput. The floating-point math score of 70,587 supports scientific computing and engineering simulations. However, 3D rendering or GPU-accelerated video editing will disappoint due to the GPU's 9th percentile. Gamers should only consider this system for esports or legacy titles, and even then, the GPU's performance class suggests modest expectations.

The ECC memory support and 28 W TDP make this suitable for always-on workstations or embedded applications where reliability and power efficiency matter. The 93rd CPU percentile ensures headroom for years of demanding productivity software, while the GPU can be treated as a display adapter rather than a gaming or compute resource.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's multi-threaded performance relative to its nearest rivals?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 scores 31,817 in PassMark multi-thread, with an average benchmark score of 62,839. This is 0.2% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX (62,738) and 0.5% ahead of the AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 (62,498), while trailing the Intel Core i7-13790F (63,080) by 0.4% and the Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX (63,173) by 0.5%.

Q: How does the Intel Arc B390 GPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Arc B390 scores 1,482 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, placing it at the 9th GPU percentile. It leads the NVIDIA GeForce GT 520MX (1,463) by 1.3%, the GeForce 800M (1,460) by 1.5%, the GeForce GT 625 OEM (1,446) by 2.5%, and the GeForce GT 710 (1,443) by 2.7%.

Q: What memory types does the CPU support?

A: The Ryzen AI Embedded P185 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory over a dual-channel bus with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth. ECC memory is supported, and the GPU uses System Shared memory, making total system memory size and speed dependent on the installed RAM.

Q: What socket does this CPU use and what is its TDP?

A: The CPU uses AMD Socket FP8 and has a 28 W TDP. The GPU has an 80 W TDP, bringing the combined thermal design power to approximately 108 W, with no suggested PSU listed in the data.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The pairing sits at the 51st combined percentile. The CPU is at the 93rd percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU is at the 9th percentile among all GPUs.

Q: Is measured gaming FPS available for this combination?

A: No. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data for this exact CPU+GPU combination. All gaming performance discussion must be treated as estimates derived from the benchmark scores.

Q: What PCIe lanes does the CPU provide?

A: The CPU provides 16 PCIe Gen 4 lanes. The GPU uses an IGP bus interface, so it does not consume these lanes, leaving them available for other devices such as NVMe storage or a discrete GPU.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: Not viable for modern titles. The GPU's 9th percentile and 1,482 Steel Nomad score place it alongside the GeForce GT 710, which cannot drive high frame rates at 1080p in demanding games. Esports titles may run at modest settings, but the CPU's 3,977 single-thread score ensures any frame rate limitation comes from the GPU.

Streaming: The CPU's 12 cores and 24 threads, with a 31,817 multi-thread score, can handle software encoding while gaming, but the GPU's low performance means the game itself will suffer. The 28 W CPU TDP leaves thermal headroom for sustained encoding workloads, though the 80 W GPU may throttle under combined load.

Video editing: CPU-based editing workflows will be responsive, with the 70,587 floating-point math score accelerating effects and transitions. GPU-accelerated rendering, however, will be severely limited by the 9th percentile GPU. Proxy-based editing on the CPU is viable; final renders on the GPU are not.

3D rendering: The CPU's 117,832 integer math score and 24 threads provide solid CPU ray-tracing performance, but the GPU's 12 ray tracing cores and 7.680 TFLOPS FP32 throughput will not accelerate real-time viewports effectively. Expect CPU-based renders to complete at competitive speeds, but GPU interactive performance will disappoint.

Software development: This is an excellent pairing for developers. The 374,429 data compression score accelerates build artifact handling, while the 3,977 single-thread score ensures responsive IDE interaction. The 24 threads handle parallel compilation efficiently, and the 16 MB L3 cache reduces cache misses in large codebases.

Student and office work: The CPU's 93rd percentile ensures smooth multitasking across office suites, web browsers, and communication tools. The GPU is sufficient for display output and 2D acceleration. The 28 W TDP and ECC memory support make this a reliable, efficient choice for extended daily use.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build (buildClass: laptop) pairing the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 CPU with the Intel Arc B390 GPU. The CPU is a 12-core, 24-thread mobile processor on AMD Socket FP8 with a 28 W TDP, while the GPU is an integrated Intel part with an 80 W TDP using the Xe3-LPG architecture on Intel's 3 nm process. The combined percentile of 51 places this system in the middle of all CPU+GPU pairings, but that figure masks the extreme split: the CPU performs at the 93rd percentile while the GPU sits at the 9th percentile.

The CPU's average benchmark score of 62,839 places it in direct competition with mid-range desktop processors like the Intel Core i7-13790F and Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX, with deltas under 0.5%. The GPU's 1,482 Steel Nomad score places it alongside decade-old entry-level discrete GPUs. This is a processor-first system where the GPU serves as a basic display adapter rather than a performance component.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between these components is heavily skewed toward the CPU. The 93rd CPU percentile versus the 9th GPU percentile creates a 84-percentage-point gap, making the GPU the bottleneck in any graphics-related workload. In CPU-bound tasks — compilation, data processing, productivity — the system performs at a level competitive with desktop processors, as evidenced by the 0.2% delta against the Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX. In GPU-bound tasks — gaming, GPU rendering, video encoding — the system falls to the performance class of the GeForce GT 710, which is 2.7% slower than the Arc B390.

The FPS scaling, while not measured, would follow this pattern: CPU-heavy games would see frame rates limited by the GPU's 9th percentile, while GPU-light games might approach playable levels. The 16 PCIe Gen 4 lanes and 28 W CPU TDP suggest the platform could support a discrete GPU upgrade, which would rebalance the system. Until then, the data clearly indicates that the Intel Arc B390 is the limiting factor in every scenario involving 3D graphics or GPU compute, while the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 provides exceptional headroom that the current GPU cannot utilize.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 + Intel Arc B390

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185

Intel Arc B390

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

Gaming Performance

Who Should Build It

FAQ

Usage Scenarios

Build Overview

Balance and Bottleneck

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds